. 0k, daniel pryor from the adam smith institute and seena i economy. 0k, daniel pryor from the i adamhe just has read for the duke of york's lawyers to get a copy of the settlement which is lawyers believe will nullify the civil sexual assault case against prince andrew, so the representative of prince andrew had argued at a previous hearing that the virginia guiffre... the lawyer of virginia guiffre... the lawyer of virginia guiffre... the lawyer of virginia guiffre was... her attorney believes this is irrelevant to the case of prince andrew. this all happened during the first pretrial hearing of the case last month, when previously prince andrew's lawyers said there had been a settlement agreement that the plaintiff had entered into in a prior action that releases the duke and others from any and all potential liability, so clearly his side believing that this sealed document is hugely important to the civil lawsuit which would in fact and it, but missed guiffre's side saying it does not make a difference. just to remind you, miss guiffre is suing prince andrew for elijah lee sexual

marc, the adam smith institute bears the name of a great economist who many conservatives revere and the last couple of centuries. they said of the prime minister's speech, bombastic, but vacuous and economically illiterate. is that a fair assessment? it is economically illiterate because what he wants to do is replace a model, an economic model, based on low wages, low productivity and massive emigration, by a future model based on high wages, based on high productivity, and also limited immigration, mostly skilled. you can't do that short—term or medium—term, and there's another problem. it a cultural problem. the young, british, unskilled workers don't want to do the job eu immigrants were doing, that is the fruit picker or the vegetable picker, the butchers or the driver, and to change that you need massive investment in training, infrastructure, and the government at the moment doesn't have lots of money. so at the moment it's voodoo econometrics. we heard the prime minister say supply chain problems are temporary. i noticed on friday he appointed a new adviser. a supply chain a

marc, the adam smith institute bears the name of a great economist who many conservatives revere and the last couple of centuries. they said at the prime minister's speech, bomb backed — bombastic, but vacuous and economically illiterate? is that a fair assessment? economically illiterate? is that a fairassessment? it economically illiterate? is that a fair assessment?— economically illiterate? is that a fair assessment? it is economically illiterate because _ fair assessment? it is economically illiterate because what _ fair assessment? it is economically illiterate because what he - fair assessment? it is economically illiterate because what he wants i fair assessment? it is economically illiterate because what he wants to | illiterate because what he wants to do is replace a model, an economic model, based on low wages, low productivity and massive emigration, by a future model based on high wages, based on high productivity, and also limited immigration, mostly skilled. you can't do that short—term or medium—term, and there's another problem. as a cultural problem. the young, bri

mark, the adam smith institute bears the name of a great economist who many conservatives revere anddone for the last couple of centuries. they said at the prime minister's speech, bomb backed vacuous and economic — — bombastic and economically illiterate. is that fair? ~ . economically illiterate. is that fair? ., ., ., ., , economically illiterate. is that fair? ., ., ., fair? what you want to do is replace a model based _ fair? what you want to do is replace a model based on low— fair? what you want to do is replace a model based on low wages. - fair? what you want to do is replace a model based on low wages. low. a model based on low wages. low productivity and massive immigration. by a future model based on high wages, high productivity and limited immigration. you can't do that short—term or medium—term. there's a lot of problem. the workers don't want to do the job that eu immigrants were doing. to change that, you need massive investment in training infrastructure, and the government infrastructure, and the government in the moment doesn't have lots of money. at the moment...

i'm joined byjohn macdonald, director of strategy at the adam smith institute.and more heavily taxed economy, which is having to be buoyed up by the huge spending spree and. i can hardly keep track of everything that has been announced. as the chancellor said, taxes are at the highest they have been in 70 years. it the highest they have been in 70 ears. , , , ~' the highest they have been in 70 ears. , , , ~ :, the highest they have been in 70 ears. , , , ~ ., ., years. it is very striking to hear that the chancellor _ years. it is very striking to hear that the chancellor has - years. it is very striking to hear that the chancellor has these i that the chancellor has these aspirations, we haven't had a chancellor who has balanced the books since gordon brown, of all people, who people think of as an enthusiastic spender? t people, who people think of as an enthusiastic spender?— people, who people think of as an enthusiastic spender? i think we are seeinr enthusiastic spender? i think we are seeing £150 — enthusiastic spender? i think we are seeing £150 billion