it's because acheson didn't put korea south korea in the defense perimeter. but if you look at other parts of the one of the things that he says is that the united has already made a significant investment and in trying to build south korea and and even you know in 1948, you have to korean states that represent influence of the cold war superpower. you have the united states try to build liberal in the south, even though it was not very liberal or very democratic in 1948. and of course, you have in the north. and so much like divided germany in europe, a lot of people, you know, americans think that people around the world are going to look at the korean peninsula and see it as sort of a showcase or a test where the relative merits of communism versus the free world are going to be to people all around the world. and so i think even in 1950 and so south korea was much more important to the united states and to policymakers in particular larger than is commonly. so so one thing that's interesting is if you go about the defense perimeters, right, where acheson

the turkish straits and undersecretary dean acheson and persuaded truman that if greece and turkey should give in to the demands of the soviets, this would endanger national security and itself. and so what what acheson said was we are the only we are the nation who have have funds and the resources to break up the soviet play. and so two months later i think it was i think it might have been march. and 1975, 79, 70, what is it, 1947, 1947, 1947, before a joint of congress, truman delivered probably the most consequential speech of his presidency. after explained the how to give the get the relief to greece and turkey, he held forth with what is called the truman doctrine and the doctrine. basically, he tied american national security to providing assistance to peoples wherever they democracies who are being threatened by autocratic regimes. and let me see if i can get the exact words used. he said in his speech, i believe that it must be the policy of the united states to support free peoples who are resisting subjugate and by autocratic regimes and ideologies. that was the truman doctri

the turkish straits and undersecretary dean acheson and persuaded truman that if greece and turkey should give in to the demands of the soviets, this would endanger national security and itself. and so what what acheson said was we are the only we are the nation who have have funds and the resources to break up the soviet play. and so two months later i think it was i think it might have been march. and 1975, 79, 70, what is it, 1947, 1947, 1947, before a joint of congress, truman delivered probably the most consequential speech of his presidency. after explained the how to give the get the relief to greece and turkey, he held forth with what is called the truman doctrine and the doctrine. basically, he tied american national security to providing assistance to peoples wherever they democracies who are being threatened by autocratic regimes. and let me see if i can get the exact words used. he said in his speech, i believe that it must be the policy of the united states to support free peoples who are resisting subjugate and by autocratic regimes and ideologies. that was the truman doctri

there was a recent report done by a lawyer, trevor acheson , and he looked at trevor acheson, and heg , both from a legal bbc reporting, both from a legal perspective and also used ai where they analysed, i think, over 9 million words since october. the seventh. and they found that the reporting by the bbc and particularly bbc arabic, was just about as bad as it gets. and the problem is the bbc management just do nothing about this. this is not new, mark. you know, the bbc were accused of being biased against israel over 20 years ago. they commissioned a report by one of their journalists, malcolm balen , and journalists, malcolm balen, and this report was done, as i say, 20 years ago, it's never seen the light of day . the bbc spent the light of day. the bbc spent half £1 million of legal fees to make sure that this report never sees the light of day. it's absolutely appalling. >> don't the bbc have an impossible job to do though this is a conflict. this is a war. there are two sides. there will be people watching the bbc's coverage who are pro—palestine , coverage who are pro—pales

that report is called the acheson report . it's made by the acheson report.businessman. it's been funded by israeli business people. it employs a range of people using ai employs a range of people using al to analyse program material. >> is the crucial bit there, though, roger? isn't it ? that's. though, roger? isn't it? that's. that's designed. the ai is designed to take out the argument that you have just made that essentially, i'm paraphrasing here because this man has vested interests with israel, that therefore there must be a problem, a human problem with this report. so that's why they used ai, isn't it? >> no no no in— >> no no no no. it? >> no no no no. because the way in which you use ai, >> no no no no. because the way in which you use al, or the way in which you use al, or the way in which you interpret the facts or evidence produced by ai is crucial. let me give you an example. big point in the report is that the reference to genocide is used far more about israel than any one else. well, thatis israel than any one else. well, that is because sou