vladimir, i will try to say to abank. igor. listen to the text.ought that the duke of albany liked the king more than the duke of cornwall. let it be as you like it. you guessed the author, it is indeed shakespeare, but the play is out of place. this is the first line from. the birthday of the theater institute now bearing his name is considered to be october 23, 1914, the date of the first lecture vakhtangov? shchukin, that's right, boris vasilyevich shchukin, a fishy surname for 100. this ex-world champion began his sports career in the chess section. cossack, a hero who is forced to leave his wife by order of the ataman to go to war against the kirghiz, no answer, this is pyotr pavlovich ershov, better known as the author of what work, the little humpbacked horse, right, a hot topic 500, these beetles are capable of accurately shooting a mixture of chemicals from their abdomen, which heats up to 100° in flight. century named after the village of lumbini in nepal, where according to one version who was born? it is possible buddha, right, accordi

ukraine today went to abank, in what sense did it go to abank? if we are talking about the fact that this region can be completely cut off, this is what concerns the kursk belgorod region, then we already see that this operation is does not have a secondary meaning, it has a primary meaning, here the part of the meaning is primary, we begin to understand in the case when political goals begin to emerge. look, the united states and other countries did not provide long-range weapons for and did not allow them to open fire on the territory, which is well recognized worldwide. russian federation, that is, it was allowed only on new territories. so, therefore it is clear that ukraine has only one chance, against the background of illegitimacy or conditional legitimacy. zelensky, against the background of the conditional illegitimacy of the parliament since august 29, the question becomes about what ukraine should do, that is , in essence, russia, by striking at infrastructure facilities throughout almost everything, has led to the fact that ukraine is

first of all, remain. missed, just maybe, this is one of the reasons why netanyahu is now going to abanks as you rightly said, it seems like one foot is stuck, but then the second foot is put in the swamp so that it gets stuck, but he just needs to distract attention from what is happening in the palestinian direction, although i want to note that the fighting there continues, and today in the gaza strip an israeli drone struck a residential building, that is, nothing has changed there, that front continues to operate, a second front is open, and netanyahu has said more than once that israel is capable of fighting on several fronts, i have i have serious doubts about this, and not only i, but many israeli politicians who oppose benjamin netanyahu, criticize him, including former prime ministers and former heads of the intelligence services, if they couldn’t cope with the palestinian group hamas, then how can they cope? 50 people in half a day, and the israelis say that today’s strike was to destroy another hezbollah militant, but they took it, destroyed an entire residential building, th

there until the new year, but zelensky has no other choice, so in this case it is really a game of abanky is this really? there is nothing to talk about with this regime, the story about the negotiating track is not on pause, it is not frozen, in principle it can no longer exist with zelensky, he has no choice. aleksandrevich, well it turns out that in any political situation, zelensky gives a certain carte blanche to washington, because yes, he is holding back. does not understand at all what war is, at all does not understand what the psychology of the military is, he is from kvn, and this whole story, it characterizes the military in ukraine, because they are not able to insist on correct, rational decisions, like ours, for example, when necessary, they defend their position in front of the supreme, the supreme agrees with them, because they are professionals, there is no such thing here, a trap of costs, that is, every day ... so many resources, emotions, people and other things are invested in this topic that every day it is becoming more difficult to stop it, because that so much h

the daily signal believes that if the new white house administration in 2025 decides to go to abank and give terrorist zelensky everything he asks for, a direct conflict with russia is inevitable. there is a high risk that this is what harris will do. the second scenario is softer, which experts cite, to maintain the status quo, observe. there is a third option. harris says. trump has never openly objected to military aid to kiev, he was the first to start it on as president, is not proposing to cancel or reduce it, he is only demanding to replenish it more actively. arsenal: ukraine, we are giving a lot of things for billions of dollars. i have rebuilt our army, replenished our ammunition stocks. we had so much, and now we have none. how would you like to be in shizenpin's place, who hears that america has no ammunition. we are very vulnerable. as for russia, as vladimir putin said, the kremlin will bet on kamela haris' victory, because she is promoted by joe biden, she has such a infectious laughter. he recommended all his supporters to support ms. harris, so we will do the same, we w

but also those who missed them, this may well be one of the reasons why netanyaho is now going to abanks you rightly said, it seems like one foot is stuck, but then he puts the other foot in the swamp so that it gets stuck, but he just needs to distract attention from what is happening in the palestinian direction, although i want to note that the fighting there continues, and today in the gaza strip an israeli drone struck a residential building, that is, nothing has changed there, that front continues to operate, a second front is open, and netanyahu has said more than once that... israel is capable of fighting on several fronts, i have there are big doubts about this, and not only me, but also many israeli politicians who oppose benjamin netanyahu, criticize him, including among them former prime ministers and former heads of the intelligence services, if they couldn’t cope with the palestinian group hamas, then how can they cope with the lebanese hezbollah, whose ministers are actually represented in the lebanese government, in 2006 there was a lebanese-israeli... war, what is happe

yes, but if there is this war, then... it disrupts this one too, that is, on tanya, as if he went to abanke, but the person doesn't want to sit in prison, yes, and he entered the obbalki, says: that's it, guys, where will you go, so to speak, yes, it looks very nice officially, he says, we must return 80 or 100,000 refugees to the northern region, and no one cares that this is aggression against lebanon, although it should be noted that, let me remind you, in the tragedy and in the terrorist act of october 7, hazbala did not participate, had nothing to do with it. that is, the world did not shudder, did not say that this is aggression against a state recognized by the un charter, lebanon, that israel invaded the territory of lebanon, strikes at lebanese territory, that is , no one cares, that is, this is the so -called other, yes, this is after hezbollah supported hamas on october 7, began military operations in the north and in this speech hassan says that they want to force us to refuse to help the palestinian resistance forces. and so on, that is, everything is extremely clear there, wh