abigail spanberger is one of a growing members of congress who say " enough is enough. we should ban members of congress and their spouses and children from engaging in this activity in the first place, or at minimum we should force everyone to put their stock assets in a blind trust or somebody else would be managing their money in a formalized way>" nancy pelosi has been in the center of this crucible. she has been reluctant to move forward in pushing for a ban and that was controversial in the democratic caucus. it is a weird bipartisan issue in this sense that abigail spanberger and chip roy agree on effectively nothing but they agree on this issue and are cosponsoring a bill that would do what we described. host: on the voters end of things, do you look at the voters' view of ethics in congress. i think this would be very much on voters' minds, how much they are beholden to their investments. guest: we found the exact opposite to be true. numerous polls now, there must have been half a dozen done, that put that question to voters. what would you like to see done? r

tell abigail spanberger to keep virginia families safe. >> what do you think, scott?ve? >> oh, yeah. it's going to work. and it's the reason joe biden changed his position on this topic. he knows he can't carry this position that they're taking in washington, d.c. into a re-election campaign, just like he knows he can't carry some of the immigration problems into a re-election campaign. it's why he's considering i guess going back to some of the trump-era policies on immigration that has democrats up in arms. he's got a real issue with the overall issue of national security. and by national i mean what's going on right here. cities with crime. the border. you've got the chinese balloon thing that still was totally mishandled and miscommunicated to the american people. i think there's a sense that the biden administration doesn't have its arms around the security of our homeland. and so it's pretty easy to see why he had to change miz position on this and i think it's totally right for republicans to hit on this because you do have a lot of democrats out there that are

so now these members who some of them are in difficult races, difficult districts like abigail spanbergerlves to attacks of being soft on crime. a lot of democrats say it's politics 101. one said i just can't trust the white house anymore. >> how does the white house answer this in the sense that the democrats are saying the president made a decision to protect himself in 2024 after exposing them. >> they definitely faced questions about it yesterday at the white house. >> a lot. >> you were among those asking the questions. let's listen to a little bit as the press secretary tries to explain this. >> the d.c. council put forward -- was put forward over the mayor's objections and the president wants to make sure that communities, even in d.c., americans in d.c., feel safe. the president still thinks that d.c. should become the 51st state, that is something that he has supported for decades not just the last couple of years, but there is, he feels as president, he has the obligation as well to keep america's cities safe. >> they are trying to say he is not a band nl principle he is just ma

abigail spanberger. >> jesse: come on. >> dana: she was the one telling them for two years that you're that's why the democrats are somatic joe biden. he should have given them a heads up because then they wouldn't have voted on it at all anyway. now they've got themselves in a political pickle. >> geraldo: in that regard, tom, what the hell is the purpose of being lenient on recidivists? where is the progressive upside to that kind of bleeding heart? >> tom: the police chief put it more simply. he said we've got to leave these criminals in jail. we would take that quote outcome of the average person would say that must be some right wing nuts saying that, no, it's the police chief. i can't believe he made police chief in d.c. with the attitude but i think there's a national waking up. we heard the mayor eric adamson with got to take masks out. yeah. you didn't see that one coming? everyone's walking around robbing stores with masks on and so he says now it's time to take the mask off. people realize we made some mistakes. let's backtrack a little bit. i think you're right, it's not go

the 2018 midterms was called the camel wave, where all of these democrats, dana's favorite, abigail spanbergerh. i think what she should have said was to explain why she might not want that enter talk about the poverty draft, which started in the 1980s, that military recruitment folks show up mostly had low income schools. they go after poor kids, minority kids, and -- statistically, it is true. >> dana: i don't think the military is not out there to recruit poor people. >> jessica: there was a study out of connecticut from a few years ago looking at how often there was junior rotc recruitment going on at lower income schools versus the wealthier schools, and they showed up -- that makes sense, you cannot afford to go to college, they are saying to you, here's a chance for you to go to college. >> greg: doesn't necessarily mean intent. we will be right back. >> jessica: that would have been a better way to explain it, versus coming off as if you just hate the armed services. >> greg: judge, what do you think? >> jeanine: i think there are a lot of high-end people who believe the military and t