caller: first nobody was murdered in abu graib. caller: four americans were murdered, ok.'t matter whether it was a rag tag new 4,000 american soldiers were killed in iraq. caller: sir sir it doesn't matter if there's a rag tag militia or me and my friends going over and murdering these people. it wouldn't matter. they got murdered. hal: so? did obama give the order to have these people killed? is that what you're saying? caller: ronald reagan was not hesitating that's for sure. hal: ronald reagan would have killed the american ambassador in benghazi? caller: i heard speeches of ronald reagan and they sound completely different as they do to obama. hal: you mean the speeches around iron-contra, for example. caller: and nobody's perfect. hal: nobody's perfect. >> how can you speculate how president reagan would react in today's environment? i think milltail things have changed. hal: if policies any indication, he'd be a democratic, because he'd have to change parties after he was primaried as a republican. jacki: because he was too moderate. the nature of warfare that ha ch

. >>> osama bin laden's son-in-law sulaiman abu graib. >> if you think you're going to let you do thatstin bieber collapses back stage during his performance in

in my view, every single democrat senators who criticize president bush for all grades -- for abu graib should have been rushing to support rand paul. there's a right to due process in the 14th amendment. it is what provided the foundation for giving african- americans the right to vote, to ensuring that people have access to government. and this administration has such disdain for it. it is shocking. i have to say that this is more than just the issue of drones used domestically. due process rights throughout our country's history have followed american citizens wherever they go around the globe. this issue about whether one is an enemy combatants, that is something that should be determined in an adversarial proceeding. the executive branch should not get the right to make a unilateral decision about whether one is an enemy combatants and then acting on the evidence they have gathered and acting along their determination of who is an enemy of the united states, go out and kill that person overseas when that person is a u.s. citizen. i am surprised that those such as saunders have not