good afternoon, commissioners adam barrett from the port of san francisco, as danielle mentioned. and if i could have the screen, please go into. i'm here today to speak about the sf waterfront flood study, which is a project of the waterfront resilience program and a collaboration between the city of san francisco and the us army corps of engineers with the port as lead agency. but we've been working very closely with all of our partner agencies, including planning mta public works, puc office of resilience and capital planning and others, so we've been working with the army corps over the last several years to develop, the coastal flood study, which is essentially analyzes the flood risk to san francisco from coastal flooding and future sea level rise along the san francisco waterfront for the seven and a half miles of the port jurisdiction taken from heron's head park in the south, all the way up to fisherman's wharf aquatic park in the north. and as danielle mentioned, we've just come to a major milestone in this plan, which is the release of the draft report and eis, which co

so i'm not going to go through the background because again, when adam barrett was here, he he presentede thing. but the draft plan and a bunch of the information for the flood study, it is a flood study with the army corps of engineers. and i think you can go ahead and say we're very early in the process. we have a conceptual idea of the plan, and that's what we have in the environmental impact statement. so i just want to highlight that we're very early in the process, and we are at a conceptual level. and a lot of work went into developing this plan. i'm not going to go into the background and into that so we can go forward, working with the army corps of engineers, we had the opportunity to look at community benefits and other social effects to develop our plan. and so historic resources and the historic districts were one of the considerations that we really got to look at when we were developing the plan. so i just wanted to highlight that as we were as we were developing the plan, all right, this slide here, this is the meat of why we're here, the draft integrated feasibility repo

adam liptak. so, who do you think had to apologize to her? >> well, i don't know what they were talking about, the recent incident, but that was a very striking statement that justice barrettlot in colorado and around the nation. so it comes in that context, what justice barrett gave, the party line, always collegial, never raise their voices in candor. i thought we had more coming from sonia sotomayor, saying certainly in their deliberations and certainly, some of the sharp things they wrote about each other in their opinions it can be crossing the line and can make for personal difficulties. >> amy coney barrett said this is a really transparent court, you understand their deliberations because you're able to read their decisions. but at the same time, she does acknowledge there is a lot out there that is not public that makes that the relationships that the justices have with each, so much to say how we live our lives in this country, it makes it all the more curious. what can you tell us, in your reporting, about what it's really like at the supreme court? >> i think it's very formal, very stylized, very ritualistic. as justice barrett said, it's like being in an arran