i know adam winkler has written today, but he has an op-ed in "the l.a.times," a very provocative thing to the more liberal people, no one will do it and then we will be valid the constitution. it's an interesting guy, but he might've been on it. >> michael, what decisions are you most concerned about? criticized as opposed or his decision, striking down an illinois law, which prohibited the carrying of a loaded weapon outside of the home. you call this a masterpiece of passive aggression that was previously criticized ms in future that might be challenged in the court, including market ammunition. what is the future going to look like and what are you concerned about? >> the post their opinions is interesting because he is the first to first and continuing those criticism from the opinion, good rehash them if they can't do anything about that and then i suggested further than it had to go. the illinois legislature has not rewritten its law so that there's a much more liberalized law in terms of carrying guns in illinois and when you lock into place of bu