adam cohen of a consummate conductor thank you for being with counting the cost thank you having me first off you've got nearly breakable smartphone technology what is it and how did you come up with it so our mirage diamond glass technology is actually a lab grown men or crystal and diamond it has all of the material properties that you'd find in bulk diamond it's exceptional hardness it's exceedingly high thermal conductivity it's an exceptionally robust material it's chemically inert biologically inert as well as having the optics that you'd require from a display glass so we've married a very thin layer of nano diamond with display glass creating the world's first display technology for cell phone smartphone and consumer facing technologies how could it revolution is the smartphone industry and what other applications does it have so right now the glass that majority of smartphones use this chemically hardened alumina silicate glass was actually pioneered of the one nine hundred sixty s. not a lot has been done in terms of innovating that glass which is why every time we drop our phon

adam cohen of a consummate conductor thank you for being with counting the cost thank you having me first off you've got nearly breakable smartphone technology what is it and how did you come up with it so our mirage diamond glass technology is actually a lab grown men or crystal and diamond it has all of the material properties that you'd find in bulk diamond it's exceptional hardness it's exceedingly high thermal conductivity it's an exceptionally robust material it's chemically inert biologically inert as well as having the optics that you'd require from a display glass so we've married a very thin layer of nano diamond with display glass creating the world's first display technology for cell phone smartphone and consumer facing technologies how could it revolution is the smartphone industry and what other applications does it have so right now the glass that majority of smartphones use this chemically hardened alumina silicate glass was actually pioneered of the one nine hundred sixty s. not a lot has been done in terms of innovating that glass which is why every time we drop our phon

adam cohen of a consummate conductor thank you for being with counting the cost thank you having me first off you've got nearly breakable smartphone technology what is it and how did you come up with it so our mirage diamond glass technology is actually a lab grown men or crystal in diamond it has all of the material properties that you'd find in bulk diamond exceptional hardness it's exceedingly high thermal conductivity it's an exceptionally robust material it's chemically inert biologically inert as well as having the optics that you'd require from a display glass so we've married a very thin layer of nano diamond with display glass creating the world's first display technology for cell phone smartphone and consumer facing technologies how could it revolution is the smartphone industry and what other applications does it have so right now the glass that majority of smartphones use this chemically hardened alumina silicate glass was actually pioneered to the one nine hundred sixty s. not a lot has been done in terms innovating that glass which is why every time we drop our phone we see

adam cohen of a consummate conductor thank you for being with counting the cost thank you having me first off you've got nearly breakable smartphone technology what is it and how did you come up with it so our mirage diamond glass technology is actually a lab grown men or crystal in diamond it has all of the material properties that you'd find in bulk diamond exceptional hardness it's exceedingly high thermal conductivity it's an exceptionally robust material it's chemically inert biologically inert as well as having the optics that you'd require from a display glass so we've married a very thin layer of nano diamond with display glass creating the world's first display technology for cell phone smartphone and consumer facing technologies how could it revolution is the smartphone industry and what other applications does it have so right now the glass that majority of smartphones use this chemically hardened alumina silicate glass was actually pioneered to the one nine hundred sixty s. not a lot has been done in terms of innovating that glass which is why every time we drop our phone we s

adam cohen of a consummate conductor thank you for being with counting the cost thank you having me first off you've got nearly breakable smartphone technology what is it and how did you come up with it so our mirage diamond glass technology is actually a lab grown men or crystal and diamond it has all of the material properties that you'd find in bulk diamond it's exceptional hardness it's exceedingly high thermal conductivity it's an exceptionally robust material it's chemically inert biologically inert as well as having the optics that you'd require from a display glass so we've married a very thin layer of nano diamond with display glass creating the world's first display technology for cell phone smartphone and consumer facing technologies how could it revolution is the smartphone industry and what other applications does it have so right now the glass that majority of smartphones use this chemically hardened alumina silicate glass was actually pioneered of the one nine hundred sixty s. not a lot has been done in terms innovating that glass which is why every time we drop our phone w

michael cohen, adam schiff, and in the interest of transarensy, the transcripts of the closed testimony of michael cohen, the president's former lawyer, is now in jail, and he makes it very clear that he at least told the mueller team that the president's private attorney jay sekulow encouraged him to give false statements to congress about how long the russia project with the trump tower in moscow was going on during the campaign. >> absolutely. the reason that was important, of course, the president said he had no business in russia and therefore no reason to suspect that he had any interest in whether or not russia was intervening in the campaign or had interest hoot would win. we now know, of course, that he did pursue a project, that would have made hundreds of millions of dollars through june 2015, a delicates to win the republican nomination for president told congress that bid for building ended in january is a significant change, a significant, you know, difference in information. now, whether you can trust michael cohen is the other thing. jay sekulow and his people say, how c

after the democrats took control of the house, adam schiff brought michael cohen back to capitol hill. the question schiff has is whether or not these attorneys coached him to make those false statements. they've essentially denied that but also have resisted his efforts to get more information. schiff is threatening to subpoena. when i asked adam schiff whether or not this was an effort to breach attorney/client privilege as trump attorneys are suggesting, he pushed back. >> if there were others participating in that act of obstruction of justice, if there were others knowing that have false statement, participated in the drafting of that false statement, we need to know about it and expose it and deter other poom from coming before our committee and lying. >> schiff has a deadline at 3:00 p.m. this afternoon eastern to turn over documents related to the mueller probe. i asked him if any progress had been made. he said it's still too early to tell whether or not they will get compliance. and threat of holding bill barr in contempt by his committee if they do not get compliance. jim?

now, what adam schiff is asking for is more information about their effort to help michael cohen, beforeony. adam schiff alleging here that these attorneys coordinated, reviewed, shaped and edited that false testimony. he wants this information. now, the trump attorneys are pushing back. they are saying that this is a fishing expedition, and also, adam schiff could issue a subpoena. a committee official tells us that an area that they could pursue, but a new line of inquiry going forward and a new fight between the trump organization and the president's team and house democrats. jake? >> all right. manu raju on capitol hill, thank you so much. and as that potential subpoena fight looms, there is a major test in federal court today for the trump administration's stonewalling strategy of house democrats. a judge deciding whether president trump can sue to block a subpoena issued by the house oversight committee, demanding eight years of the president's financial records. cnn's sara murray joins me now live from the courthouse here in washington, d.c. and sara, what did the judge say to the

again, michael cohen, grain of salt, he's talking again in testimony with adam schiff and schiff saystestimony that whatever happened -- was done with the knowledge and authority of the president? and michael cohen says i believe so and this is all part of this discussion about how michael cohen is saying these were conversations that were done with the president included, according to michael cohen's version of events that were done essentially to shut down the investigation, you know, that he wanted the president, the president's lawyers, wanted apparently people like michael cohen to know, look, you're on the inside, you're still in the president's good graces, if you essentially don't cooperate, you'll get this pardon, there's nothing to worry about for you here. that's not how these things worked out, don, but again, michael cohen, grain of salt. >> everyone keeps saying grain of salt but again, as elie said this is a starting point and if jay sekulow knew the testimony was false, this is just the beginning point, where does the congress or anyone, investigators, go from here? >>

we will be getting more testimony from michael cohen next week because the chairman of the house intelligence committee adamchiff plans to release the transcript of the closed door testimony that michael cohen gave to the intelligence committee in march. former white house counsel don mcgahn is scheduled to testify tuesday of next week to the house judiciary committee. president trump is trying to block that testimony claiming executive privilege. the judiciary committee still expects don mcgahn to show up according to terms of his subpoena on tuesday morning. that could create a hearing in which don mcgahn answers some questions and refuses to answer some questions citing the president's executive privilege claim. but nothing in the president's executive privilege claim allows don mcgahn to simply ignore the house subpoena and not show up. and "the wall street journal" is reporting that negotiations for robert mueller's testimony to the house judiciary committee have been stalled partially because of executive privilege issues raised by president trump. "the wall street journal" reports legal questions on

february, michael cohen said that the trump lawyers helped edit the false testimony that he gave to congress in 2017 about a trump tower project in moscow. a may 3rd letter from chairman adam schiff to the trump family lawyers says, among other things, it appears that your clients may have reviewed, shaped and edited the false statement that cohen submitted to the committee, including causing the omission of material facts. in addition, certain of your clients may have engaged in discussions about potential pardons in an effort to deter one or more witnesses from cooperating with authorized investigations. chairman schiff is demanding documents from those lawyers in his investigation. today chairman schiff said this -- >> if there were others that were participating in that act of obstruction of justice, if there were others that were knowing of that false statement, participated in the drafting of that false statement, we need to know about it, we need to expose it and we need to deter other people from coming before our committee and lying. >> we're going to lead off our discussion tonight with some veterans of the senate judiciary committee who i am sure have never seen

that testimony was part of 600 pages of cohen's testimony that were released by the intelligence committee tonight. joining us now is chairman adamnk you very much for being here tonight, much appreciated. >> you bet. >> you released transcripts tonight of michael cohen appearing before your committee. why did you want those transcripts in the public record, and what do you think the public should understand about what he testified to and what he provided you in those hearings? >> i think it's important that the public get to see as much as they can of what these witnesses had to say. that's all the more important given that the trump administration is stonewalling on allowing witnesses like don mcgahn to testify in public. so where we have accessed information that we can provide the public we want to do it. here you can see why we are so concerned about these attorneys that were representing the president and ivanka trump and jared kushner and others, that they may have been involved in trying to get michael cohen to testify falsely before our committee. we want to find out were others involved in that false testimony. one of t

we'll be able to see exactly what michael cohen is alleging behind closed doors and exactly what adamf is trying to pursue as part of that investigation. two key developments, that and releasing the transcripts and also this move to hold the justice department and take some sort of enforcement action after the justice department did not turn over documents related to counterintelligence information as part of the mueller probe as schiff was demanding was part of his subpoena. wolf? >> stand by. i want to get back to the legal and political analysts. it looks like it's coming in >> it is, wonderful. i think one we're going to fine out the answer to soon where at least i hope we do is what chairman schiff means by enforcement action. congress has oversight power and article 2 of the constitution gives impeachment power. we are not there yet. the question is if he is talking about enforcement that could mean anything from a vote in the full house to censure someone to up and to and including the attorney general. it could mean actually taking a vote to hold someone in contempt. it's hard

cohen defies logic. well established law and common sense, house intelligence chairman adam schiff says he's consideringo subpoena trump lawyers who have rejected his committee's request for documents. >>> a republican congressman justin amash holding firm on his decision that president trump engaged in impeachable. hee -- impeachable conduct. here's what the president had to say. >> he's been a loser a long time. rarely votes for republicans, and you know, personally, i think he's not much. >> amash is not flinching. >> sir, what about president trump calling you a loser? >> okay. >> a primary opponent announced the issue after your speech about impeachment. >> yeah, it's not serious. >> amash, and president trump have been at odds in the past. the michigan congressman was the first republican to express support for an investigation into the 2016 election and russian interference. >> president trump's 2020 strategy is starting to take shape. he just wrapped up his fourth rally in 22 days and noticed the four states. pennsylvania last night along with michigan, wisconsin and florida. most experts believ

cohen in 2017. a senior committee so official telling cnn, chairman adam schiff is ready to subpoena if trump's attorneys do not provide documents and testimony. >> we need to deter other people from coming before our committee and lying. >> reporter: trump's lawyers arguing schiff's request is, quote, far afield from any proper legislative purpose. >> this all comes after we learned yesterday that attorney general william barr is working closely with the cia, dni, and the fbi into the origins of the russia probe. president trump said yesterday he did not direct william barr to work closely with the intelligence community. john? >> he did say he was proud that william barr was doing this. lauren fox, great to have you with us. thank you very much. >>> breaking news. we learned a short time ago the state department ordered all nonemergency american workers out of iraq. what's the new cause of concern? that's next. >> announcer: "new day" brought to you by sleep number. discover proven quality sleep. . it's a revolution in sleep. the sleep number 360 smart bed is on sale now during our memorial day sale. i

cohen was testifying, he said that changes were made to his statement. he specifically mentioned one of those attorneys. and we have a statement from adam schiff, the chairman of the house intelligence committee. and in that he said, we must determine how expansive. the obstruction effort was and whether others were involved beyond those who were indicted. the materials we are requesting in these letters go to the heart of that investigation and to congress' ability to conduct meaningful oversight. a source tells us that it's possible that adam schiff will move to subpoena these letters. others are pushing back saying they have to protect attorney/client privilege and we have a letter from one lawyer representing all four of those. he says, the house intelligence committee appears to seek a truly needless dispute, this one with private attorneys. as committed defense lawyers, we will respect the constitution and defend the attorney/client privilege, one of the oldest and most sacred privileges in the law. it appears that at this point, they're not going to comply with this. we'll see how strong schiff has to go on this, if he does seek

cohen alone without assistance, without encouragement would take it upon himself to mislead our committee about donald trump's pursuit of money and russia during the campaign. >> that was intelligence committee chairman adam schiff today speaking to reporters after news broke his committee demanded documents and testimony from jay sekulow. who were part of this joint defense agreement which michael cohen said was used for a criminal and corrupt purpose. >> now, those lawyers are being told to hand over documents and also to testify themselves. what we learned today is back in march those lawyers were told by the intelligence committee that they needed to hand over documents related to that alleged obstruction of justice, documents related to the drafting of michael cohen's false statement to congress. documents about the joint defense agreement. documents and communications about whether pardons were offered or discussed for ocohen or other witnesses. statements about the trump tower moskow project, tons of stuff. the document request itself is sort of stunning. even just the pardon part of it is amazing. i mean, these lawyers are being told, i'll just read you the pardon part of it, they're being told to

this closed door meeting with michael cohen in which michael cohen basically admits that he lied to congress. so i will read this. chairman adam statement about the trump tower moscow negotiations ending in january that was part of your original draft was false? and mr. sekulow, of course, the president's lawyer knew it was false? michael cohen says, yes, sir. what dunning comes out of that moment? >> well, what comes out of that moment and many others during that interview is that mr. sekulow and mr. lowell, attorneys for both the president and his children, were obstructing justice. they were clearly setting out a narrative that was false. they knew it was false. michael cohen said he talked to jay sekulow i think 10 or 15 times about his statement. he said in code, stay strong, stay on message, the president loves you. i mean, those are words that a mafia boss would say to someone who was doing their skirty work. >> i want to turn now to a much more personal matter and you shared on twitter the fact that you had an abortion and i want to read to you what you've just -- what you shared this week. you said #youknowme, i had a

what adam schiff is looking at is the extent to which they may have helped shape michael cohen's testimony. cohen, of course, guilty of providing false testimony to congress. >> peter, any word from the white house on this latest investigation? i'm guessing they don't like it. >> yeah, you can imagine they don't like it. we've reached out to the white house. have not heard any public comment on that. i think if it gets under the president's skin if he hears this likely on one of his favorite news sources across the street at fox news, we may hear from him. >> peter, we could be one of his favorite news sources. he could be watching. keep an eye on twitter. thank you both so much. >>> let's go overseas where worries about threats from iran have now prompted new warnings for americans working in iraq. the state department ordering their people to go home. our chief foreign correspondent richard engel joins me now. richard, walk me through this. was there something specific that triggered this? we know things are getting more tense but to say get out of the country, that's big. >> well, it's

and edited the false statement cohen submitted to the committee including causing the omission of material facts. the intelligence committee's chairman, representative adam schiff of california wrote to lawyers representing the four men in a may 3rd letter obtained by "the new york times." this seems like a very clear escalation of at least the house intel committee taking very seriously their oversight responsibilities. what happens next? >> they are throwing down the gauntlet. i agree with frank, this will all proceed to litigation. this one in particular will be litigation under the crime fraud exception. that is, they are not going to be looking to charge them but to say your attorney/client privilege, executive client privilege, it doesn't exist. it's vitiated because what you were doing was a crime. we're not charging you with a crime but you can't keep that material privileged. that's while you'll have to testify. likewise with trump jr. who suggested he's cooperating. notice he's studiously avoided saying anything since he gave the testimony that was probably false to congress. he'll now be on the hot seat and he's avoided all efforts but he'll b

cohen's false testimony to congress. as you may expect, the lawyers are none too pleased about this. here is how adam schiff is describing why he needs this information. he says we must determine how expansive the obstruction effort was and whether others were involved beyond those indicted. the material go to the heart of that i vest ganvestigation and congress's ability to conduct oversight. schiff is preparing to go so far to issue a subpoena. it does not look like they are willing to do so. there's a statement on behalf of all four of these gentlemen. this statement on their behalf says instead of addressing important intelligence needs, they appear to seek a truly needless dispute with private attorneys that would force them to violate privilege and ethical rules. we will respect the constitution and defend the attorney-client privilege. if this battle continues, it could be decided by a judge. >> there's another significant development and you're outside a federal courthouse watching this fight between the trump administration and democrats over a subpoena to try to access the president's perso

adam schiff. >> a close second. schiff is saying is he going after the president's lawyer abby lowell jared kushner's lawyer based on the word of michael cohenat i worry about don jr. if we use michael cohen testimony we will be going after everybody in america. richard burr is a wonderful fellow. my problem is not with richard burr. >> sean: i have a problem with richard burr. you and i differ here. >> i don't. >> sean: he spent 30 hours. now somebody that again, admitted to lying before congress, okay? >> right. >> then a criminal referral went forward by jim jordan and mark meadows about the second appearance. and so at this point, all right. i want to ask you this: so we are going to, in the days ahead. we are going to get the fisa applications. grassley, graham memo. bulk of the application is hillary bought and paid, unverified dossier which even the dossier's author doesn't stand by. then we will get the 302 meeting notes with ohr and christopher steele. then we are going to get the gang of 8 material which i understand is not really good about the fbi admitting things they did wrong. the fourth bracket we talk about are a series of e

cohen, and what the committee says is corroborating evidence, to conceal the extent of a trump proposal to build in moscow. the lawyers of the president, his daughter, ivanka, jared kushner, don junior, adamamong other things, it appears your clients reviewed, shaped, and edited false statements cohen submitted to the committee, including omission of material facts. clients may have engaged in discussions about potential pardons in an effort to deter one or more witnesses from cooperating with authorized investigations. a statement on behalf of the lawyers responded this way. quote, the house intelligence committee appears to seek a truly needless dispute that would force private attorneys to violate privileges and ethics rules. as committed lawyers, we will respect the constitution and defend the attorney/client privilege, one of the most sacred in the law. >> we have volume ii of the mueller report, opening up to schiff and others in congress, the idea of obstruction that bob mueller left over. volume i, he said there was no conspiracy between the russian government and trump campaign, but obstruction is an open question. >> we'll see months and months of exploration of this question. i

cohen. in terms of the politics of it, i would love to have him testify. i think he's afraid to. that's rudy giuliani talking. meanwhile democrats remain adamant in their call that mueller testify. they also want him to testify, even though mueller made clear he won't say anything beyond the contents of his report. here's the chairman of the house judiciary committee, new york congressman jerry nadler. >> we will have mr. mueller's testimony. i think it's very important that he testify before the american people, even if he doesn't say anything beyond what was said there. >> well, this comes as attorney general william barr tells cbs news that he didn't agree with the legal analysis in mueller's report. barr says that he intervened to apply what he called the right law when he decided to announce that the president had not obstructed justice. >> we analyzed the law and the facts, and a group of us spent a lot of time doing that and determined that both as a matter of law, many of the instances would not amount to obstruction. >> as a matter of law? >> as a matter of law. we didn't agree with the legal analysis -- a lot of the legal analysis in

adam schiff is threatening to subpoena to get information from these lawyers because of his concerns that the lawyers may have been involved in shaping testimony that ultimately turned out to be false, michael coheny ended up pleading guilty to lying to this very committee about the pursuit of the trump tower moscow project by the trump organization in the runup to the 2016 elections, schiff sent letter a letter that is has been rejected by those attorneys because they say this could breach attorney giant privilege. called this a fish expedition of sorts, when i asked adam schiff about whether or not he is breaching attorney/client privilege he pushed back. >> if there were others that were participating in that act of obstruction of justice, if there were others that were knowing of that false statement, participated in the drafting of that false statement, we need to know about it, we need to expose it and we need to deter other people from coming before our committee and lying. >> reporter: now, another big deadline looming this afternoon from the house intelligence committee that has issued a subpoena for the justice department to turn over counterintelligence information related to the muell

adam sandler to make saturday night live great again. one evening. i've got to ask you, politicians , not often funny sometimes they try and -- ed: accidentally funny. pete: they like to use props. here is steve cohenown up today and answered questions. he was afraid of nora mycin, an attorney general picked for his abilities would not be fearful of any other attorneys questioning him for 30 minutes. ed: he can't even pronounce cabbies you men. >> he knows the bit is failing and he's just shaking because he's dying on stage. what a horrible little prop act. like first of all isn't this guy from tennessee? shouldn't he have picked a product made in tennessee like jack daniels or something or like bill barr is drunk on power something like that? ed: [laughter] you're right. >> this whole fried chicken stunt was horrible. it's the perfect embodiment of a democrat policy. i guarantee the taxpayers paid for that chicken and then the government gets to eat it and then it didn't work. it was a failure. and right now they're like but we need more money for more chicken. we should try it again let's raise your taxes for more chickens. jedediah: we got another one for you from hillary clinton who never disap