let's hold on for someone who works in academia big hospital institutions we get a lot of recommendationsa lot of different your credit people. you could not take all the recommendations some of them are overreaches and some actually will make things less safe that's where you getting this recommendations academia or the people literally trained to look for these problems like the n ntsb. >> administrative people like to make a lot of recommendations adult messiah quite to real world. i think the secretary death he is going to come in right now and take a look at some these recommendations that have been made and question why i haven't some of these men followed? and some should not have been followed but i guarantee. look at secretary duffy he's been out come out every single minute since he is been sworn anyand is continued to keep peoe up-to-date. this next year will see a lot more out of transportation progress a busy dr. to put this all together for jon we cannot thank you enough for sticking around for that information is invaluable thank you. coming up on this and jampacked to our

la academia premiÓ a talentos latinos como shakira, con mejor Álbum de pop latino. y en la nba luka doncic llega a los lakers de los

academia is now overwhelmed only left leaning and sometimes even marxist and their ideology and if you think i'm being hyperbolic this in 2000 the national association of scholars reported that democrat professors outnumbered, outnumbered professors by a ratio of roughly 9 to 1 on top us campuses, female professors outnumbered their female professors identifying as democrats outnumbered their republican counterparts by 16 to 1. at cornell, the college fix reported a couple of years ago that democrat professors outnumbered. republicans 98 to 1. the history department are dominated by instructors who embrace howard zinn's book a people's history of the united states, which was in 1980. howard was a well-known marx who said that, and i quote, history is a weapon. and dedicated his life to rewriting history to oust our heroes. their pedestals. zinn's work was notoriously and biased. he viewed history as a quiet revolution. and he said, and i quote, not a revolution in the classical of a seizure of power, but rather from people beginning to take power from within the institutions, end quote

having been pilloried in the new york review of books, i decided my not being wise in the ways of academia that my career was over and i'd forgotten. p.t. barnum was very wise that make sure they spell the name right. did he get it wrong? i know he got a good fact checking everything followed from that. so take us back to your original in the history of the american left and history of the american communist party. yeah, i think this is sort of generational in terms of generation of historians looking around. i see more from our of historians. but we were coming out of the 1960s, which was a period of very intense political engagement, which to my mind didn't end up very well and i mean, i thought about in the early 1970s writing a history of the new left, but i was too close to it. but i thought another way to to get at that history was to a little further back and to find an earlier period of political engagement in this case, the 1930s and 1940s. and look the history of american communism, which did not turn out all that well. and i was always to in all those books that you mentioned, t

it's the time for government, academia and our industry to come together to find solutions and better understand this evolving virus. >> people do tend to panic buy, you know, when stores put limits on things or hearing something like this, that the supply is going to be limited over time, but eggs often have an expiration. you know, you can't just hoard a bunch of eggs because you better cook them or do something with them. pretty soon. however, what kinds of concerns or worries do you have before the big idea? eventually comes? >> well, i think our farmers are living in fear absolutely every day that their farm is next and we have not had a week that's gone by in recent memory without a new farm being affected by this virus. and we know that people are panic buying and that i think that might be the one bright spot in this entire thing is we know eggs are indispensable to people. there are 95% of refrigerators on any given day, and people are paying so much attention because they just love eggs. and again, when you have a really strained supply, you know, normally we have a bird in

the court's 1978 decision in regents of the university of california versus becky, which barred academiarimination when evaluating applicants, effectively severing the connection between current inequality and its historical roots. according to hannah-jones, this shift effectively undermined the civil rights movement's hard won gains, enabling white supremacy to persist through more subtle institutional mechanisms. and then came trump. he called our collective bluff, bringing to the forefront the racism that is at the core of many of these policies. as hannah-jones observed, quote, he repeatedly broke the discursive norms that had been greasing the wheels of american capitalism since the passage of the civil rights act. because indiana born judge gonzalo gonzalo curiel was a mexican, trump deemed him unqualified to adjudicate the trump university fraud case because nbc debate moderator lester holt was black, trump decided that he was a democrat and thus part of the phony system propping up hillary clinton. lester holt, by the way, was a republican. trump, in other words, refused to play

the people who themselves have benefited from dei programs in the private sector, in academia, and have benefited in all kinds of ways. i wish they would speak up more because again, in the absence of that, this administration is going to first demonize the idea of diversity and then weaponize any program that is intended to create diversity. and you're already seeing how they're aerosolizing that at a press conference where they are supposed to be focused on the cause of a crash that took 67 souls on the banks of the potomac while those bodies were still in the icy potomac. and he was talking about diversity. i you know, it was it was a chance to advance an agenda that is based on a white. >> well, trump advances agendas, literally, while bodies remain in the potomac river. that kind of tells you what's going on right now. michele norris, thank you so much for joining us today. it's a pleasure to have you here. thanks for being here. >> good. >> thank you. >> and please, folks, don't forget to head over to msnbc.com to check out michelle's latest piece on trump's shameless politicizati

strategy intelligence, diplomacy, the know how to achieve results, whether in the private sector, academia or government bureaucracies. knutson met the demand. so in a way, you're talking about someone who right for this moment. and that's what i want to get into now, because the moment where everything was falling apart by his own account, that's where we were. the pillars of our postwar foreign policy were failing and they had to go back and address some fundamental questions about the world in nsc 68. and i think someone like this who who was able to draw in all of these and therefore deal with fundamental elements of the world to speak. it was really seemed to me like a unique moment in american history. we ask ourselves today what led to the creation of successful grand strategy and how would you define the sort of what was being asked the people that dealt with this at the beginning, what were they bring into it? and in a way? i mean, to me, there's sort of a creative to this, to be fundamental questions, to have a diverse background with lots of experience, and then to in and just d