and you see at least federally there's the movement now after the adam walsh case that there really is no statute of limitation when's it comes to first-degree sex crimes against children. i think all the states are reviewing it, anderson. but the bottom line, i think the theory is memories fade, witnesses don't come forward, you don't want someone to be accused of something many, many, many years down the line. it's more difficult to defend oneself. but i really do think that the movement has been towards abolishing, really, statute of limitations when it comes to child sex crimes. and i think that's the right way to go. >> i actually think abolition would be too great a step. >> jeff. >> no, i mean there's a concern, fairness of if someone said to you, well, where were you on january 23rd, 1980? >> right. >> i mean, how would you go about proving -- >> but these are very different cases because children when they're abused, it's shrouded in secrecy, they're uncomfortable and they don't want to come forward. >> well, it's a difficult situation. obviously, there's the children's perspe