distinguished people that say it is the most speech protected court ever and there are people like adam liptak of "the new york times" that say what is going on is the justice vote for the speakers they agree with and not the other way around. i think the book shows both of those positions are absolutely unattainable. let me begin and end with these paragraphs from the freedom of speech chapter and then take your questions. throughout the late 1960s the justice of the court spent a day each year in the basement watching porn together. it was fantastically awkward. unable to define obscenity but the first amendment couldn't possibly protect the unduly dangerous and more laker expressions. it is one scene at a time. the films range from scientific arguments are useargument to rad probable escapades of lesbian maniacs. justice marshal a civil rights hero to converse with pleasure in narrating the clips for the benefit of john harland the second coming and elegant former wall street lawyer who was by then losing his eyesight so marshal would basically say okay was happening now. the assistance tha