as they pronounced abdelbaset al-megrahi guilty of murder, there was a sudden gasp. then, as they announced lamin fhimah was not guilty, a second gasp. i thought they would both be sent home not-guilty. the shock of the verdict initially, was so great, i collapsed. reporter: many people are left to wonder, how one of the accused could be guilty and the other not. fhimah's lawyer declared there was no evidence he was at malta airport on the day the bomb was allegedly loaded, and still less that he was aware of being part of a bomb plot. the judges apparently agreed. it seemed odd - the case was against both men - that one of them should not be proven to have been involved. i think that shocked a lot of people. my heart broke when mr fhimah was allowed to leave the courtroom, because clearly that bomb could not have gotten on the plane without his assistance. and in the case of megrahi, the judges obviously felt that despite some of the inconsistencies in the evidence, he could still be convicted. reporter: it's been a day of conflicting emotions. delight, at seeing at