about the macro, not just about how we think about moments.nd then i write about what our relationship is with a power greater than our own, whether that is how we think about faith, hope, god, ourselves -- trying to put those pieces together to offer something based on what i've been through and what i've seen. >> i want to thank you, deray, for being here. thank you for joining me on "firing line." >> thank you. >> it's really been a true pleasure, and i really enjoyed your book. >> thank you. >> "firing line with margaret hoover" is made possible by... corporate funding is provided by... ♪ ♪ ♪ funding for arthur is provided by: when you encourage your children to learn, wonderful things can happen. abcmouse.com early learning academy-- proud sponsor of pbs kids and arthur. and by contributions to your pbs station from: ♪ every day when you're walking down the street ♪ ♪ everybody that you meet has an original point of view ♪ (laughing) ♪ and i say hey hey! ♪ what a wonderful kind of day ♪ ♪ if we could learn to work and play ♪ ♪ and get alo

about it. so it was too late and she was really hurt and i think for all of us to think about no matter whatwork we do, no matter where we go from here , whether it was social workers or warriors or what have you, we need to listen and we need to believe and we need to act and we need to support people when they tell us what's happening and try to connect them to the best of our abilities and i think that is true for people who are receiving those complaints in hr. representatives as well as others and part of listening and part of learning and responding to this moment also extends to the political leaders who need to understand that there are whole groups of individuals across our country like this very minute or not protected by the law and we cannot have a situation in this country where only some people can work in placeswhere they are free of violence though there's a lot . >>. >> so we do have a retreat but as i pull up to, andrea, can you speak about actionable or what exactly we can ar

[applause] >> my call to action is about how we think about and how we talk about our work in these movements. the national dialogue around the #me too movement and round times up has largely been about taking people down, holding people accountable and figuring out how to get companies to pay for what's happened. and yes, we believe there has to be accountability and nasty measures that are taken to ensure that people who violate the law are held accountable. but what i also think is important for us to understand is that we as a movement, what we want is we want people to talk about what we are for. what we are for is for safe workplaces, for people to go to work in fair workplaces, for people to be able to thrive in a workplaces and for people to be able to live and work with dignity. that is what we are for. as long as we talk about what we are for, we can then change the culture we believe that. what if we talk only about bringing people down, then people close down and we can't have a conversation. and we need to have the conversations because that is how we're going to eventually make

outside of washington, people are not talking about cable news. the are talking about op-ed. they are not talking about the book. they are talking about what is going on in the economy. school just started a lot of places and they are talking about their dreams for their economy isw the helping them, the prospects are brighter. we have seen fears and concerns and we are trying to address all of those issues. that is not what people out in the rest of the country are talking about. i know it becomes a tempest in washington. the rest of the country really is different. they are not talking about the same stuff. you might see it on cable news, but it is not what we are talking about in the barbershop or other family tables. obamas weekend, barack will launch his new term campaigning. >> what's he running for? something about vice president and the president. how helpful will the former president beats democrats in their drive to be take the house? does his campaigning actually help you? does president obama give republicans an easy foil to campaign against? mr. stivers: so i hav

talk a little bit about that. what she still has to overcome even with this laundry list of accomplishments that any man would be, you know, that would be all you have to see. why are we still talking about whether her voice is too loud? >> at the double standard for women leaders. there is quite a bit in the book about women in the senate and the house and have it come across the same double standard and they find it every day in their work and what they do for the quality is so confident and straightforwardness and steadfastness and earnestness and knowing your stuff being very clear about where you stand in the mail that those qualities are seen as very strong and just great qualities of leadership whereas he said, when he won and exert that kind of authority with that kind of energy and intensity, she's been as they said, people who admire her and she decided she wasn't so shrill. it's a double standard and we are so far behind other industrialized nations and how we look at women as leaders. we are so far beh

about about north korea. i've asked about china. and i did ask a question that they didn't like. let's put me on the blacklist. if you don't know about it, google it. it's in my book. [laughter] it gets to be upset, no one, no reporter should ever have to ask a sitting united states president, mr. president, are you a racist? no one should ever have to ask sitting united states president and then on the day that i asked that question -- that day meant a lot to me. it was the the time where we were celebrating the march of who is now a martyr. dr. martin luther king, jr. the president was announcing the fact that dr. king, his sensor was going to be expanded by national park service. an that was only time i was in a pool that day. and pool is when a certain number of people representing each medium and going to the small rooms are travel with the president in the vans to -- the course trump golf course or to trump international hotel with something trump. that's true and might be -- i'm serious or you know whe

the data issues about this and what about companies like cde where we have real concerns about who they are, what they are doing? >> we first of all, on the technical side, the us is done very well on the tech reference, to the point that a lot of countries sometimes use their privacy laws a little bit to handicap american companies where they drive toward data localization and all the data on citizens in that country which is a way basically of fragmenting the global reach in our companies so there is. we've definitely done well out of the global reach of data and to be honest, you do have to have a globally more or less seamless set of rules because if you have a lot of fragmented rules, you don't have an internet, you have many internet so we benefit from that. we do need to however recognize countries that do have an interest in protecting their citizens and part of what we're talking about now is how do you at least with respect to countries of a similar value system, democratic countries, how do we synchronize a way to have kind of a common picture of what the rules are that gover

no, he primarily has information to offer about this presidency, about this campaign, about communicationsout finances. that's the only thing that paul manafort can really come to the table and offer this investigation. so he becomes a very dangerous man for this administration. i think it's important to note that the fact that he's considering these negotiations means he either doesn't believe that a presidential pardon is coming or doesn't believe that a presidential pardon can cover him from all the crimes he is potentially guilty of. that's the other layer of this that sends a message to everybody else out there. maybe pardons won't be enough and working with mueller might be your safer option. >> mimi, there are so many stunning things in bob woodward's book. but one of them is john dowd's obvious cooperation with bob woodward on this book, which seems to be a violation of the attorney/client privilege. >> well, it's a violation if he's revealing, yes, conversations he had directly with trump, which it seems like -- >> he is. >> he is. although some of it, as you say, is also his inte

about who he is and what he's about, maybe not about what happened with ford, i don't really know about women, i don't have time to assess. but i know he's not telling the truth. and it was under the oath. so if they feel that in the extreme, right? i'm giving you an extreme position. well, i can only vote him down if i think we're going to win the senate because i have to make sure we get the court or i'm in really deep trouble. that's the political calculus. now, what should the real question be? do i believe that this man represents our best? that he is a paragon of integrity, because i'm going to put him in a position as a young and healthy man for the rest of his life, probably 35 years, and he is going to decide what matters most about who we are and what we're about as a people. and if the answers don't ring true, not just about the sexual assault, this is not a trial, this is a job interview. this is an assessment of character. it's about how he handles it as much as the truth of the matters asserted. and on balance do i think if i'm one of these senators that i should reward hi

it wasn't about science, it was about a good school. that's why i think community schooling fits in the stem world and the critical thinking world because it supports it. that's why kids are in school. they're fought there for me to solve poverty. i would love to do. that but they're there to learn. i'm still the high standards test guy. it's my job to help kids get across that particular finish line. >> looks like we're ready to go to some audience questions and answering. taylor will be running the mic. if someone has a question, just raise your hand. we only ask that you quickly state your name and affiliation, then receive your question. we have a lot of people that would like to get through as many questions as we can. so name, affiliation, then ask your question, please. >> i'm julie denis, communities in schools. high, dale. i actually had a question for terry about policy. i was wondering what kind of work you've been doing if any with housing policy and how integrated it is with education as we see the two go hand in hand. than

here's what i'm concerned about. i understand that there's still thinking through whether or not they will have staff members question her or outside counsel, a woman question her. these senators need to accept their constitutional responsibility. they can't hide behind staff. they can't be protected because someone believes they will say the wrong thing. they are not going to conduct themselves in the correct way. they've got to come forward. the people of this country elected them to carry out their constitutional responsibility and if they don't do it, they are nothing but cowards. >> you're mentioning the republicans have not decided who will ask those questions. what's your message to your colleagues on the other side of the aisle in the other house on capitol hill? what would you say to those republican senators? those 11 men who sit on the judiciary committee. >> i would say to them that i don't trust that you really want the truth to come out about this. if you did, you would have mark judge in that hearing a

i don't think this is about the fact, but about what we want to see. i am curious on how the panel seems to be talking about lin -manuel miranda but not ron chernow who wrote the book. he listened to the first song and said, wow, that is very accurate. why is no one taking on ron chernow? >> that person could not be here tonight. atre is someone who looks the challenges and inaccuracies in the play as he argues very directly from chernow's treatment. he has some real critiques of the chernow book. that is something that gets talked about. i think the chernow book does a lot of things well, right? and other things it does not as well. one of the key things that gets and in both chernow's book the play is that one about sender hamilton's most important accomplishments is something that is really not very democratic. when he talks about financing the national bank, what he really wanted to do and achieve as a major marker was to get elites to buy into the debt. it get you some stability because it means the elites now have interest in the country continui

were you thinking about brown? were you thinking about loving? were you thinking about any of the warren court decisions that created rights for individuals, privacy rights? which were the warren court decisions you thought needed to be righted by the rehnquist court. >> and i said "or so the critics charged." i'd paid to the areas where chief justice rehnquist helped the court reach consensus or maybe a middle ground on areas such as criminal procedure that is religion cause cases. when he passed away and even before, many of the justice who worked with him were very much praiseworthy of chief justice rehnquist for fiercely defending the jew dish udiciary -- >> i'd be interested to know the particular cases you're referring to. >> i think i referred to them in the speech but thank you, senator. >> after senator kennedy asks his questions we'll take a 30 minute dinner break. i expect we'll be back around 6:15 and four senators will be able to ask questions, booker, tillis, harris, cornyn, and then several members have requested a third round afte

, but it's actually what's saying about john kelly, his chief of staff about his attention span, about what he's interested in, about how to present him with substance. so the question is, what face do you put in the people around the president? >> well, there are all kinds of people at all kinds of levels. as we're trying to say, it's about reporting, and you can do it. let's not kid ourselves. in the white house, in the trump white house, there is a level of anxiety that people have that, my god, the impulse is going to drive the president to do one thing or another like imposing steel tariffs. 99.9% of the economists say this is foolish. this is not going to help the american economy, and the president even keeps it secret from his top economic adviser in the white house, and his chief of staff general kelly at the time. >> carl, i wonder whether you think one of the unintended consequences of these kinds of stories is something might happen to one of the gate keepers. for instance, many people believe the general, now defense secretary james mattis is a man of great experience, gre

what about money? dad gets his paycheck on friday and coming home and mom says -- where is the paycheck, what does that say? he says he doesn't have it. a lot of people, both women and a lot of religious folks in the early 19th century who wants to look at alcohol and how americans consume alcohol. one scholar dubs it the alcoholic republic. anyway, some of the reforms of americans are looking get that deal with prisons. in my view, this is one of the biggest reforms that americans are thinking about in the 19th century. what is significant about abolitionism, as we will talk americans start to think about equality. what is of the relationship of slaves to the larger democratic society? what is the relationship of women to the larger democratic society? can women vote? if women are in abusive relationships, can they seek a divorce from the state? it all hinges on the idea that americans are feeling more equal. what is it about the revolution that connects americans? this sort of equality is in the erro

it's not about me, it's not about you, it's not about anyone else. aunt and my cousins who don't have this opportunity. people from a small town like canton, mississippi, 13,000 people who see me and see them and see their voice being represented and even though i'm not a member of congress, they need someone who works for them every single day. it's not just people of canton, but also the people of the united states. the black people of the united states. the women people of the united states. all people of the united states. need someone in that position, in a position, that is willing to go to bat for them even when it's not popular, when it's not fair. let me tell you one of the things in going into alabama, can you get this -- i can't get nobody. you can't ask me to come talk to my people for free. i'm not going to do it. i have -- i was raised, born and raised in the naacp. my grandmother was a charter member of the canton, mississippi, naacp with an eighth grade education. i don't believe in free labor. don't believe in it. [ applause ] >> be

people talk about the story a lot about what to do. to make mistakes along the way. and to make mistakes. what i don't appreciate what i will not ever forget. but that lack of empathy that they have for us. and it hurts. to be attacked from all different sides people are attacking me and lesbians the university of chicago. we even get a photo. i am not a paid protester. but all of us on the internet left mac. and on black friday. it was wild. and at the beginning i wanted people to know what it's like to have to practice what you preach. organization now. and then to start that all over again. and for what it means to win a self-governing and self determining body. and with that lifecycle to recognize not think it could work but you make that assessment in the way that we went to. >> and then and then i was hoping you could about what them should all. in the final question what about that before black life so chapter number four. so it was that close. close enough that i first started to write this book poured half years ago there was a lot written down about what ge

what did you talk about? she asked me some questions about the incident.i answered those questions. was that the extent of the conversation? yes, it was a belief phone call. did you ever give senator feinstein or anyone else permission to release that letter? not that i know of. between the later date, 30th of july, and august seven, did you speak with any other person about your allegations? save the dates again. between the letter date of 30th ofjuly again. between the letter date of 30th of july and again. between the letter date of 30th ofjuly and august the 7th, while you were still in delaware, did you speak with any other person about your allegations?” did you speak with any other person about your allegations? i am trying to remember what the is... stop. stop the clock. i think, correct. to remember what the is... stop. stop the clock. ithink, correct. i was interviewing lawyers. speaking personally about it. aside from lawyers that you were seeking to possibly higher to represent you did you speak to anybody else about it during that period of ti

talk about success in 2020. a lot of those things are originated by government or they are just places where you guys step and just offer services. so we're kind of like are the lines on? >> any reference, i mean make a show we are all and federal election commission in-kind contribution is always something we're constantly insuring that we are doing but i think figuring out how to talk with him our works through the existing guidelines to make sure we're offering the best security features and consultations to this at risk audience is important. i also think, i know all of us have met with, for example, the dhs and election task force and we can to do so. >> is at on a regular basis? >> we speak with the government on a regular basis when necessary and also speak with each other. the collaboration we have with each other as well as government being more aware of how they can be a resource to campaigns, election officials, sectors of state, local, county election clerks is a a really big collaboration between al

funny about that.elissa: what is your counsel to folks who are looking pretty vulnerable at this point and what you think of the other competitive districts in michigan. mr. stivers: my advice to folks is have enough money to define yourself especially and to help start define your opponent and we'll come to help define your opponent and don't take anything for granted. mike bishop, while he's been outraised, he's raised record amounts of money for himself horseshoes use the and hand grenades phrase, he's got enough. as long as you are in the same zip code and mike bishop is going to be close enough to get his own message out and he's already got a great image among the voters, if you saw what happened last term in his race, everybody always thinks that mike bishop is this teddy bear, warm and fuzzy guy and i assume laura engel thought -- what's her real name? prairie."use on the melissa gilbert -- i knew her tv name -- she had no drop out it was so bad. -- to drop out it was so bad. mike is a good cam

and what about men? you can watch this and other programs online at booktv.org. >> and now it gives us great pleasure to introduce this evening's guest, our interviewer this evening is allison goodman, regional director of the adl southeast region which includes alabama, georgia, south carolina, and tennessee. the office was first established in atlanta in 1946. and has served those communities in the south ever since. prior to assuming this role, goodman served as adl south central regional director based in new orleans. our author and special guest is eli a staff writer for "the washington post," and a contradict tore to espn, the magazine. he's won a pulitzer prize a george reward and pulitzer prize and feature writing. his works include ten letters, the stories americans tell their president, and american hung pulitzer prize winning washington post sures. series he lives in tacoma park yanked with his wife and two daughters. please help us welcome them to the stage. [applause] >> so, i can't tell you

in the book you talk a lot about a very specific part and human op-ed about it. and the finding is that there is the one string a bacteria that's normally in the infant got. it has been the dominant strain. and it's highly protective. even to autism also. we completely like the population. overuse of antibiotics. infant formula. for many people is the first processed food. you have to actually had it in the first place. if you are like me. or like everyone in this room probably, we have all used in a biotics. and always had that formula. in the 50s and 60s it was heavily promoted. the unforeseen consequences. they always think they're moving forward but actually we've undermined our best interest. it's so incredible. for how long it's been here. it's the most important thing. we wiped it out in the course of a single generation. we all know that. one thing you kept really fascinating. was they had found all of these things. they are called pre- biotics. we can't digest them. they are food for the bacteria not for us. it's naturally in breast milk. the researchers

kenny talk to us a little bit about some of the things you have written about and talked about regardingparents can do and what schools can do outside of this? >> sure. first of all on the table is an article that i wrote about school safety for a publication. do not read it now. take it with the. there's good instruction in there about prevention and preparation and response and recovery. those are the main areas that we talked about when we talk about school safety as administrators. the bottom line messages this. it is a harrowing experience for parents to drop their little children off at a school that somebody else owns and runs and manages to go to school and for the things that you expect to happen at school that can be terrifying when you drop that little child off at the curb and say go in there and we will see you later. it is another thing to be confronted with the emotion and stories and pictures that we hear from time to time when something goes wrong and there is a violent episode at school where you are not there and somebody else is in charge of that facility and you can'

i'm talking about chuck holson, i'm talking about john dean, i'm talking about george schultz and leonard garment and have those choic voices tell about the crimes, abuse of power, let them, not some carpet bagger -- i was fearful of being the carpet bagger from the north. the tapes themselves would be the dna. i wish i had a good story to tell you. i have a very good story to tell you about the national effect, and i'm very proud to say, and i was just trying to talking to sharon, who was my boss for most of this process, that the watergate is exhibit is still there and now considered a permanent feature. but i don't think we convinced the local community. i think they actually thought of it as fake news. it was my first experience of encountering people whose minds were closed. at one point they came to me and said, we understand that when the president says things about jews, you've made this up in washington. you created it, tim, didn't you? that i was somehow creating this data. and the family worked very hard from preventing those oral histories from being shown because they did not

and it's also a way into talking about like again if her talking about people of color were talking about people who endorse some of the worst elements of this country and who have the least access to that resource in privilege. what i would like to encourage people to do is recognize that if we are fighting for their rights and if we are allies for them this is about bringing everyone up. but to ask people to pretend that their personal identity does not shape their direct experiences in this country it's an impossibility. no one can be reduced to black or queer. that sums it up entirely. when you speak to the role of dialogue and differences. i think that may seem inconsistent with activism. but could you talk about that. >> i think a big part of the reason why i write from set up personal space in this book. i didn't feel like i could speak about politics without being very upfront. so i would say anytime were speaking across divides to try to here to that. to come to people with the court motivation behind why they are fighting for their concerns. it's almost always personal and i thi

i think about both dr. ford and also about miss ramirez.en who came out publicly of their own volition. these are both cases where the senate began looking at this. dr. ford sent a letter but she intended that to be anonymous initially. when we first reported the detail of her allegation, we kept her name out of there at her request. but the story became huge and it was out of her hands and felt ultimately she had to speak. that's also the case with miss ramirez. she was not connected to the individual who first reported this to "the hill." those reports came to "the hill" through other individuals in this yale class who were all talking about this story. dating back to when the nomination happened. not after dr. ford. >> so there were other individuals who were freshmen at yale, i guess at that time, or at yale at that time, and i think we're talking about '83, '84, if memory serves me correctly. >> '83. >> '83. who had heard about this incident at the time? >> exactly so. so, you know, obviously, with all of these stories, we are extraord

montana was890's, about 30,000 wolves a year and about 30,000 coyotes. this will get to the explanation of your question. montana paid bounty on 17 gray wolves and 30,000 coyotes. in other words, the number of wolves had diminished to a fraction, only a tiny remnant. coyote numbers were still where they had been. the 20th beginning of century, people who are observing the west realized that we pushed all these animals to the brink of extinction, and somehow we have not been able to eradicate coyotes. the greatmpson seton, canadian history writer who ended up settling in santa fe, wrote a story in "scribners" magazine in 1900, to explain why coyotes survived this slaughterhouse. ad he argued that tito, little female pop that had been captured and chained in a rancher's yard, had observed all the stratagems ranchers used to kill coyotes. finds alater escapes, mate in the wild, and then teaches her pops all the things that humans were doing to try to wipe them out. seton argues at the end of that essay that, you basically realize who tito is, she is moses,

africa diverted to talking about other countries we're talking about a country of china of them and good part of china yes so i think we are now we are trying to improve our community every day just like other countries in the latest report by the hong kong journalists association says that as hong kong has become more polarized between probe aging and pro-democracy factions it's media hong kong media have experienced growing interference by the chinese authorities you said earlier you have free speech in the whole gulf they're saying and they know what they're talking about because they're in charge of the journalists they have their members in all the media they're saying they're getting increased interference by the chinese or thirty's one of you is not up to like i can say the mass media in hong kong they are quite independent and i don't i don't think they will be in time and they too are why doing something in the hong kong. according to reporters without borders china you can see from the mass media in hong kong. there are many many opinions even against the hong kong governm

we'll talk about it next. there's nothing small about your business.ess technology advisors, you get the one-on-one partnership to grow your business. the dell vostro 14 laptop. get up to 40% off on select pcs. call 877-buy-dell today. ( ♪ ) adults are just kids with much, much better toys. [ giggling ] introducing the 2018 c-class sedan, coupe and cabriolet. the thrills keep getting better. lease the c300 sedan for $399 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. - [narrator] at athene, we think it's time for the financial world to stop acting the same old way. in today's complex world, you need a partner that is driven to provide you with better solutions for these challenging times, one that is willing to disrupt the industry, and break free from conventional thinking. (thudding) we are a different kind of financial company. we are athene, and we are driven to do more. >>> this just in, president donald trump responding to the story about deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. trump calls the controversy surround

it's so simple, i don't even have to think about it. so i think about mouthfeel.ut the ink card. i think about nitrogen ice cream in supermarkets all over the world. i think about the details. fine, i obsess over the details. think about every part of your business except the one part that works without a thought your ink card. introducing chase ink business unlimited with unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase. chase for business. make more of what's yours. >>> this is this headline that just went up on the new york website tonight. confirmed of the brett kavanaugh can't be trusted. a perfect nominee for a president with no clear relation to the truth. it is not an op-ed. this is from the editorial board. judge brett kavanaugh would be deeply embarrassed in which he has arrived at the doorstep of a lifetime appointment to the supreme court. perhaps most concerning, judge kavanaugh seems to have trouble remembering certain important facts about his years of service to republican administrations. joining us, senior editor and legal correspondent. thank you for

appearance, about 12% of messages were about appearance. there was jealousy, sexual activity, personality, and most of the language involved peers communicating about peers, peers to peers, and dating partners. i just thought i would show you a few snippets of this language. here's one about personality and note that many of these messages could be overlapping. so, one could be about personality and also about race, ethnicity. and you can see the common language used were a-hole, annoying, irritating -- i told my children i wouldn't use any bad words for this presentation. okay? this one is about appearance. and what was interesting about appearance, this is where we saw kids actually engaging in self-aggression towards themselves. very -- and this was often involving girls. asf is as f-word. i'm so ugly. and here's a peer. yeah, you're not ugly. you're a bae. i need help. and yes, i am. so, what we also noticed here is this is where there was some bystander intervention going on, and we saw that as potentially an area to consider for futur

but really you've got to think about it's not about building the million plus man army, it's about how do you build some very discreet asymmetric types of capabilities that work as a deterrent. for the most part really a deterrent for russia proper. so you look at some of the investments they have, obviously nuclear -- the nuclear weapons becomes a huge investment for them. looking at things like hypersonic, looking at things like anti-satellite capabilities. so it's more of the asymmetric approach of things that they can do, while they still continue to seek a global presence. the other part is the strength of those allies, a little precarious i think at best. it's one of the things about democracy is that it's so much stronger when you think about nato. when you think about the allies that we have, those that are built on trust and a partnership that is much stronger than those that are built on a degree of coercion. so in that fashion, i think we're in a much better position in the long run and we have been. i think that's our strength coming out of world war ii when you look at the

it's about the things he said and done. >> i'm not talking about women.lking about over all generally. that's what made this presidency possible. right? when barack obama got up and started talking about, you know, all of these bad things, it was a reaction to eight years of obama presidency. >> hold on, now. no. i just want to be clear. what happened was donald trump being elected president was a culmination of a lot of things. it included some racism, it included some down turns for some people in the economy. it included lots of things. but president obama dug this country out of a proverbial economic ditch. and the reason we have the opportunity to celebrate these great economic numbers we have is because president obama was at work. and i'll say about the women, though, jim, it is really important that folks understand that this election will be decided by women. will be decided by black women, will be decided by these wihite suburban women. and that is the key here. and the fact that a lot of women do not like -- not just dislike the president, but

hit at about 11:00 tonight. so we're expecting a storm surge up to seven and a half feet. that can be catastrophic. the last time they had an extreme flood like that in the 1950s just under seven feet. there's a railroad that goes through this area. they were saying that the storm surge back then was so bad this were boats that were lifted up and placed on the railroad that went through here. there's some areas down here that are pretty low-lying. buford is right across the bay over there. we were just talking to the mayor. he said there are some places that see a little bit of flooding but that's from the high tide and the surge of water. however, if you think about the surge that's coming right now as we were just talking about, the winds are going that way. that's the atlantic. so these winds are spinning around and coming from land out to sea. at some point the hurricane is going to be pushing the water a lot higher. this particular area -- right now these winds are still not hurricane force winds. they are

need to know about justice thomas. first of all, read his autobiography. my grandfather's son. ou will find that it is a intellectually portrayal of his life. it is a tribute to his we call er and to what he american work ethic and diligence and the opportunities that this country offers to people that are always at risk. second, i will refer to a book friend professor ralph ossum wrote called understanding clarence thomas. it goes over his opinions until years ago when his quarter century on the bench that systemic intellectual rigor, fearlessness to the original bound by saying we're the constitution no matter what ome court decisions have said, and the insurance fluences that he's steadily wielded. by ecommends that book saying he's a marathon runner whose stamina has only been career on the s court. in the magazine city journal magnet a well known social at a timer -- magnet makes the same observations justicee influence that thomas has had intellectually on the development of the law and of course my favorite just

not talking about the harasser? >> the harassed and the harasser, what's being facilitated is more voices from those who are the victims. >> right. >> that i think -- >> that's good. >> is very powerful. >> very powerful. i was looking at the show and that tends to been very graphic and i thought this isn't the right time for the show, this moment is different than other moments. moments change, cultural context change and this is a very special moment and the more we try to define it, conversations like this one, the more aware we all are. >> what i wanted to get to the reason i feel it's important to hear from the harassers and harassed because it leads us to understanding of where this behavior comes from because in many cases, you know, we read the statistics that the majority of people in prison are people who are harassed or abused as children but we often don't know that, we see them as criminals, but for me i'm personally interested in understanding both psychologies. >> okay, i'm not interested in the psych

, is not about punishment. his decision-making matrixed is harder for him and the economic downturn or another round of sanctions to raise funds -- when their time comes, maybe they will think twice about pushing further into the ukraine or continuing to evade help and the north korean regime. and sanction russian entities that are involved in that recently. how do you change -- some of these macro issues beyond the -- how do you change that -- because what we know as it will continue to aggressively -- they will continue to undermine global order and work with like-minded states whenever they need help. they do that abroad and whenever there is an issue, that they can exploit, we have seen them dive headfirst. so expect more of that. from where we get into this program, read/blue, right/left, the more they are able to orchestrate that. and i think we will see that but also from the water --. >> thank you, boris. [ applause ] >> thank you for inviting me. 2000 by the russian government had decided -- the defens

let's think about this. and i have been talking about a supreme court nominee that will serve for life, that will have an impact on the constitution of the united states for decades. and instead we are talking about anonymous. my answer to anonymous is: i am not talking about anonymous. >> shannon: okay. when i was a practicing attorney i preferred written questions for my client. these are things you are negotiating with the special counsel. can you give us a timeline that this might be resolved? >> well, let me tell you what i don't give. i don't give timelines. it needs to be wrapped up soon for the good of the country and our national security interest. just to get this investigation done. this has been the most transpare transparent inquiry of a white house in history. 1.4 million documents. 30 witnesses put forward by the administration. i don't think bob mueller would argue this is not transparent. the question of where we are now, our policy is we won't comment on, on-going dialogue with the office o

talking about activism. talking about the relationship between african americans and africa and u.s. foreign policy. they're critiquing capitalism and saying it's just the right economic system for poor black people. and they're really trying to reimagine what citizenship will look like in the future. so it's an incredibly hopeful time as well. host: we mentioned one of those activists already elled ridge cleaver. who is hughie activism. >> a law student in newton? oak california, who started an organization along with his friend bobby seal. he and bobby had met at college and they created an org is, they outlined the platform, they gave it a name, and they were just two men. but they had a vision of what change should be like and once they stafert they started it in oakland. people flocked in and it got a lot of attention very, very quickly. host: what was that organization? guest: black panther party for self-defense. host: here they are speaking about the black panther party in 196. are america, black peo

at one stage he or she talks about trade and being upset about that. then talks about the great tax cuts. so maybe it's an economic person. then they're talking about russia and the dual tracks of national security maybe a national security person. then they use the word lode star maybe it's someone in the vice-president's office. the person was sophisticated enough that they didn't leave enough trails. i just want to say one other thing just in your intro or your question to me. this search is on taxpayer dollars. we have a lot of people in the white house right now focused on something that's embarrassing, not folk used on the substance of what was being said. just to remind people that this witch-hunt or whatever it is going to be is on our dime. and so, you know, whatever is going to happen, whether they narrow down the 12 people to one, this is what our government resources are being spent on. >> since you mention the language, let's go there, because many are taking a look at the word lode star. we're talking about senator john mccain that was a

think about if this was your son. think about if this was your brother. would you want this to happen to them? >> i thought that was rhetorically one of the smartest, put it on others, your father, your brothers, your son, especially your son. the other thing about partisan politics. we've seen several nominees get up there and suggest partisanship. he went further than ever and also went further with sort of a dare. i dare you to deny me this seat. i'm staying in it. i'm going to get a vote no matter what, and that's -- he's got a do or die thing that obviously appeals to president trump but will it appeal to sue soon collins. >> i can't wait to hear the endlessly sanctimonious ben sasse and jeff flake, all their talk about kindness and -- is this what they want? is this -- is this the nominee that they think -- >> they had him the first round, right. >> but you -- all these republicans who like dabble in moderation, they always come home to trump. they always wind up voting for trump, and that's what flake is going to do and that's what sasse is going t

someone just asked about turkey. what about indonesia, what about obviously arabic? there's languages, portuguese, out there, that people need to learn, because we're going to need people who are comfortable traveling and working around the world. again, as journalists, in n.g.o.'s in the medicaltory and intelligence, as diplomats, in business. we need millions of people who will be, again, globally literate and comfortable and experienced living abroad. again, the fact that you're here is great. if you didn't take gap time, after you finish here, i would hope you'd spend time living overseas. i think it's a great way to spend time in the course of your development whether you opt at this as a career or not. see, i knew i'd forget the other questions. dean brigety: what conflicts are we ignoring? mr. haass: that's a really good question. one thing i worry about is in the totality of u.s.-chinese issue. i worry about taiwan. my hunch is taiwan is a little bit of a sleeper issue, and there's things going on in the american congress on taiwan in on the mainland that sug

so the shootout in 68 and i'll tell you about is not about drugs, it isn't about territory. it isn't about anything other than dignity and an urban guerrilla warfare to make a statement that these guys had started to think about in 1964 so it was four years later that that happened. these things that happenedin the united states . malcom x is killed. watts happens, that summer in 65 and that comes out of nowhere, by the way. in white americans, it comes out of nowhere too. and what was, what people couldn't understand was lyndon johnson had just passed the 65 voting rights act. and two weeks later it was watts and the question is what's going on here? we are having progress, we are seeing things progress and yet this violence happens and what white america didn't know is that these thing that had built up from these migrations during the wars were really pestering places of injustice and police brutality. and it was just too little, too late. so we begin with watson 65 and cleveland in 1966 we have the rebellion . and it is, comes out of almost nowhere. again, the community

he'll tweet about jeff sessions like black twitter will tweet about mclemore, but he's not tweeting about manafort. that shows how frightened he is of manafort. whatever manafort knows, he knows and he's scared of that. >> here's the other timing issue. today we learned there is a joint status report from mueller's team about flynn. this has been a big question. when is he going to be sentenced? when he's done cooperating. flynn is ready for sentencing on november 28 or 7 business days after that. what can we take from that? >> some think they're not going to use him in a prosecutorial intention with someone else. we just know a very small portion of what's actually happening. i think the bigger issue people are curious about or need know about is why do we even care diplomat? it's been a tsunami of this information. and today happens to be constitution day. 1787 was a majority of the delegates signed the document and why does in matter? it matters because we're talking about five of the president's closest advisors and potential serious wrongdoing by the president of the united states an

about how about whether he should be smashed with a sledgehammer as recommended by the people's daily in beijing i think here he must be quick should be criticized by hong kong people. is the chinese state so weak and fragile that a constitutional law expert who talks about independence is a threat to a country of one point four billion people come on really a threat are they so fragile so insecure in beijing these days no look i think as a legal professor here for the understand that we should not put more independence in hong kong is not allow in the most as yet says you shouldn't is and it's under the law says you shouldn't not know china under the basically what you say that we we are a part a part and parcel of the of the people's republic of china under the best you know it all should she has free speech and for in your freedom of association most which has a limitation that is decided by china must obey in a compiler's with the basic law and respect one country two system and you should not see any movement for independence and more makes you so afraid of it is it because china

hard to say about someone who bragged about assaulting women. it is understandable for people to suspect that there's something going on, but somehow this is rigged. the yogurt on the bench and i hear your admonition that you'll be independent, but the suspicion is clearly there. and so, you've written extensively about this. he spoken to the issue. you've written about the issue in law journals. can you tell me why the common person, millions of americans will sit back and say this is donald trump. demanding loyalty from the fbi director and the attorney general. in fact, he criticizes in a three-piecebe all right before e hearings began, criticizes very dramatically the justice department for doing investigation on folks it seems because the republican and the most partisan way. to me, that casts a shadow over this whole t processes. it is extended by not having your documents, extended by not having access to your full record. but can you speak to that for me, sir? can you speak to the incredible suspicion that people have with the system is

i was worried about you, don't worry about me. there are plenty of those, as i think back on it and i don't want to think back on all the different moments, but there are plenty of them. >> tim, your moment? tim: i remember that mix of responsibility of fear about whether or not we were going to be able to get our arms around it. it was easier when we decided whatever the next stage of escalation when he could choose to act. as if the hardest thing was sitting at the table with my wife in the morning with her reading about what we were doing and seeing on her face that mix of despair and doubt. [laughter] i believe she felt we were ethical people trying to do the right thing, but she looked at what we did and said, she was like, really? [laughter] of course, that was mirrored by what we faced across the country. that gap between what we thought was right, what we thought was the best available option, the gap between what we thought was going to provide the broadest benefit with what people thought was fair and just. that was the

and he always laughed about it later, but i mean, there's no question about that. and he said things he should not have said. but in the heat of battle. but he was the first to say, look, i'll never be elected miss congeniality of the united states senate, but he managed to get by that. >> i remember once seeing a profile of him in 1999 and asking him, do you take medication for your anger? that was not a -- he didn't enjoy that question. but you know, and his colleagues when he ran for president, who didn't like him because he behaved that way, said he lacks the temperament to be president because he's such a -- because he's so -- gets into these fights. he's violent, you know -- or not violent, he's quite passionate, which left some bruises. >> for those who ascribe that to his time in captivity, you know, last weekend we were talking to karen timulty, who had written an in-depth obituary about john mccain and said, no, no, no, his mother said when he was a toddler, he would get so mad, he would hold his breath until he passed out, literally, and that the navy do