that was a mistake and we wrote letters of apology to jeremy corbyn where as abol a tickle as we could be and the foreign office ordered an investigation into the matter if there is any kind of organization for which we are paying which is involved in domestic politics in that way i would totally condemn it but it seems the questions will continue to rise as to the extent of the u.k. government's funding for groups and gauging in such political attacks especially just before an election that could decide the u.k.'s future for many decades to come there's a body of people particularly who take an interest in his national security policy and or who are overwhelmingly critical when i'm skeptical about the scorpion's policies and his past involvement and where as it seems to me far enough for somebody to criticize those without hiding behind as it were charity label to saying this is my view any organization that's funded by the taxpayer and says it's a charity should take a party political parties and viewpoint and i think that's a great mistake and just actually wrong in law. the europea

americans and the world got to see what we are talking abole, these so-c conspirators.hey are highly skilled, very dedicated, they have each other's backs, they care about american policy, they are experts in their fields, they ar very solid, regular people, the kind of people we want doing these very sobering, important jobs, and essentially they were saying they were bypassemiwith a were s, they were out of the loop. what was best for america was sidelined based o' giuliani' basically executing directions on behalf of the president that hee not of any interest to united states. the question is, do we care? laura: also, there are no more public hearing scheduled in the impeachment inquiry. what happens next? kim: the next step is it would go to the house judiciy committee which traditionally is the entity in congress address what legal articles of list of allegations from list of alleged wrongdoing. it is not until we seethat piece of paper that we can fairly assess what the demoats' case is full to we eculation what would be the piece of paper. the house would vote on

simply beating his perceived ended ingrid's in the judiciary committee and that that's where and that abol where the really some blow what do you how resides so while. she's taken some criticism for not doing it that way by republicans she's taken some criticism for not doing it that way by republicans i think you've got she's waiting to see a little bit how this plays out what the evidence was i think you've got she's waiting to see a little bit how this plays out what the evidence was the report did not a number i would model a report that the tide not meant for me in a kind of dumb people would with the type of men from ation that people equals can saying pre-condition people but it might want to bid one point did so if she sees oh she said you know if you thought or thought to take i could retire i am i guess this they answer will be will be when she say she has the body she had as the votes in the united time and i'm as ready in the in the house. because she couldn't determine it should she will propose that seat but but she's also told will look like spirit or is to stand and you can

so what will happen if it aboll hirschs this process. my neighborhood -- abolishes this process? my neighborhood is ground zero. it will stop high net worth individuals -- it will not stop having attorneys litigate. it won't stop my organization from opposing egregious projects that we think have a negative impact on our overall neighborhood ultimately san francisco. so we stakeholders will not stop participating in the process and opposing projects just because senators oppose appeals. please provide an update on how senate bill 330 impacts san francisco and how it will be implemented. it will help all stakeholders remain engaged in the process. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> sue. planning staff, including commission secretary, speak into the microphone whenever you speak. you have a tendency to speak among yourselves up there. and you turn your heads, secretary and the planning director as well. and please, if the microphone isn't pointed to your mouth pointed to your shoulder if it's pointed to your ear people will assure you. today i'm here -- a case i've been waiting