la corte analizÓ el caso de abigaÍl fisher, una estudiante blanca que dijo haber sido discriminada en convenio con todo con la asistencia de varios presidentes latinoamericanos. blanca rosa vilches estuvo aquÍ. blanca: desde la habana cuba fue precisamente desde donde se iniciaron las conversaciones de paz en noviembre de 2002 y es aquÍ donde se llegÓ hoy a este acuerdo histÓrico. con este intercambio que contiene los documentos del acuerdo se marca un cese al fuego bilateral definitivo. es un preludio al fin del conflicto armado mÁs antiguo de amÉrica latina y fue firmado hoy en la habana frente a varios presidentes latinoamericanos. el lÍder de las farc dijo que no lo considera una capitulaciÓn ni para el gobierno colombiano ni para ellos. el presidente colombiano, sin embargo, no declarÓ el fin de las farc como grupo armado. el presidente santos dice que espera llegar a un acuerdo final sobre este tema y firmarlo en colombia es todo lo que tenemos desde la habana, cuba, regresÓ con ustedes. jorge: blanca rosa, muchas gracias ahora pasemos con calderÓn que tiene un adelanto de lo qu

and then, however, when he applies that to looking at abigail fisher's challenge to the university of texas' process, he really takes down each of her complaints one by one. and in many instances, her complaints really echoed his in grudder. so it is a fascinating read. she begins by saying that he says that the university of texas failed to precisely define the level of minority enrollment that would actually constitute critical mass. and therefore would be impossible for the court to assess whether or not the university of texas had met its goal of achieving critical mass. and citing to grudder, justice kennedy says, absolutely not. and i will quote from him. he says, increasing minority enrollment may be instrumental to these educational benefits, but it is not, as petitioner seems to suggest, a goal that can or should be reduced to pure numbers. indeed, since the university is prohibited from seeking a particular number or quota of minority students, it cannot be faulted for failing to specify the particular level of minority enrollment at which it believes the educational benefit

abigail fisher says she was rejected by the university of texas because she is white. this online video, fisher billed her lawsuit against affirmative action as a challenge to discrimination. >> there were people in my class with lower grades who were not in all of the activities i was who are being accepted and the only difference was the color of our skin. it would get rid of the boxes. male, female, whatever. it doesn't tell who you are or how involved you are. all addresses for you even a box. get rid of the box. amy: thomas saenz, your response? victorys a great yesterday. it does ensure that across the country, universities can continue to use affirmative action in admissions, which is the necessary element of educationalual opportunity. it is not true that we could illuminate the box and somehow act as though we are adequately evaluating students. the fact is, race and gender and national origin still matter in this country. it shapes how students who are preparing for college are allowed to prepare. it shapes their opportunities. it shapes their experiences. an

a white woman named abigail fisher claimed it was reverse discrimination and people who brought this to the supreme court were hoping this would be a vehicle that the supreme court would use to strike down affirmative action. that clearly is not going to happen. secondly, as for what other universities can do, it is a sort of modified green light to continue with affirmative action at other universities. the university of texas at austin, which is what this case involved, was a special case because state law says that the university must admit the top ten percent academically. that gets the university some diversity. university said we need a little more diversity after that and so for the rest of the admissions we wanted to use affirmative action and the supreme court today said, you can do that. >> critics of affirmative action, what it's become in the modern era have referred to it kindsly as the cost of good intentions. but in our early reading of this, you feel that the warning here is, mend it, don't end it and continue to refine it and make it better and match its times. >> re

back in 2013, the case came to the supreme court by abigail fisher, a student who was denied admissionuniversity in 2008. and she claimed that the use of race as factor was why she was denied admission and that it violated the constitution. the supreme court in 2013, led by justice kennedy, a 7-1 court, sent it back to the lower federal court saying you gave too much deference to the university's explanation. you have to give the tougher scrutiny we have under the constitution, and the university has to show there are no workable race-neutral alternatives. well, that lower federal appellate court held hearings, briefings, upheld the plan again. it came back to the supreme court. abigail fisher brought it back with a conservative organization that had backed her from the beginning. and the supreme court today in a surprising 4-3 decision upheld the university's use of race as justice kennedy said, factor of factor of a factor. >> woodruff: why do you say surprising? >> he had never voted to uphold an affirmative action plan, although he had written and spoken about the importance of div

justice kennedy joined the more liberal justices saying the policy that was in effect when abigail fisherniversity doesn't violate the constitution. so there was -- and he also said in his opinion for the court that colleges can continue to consider race, they can decide that they have a strong interest in having their students experience the educational benefits that come from having a diverse student body and colleges will continue to get a fair amount of deference deciding what that means and how they're going to take it into account. >> just to show how slowly the wheels of justice move, abigail has since graduated from lsu so it's not going to affect her personally. and thank you, amy howe, for your time. >> a congratulations effort to dump donald trump next month in favor of another candidate. car. and every day brian drives carefully to work, there are rate suckers. he's been paying more for car insurance because of their bad driving for so long, he doesn't even notice them anymore. but one day brian gets snapshot from progressive. now brian has a rate based on his driving, not the

the case was brought by abigail fisher, a white student from texas who was denied admission to the school rejected while african-americans with lower test scores were admit. the court ruled in texas' favor 4-3 with the more conservative justices dissenting. >> the ruling was 4-3 because justice kagany h recused hersel. >>> a baltimore judge has seen no evidence proving criminality by officers in the death of freddie gray. the judge yesterday cleared caesar goodson jr. of murder and manslaughter charges. he was the third of six officers accused in gray's death last year. the ruling dims prosecutors' chances in the remaining three cases. >>> here at home, orlando is taking another step in the healing process after the nightclub shootings. hundreds turned out yesterday for a party in a downtown park. it was organized by the owner of pulse to help the club's workers. >> i believe it's important to do events like this to show that pulse is still alive. i think it's good for our community. >> pulse employees had been out of work because the club has been closed since the attack. we'll be right

decided 4-3 that the university of texas at austin did not discriminate in denying admission to abigail fisher, a white woman. the majority ruled that race could be used as a limited factor in trying to build a ♪ we shall overcome ♪ someday >>> the democrats end their sit-in. why they are still declaring victory even though they did not pass a gun control bill. >>> i was going to rescue the girl. sometimes people need protection. >> a local man arrested with an arsenal. who's now coming to his defense? prodders, shuckersers, and sniffers, all giant produce is triple checked. we're focusing on fresh... ...so you don't have to guess. my giant. i survived breast cancer. if the doctors hadn't caught it early i might not be sitting here. so i'm outraged that pat toomey voted to defund planned parenthood... ...which thousands of pennsylvania women depend on for cancer screenings. pat toomey was even willing to shut down the federal government to eliminate funding for planned parenthood. shut down the government over planned parenthood? i think we ought to shut down pat toomey. women vote is responsi

ago when the justices first took up this case, brought by a white young woman by the name of abigail fisher, it was sort of a surprising move. she had been rejected in 2008 from the university of texas flagship campus in austin. she had already gone to another school. she was close to graduating. it looked like the case should be over. the texas affirmative action policy is fairly distinct. but the justices still reached out to take it. and we think, you know, conservative interests to maybe roll back the policy. nd then in the 2013, earlier ruling on this, they punted back to a lower court. but suggested that these programs need more scrutiny. then she lost in the lower court. she came back again and the justices said we're going to hear your challenge again. so it looked like they were headed in a certain direction. and then reversed course all because of anthony kennedy. >> that immigration case, though, probably has a more real world impact on a lot of people in this country. and i'm just curious, it was 4-4 which means -- gwen: talking millions and millions of people. >> or their child

abigail fisher brought the case in 2008, she sued u.t.tin after the school rejected her, she claims in favor of minority applicants with lower grades and test scores as she argued last year. >> like most americans, i don't believe that students should be treated differently based on their race. >> reporter: justice samuel alito agreed. his dissent called today's ruling "remarkable and remarkably wrong" and argued u.t. austin's policy "is affirmative action gone wild." sergio cavazos disagrees. >> i think it's about giving us a chance. >> reporter: he's a 20-year-old senior at u.t. austin. you grew up in south texas, lower income, spanish speaking. do kids there need this kind of help to get into a school like this? >> absolutely. and a lot of our schools down there aren't as well funded and don't have those opportunities and, frankly, we aren't as prepared. >> reporter: he has a mexican father and a nicaraguan mother. scott, he told me today's supreme court decision will help his younger sister who intends to apply to u.t. austin next yea

case is the abigail fisher case, a white woman says she suffered unconstitutional discrimination whenejected by the university of texas at austin in 2008 it the texas system is a hybrid admission policy. it requires a school to admit three quarters of it -- middle-class solely on the base of high school ranks. it looks racist on the surface, but it ensures a significant number of minorities. that is the origin of this case. without the opinion today. it is time now for our business flash. a look at some of the biggest new stories right now. bill gross has become the latest investment -- investor to bet on argentina. over the past year, argentine debt has posted the biggest return. the president has settled with disgruntled investors to pull argentine out of the fold. any credit card from citigroup has been a mess. they have endured -- customers complained that they have had trouble activating accounts. cardo pick the city visa as a replacement. some of the biggest wall street are wanting to sue the labor department over new rules. according to people familiar with the matter, major ba

againsted for-three, abigail fisher, a white woman who said she suffered his termination when she was rejected by the school in 2008. excused herself because of previous work on the case when she was the u.s. solicitor general. a baltimore cop facing serious charges in the 2013 death of freddie gray has been found not guilty. he opted for a bench trial instead of one by jury. he drove the van in which the 25-year-old gray suffered a spinal injury. so far, none of the six officers, three officers who face trial had been convicted. six officers in all face charges in connection with the case. global news 24 hours a day, powered by more than 2600 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries. this is bloomberg. david: let's go back to the markets and the state of the economy. we have achieved market strategist at oppenheimer. good to talk to you again. i want to ask you about the employment report from the labor department, 30,000 fewer apply for jobs then was forecasted. with the calculus the fed on it the capare you -- greater the fed had on it stable, are you concerned? >> the e

the case centers on abigail fisher who claims she was not admitted to the school because she's white. >>> a gunman stormed a german movie theater today firing shots and taking several people hostages but no one was hurt except for the gunman shot dead by the german police. there were no other injuries reported in the incident about 45 miles south of frankfurt. police are still sorting it all out. >>> now to baltimore where the only officer charged with the death of freddie gray will walk free. a judge found officer cesar goodson jr. not guilty on all seven counts related to gray's death last year. goodson is one of six officers charged in this case. he, though, faced the most serious charges, which were second-degree murder, manslaughter, second-degree assault and reckless endangerment. community leaders say that they are disappointed but hoping for peace in their city. much more on that verdict and the reality from baltimore coming up in 25 minutes. >>> and just in, an unprecedented sit-in by democrats on the house froloor came to an end about 25 hours later. >> the democrats have th

decided 4-3 that the university of texas at austin did not discriminate in denying admission to abigail fisher. race could be used as a limited factor in trying to build a diverse student body. samuel alito called it, quote, affirmative action gone >>> here's some of what donald trump had to say when asked about his claims that hillary clinton's e-mail server was hacked by a foreign state. >> it's illegal. what she did is illegal. now she might not be judged that way because we have a rigged system, but what she did is illegal. she shouldn't have had a personal system. >> is there any evidence that it was hacked? >> i think i read that and heard it. >> where? >> i will report back to you. i will give it to you. >> lester holt's interview with trump airs tonight on night "ni news" at 7:00. >>> things may not be so bad during the next phase of safetrack repairs. woman: i have a masurprise for you.are you? man: you have a surprise for me? narrator: at dominion, 1 in 5 new hires is a veteran. and when they're away, they miss out on a lot. but they won't miss out on financial support. because we co

taken into consideration for students admitted after the 10% is accepted, and so the student, abigail fisher not accepted to the university of texas, and she claimed it was because she was white, but today the high court is saying that this program is constitutional under the equal protection clause, which was an opinion written by justice kennedy, and there were two dissents by justice thomas as well as justice alito, but certainly a big win for those who favor affirmative action. >> certainly is an important win for those who support affirmative action, an admissions factor at universities and colleges in the united states. jeffrey toobin is with us. were you surprised? seven justices ruled on this because elena kagan recused herself. she had been solicitor general when it was argued earlier. >> this is a somewhat surprising issue because justice kennedy, who was the swing vote, has expressed a lot of misgivings about affirmative action over the years, but in this case he had clearly very much endorsed affirmative action. the texas plan is that most students are admitted to the university

>> this is about a woman who applied to the university of texas, abigail fisher, white woman applied as rejected. said she was rejected based on race because she was white. affirmative reaction should no longer have a place in this country. >> how does abigail know she was rejected by color. were her grades better than minority students. >> they were. >> she has a legitimate beef. >> she has legitimate beef. this is very strong case go forward on this issue. there has been a lot of criticism time and place necessary. >> what is the supreme court likely to rule on this? >> it will be four-three decision. >> because kagan is out of it, right? >> she is out of it. recused herself. four-three. this time kennedy is siding with the conservatives. >> she will be allowed. >> she has already graduated because so much time has passed. >> strike down the affirmative action policy of. >> right. >> the longhorn policy is going to get struck down don't do it again. where did this girl graduate from? where did she go? >> she graduated from st. louis. >> louisiana state university. >> lsu. >> she has

the case was brought by abigail fisher, a white student from texas, who was denied admission to the school in 2008. she claimed she was rejected while african-american students with lower test scores were admitted. the court ruled in favor of texas policy four to three, with the court three more conservative justices dissenting. paula read, for cbs-3, "eyewitness news". >>> hillary clinton took to twitter after the ruling on immigration. she wrote, quote, today's heart breaking immigration ruling could tear apart 5 million families, facing deportation, we must do better. presumptive republican presidential nominee donald trump, had this to say about the immigration ruling, quote, today's four-four supreme court ruling has blocked one of the most unconstitutional actions ever undertaken by a president. >>> another baltimore police officer charged in the death of freddie gray is found not guilty. and protesters voice their concerns. >> judge cleared goodson of seven charges against him including involuntary manslaughter. gray suffered a spinal injury and died last april after he was arrested

this puts an end to the fisher versus texas case that was brought forward in 2013 when abigail fisher texas woman sued the university claiming that the sears -- school's affirmative action amounted to unconstitutional racial discrimination. >>> we want to bring in our meteorologist, mark let's take a look at those skies. >> the backdrop of san francisco always looks so rich. and it looks like the timing is perfect with the forecast as well. some patchy fog for the morning hours but later in the day lots of sunshine and temperatures back into the 70s. >>> there are a lot of events in the bay area this weekend in the weather will be shaping up to be nice as well. temperatures today i would call him the perfect range. it was not too cold or hot just kind of in the warm range. 67 in san francisco, santa rosa 89, lower 90s out rosa 89, lower 90s out toward antioch and san jose lower 80s, 82 degrees. outside right now our live camera looking out toward the bay bridge toward san francisco in the clear. a bit of haze out there with some patchy fog could be making a comeback first thing tomorr

this case going back to this young lady, abigail fisher, a white woman, arguing that she was unfairlysed on her race. the high court upheld the policy, in a surprise 4-3 ruling. you were not particularly happy with that decision, i understand, even though it supported your state university. why? >> well, that's true. that was actually not our case. my office did not deal with that case, but we weren't happy, because we don't think any decision should be based on race or color of the skin. it should be based on the merits of the students, and that would be, in our opinion, our better policy. now, the supreme court in the past has actually said, the only way to stop race discrimination is to stop discriminating on race. so that was what we were hoping the supreme court would continue to say. >> but isn't the argument, it's not discrimination based on race, but you have one part of the community, whereas others may not be considered, who happen to be of another race, but because they don't have the financial resources to be competitive on the same playing field. >> sure. but in this case

el caso se remite al 2008 cuando a abigail fisher se le nego el ingreso al campus porque no estuvo entreando que se lanza esta pelÍcula, que nos va a encantar a todos. william: y mÁs adelante estarÁn varios de los actores que hacen voces en esta pelÍcula. no se lo pierdan. regresamos con mÁs al estudio. ana patricia: gracias, willy! alan: de aquÍ para allÁ, de allÁ para acá. y la vista maravillosa. bueno, ¿quÉ creen? mÁs adelante, en los deportes, la copa amÉrica. me desvelé! a chile le bastaron los primeros 15 minutitos para liquidar a colombia y estar en la gran final contra la argentina. por otro lado, cristiano ronaldo, jugando pÉsimo y con tres empates, pasa a la siguiente ronda. ana patricia: no importa que juegue mal. con verlo ya es un golazo. en la segunda parte de la entrevista que maity interiano hizo a lupillo rivera conoceremos mÁs de su historia ♪ alan: aquÍ estamos. hombre, es que esta semanita y este mes ha estado fabuloso con los deportes! quiero decirles que por primera vez me perdÍ un juego de la copa amÉrica centenario. reportero: muy, pero muy tarde se reiniciÓ el pa

and a texas woman by the name of abigail fisher who is a white woman was not admitted to the university of texas, and she claims it was because she was white, that her race put her at a disadvantage. she sued the university of texas for discrimination, but today the high court held that this program that the university of texas used, this affirmative action program, is lawful and so, therefore, it will continue to move forward. so two huge rulings today at the high court. >> two rulings that everyone was watching very closely as the court's term came to a close and now all eyes are turning to that briefing room. pamela, thank you so much. as we're waiting to hear from president obama. he will be coming to the briefing room to speak in minutes, any minute now really. let's go to michelle kosinski, white house correspondent, who is there standing by for the president. michelle, what are you hearing? what could we be hearing from president obama? >> reporter: we expect him to express his disappointment at this ruling, at this division in the court that, you know, we all know what this does

guest: abigail fisher was a white student who applied to the university of texas. didn't get in.nd the university said at the time, that she wouldn't have got in anyway regardless. she sued with the backing of a conservative group that has fought various cases seeking to end racial preferences as they call them. so this case actually went up to the supreme court in 2013 and the court didn't really decide it on the merits. they sent it back for further litigation. then the case continued. went back to the appeals court, then came back up to the supreme court. finally we have a ruling that -- against abigail fisher so she basically spent eight years fighting this. she's since graduated from a different college and working in austin for a fortune 500 company. it's a lot of legal fighting and not much in the way of an outcome. host: was she getting legal help from other organizations? guest: she was helped by this conservative legal group. host: here's abilene, texas. good morning to matty. caller: yes, sir. i'm from texas. and unless you live in a border state, you don't understand

abigail fisher brought the case in 2008. she sued u.t.r, she claims in favor of minority applicants with lower grades and test scores, as she argued last year. >> like most americans, i don't believe that students should be treated differently based on their race. >> reporter: justice samuel alito agreed. his dissent called today's ruling "remarkable and remarkably wrong" and argued u.t. austin's policy is "affirmative action gone wild." sergio cavazos disagrees. >> a lot of our schools down there aren't as well funded and don't have the opportunities and frankly we aren't as prepared. >> reporter: cavazos has a mexican father and nicaraguan mother. scott, he told me today's supreme court decision will help his younger sister, who intends to apply to u.t. austin next year. >> mark strassmann on the u.t. mark, thank you. >>> well, today house democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in, and it failed to force the republican majority to call a vote on gun control. here's nancy cordes. >> reporter: last night's rebellion gave way to a more subdued

the case, fisher the university of texas was broad by abigail fisher who said the university denied her admission based on her race. she graduated from louisiana state university. justice kennedy wrote the condition for the court. the fact that race consciousness played a role on the admissions decisions. it shouldn't be evidence of constitutionality. the opinion was shared and justice alito in his decent for the court wrote ut never provided the need to discriminate on the need of race and even though they rely on unsupported and noxious racial assumptions, they conclude that they met the heavy burden. this conclusion is remarkably and remarkably wrong. his decent is joined by the chief justice roberts. justice kagan recused herself because they worked on it as solicitor general. this is from the hills website. you can read a detailed article about the case. here's the oral argument from december of last year. >> you will hear argument in morning in case 14981. fisher versus the university of texas in austin. before we get started, we will say this is our only case and we intend to gra

guest: abigail fisher was a white student who applied to the university of texas. didn't get in. and the university said at the time, that she wouldn't have got in anyway regardless. she sued with the backing of a conservative group that has fought various cases seeking to end racial preferences as they call them. so this case actually went up to the supreme court in 2013 and the court didn't really decide it on the merits. they sent it back for further litigation. then the case continued. went back to the appeals court, then came back up to the supreme court. finally we have a ruling that -- against abigail fisher so she basically spent eight years fighting this. she's since graduated from a different college and working in austin for a fortune 500 company. it's a lot of legal fighting and not much in the way of an outcome. host: was she getting legal help from other organizations? guest: she was helped by this conservative legal group. host: here's abilene, texas. good morning to mattie. aller: yes, sir. i'm from texas. and unless you live in a border state, you don't understan

this case is the second trip to the supreme court for abigail fisher, a white woman, who was denied admissionuniversity of texas and filed alawsuit challenging race and admissions. i want to get to jon karl standing by at the court this morning. it would appear affirmative action will stay in place. >> reporter: david, a major victory for advocates of affirmative action. what the majority and the court are saying, the 4-3 majority, that of universities, the university of texas, can use race as a factor, one of several factors in achieving the goal of diversity of the student body. it affirms the right of that university to use race as a factor. this draws a stinging descent, david, from the conservatives. justice alito has written a 51-page descent, more than twice as long as the actual opinion, saying that the policy amounts to systematic racial discrimination, and that the court's decision, quote, is remarkable and remarkably wrong. >> and we also knew there would be no chance of a deadlock in this case because justice kagan had recused herself from the case. let's bring in tori moran who c

el caso se remite al 2008 cuando a abigail fisher se le nego el ingreso al campus porque no estuvo entrextensa, y se enfriÓ la cosa. se enfriÓ todo y quedamos en un tÉmpano de hielo. karla: pero depende de ustedes. erick: claro, pero por lo general este tipo de conversaciÓn se refiere mucho a lo que es la parte de la intimidad, cuando no hay ganas de tener intimidad, o deseo. el deseo disminuye tambiÉn porque a veces las mujeres se descuidan un poco, se dejan un poco, y creen que ya estÁn en un ambiente seguro. y ahÍ empieza esa parte de: se acabÓ el deseo. yo no quiero estar con Él. doctora Álvarez: eso es parte, las mujeres que se van con los rolos puestos y una camiseta de minnie mouse... vero: ese es el momento mÁs peligroso, porque voltean a ver al otro lado. doctora Álvarez: y hay mucha oferta. vero: ahora, ¿quÉ hacer cuando tu pareja te obliga de alguna manera? yo estoy haciendo ejercicio, entonces tÚ tambiÉn. no me pueden obligar. doctora Álvarez: es que el deseo no tiene sÓlo que ver con una escultura de cuerpo. el deseo tiene que ver mÁs que nada con la relaciÓn. cuando se pone

the case of fisher versus university of texas was brought by abigail fisher, a white woman denied admission to the school based on her race. justice anthony kennedy wrote the court's 4-3 majority opinion. the supreme court heard oral argument in the case last december. it's an hour and a half. >> you will hear argument in morning in case 14981. fisher versus the university of texas at austin. before we get started, we will say this is our only case and we intend to grant the parties ten minutes or so of extra time and five minutes. so mr. ryan, no need to rush. >> mr. chief justice, may it please the court and the extra time, i didn't rush up here to review the fifth circuit's initial decision. seven members of the court reaffirmed that a clear precondition to the u.s. of race they have the ability to satisfy what was called the demanding scrutiny which was articulated. my establishing that she was considered for admission under a system that discriminated on the basis of her race. ms. fisher placed upon ut the burden of proving by evidence of the record that its use of race was first, in p

guest: abigail fisher was a white student who applied to the university of texas. didn't get in.nd the university said at the time, that she wouldn't have got in anyway regardless. she sued with the backing of a conservative group that has fought various cases seeking to end racial preferences as they call them. so this case actually went up to the supreme court in 2013 and the court didn't really decide it on the merits. they sent it back for further litigation. then the case continued. went back to the appeals court, then came back up to the supreme court. finally we have a ruling that -- against abigail fisher so she basically spent eight years fighting this. she's since graduated from a different college and working in austin for a fortune 500 company. it's a lot of legal fighting and not much in the way of an outcome. host: was she getting legal help from other organizations? guest: she was helped by this conservative legal group. host: here's abilene, texas. good morning to matty. caller: yes, sir. i'm from texas. and unless you live in a border state, you don't understand

t judges issuing a four-threeour-e ruling putting an end to the fisher versus texas caseas c brought forward back in 201313 when abigailh area white texas woman sued thete university claiming the school'ser affirmative actionn efforts amounted to unconstitutional racialtution discrimination. >>> and in baltimore, theand city's police commissionerommi commending residents for remaining calm following the acquittal of officer caesarer goodson. >> goodson was that found not guilty on all charges including second degree murderg in the death of freddiese gray. the police union is now askingsk the states attorney to drop charges against the remaining ri three officers waiting toficersi stand trial.d trial. >> coming up, hateful messages a have been spray painted all a over one arlingtongton neighborhood. who police think is responsible. >> first, though, our zip trip to vienna continues thisontinuet morning and it's just gettingt g started.ar tucker is getting a t'ai chii lesson, the t'ai chi is strongsr this morning. m we'll have all that and much and more coming up.g time now is seven:12. sen:12. we'll be right back. >> ♪