you can read through them about issues related to the ability to metabolize cholesterol, mineral absorpon, you got issues of cardiac, brain, aging, cancer and then age-related conditions associated with elevated levels of dna damage. so there was discussion of damaged dna in these items. at the time we did this, and it sounds like probably still, the experts that we consulted said that the predictions did not have a basis in fact or there was not enough evidence out there for these predictions to have a scientific basis, if you will. and really so there's no parts of this. unproven at the time but also ambiguous. i mean, the way that they were written was you were at increased risk o you may be at increased risk of these various conditions s it was very strange wording if you will, something like the weatherman predicting a 50% chance for rain, you know, just about anybody in the world could meet the criteria you may be at increased risk of getting certain types of lung cancers. that was the type of results that we received with respect to to that. on the lifestyle piece of this and this