adam schiff, just standing here today i watched you ask him a question about whether we should move forward with impeachment. it's interesting because adam has a hard time with the truth. because adam said just a few days ago in his words, he is going to send the president back to the golden throne he came from. adam had made his mind up long before. he just didn't have the proof so he had to write his own story. you read his report, he only picks what he wants. he still does not have anything overwhelm, compelling, or bipartisan. but that does not stop him. from continuing to make items up. we watch where it's going to go tomorrow. we heard from doug collins. doug collins is the ranking member in that committee. the committee chairman is a congressman named nadler. nadler had to campaign for this position. it was a competitive race. so nadler wanted to lay out to all of america and especially to his colleagues why they should vote for him to become chairman. he said he would be the strongest member to lead a potential impeachment. this was the creation of their majority. that was their goa

did adam schiff break the law?ily think he broke the law although there is a very serious legal question as to whether or not he had authority to do what he did. undoubtedly i think if he did have authority to do this he dramatically abused his power. liz: the abuse of power is this, congress is supposed to be making laws, they have to have a legislative purpose according to supreme court to do what they do. and we don't see what the law is in the purpose and exposing people's phone record. critics say in a free society this must be shut down. of lo phone logs of devin nunes, rudy giuliani, john solomon, and the justification from california democrat saint eric swalwell is saying basically defending out of shift that if you're going to talk to criminal we cannot protect you. how does he even know anybody's a criminal. that's eric swalwell saying that. >> he does not. i think ranking member devin nunes, there's nothing that suggests anything improper at all, having looked at call records before, someone would have h

adam schiff once again had a closed meeting once again. congress looks divided, there is something that the speaker has said just this year that i think united's the entire nation. what she said, i think almost everybody agrees with. impeachment is so divisive that unless there is something so , overwhelming and bipartisan, i do not think we should go down the path because it divides the country. i imagine most everyone believes impeachment is divisive, but if we were to do it it would have to be overwhelming, compelling and bipartisan. three criteria to move what will happen this week. issues she laid have failed. there is nothing compelling, nothing overwhelming and the only bipartisan vote we have had is not to move forward with an impeachment inquiry, but that has not stopped them. in a venue that we cannot go to that is created solely for the intel committee. , theork is so sensitive intel committee has now been changed to the impeachment committee. watched you today i asked him a question on whether we should move forward on impeachm

so isn't this just adam schiff doubling down on his own lies? >> adam schiff has been caught. donald trump only committed one crime and one crime alone. he defeated hillary clinton. and adam schiff will do whatever he can to punish donald trump. but he chose the wrong president. it is adam schiff who is in legal jeopardy for all his illegal activities and contravention of the u.s. constitution. and that's why they ebb lost the independent. in october the independent were slightly in favor of impeachment. in december they are against it. what happened? oh, yes, the impeachment hearings. the democrats launched a -- a boomerang and it will take their heads off. gregg: adam schiff should be banished from congress. devastating fires burning across australia tonight. they follow weeks of drought, extreme heat, strong winds. the flames threatening australia's most populated areas. hundreds of homes have been destroyed with 300 million acres of bushland. john durham may be getting help from an obama-era intelligence official. hey and learn a skill's a wathat can save their life.un swi

this is the words of adam schiff. but you can wait, you can fight battles, you can try to get mick mulvaney and secretary pompeo and others to testify. but they are not choosing to do that. >> i think that's one of the most mystifying parts of all of this, especially with investor john bolton. they didn't even subpoena him had he would be possibly the most important witness and all of this. adam schiff said he did not want to get into a game of jump rope with him but there are clear issues of privilege between what a national security advisor says to a president and said the white house. it's the kind of thing that if the house is going to subpoena the national security advisor, it's probably going to go to court and a judge will have to decide and the house didn't even try. >> bret: i have heard, and this may be recent, but it is interesting to see adam schiff continue to bring up mick mulvaney for them to play during the hearing a video tape of mick mulvaney at the press conference with the acting white house chief

we are free to have them, adam schiff. the last time i checked. e first amendment was an is still in play. as kimberley strassel at the "wall street journal" points out, schiff's report means it's open season on the press. why stop at john solomon, adam schiff? this is a mccarthy witch hunt. he's doing a lot of people a lot of harm along the way. namely american citizens. it's clear this is the tip of the iceberg. the left is double down. in their frustrations they are promising to never give up. it's kind of pathetic they have become to this so-called cause and cause it is. >> there is no limit on the number of times the senate can vote to convict or not a president, no limit to the number of times the house can vote into peach a president. we are not going to end investigations because there may be a possible opportunity to do other things at a later time. trish: they can gene go and go. a former obama administration official tweeted out a similar sentiment. at what point does this become presidential harassment. plus over two years of our time w

adam schiff made up our conversation with the president of ukraine. if he didn't do that in the halls of congress, he would be thrown into jail! but he did it in the halls of congress, and he's given immunity. this is a person, he's a liar. >> laura: "the ingraham angle"'s impeachment article three: invasion of privacy. now, without a warrant, adam schiff obtained the phone records of americans, including the president's personal attorney and congressman devin nunes. >> they published the phone records of the president's personal lawyer, the phone records of a member of the press, and thes phone records of the chairman intelligent committee congressman nunes. to impeach the president 11 months before an election. >> be careful, you are under oath. >> i know i am under oath, sir. >> laura: "i know i am under oath, sir." we will talk with congressman nunes about this in a few moments. think about it. schiff's entire investigation was about how the president supposedly used his position of power to dig up dirt on a political opponent. but that is precise

this is a gross overreach by adam schiff, to say the word complicit here. one logs are just logs. the, schiff and democrats do not have the content of what was said on those phone calls? >> absolutely. they just have metadata shows there was contact between two phone numbers. doesn't tell us anything about the content t doesn't have any justification for why it could be related to something in the ukraine investigation. obviously the irony is not lost on most people that adam schiff is engaging in the same type of behavior he is allegedly investigating. liz: okay. here are the other reports. we know that the democrats issued a subpoena to at&t to get phone call logs from rudy giuliani, jay sekulow, john solomon a hill reporter, even omb officials, at&t, did release a statement saying required by law to provide this information. i want to move on to this. there is more credibility problems for adam schiff. the house intelligence report, basically says, it claims, that schiff first heard about the whistleblower on september 9th, when the complaint became publi

what's your reaction to donald trump saying that about adam schiff? and i think he got it exactly right. he said this is a projection. that's exactly what it is. he tells other people that they are what he is. it's a common enough mechanism in early childhood. and it's -- but as an adult using it all the time it's what we would call primitive. if donald trump were capable of giving a reasonable discussion of something he didn't agree with, he would make some sort of logical case. but he's unable to do that. he runs kind of a simple program in that way, so he tells you that other people are what he is being accused of and what he actually is. >> so in that sense, doctor, does that mean that his source material for what he is saying is almost always himself because that's the only source material he has? >> yes. everything is about him. as you pointed out he doesn't have actual knowledge so he just says what feels right to him. and especially what he thinks is in his personal interest. your other guest was pointing out that he is replacing america with h

that would be adam schiff, their leader. the report is chock-full of nothing but conspiracy theories, left-wing opinions, conjecture, hearsay witnesses, complaints about f donald trump's foreign policy by people who think they are more important than a duly-elected president, and a whole lot of outright lies. and, yeah, two quotes from george washington and alexander hamilton. they are even dragging them through the mud. this is not a serious document. in fact, the only clear piece of relevant, clear, hard evidence is testimony from their one direct witness. that guy right there, ambassador gordon sondland. according to the report, quote, i am reading, "on september 9th, sondland claimed the president answered an open question about what he wanted from ukraine with aned immediate denial. i want nothing. no quid pro quo. "uh, that is the only person under the federal rules of evidence, not the hearsay witnesses or opinion witnesses, that is the only guy that could be a real witness in a real court of law. the others, inadmiss

wenstrup who made the point to me earlier this evening it should be adam schiff send sitting in that witness chair defending his work product. the schiff report isn't the gospel we don't take it as an article of faith. we should be able to ask questions. when he wants to hide in the bunk err and take secret depositions then is he a special prosecutor. but when he produces his work, doesn't actually want to have to stand behind it. hunter biden should be in that witness chair. and by the way if adam schiff is going to be getting the phone logs of republicans like devin nunes. i want to see adam schiff's call logs. i want to see how many times he and members of his staff coordinated with the whistleblower and trump-hating lawyers and everyone trying to create a frenzy for a coup whe when we should be working on behalf of the interests of the american people. >> sean: well said both of you. thanks for what you do. we will be watching the talk show tomorrow. thank you both. house democrats now engaged in what is only a grand gross political stunt. not caring one bit about you, we the amer

adam schiff. in terms of the fisa abuse, we're going to get the report tomorrow. >> right. maria: michael horowitz testifies in front of your committee on wednesday. >> yes. maria: will we see there was exculpatory evidence held back from the fisa court in order to get a warrant to spy on carter page? >> we'll soon see. there's a pattern of where they've manipulated the evidence to get a warrant. they ignored strong signals that christopher steele, the author of the dossier, was biased against trump. they withheld information from the court about how the dossier was created. they never informed the court that it was paid for by the democratic party and christopher steele hated trump's guts. i'm looking for evidence of whether or not they manipulated the facts to get the warrant. and as to the counterintelligence investigation, why didn't they tell president trump that they suspected carter page of working with the russians? and if they didn't tell him, there's a reason. counterintelligence is desi

i do not know what to make of adam schiff. unless what you see is precisely what you get.ithout conscience. >> sometime ago he wrote a report, the mainstream media peddled it, the democrats. it and today we now know the inspector general has given it a failing grade. adam schiff told us there was no fisa abuse and told all the evidence was presented to the court and he said the dirty dossier, the political opposition research was not the central piece of evidence allowing our government on the trump campaign, all of those things are proven lies in a basic question, why would the american people believe a single thing adam schiff says going forward when he has a demonstrated history and getting caught lying which almost never happens about way of washington. lou: your exactly right very seldom have we seen documented evidence of demonstrating the sitting congressman is a liar. and he's 242. whereto we go from here. first of all i want to stipulate, this is an impeachment that will go nowhere if indeed it moves to a vote, it's a sad tragic farce. how do you work with these p

here is the debate, adam schiff claiming he was quote, unaware of fbi abuses of fisa court when adam who last year led the charge in attacking devin nunes when devin nunes spelled out the problem in his memos, the same problem that the doj watchdog found. that debate coming up. tment opportunities firsthand. like a biotech firm that engineers a patient's own cells to fight cancer. this is strategic investing. because your investments deserve the full story. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. (loud fan noise) (children playing) ♪ (music building) experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list sales event. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with zero down, zero due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment. male anchor: ...an update on the cat who captured our hearts. female anchor: how often should you clean your fridge? stay tuned to find out. male anchor: beats the odds at the box office to become a rare non-franchise hit. you can give help and hope to those in need. as a doctor, i agree with cdc guidance. i recommend topical pain relievers first... like

he had strong language from adam schiff. it sounded he went further calling adam schiff deranged. we'll have to go back and look at his list of schiff insults, to see if that advances it in any material way. the main new line of attack they have on these hearings is they're unpatriotic president the president is overseas. that's the line they've been pushing. the president mentioned i'm impeachment in all engagements. a lot of this is what's on the president's mind. a lot of this is the reporters drawing things out of it. we've had the third engagement and there have been a lot of questions of the president. he's in some cases cleaning things up, in some cases taking attacks back. in some places not repeating attacks. this morning he went after macron. to are the first half of the macron meeting, he pulled a few punches and then he went back and tried to gig macron again on the idea of isis fighters and suggested in front of cameras this was a politician's answer. a lot of answers for me. but a lot of questions posed to the president. >> let's turn to corey shock ki. both seemed to

[shouting] adam schiff getting booed, called a liar.ords even in tinseltown, even in tinseltown, hollywood california the fashion of liberal elitism

congressman nunez's message to adam schiff. adam schiff. we have t adam schiff.phie opened up a wormhole through time? (speaking japanese) where am i? (woman speaking french) are you crazy/nuts? cyclist: pip! pip! (woman speaking french) i'm here, look at me. it's completely your fault. (man speaking french) ok? it's me. it's my fault? no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on my car insurance with geico. (pterodactyl screech) believe it. geico could save you 15% or more on car insurance. 1 in 5 people you meet wear yeah. that many! but right now, is not the time to talk about it. so when you're ready, search 'my denture care'. poligrip and polident. fixed. fresh. and just between us. do seek out an open road.th an italian work of art. and definitely...don't do this. see everything you should never do with an alfa romeo. ...then experience everything you should on the road now. colon cancer screening for people 50 plus at average risk. some things are harder than you thought. and others are easier. like screening for colon cancer with me,

it is indictment that the things that adam schiff was saying.s an indictment of jim comey's leadership at the fbi. the biggest takeaway out there, maria, what the inspector general's findings clearly delineate, even if you concede, and i don't, even if you concede there was a predicate to start this, there was no predicate to continue a counterintelligence investigation against the president of the united states. they had to do it by making those false representations to the fisa court. maria: yeah. we'll speak to devin nunez shortly of course. you referred to the nunes memo back in 2018, february of 18, where he wrote out all of the misconduct that took place by that cabal of people. then schiff came out with that correcting the record memo which we know now was wrong, just flat-out wrong. you mentioned some of the wrongdoing. one of them we know from the michael horowitz report was altering of a document by a fbi lawyer. tell me about that. where are you expect accountability, congressman? >> well, as the inspector general's findings outline,

and also they suggested somehow maybe adam schiff should be a witness to this. heard adam schiff in his press conference say members of congress were complicit. not enough information at this point, i imagine he was talking about nunes. as you point out, he shows up all through this talking to giuliani, talking to lev parnas. do they wait for more information? something else that schiff said there was that there is this discussion about whether or not they wait for every fact. right? every witness to come forward. obviously, some witnesses, a lot of witnesses, from this without, is this matter urgent enough to just meev forward? and schiff feels it's urgent enough they don't necessarily have to wait on every fact. >> a risk what they're doing. worth noting. >> a risk to democrats? >> in terms of not waiting. there's clearly information they're not going to have. i mentioned before. they made their piece before they won't probably have it. a risk to rushing ahead and not following what has traditionally been a schedule for how you handle this kind of thing. i und

we are free to have them, adam schiff. the last time i checked. e first amendment was an is still in play. as kimberley strassel at the "wall street journal" points out, schiff's report means it's open season on the press. why stop at john solomon, adam schiff? this is a mccarthy witch hunt. he's doing a lot of people a lot of harm along the way. namely american citizens. it's clear this is the tip of the iceberg. the left is double down. in their frustrations they are promising to never give up. it's kind of pathetic they have become to this so-called cause and cause it is. >> there is no limit on the number of times the senate can vote to convict or not a president, no limit to the number of times the house can vote into peach a president. we are not going to end investigations because there may be a possible opportunity to do other things at a later time. trish: they can gene go and go. a former obama administration official tweeted out a similar sentiment. at what point does this become presidential harassment. plus over two years of our time w

congressman nunez's message to adam schiff.ope, struggles in the spider's web. with every attempt to free itself, it only becomes more entangled. unaware that an exhilarating escape is just within reach. defy the laws of human nature. at the season of audi sales event. and i like to question your i'm yoevery move.n law. like this left turn. it's the next one. you always drive this slow? how did you make someone i love? that must be why you're always so late. i do not speed. and that's saving me cash with drivewise. my son, he did say that you were the safe option. and that's the nicest thing you ever said to me. so get allstate. stop bossing. where good drivers save 40% for avoiding mayhem, like me. this is my son's favorite color, you should try it. [mayhem] you always drive like an old lady? [tina] you're an old lady. male anchor: ...an update on the cat who captured our hearts. female anchor: how often should you clean your fridge? stay tuned to find out. male anchor: beats the odds at the box office to become a rare non-fra

i'm happy to introduce the chairman of the intelligence committee, adam schiff. the president of the united states has been impeached. for now, it's the third time in history. the president of the united states should be tried in the question is now whether senator mcconnell will allow a fair trial in the senate. it's whether the majority leader will allow a trial that involves witnesses and testimony and documents, a trial that should be fair to the president, yes, but should be fair also to the american people. the american people want to hear from people like john bolton, the american people want to hear from people like mick mulvaney. the american people want to see within those documents that the president has been hiding at the state department in the office of management and budget, in the white house itself. we have done our duty here in the house. we have upheld the constitution. we have done as the framers would have us do when a president abuses his office and obstructs a coequal branch of government. the question now is will the senate uphold its duty

it was a complete sham dredged up by adam schiff. he failed with the russia hoax and he came up with this to distract america from the good things the president is doing. it's not a surprise after two weeks of hearing their star witnesses admit to not witnessing anything, this thing has tanked. and people are sick and tired of watching it. they want congress to get things done. they would love to have usmc sarks passed, and talk about infrastructure or drug pricing. you can see these democrats have no plan, no vision, no solution, and all they dock is attack this president. people -- all they can do is attack this president and people aren't paying attention to it. jean very when they are finished doing what they are doing, when it go does jerry nadler who hates donald trump and has for decades. now they will have the articles of impeachment. if they send it to the senate the question is what does mitch mcconnell do. i'm a fighter. i want a full-blown trial. as far as i am concerned the president can present witnesses and do all the

when you look at adam schiff who gets the records of devin nunes, he should've been put on new nurse in the telephone company should appoint somebody on notice and an awareness and lindsey graham says in the senate, adam schiff, this guy is always lying but that was getting the telephone logs, what were they going to tell him, they were going to tell a conversation they weren't wiretapped. but now lindsey graham says i'm not going to ask for anybody's record. part of america, that he is talking about that once their pound of flesh because they feel like they have been victimized over and over and we play by the markets of rules. >> we said so many times the republicans are too nice. can you imagine if the republicans releasing phone records of the member of press and their colleagues to devin nunes, it would be outraged from every other major media outlet in the country. but not when it's a conservative. we still have a formal pending for andy mccabe -- and we not have had any judge. this is why middle america is outraged because there's two different sets of rules, one if your trump

plus, stephen welcomes: congressman adam schiff. musical guest sharon van featuring jon batiste and stay human. and, now, live on tape from the ed sullivan theater in new york city, it's stephen colbert! ( band playing ) >> stephen: come on! hey! it's the holiday season, that's what it is! that's what it is! ( cheers and applause ) oh, my goodness! welcome one and all, ladies and gentlemen, children of all ages, to "the late show." i'm your host, stephen colbert. the big story continues to be donald trump's allergic reaction to the constitution. ( laughter ) tonight, i'll stab you with the epipen of fun in the latest installment of "don and the giant impeach." ( cheering ) >> i have the right to do whatever i want as president. >> stephen: today, the house judiciary committee debated whether to send two articles of impeachment to the house floor. but first, they spent hours proposing highly specific and asinine amendments. like one from florida congressman and human/hangover hybrid, matt gaetz. ( audience booing ) gaetz argued that

lou: kevin mccarthy telling reporters that perpetuating lies is nothing new for adam schiff. >> adam has a hard time with the truth. adam said just a few days ago in his words he is going to send the president back to the golden thrown -- throne he came from. adam made up his mind a long time ago. he didn't have the proof so he had to write his own story. lou: but his objective was to overthrow the president of the united states who the dimms deem unbeat panel at the polls. the impeachment report makes the argument president trump was acting on reasonable and valid concerns on corruption? ukraine in the republican report. and not in self-interest. as adam schiff and his band of radical dimms are alearning. the republicans write, the evidence shows president holds a deep-seated reasonable scepticism of ukraine based on its history of pervasive corruption. the president's initial hesitation to meet with president zelensky without thoughtful review is entirely prudent. the republicans took aim at the denial of the radical dimms that publicly available and i are refutable evidence shows

we should have had adam schiff here. we didn't get that opportunity. what i said in my closing is , we we are worried about are eroding the trust of people in our institutions. the people there are deeply concerned. they're not trusting the congress, the system of justice, they certainly don't trust this impeachment. we set a very dangerous precedent with this. you said at the end of the hearing you don't know what is next, what the course of action will be. would you encourage intelligence committee members on your side --that was the inclination of what nadler said they would have some sort of hearing? you bring a great question. is --here right now, there is a myth coming out. nobody knows what is going on. we are hearing there will be a judiciary presentation. we hear there is going to be an intel presentation. when adam schiff got in front of the mic and said i'm not testifying. if he's comparing himself to ken ther, why would he not be one to come testify instead of sending a staffer who is getting airtime to do that? the chairman would not commi

he wants to call a bunch of witnesses including adam schiff.l adam schiff to testify in front of the senate? do you have any evidence at your fingertips that the president has perhaps abused his office? >> well, yes, i do. but i'm no more a fact witness than you are. perhaps they should add you to the witness list. >> stephen: i would be honored. ( cheers and applause ) ready for my closeup. >> and some of the republican members have echoed the president's talk about well, we should get adam schiff to testify. it just goes to show, there is no bottom to the degree to which some of my colleagues will prostrate themselves to please the president. >> stephen: what happens when the camera's off? do they ever say, look, we know this is a huge problem but we just can't say that out loud? is there any of that going on backstage? >> there is. >> stephen: so what do you say to those people? >> well, i'll have to say -- >> stephen: do you always get this animated and angry? ( laughter ) >> i have to tell you, one of my favorite twitter responses to the h

so i think a lot of republicans would obviously love to have adam schiff come as a witness. adam schiff has really become a face of their anti-impeachment movement and has been used as a bit of a foil on the side of republicans, however, it's hard for me to imagine democrats really allowing that to move forward. you're hearing a lot of witnesses being floated from both sides, you know, especially from republicans. not only adam schiff, but joe and hunter biden as well, but i'm hesitant to say whether either of those scenarios will actually happen. >> since mitch mcconnell holds the keys to this senate trial, what do you think about the effort here by democrats and nancy pelosi of raising public sentiment to get those witnesses to testify? >> yeah, it's interesting in terms of nancy pelosi's strategy with, you know, getting these witnesses to testify, as well as delaying the articles of impeachment to go to the senate right now. remember, this comes just before the christmas holiday, so we know that congress won't be -- the senate won't be back until january 3rd, the house wo

does adam schiff want to testify? >> bill: i would doubt it. >> he should. he is a fact witness. >> bill: the letter says this, given no information regarding your plans, set arbitrary deadlines and demanded a response to create the false appearance of providing the president some rude meant tree process. also in the letter he leaves open the possibility to participate later in this process. >> we'll see where the process goes. >> bill: on what grounds will you say yes to participation? >> the judiciary committee has -- jerry nadler has been trying to impeach im, nancy pelosi was afraid to have him take over the proceeding and put it to adam schiff. he grew mushrooms in the dark, having these depositions if secret and for the whole world to see. in what process in a first world country centered on the rule of law do we have the equivalent of the judge, adam schiff, giving three to five minute long statements about the defendant, donald trump, who isn't present and can't have a lawyer present? in no regular court would that be appropriate. that would be objec

adam schiff spoke for the better part of 20 minutes there. kind of giving a closing argument like he did in the public hearings in the house committee and took a few questions. i want to bring in brett bear, the abe core of "special report." anything jump out that he just said here? >> a couple things. you're seeing the outlines of what chairman schiff and democrats in the majority believe are the articles of impeachment. that is bribery, abuse of power, contempt of congress and obstruction of justice. those four generally. and it will be up to the judiciary committee to put it together. the thing that jumped out is this explanation about why democrats have to move fast, move now. because chairman schiff said that they believe the president could do it again. saying reach out to other foreign entities to somehow affect the 2020 election. so they feel they're compelled to act now as opposed to wait for these key people to testify like mick mulvaney and secretary pompeo and rudy guliani. that would have to wind its way through the courts. schif

from adam schiff. i think he is a maniac. i think adam schiff is a deranged human being. i think he grew up with a complex for lots of reasons that are obvious. i think he is a very sick man and he lies. adam schiff made up my conversation with the president of ukraine. >> he is not the only one that says that adam schiff lies. kevin mccarthy said that too he has a long history of not telling the truth. you heard that soundbite of him saying i haven't made up my mind yet. really? steve: reserving judgment. brian: here is kevin mccarthy. >> the president is overseas defending our country and they're back home dividing our country. that's what's wrong with this. that's why this put is being presidential. and they are doing exactly what they always said they would do. for adam schiff to sit there and lie once again this that press conference not knowing how is he going to vote. a couple weeks ago he was in california speaking to all the of the democrats we are going to send him back to the golden throne.

[cheers and applause] >> and now adam schiff tries buffalo wings for the first time. >> can't believe you have never had buffalo wings before, adam. >> i'm a little suspicious. [laughter] >> just give them a try, but be careful. they are hot. [laughter] >> spicy. [laughter] >> i give up, man. you are so weird. >> in a court of law. [laughter] [cheers and applause] greg: how did this come about? what is it about adam schiff that makes him so unique? as you know, none of these are about politics at all. >> he's a very strange guy. he lives in an alternative kind of universe. greg: right. >> he sees the world his own way, which we're all encouraged to do. greg: right, exactly. >> i prepare for the role by wearing shoes that are two sizes too small. [laughter] >> then i spray lemon juice into my eyes and then we're off to the races. [laughter] >> simple. greg: i imagine you are being treated differently when you walk down the street. >> around fox news i am certainly. all they want to talk about is adam schiff. i'm getting e-mails every day. they are fantastic. i'm hearing the suggestions