one of them gets directly to your place in academia.hen people ask me which of the two i worry about more, i'm more worried about the attacks from disinformation because it's essentially seized control of an entire political party. the republican party is now unfortunately this sounds partisan, i don't think it is and it's just an observation take it or leave it. i think the republican party is operating as a propaganda workshop led by an authoritarian is developed a cult of personality. this is a very dangerous thing in democracy where there are only two parties. but this comes closer topower and i think any of the other threats . but there's a different kind of menace that's also quite serious which i think you just alluded to in cancel culture and that's that it's crept into the very heart of the reality-based community in academia. this is the place that we rely on to uphold the standards of free and open inquiry and rigorous inquiry. according to these models it would require us to do things in certain ways and torespect these norm

but mostly in academia. you aren't academia does anyone read the. review articles rewrite? maybe grad students? i written the article, white fragility about the frustration of trying to talk to white people aboutal racism. being a diversity trainer, going day in and day out going against my socialization which most white people are taught not to talk about racism. everyday i walked into rooms filled with white people unsaid working to talk about racism. most often sitting side-by-side with a black cofacilitator was the only person of color in those rooms. being stunned at the hostility to theon conversation, at the meanness. we can be really mean on this topic and driving home was that cofacilitator bearing witness. it's part of being white birds never having to bear witness to the pain of racism for black people. that experience, plus academia kind of brought me too be writing. somebody somewhere quoted from right fragility the article and in exploded. this language that has been familiar certainly to black people but once i named it, familiar to white people. it is harder

culture, and that's that it's crept into the very heart of the reality-based community, which is academia. this is the place that we rely on to uphold the standards of free and open inquiry and rigorous inquiry, according to these models, that require us to do things in certain ways and to respect these norms. and a couple of things have happened there. one is a lot of chilling. polls show that now two thirds of american students are afraid to talk about politics, for fear of offending someone, in other words, being cancelled. i have multiple interviews in the book. i hear this again and again. students are not afraid of left wing professors grading them down primarily. they are afraid of their peers. they're afraid of gang-ups and pile-ons, no one sitting with them at lunch, and that sort of thing. the second problem may be even more insidious which is now -- and here's where i would love for your corrective comment because i hope this isn't true, but there's a lot of evidence that in disciplines and departments in a lot of major universities, there's no longer enough diversity of viewpo

puede visitar telemundo48.com 12:13 una pausa, este niño puede tener un brillante futuro en una academiaiento, hablaremos de la calidad del aire y el pronóstico al regresar (música) le comento que los incendios han provocado la evacuación de miles de personas en los Ángeles al norte del estado, alejandra quezada nos dice que los damnificados tienen ayuda. >> este hombre visita las casa de los evacuados de (nombre en inglés), algunos necesitan agua o hielo, otros simplemente platicar un ratito , ella vive en missouri llegó el viernes pasado, es voluntaria y dice que ha hecho esto hace varios años. >> (hablan en inglés) había necesidad de voluntarios de todo el país para ayudar por incendios, quería ayudar . >> dice que la enviaron a texas el año pasado para ayudar a menores migrantes y también en inundaciones hace dos años, es la manera de dar las gracias al país que la acogió como migrante migrante:(hablan en inglés) he tenido una buena vida el albergue tiene 58 camas en el edificio y 225 personas se quedan en casas de campaña, (nombre en inglés) se ha quedado por 8 días en el estacionam

it's never having to bear pain to the witness of racism so that experience s of academia and that haseen familiar certainly to black people but also to white people. to make it accessible. a non- academic publisher i knew there be an audience based on the reaction to the article it still on the list and three years later who could dream of that i expected it from the right. and then to because in the crosshairs james baldwin testifying before congress and those that responded to the cold war so talk about nice racism so who are the nice races that you're talking to? >> it is me. that racism occurs in explicit acts but it is a structure across society and it is the norm it's not an aberration highly adaptive system and we are in a very serious place right now. so as the system we are all shaped by it. so wero have to change our questions from if i was shaped by the system you cannot be exempt from those waters that use women so nice risen racism is meant to capture the well intended right progressive and so many p white people feeling guilty but that is a great example of my goodness w

rarely held accountable for the pain that you because black people so that experience, academia brought me to be writing somebody somewhere ordered from white fragility of the article and it exploded i apparently captured in language are dynamic that was a formula, certainly the black people but it's familiar to white people. i was getting e-mails from around them world about that article it would be useful to develop it further and make accessible because it's academic, we know how to do it, it's not my favorite way to write but you kind of have to and academia in more plain language so i went to a non- academic publisher, nonprofit social justice publisher, i knew there would be an audience based on the reaction to the article but it's still onn the list, three years, who could dream about? i wasn't prepared for backlash from all sides of the spectrum, i expected it from the right, you expect that, it doesn't get to you in the same way but i didn't expect it to that degree from the left so that has been a process. >> that's interesting you didn't expect it from the left. there is a se

and so that experience of academia kind of got me to the writings and somebody somewhere courted from white fragility of the article and it exploded it. and i apparently had language that was dynamic and familiar and certainly did to black alpeople but also once i named , familiar to white people and it's harder to deny a shared experience. so is getting e-mails from around the world about that article and i knew that it would be useful to develop bit more itther and to make acceptable because it's an academic speak and we know how to do that. itit is not my favorite way to write be to kind of have to do it in academia and i wanted to make it acceptable. anymore plain language. so i went to a non- academic publisher, nonprofit social justice publisher. and i knew there would be an audiencece for the month based n the reaction too the article but who could dream it's still on the list, and three years and could dream of that read i was not prepared for the depth of backlash from all sides of the spectrum and expected it from the right. you expect that, that does not really get to you i

we know how to do that, it's not my favorite way to write you have to do it in academia. i wanted to make it acceptable. and more plain language. so i went to a nonacademic publisher, a nonprofit publisher, beacon press. i knew there would be an audience for the book based on the reaction to the article but who could dream. it's still on the list in three years, who could dream of that. i don't, i wasn't prepared for the depth of backlash from all sides of the spectrum. i expected it from theright . you expect that, that doesn't get to you in the same way. but i didn't expect it to that degree from the left so that's been a problem. >> that's interesting you didn't expect it from theleft . there's a sense in which the left is not, i wouldn't want to say it. i don't want to overgeneralize but they are caught within the crosshairs of this book. there's a sense in which i remember this moment . he was a kind of testifying before congress about his friend. and he said something to the effect that he was skeptical of those who wanted to do something for him as opposed to with

on a daily basis, especially in academia. you are most likely interacting with colleagues just like me. and we are the ones that send you home often exhausted. those thousand daily cuts, that maddening insidious, i can't get my fingers on this but yet again, we've reproduced racism in our outcomes, in our hiring and in our policies . so it's a more subtle, is the smileon the face . it's the tgas lighting. it's thedenying . >> you invoke guilt and inthe book you make a distinction between shame and guilt, talk about that . >> in just a condensed version, guilt is generally what you feel about something you've done and feel responsiblefor. and shame is generally something you feel that you've inherently are . so is i did that. and shame is i am back. andmy area of scholarship is discourse analysis so language is political, language is not objective, it's not neutral. perception.apes so i'm very attentive to how we frame conversations and how we position ourselves in conversations and i notice white progressives, those who would

within academia, critical thinking means thinking deeply with nuance and with education. and then you have the word theory. that sounds like some radical crockpot thing. if it's just a theory that it's not true or established and it's such a perfect little meme to dismiss the conversation. and it's been very effective. there's a part of me that doesn't want to talk about it because it will reinforce the legitimacy of his crt right or wrong? maybe clear, true critical race theory comes out of legal scholarship. like kendall crenshaw's work and derek bell so i'm not a critical race theorist. but of course it's been applied, supremacist. that racism is structured into thesociety . at absolutely. >> like you switched the question, to how, with regards to the critical race theory debate, i want to ask a question, why? why critical race theory, why now? when it seems to me these moments to assert that america is not a racist society, to attack 1619, to attack crt. all this is aimed as we said at the beginning of this conversation is aimed at arresting change.limit the scope of

we know how to do that, it's not my favorite way to write you have to do it in academia. i wanted to make it acceptable. and more plain language. so i went to a nonacademic publisher, a nonprofit publisher, beacon press. i knew there would be an audience for the book based on the reaction to the article but who could dream. it's still on the list in three years, who could dream of that. i don't, i wasn't prepared for the depth of backlash from all sides of the spectrum. i expected it from theright . you expect that, that doesn't get to you in the same way. but i didn't expect it to that degree from the left so that's been a problem. >> that's interesting you didn't expect it from theleft . there's a sense in which the left is not, i wouldn't want to say it. i don't want to overgeneralize but they are caught within the crosshairs of this book. there's a sense in which i remember this moment . he was a kind of testifying before congress about his friend. and he said something to the effect that he was skeptical of those who wanted to do something for him as opposed to with

. >> have you been in academia before? >> i have it. spent about ten years teaching college american university and very college all over the united states but. >> what was your experience like? >> it was an interesting environment to put it mildly. many good positive things came out of it both in terms of college i work with and the research that i did. i also got to see the inside behind the scenes of what happens in the way a university runs. >> and what did you find? >> my immediate take on it is, if we judged a university just as a normal business operation there are things that happen in universities that would make things like enron look ethical by comparison. >> give us an example. >> the first thing is the weight universities and market themselves through students. if you go to any university they have literature they present themselves as you are going to get a world-class education and open up all sorts of possibilities. their promising high and mighty things but every student that comes to their system is going to get. but w

la alcaldesa propuso 6 academias de policÍa, y el concilio aprobÓ 4 academias y redujo al equipo de respuestae aÑo aumentaron en un 51% en comparaciÓn al aÑo pasado. >>> un sospechoso que se atrincherÓ en una casa en san josÉ otros fue detenido esto fue en la avenida (hablan en inglÉs), los residentes regresaron a sus casas. la policÍa investiga los incendios provocados a tres vehÍculos al noreste de san josÉ, dos coches pertenecen a la misma familia. no hay informaciÓn de los sospechosos. >>> estos cachorritos de la raza bulldog francÉs fueron rescatados de ladrones. >>> esto ocurriÓ luego que una ola de acusaciones de acoso sexual se presentarÁ en la preparatoria de los gatos. >>> hoy estuvo en audiencia el sospechoso de abusar de una niÑa de 8 aÑos. vamos al informe. >>> un crimen de pesadilla, asÍ fue cÓmo describiÓ la fiscalÍa cuando un desconocido entrÓ a una casa en san josÉ y encerrÓ a una niÑa de 8 aÑos abuso de la menor. esto ocurriÓ a las 7: 30 de la maÑana cuando este hombre entrÓ a la vivienda. esta persona fue identificada como (hablan en inglÉs) de 24 aÑos y residente de san jo

otra parte los casos de coronavirus entre menores de edad se estÁn incrementando de acuerdo a la academia por de acuerdo con la academia americana de 10 dÍas, desde fÁbrica de informÓ que 16 menores han fallecido por covid 19 >> la diabetes, la obesidad, la hipertensiÓn reportera: como el coronavirus es una pandemia global, nos transportamos hasta medellÍn, colombiasi la salud es buena es mÁs probable que la sobrevivan su esposa rosaura castaÑo tambiÉn se estÁ reponiendo del covid de regreso al sur de california en donde manuel de 15 aÑos y su hermana de 17 nos recuerdan la importancia de la vacuna creo que es muy importante, y tu peso tiene mucho que ver en que te mantenga sano presentadora: ponga mucha atenciÓn porque si ha recibido mensaje de texto alarmante o un correo electrÓnico sobre sus beneficios de desempleo por parte de una identidad que parece ser una agencia estatal legÍtima, tenga mucho cuidado porque podrÍa tratarse de una estafa. tenemos a rosa aldama representante de la comisiÓn federal de comercio. rusia, dÍgame, es posible que una agencia federalmandÉ un mensaje de text

well, it's bi partisan when it comes to the media, but i ask you about the academia. academia, like, let's not put them into the that's good because i agree. the journalists are also supposed to be at balance. i mean, this is the very premise of our profession, but when it comes to me, i think the standard is standard is much higher. i mean, isn't that supposed to be different in that very? i agree with you and this is a problem and it is true that on our campuses, the campuses are run by professors administrators mostly come from the last, although not entirely. so it didn't surprise us in a sad way than on campuses. when you see campus leaders will campus students sentence lang people, it often comes from the left, but we live in a culture of it's bigger than our universities. and one of the really sad things that the united states right now is the same. people complain about cancer, cultural care. and that's really the story purposes. zimmerman. in the previous interviews, he talked about the psychologist of politics, the framing of political claims in terms of psychological harm,

there is nothing wrong without the left in academia decided to place in dialogue without in the mainstream, if you go into the normal blog and statements coming from faculty members around the country they are exercised by this, tens of thousands of american academics who believe wrongly when she was denied tenure and they don't care that it's a true story but they want to escalate this into a fight the paternal mission pressure on the board of trustees and they will grant per tenure until kobe goes away. jimmy i have no idea what goes on on the board it would be interesting to see the pressure that they are in the fall story they can't high pressure to begin with and there was no pressure to begin with and others in enormous pressure and this will be a test. >> can i stop a a hero quick, i say this is a publisher of the carolina journal of an undergraduate degree in journalism and a masters degree which means i care about theis history of journalism. to jenna's point the false narrative that surrounds us number one enter peter's point will hear later the false narrative that she created a

so it's now turning out people are discovering academia, liberals are not safe, diprogressives are not, because you can never tell was going to set off the cancel campaign and that's the dynamics that make it both especially treacherous but also gives hope because wee are finally seeing progressives in academia startingem to realize there is a problem and starting to mobilize against it. >> it's not as left as we could be. that perhaps is a tactical weapon that could be used. we look at all these good guys that are being canceled, so it's bad. it's a disingenuous but if it works, let's go for it. another thing we couldfa mobilie is if people don't like being shot down by older people, i hope that there will be somewhat of a movement by students upward saying i will say what i want. that's what happened in our baby boomers.e there are -- i know talking to students there's a significant portion that recent the silencing and intimidation [inaudible] >> i guess we are about out of time, so maybe if i could close by asking you a question. the last chapter of the book is called unmutepu your

all of this troubling and when i look at it from a at the state of journalism and academia, they arencerned about a false narrative in a frenzy over both narratives nobody is curious -- i shouldn't say nobody because the script obviously there are very few people who seem curious to want to get to the actual truth of this. what genocide from local news outlets have reported correct narratives now but there are bunch of people in academia and in journalism for that matter that aren't curious enough to want to get to the actual truth are visible narrative that surrounds nicole anna jones and i find it incredibly troubling. another thing, fatal flaw when people whose job it is to do research rather investigative journalism or higher education, one that is actually their job and not willing to do it, we have a serious problem. >> i was just going to say something general here, tenure is a bold idea, this goes back to the development of the university, the whole idea of it that an academic half this tenure, this post at a college. it's the most important thing a college can offer. the col

critical race theory has been around academia for several decades. nicole hannah jones knows what is, she's simply taken this analyzation and try to get the material by this particularly egregious and false narrative, they don't go together. critical race theory result as of 1519 project and make it easier bring into process. >> -- go ahead. >> one thing about the 1619 project being in this political battle, let's not forget that eckstein 19 makes the new york times relevant. not that they work but they hadn't had as big of a viewership as they did -- actually, i should take it back. the 1619 was released, they said people were lined up at stand around city blocks. people were buying the new york times addition in droves, they hadn't seen that kind of response barack obama was -- since he won the election in 2008 so make no mistake, this is a way for new york times to make some money, relevant in so many places across the country. i'm not saying that is the primary driver but it is important to all of us. >> we are also hearing some talk and sing rep

the left in academia has decided that is not just in the mainstream press, if you go into the normal list of the statements that are coming from the faculty members around the country, there really exercised by this pretty tens and thousands of americans academics who believe wrongly that she was denied tenure and actually they don't care that's untrue story but what they really want to do is fight the enormous pressure on the board of trustees for tenure right now and then that focus will go away. but to me and no knowledge what goes on without will be interesting to see. in the fall story is that they caved into the pressure to begin with full there was no pressure to begin with but now there is an this will be if they have the gumption to stand up predict. [inaudible]. >> tonic and jumping hero quick. i think as the publisher of the journal and have an undergraduate degree in journalism and a master degree in history in american history which gives me they care about the history of journalism. so to janice point, the false narrative that surrounds this, number one and then to pete

so, there's nothing really wrong with that, but the left in academia decided that this is it-- it not just out in the mainstream press. if you go into the blogs and statements that are coming from faculty members around the country, they are really exorcized by this and there are tens of thousands of american academics who believe wrongly that she was denied tenure and actually they don't care that that's not a true story. what they really want to do is escalate this into a fight that puts such enormous pressure on the board of trustees that they'll grant her tenure right now just so it goes away. now, to me, i have no inside knowledge of what goes on with that board. it would be interesting to see how susceptible to pressure they are since the false story is that they caved in to pressure to begin with. there was no pressure to begin with, but now there's enormous pressure and this will be a test case whether that board has the gumption to stand up against it. >> donna, can i jump in here real quick and i say this as the publisher of carolina journal and i tell people, i have an unde

host: although mainly do not exclusively acknowledge to knowledge producing industries like academia,hink tanks and journalism. can you tell us why we's pay special attention to the norms and the claimant of these in particular? >> these industries give us a picture of the world. so any type policy for example if we say what is the relation between guns and crimes? so we rely on the knowledge producing industries and with that division of labor a society has progressed we have intense division of labor and how the increases productivity but the division of labor is not just with respect to making things or professions but also knowledgeio production so we can specialize so we have to rely on others one of the things i explore in the book is the idea knowledge is the common resource especially with the knowledge producing industries as journalist and academics to know what the world is like we should be wary of social pressures to conceal information or conceal evidence or avoid aid arguments in both professions because i argue only under a free and robust exchange of ideas that are we

some of the local news outlets have reported correct narrative now there are a bunch of people in academian't curious enough or want to get to the actual truth of this whole narrative that surrounds nicole hannah jones and i find it incredibly troubling. it's a fatal flaw when people's job to do research, investigative journalism or in higher education from one that is their job they are not willing to do it, we have a serious problem. >> generally, tenure is an old idea, this goes back to medieval of the university ... as they have professional publications, approval of the teacher, they have to have reviews . they have to have had dissertations into serious academic studies. so it's extremely serious thing . what struck me about it and i appreciate amy and peter who looked at this particularly in more depththan i have, i've watched it from afar . what strikes me is how absurd it is on its face to assume that someone comes in and immediately receives tenure on a full boat. that's just not how it works. that's against the nature of the university which my second point, peters got this exac

it's not my favorite way to write but we have to do it in academia. i wanted to make it accessible in more plain language. so i went to a non-academic publisher, and nonprofit social justice public or publisher, beacon press. i knew there would be an audience for the book based on the reaction but it's still on the list, in three years who coulddream of that ? i wasn't prepared i for the depth of backlashfrom all sides of the spectrum. i expected it from the right . you expect that, that doesn't really get to you in the same way. but i didn't expect it to that degree from the left. though that's been a process. >> that's interesting that you didn't expect it from the left. there's a sense in which the left is i wouldn't want to say it, i wouldn't want to generalize too much but there's a sense in which i remember this moment, he was kind of testifying before congress and he said something to this effect that he was skeptical of the white liberal. skeptical of those who wanted to do something for him as opposed to with him and he had seen how white lib

. >> i want to get to academia in a minute. i think that most americans would say yes, we believe in free speech. we are proud of the first amendment. and yet, there are signs that they like to tinker with the first amendment a little bit. it's maybe gone too far for some people. isis there any evidence that americans are torn on this issue? >> we are not justy a little. we are cutting into pieces. we are in fragments around the floor. a we are very proud of our traditions. we are very proud of our free speech, but at the same time, surveys are showing that at least half of americans and more millennial's believe that the first amendmentll is outdated. it's getting more and more. there is a group that attracts a lot of ivy league students who thought you could forcibly shut people down. we cannot bear the idea that doesn't fit hours. it's really interesting in my opinion one of the signature achievements by a large margin we have a supreme court that said you know, the noise of free speech is powerful medicine for a society. it

. >> arctic and academia a minute but i think most americans would say yes, we believe in free speechf the first amendment and get their are signs they would like to tinker with a little bit. maybe it's gone too far for some people. is there any evidence americans are torn on this, schizoid on this issue? >> we are not a little bit, we are cut into pieces. we are in fragments along the floor. we are proud of our traditions, very proud of free speech, showing half americans and more millennial's believe the first amendment is outdated and it's getting more and more. the fire that attract ivy league students without euclid forcefully shut people down. it was coupons notably we can't bear the idea for today so it's interesting, in my opinion the signature of this country is last 65 years, free-speech environment in the world by large margin. we have as a that said the noise of free speech powerful medicine, it makes us responsible for ourselves and for taking care of the free society but now i think a lot of people are turning to the government and think protect me, stuff that person. st

it plays an important role in spinning the gap between foundational research found in academia like the national laboratory and translating two applications -- to. i think as the doctor mentioned, there are a number of areas where investments in research activities are key to provide the solutions necessary for the critical problems that faces humanity and for us as a nation to compete the rest of the world. equally important is the sustained world leading capabilities of the national laboratories in order to continue to upgrade them in a reliable faction, making it available to -- fashion, making it available to academia. these upgraded facilities that have been officially recommended by the scientific committee, to committees, to the department of energy, and supported by congress, just to give an example. >> if i may, we have limited time. if i could ask what is important to all of us as senators who may not realize the role that the labs have played in helping us advance a vaccine, working in collaboration with pharmaceuticals and equipment that we have invested in over the years. c

especially in academia. we must increase reporting requirements for foreign reporting at academic research institutes and university government labs and research institutions should have clear reporting requirements and rules on the participation of foreign talent programs. that part especially. we need to ensure true reciprocity. this is about fairness and market access. we can no longer allow china to weaponize their markets, connecting the reciprocity and sharing of data to big science facilities is a leverage point and for too long we have looked the other way when china has not followed through on the details of its agreements that it has entered into and we need to bolster cooperation with allies and partners. what also makes these conversations difficult, and as my colleague alluded to, the reality that they are presenting is inconvenient to those who benefit in the short-term term. this includes companies looking for short-term profits, academics that benefit personally from funding and cheap labor i

within academia if we look at that structure like graduate students are the most vulnerable. that may be tenured track professors are not yet and then the tenured professors have much more status with robust protections with what they can say. if you are tenured professor you could lose some status but at least you cannot lose your job. so i emphasize in the book the cost differs. if you live in the authoritarian regime it's too much to ask to speak your mind and to be sent to the gulags. but on the other hand, we should be willing to take some cost to improve our collective picture of the world. just as we should be willing to help others or protect the environment that involves some cost may be. maybe it's more costly to buy a more efficient vehicle but many people say we should protect the common resource that is helpful to all of us. so likewise put that reasoning into speaking your mind and we put that into our shared picture of the world or our shared knowledge and we should be willing to take some cost. maybe not losing your job, but maybe a loss of status that is some

. >> i want to get to academia and a minute. but most americans would say yes we believe in free speech and we are proud of the first amendment and yet there are signs that we'd like to tinker with the first amendment a little bit. maybe it's gone too far for some people. is there any evidence that americans are low schizoid on this? >> oh my god we aren't a little schizoid, we are cut into pieces and we are on fragments around the floor. we are very proud of our -- proud of our traditions and free speech but at the same time surveys have shown that half of americans and even more millenials believe the first amendment is outdated. i cite a few poles and it's getting more and more. in fact attracts a lot of ivy league students who say you can shut people down. we can't bear the idea of an idea that doesn't fit us. it's really really interesting. in my opinion when the signature achievements of this country in the last 50 or 60 odd years is decreased like the world is never known by a large margin. the noise of free speech is pow