his mission, find adam. if that was even his name. >> he reaches out on facebook, which means you have his facebook address, right? >> we do. >> you kind of know where he is. >> we know he's in somalia. >> right. >> we suspect he is using an alias, so the principle course of action tant is who is adam? and so to do that, we have to engage him directly through an under cover operation. >> under cover agent? >> correct? is he going to start getting in touch with adam? >> yes. >> that's where this man comes in. he's a canadian investigator who we've agreed to refer to by his cover name ak. >> right off the top, we want to acknowledge we are hiding your identity. we've changed your look. >> yes. >> that's because are you an under cover agent? >> correct. >> ak reached out to adam first by phone. the under cover agent told him he was a media consultant for amanda's family. amanda didn't know about ak or what he was doing. all she knew was adam's facebook messages had triggered some kind of investigation. >> i did

what role did adam schiff have to the whistleblower? what role did his staff have to the whistleblower? for one man to turn this country upside down, to have this vote today. our founding fathers warned about this in the federalist papers that a future congress at some point in time would base an impeachment, not on guilt or innocence, but rather on partisan politics. partisan politics. sadly today, in this chamber, their worst fears have been realized. i turn it over to lee zeldin from the house foreign affairs committee. mr. zeldin: in a way you could say congratulations to nancy pelosi and wanted a bipartisan vote on her impeachment inquiry resolution and got it. it was a bipartisan vote against her inquiry resolution. there are a number of other democrats who chose to vote the wrong way and should have voted no and won't be here to serve with us anymore with us come january 2021. nancy pelosi as the leader, has chosen to sacrifice a few of her own members. those members are going to lose for all of the right reasons. because as we h

yes-day believe adam schiff -- believe adam schiff has spent his entire time in congress, since the president as been in, trying to impeach him. i think he's already written the script. he auditioned the individuals in he's picking and and choosing them to come forward. would he have lied when he came and said he's a so concerned the administration is withholding the whistleblower, that he will whistleblower to come forward, that they wanted to move legislation on the lie to us then? now he doesn't want to bring the forward, s blower would -- whether to bring the whistleblower forward, i think adam a question for schiff. thank you, all, very much. >> the u.s. house of representatives will be back in noon eastern to start work on legislation extending charterrt-import bank's for 10 years. the bill also renames the bank agency. export finance the rule for debate on the bill include several unrelated measures. allowing the house of representatives to hire private attorneys to work on the impeachment inquiry. allow ther would congresswoman tulsi gabbard to offer a motion to discharge a esolution

this is what adam schiff does. his opening statement -- he made up a fictitious call transcript of july 25 because the real one does not have the bribery that he wants to allege. just like that make-believe , he asked thedy ambassador to respond. it would have been more responsible that if adam schiff wanted to ask that question, to allow the ambassador to read the entire tweet from a digest it and respond. outwould he cherry picked -- he loves to withhold key facts, he withholds information. he outright lies. and he cherry picks key facts. part ofcase, he took a a tweet. he never asked the ambassador about what president zelinski said about her. that is how he rolls. why is president trump putting out information and writing back -- fighting back? it is because adam schiff wants the american public to only have partial information. we have asked the ambassador about this. or nine hours. president trump is right to want to defend himself and ensure the other 97% of the story gets out there. because adam schiff is o

i think adam schiff has lied numerous times. i do not think adam schiff is fit to be in this position of running the intel committee, and that's only a decision by with one person, who could put them in there. yes, i believe adam schiff has spent his entire time in congress, since the president has been in, trying to impeach him. and i think he's already written the script. he auditioned the individuals in the basement, and he's picking and choosing them to come forward. why don't we take him at his own word? would he have lied when he came to us in america and said he's so concerned that the administration is withholding the whistleblower, that he will fight for this whistleblower to come forward, that they wanted to move legislation on the floor, did he lie to us then? now he doesn't want to bring the whistleblower forward, would that be a lie? i think that's a question for adam schiff. thank you all very much. announcer: live on friday, the house returns for work on the bill to reauthorize the u.s. export import bank for 10 y

where muzzled adam schiff. -- we are muzzled by adam schiff. when we are talking about impeachment, we are talking about impeachable offenses. you can disagree or agree with the tweet, but as we know, the democrats want to continue making this a political food fight. this is a very serious matter, this is a constitutional matter, not about tweets. reporter: [indiscernible] >> i agree with marie yovanovitch's testimony that she thinks it is good policy that the president of the u.s. can determine who serves as his ambassador. i agree with the president's ability to pick and choose who his ambassadors are and those voted on by the senate. reporter: [indiscernible] >> the president wants diplomatic position. that is the president's call. >> we have a new administration in ukraine that didn't have the same confidence in this ambassador. it was appropriate with all the diplomats we had to put someone in with a new regime in the ukraine that can actually work behalf,resident's the behalf of the american people. she testified a smear campaign against

twot now, as we're here, floors below us, in the bunker, adam schiff's bunker in the baseman, adam schiff is tearing up his parody. he's going to have to rewrite it. is that? well, we can't talk about it. they say the substance of the depositions. you, isn't it kind of curious that you don't know what's going on today with tim his deposition? why is it that you don't have the information, the opening statements? was alex vindman's boss. the ukraine aid was not even up by ukraine.d they did not say anything to us until just before it was released. and then it was released. as jim jordan pointed out, guess orderkraine had to do in to get that hold released? nothing. to releasehiff needs all the transcripts right now. crowd member: yes! [applause] ourn behalf of constituents, on behalf of the american public, for everyone misledpissed about being by adam schiff and his cohorts, theng in the bunker of capitol basement, using you to lie to our constituents, release transcripts! let's have a conversation about substance, because i'll tell you what, you lost the conversation process. you're losi

the final bell for nicola adams‘ career.e olympic champion retires from boxing at the age of 37. atalanta and red star belgrade lie in store for manchester city and spurs in the champions league. we'll assess their ambitions to reach the knockout stages. and the waltzing matildas. australia's women's football team are celebrating after securing equal pay with their male counterparts. thanks for your company. for the best part of a decade, nicola adams has been one of the faces of women's boxing both in great britain and around the world. a two—time olympic champion and three months ago, a world champion in the professional ranks. now she's stepped out of the ring for the last time. citing fears over losing her vision, she's called time on a boxing career. michael redford reflects on one of boxing's true pioneers. commentator: nicola adams of great britain has made sporting history! she is the first olympic boxing champion... it would have been easy to relax, career and ambition achieved, history made, yet this was just the b

adam -- guest: adam schiff and devin nunes. adam schiff will control how the hearing goes and he will have to operate within the bounds of the resolution that the house passed last month regarding the procedures. how manylly controls 45 minute rounds that he and devin nunes get, during which they are expected to yield much of their time to staff attorneys who are more effective questioners than lawmakers. host: we have not seen devin nunes come to the cameras while the closed-door depositions have been going on. what role do you think you will play? guest: he has become skeptical of the press. he used to talk to us all the time on the record on background and off the record. awadays, he has gone on certain network and tried to disparage the press and he does not trust us. that is his view. other republicans have filled the void like jim jordan and others eager to defend the president on camera. devin nunes has not been as eager to do that. host: jim jordan is the top republican on the house oversight committee has secured a pos

i think that's a question for adam schiff. thank you all very much. >> follow the house impeachment inquiry and the administration's response on c-span. unfiltered coverage live on tv, our radio app and online. watch primetime reairs on c-span or stream anytime on demand at c-span.org. watch impeachment. >> a look at president trump boarding air force one earlier this evening en route to louisiana for a campaign rally. his visit comes two days before voters head to the poll this is weekend to choose the state's next governor that race is between democratic incumbent john bell edward and republican businessman. we'll have live coverage of the rally from bossier city starting at 8:00 eastern. >> c-span's "washington journal," live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. coming up friday morning, michigan democratic congressman dan kildee discussing the latest on the house democrat's impeachment inquishry and author and syndicated columnist ann coulter talks about daca. impeachment. and campaign 2020. watch c-span'

natural ability mixed with raw determination saw adams accelerate.red the heart of a nation. she has brought women's boxing into a new era. she was the first definite female boxer and amateur boxer that captured people's hearts. they wanted to see her progression into what she had done and that was because she spoke well and she broke down a lot of the barriers and stereotypes that people have. adams was far from finished. golds at the commonwealth and european games. and the world championships followed before more history in rio. commentator: nicola adams lets out a triumphant roar having been crowned an olympic champion for the second successive time! adams becoming the first british boxer for 92 years to retain to retain an olympic title. her unprecedented achievements led her to buckingham palace. an mbe followed by an obe. still, she would not rest. with everything won at amateur level, she turned professional, five fights, five wins and a world flyweight title. her latest bout was a draw against maria salinas earlier this year. it would be her

schiffand i -- adam initially in september said he was adamant about hearing from the whistleblower, and it only change when it became clear there was coordination between democratic staff and the whistleblower, before the whistleblower complaint was issued. rep. jordan: let me say to other real quick things. first, i thought we were in the public stage of this so-called impeachment inquiry, the yet in a few minutes, we going back into the bunker in the basement of the capital for a deposition the american people will not get to see. what they also have not seen yet are four transcript of people who have already been deposed, which means under house rules, we cannot use that testimony in these proceedings. we would like to use parts of the testimony from mr. morrison, as an example, but we are riveted from house rules from doing that. when are we going to release those transcripts, so we can use them in the public hearings? this completely undercut anything you are trying to do in the hearings today? rep. stefanik: we are not here to talk about that, we are here to talk about it thes

adams was far from finished.l history in rio. commentator: nicola adams lets out a triumphant roar, having been crowned as olympic champion for the second successive time. adams becoming the first british boxer for 92 years to retain olympic title. an unprecedented achievement that led her to buckingham palace. an mbe followed by an obe. still, she wouldn't rest. with everything won at amateur level, she turned professional. 5fights, 5 wins and the world flyweight title. the latest bout was a fight against maria salinas. it turned out to be her last as her health took priority. about the injury in the first round of my last fight. i saw the doctors and did not think it was going to be anything too serious, but i could take the chance and risk and keep on boxing and nothing else happens to my eye which could be an unlucky punch and i could lose my sight. i'd achieved a lot in boxing, it was time to hang up the gloves and keep my side. the promoter frank warren added: adams grew up idolising the likes of muhammad a

this is an abject failure for adam schiff. [indiscernible] there was more reaction from members of congress on the sunday news programs. here is a look at some with members of the house intelligence committee and house speaker nancy pelosi. callingyou join me in on the state department to produce the mountain of evidence, notes, calendar entries, our committee has subpoenaed them. when you join me in calling on the state department to produce the evidence? >> you bet i do not think there is going to be anything that implicates the president. if you will join with me in calling to hear from the witness -- from the whistleblower. how can you impeach the president of the united states and never hear from the person who started the process? we know he was deeply involved. how can you say we do not need to hear from him? >>>> let me respond to that. thank you for calling on me to produce the evidence. i hope you will tweet that out so the white house gets the message there is a bipartisan call to stop resisting our subpoena. we hav

they made adam schiff not only a fact witness, but he's the judge, the jury, and the prosecutor. that is unheard of. and if you take what nancy pelosi, the speaker of the house said just last march, that impeachment is so divisive to this nation, unless it is more compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, we should not go forward. thursday's vote, the only bipartisan vote was not to move forward. never in our history has we ever proved through such a partisan impeachment movement. this is unheard of, and what they're trying to do, remember, what is today, november 3rd. we are exactly one year away from americans going to the polls to vote for the president. they're trying the change the outcome of 2016 and influence the next one. >> brennan: well, republicans will be able to ask questions of witnesses and call their own. who is it in the public hearings that republicans want the hear from? >> well, margaret, that's not true. if you read what the resolution says, now adam schiff controls the time, and new they have written it -- >> brennan: democrats are in the majority. that's

adam schiff, you said you want adam schiff to come down and testify under oath.s that mean what we hear from adam schiff needs public hearings he is not under oath he can say whatever he wants? >> yet he is not sworn in as a witness as we preside over these hearings or he presides over these hearings. much of what he he is saying to the american people is not true. i know it's not true and we know it is not true. we would like him to testify, i think congressman collins is going to ask for that when the house intelligence committee sent a report to the judiciary committee and i doubt that chairman nadler is going to allow that. i don't think they will allow that, they should and i think that's unfortunate. it's another reason why this will be dead on arrival in the senate including adam schiff will not be testifying. >> i'm going to speak with doug collins in just a few minutes and ask him about that pre-but it struck me because i guess that's what he can say we have not seen the whistleblower, we don't know who the whistleblower is and then a couple weeks later

german adam schiff is playing by his rules -- chairman adam schiff is playing by his rules and will not provide the president of fair process. we have not had a witness we requested outside of those that adam schiff has gone through his audition. we do not have a process where the president's own attorney can have a cross-examination. we do not have due process. despite all the advantage to adam schiff, he still cannot come up with a reason to impeach the president. i know it has been his goal and i know he has taken this country through a nightmare and i know he has continued to go -- to care for this so much that he is willing to lie on national television. do we all forget just a few short weeks ago that adam schiff went on national tv repeatedly making the claim that the intelligence committee would hear from the whistleblower, that he would stand up to the president to make sure the whistleblower came forward. we learned later that they met with the whistleblower and adam schiff decides the whistleblower should not come through. he claims not to know who this person is. he will sto

it's interesting you mention adam schiff conduct it.t's widely reported that adam shift ordered a witness not top answer a republican question. there is no authority for him to do that. david: wouldn't republicans have been within their rights if they had said that and asked the witness anyway and said sir you are forced to answer my question? >> i can't speak to what happened because we don't have the transcript. and in fact the new house resolution gives adam schiff the power use laterally to release edited transcripts on sensitive gnat matter. we won't have the transcript until he releases them rather than following regular order. so weave just don't know. david: it's preposterous if it wasn't so deadly serious. you just have to shake it off. but you can't. this is affecting our republic here. thank you for being sheer. president trump says he's drawing the most of energized support from in his fight against impeachment. we'll have all that and more right after a i've always been fascinated by what's next. and still going for my best

this, adam schiff initially in september said he is adamant about hearing from the whistle-blower. and only change when it became clear that there was coordination between democratic staff and the whistle-blower. before the whistle-blower complaint with issues. >> let me say two other quick things, first, i thought we were in the public stage of the so-called impeachment inquiry, but back we are going to the bunker for another deposition that the american people will not get to see. but they also have not seen at our four transcripts of people who have already been deposed. which means under house rules we cannot use that testimony in these proceedings. we would like to use parts of the testimony from mr. morrison as an example in the open hearings, but we are prohibited under house rules from doing that. so great question for you all to ask mr. schiff, when will he release those transcripts so that we can use that informati information? >> reporter: tenant that undercut anything you were trying to do in the hearing today? >> we are not here to talk about tweets. let me answer your

if adam schiff wants to keep this up.im answer some questions why he misrepresented the truth. let's put him on the stand if he wants to be judge and jury. david: jerry nadler and robert mueller came out with reports that didn't deliver the evidence adam schiff said existed forward whatever case he was making. therefore he wants the secret so he can keep everything from the american public. things might change with these public hearings? >> the problem itch with it is the fact that adam schiff still can dictate who comes on, who testifies, he completely interrupts any question he doesn't ask. there are 435 members of congress, 106 members are on the three committees that have been able to see the testimony. that leaves roughly 232 americans from hearing what they have should be able to hear. they are trying to drum something up that's not there. david: what about the reputation of adam schiff. i mentioned several times the lies he's been caught at. even "the washington post" has given him four pinnochios. won't that come

that means there was a nation ahead of time and i also highlighted the adam schiff was adamant from hearingthe whistleblower until he came out to the public to know that he according it ahead of time. the american people are smart enough to know this is been partisan and all of a sudden adam schiff wants to refuse to hear from the whistleblower. we need to hear from the whistleblower, he needs to be our witness and of course he should be protected from retaliation or firing but this is what started off the entire appeasement process which is taken up two months of work in the intelligence committee. >> lindsey graham was here couple weeks ago and said this is dead on arrival when it reaches the senate unless he could question the one person who brought the charges forth and that's the whistleblower. walk us through what's taken place the last two weeks, tell us about the case you have made and the democrats have made in terms of the president doing something wrong. >> it's longer than two weeks, prior to this we had two months of closer deposition where there was no press, no public and i r

that's run by adam schiff and the democratic counsel. the minority gets 45 minutes. same amount of time. run by nunes or the republican counsel. under the rules they are not allowed to let any of the other committee members take any time of that 45-minute slot. the other committee members will get five minutes each. they'll get five-minute rounds. that's next after this break. emily, go ahead. caller: well, i definitely think -- i forget which one of the earlier callers, trump seemed frustrated. it seems like they are pushing goal posts back or trying to down play these events that took place. it's definitely called into question the integrity here that trump's had. i think -- that's all i have to say. host: emily, before you go? are you still there? caller: sure. host: how do you respond to republicans pointing to part of the testimony today where gordon sondland is asked, did the president -- did you have a conversation with the president where he said, he conditioned the meeting, the aid on these investigations and gord beyond sondland says no. he did not directly

remember that adam schiff started this all by wanting the whistleblower to testify and now adam schiffs to died who comes forward and now fighting the whistleblower from coming forward, why is he doing that, is it because he found out that the staff met with him and the whistleblower's attorney tweeted that the coup had started, that impeachment will follow ultimately that he predicted attorney, that cnn will play a key role, maria, it is clear now more than ever this is a calculating coup and it is being orchestrated by adam schiff, we are watching him orchestrate a takedown of a president after we just celebrated 30 years of taking down the berlin wall. maria: unbelievable and, you know, congressman, i think one of the reasons that you're seeing them want to go really fast on this is because they want to try to get this done before the americans go to the polls and actually make their choice for the president in 2020. so tell me about the timing here and what you're expecting in terms of next week, this upcoming week's hearings and when this will actually go for a vote to impeach the

it's interesting you mention adam schiff conduct it.s widely reported that adam shift ordered a witness not top answer a republican question. there is no authority for him to do that. david: wouldn't republicans have been within their rights if they had said that and asked the witness anyway and said sir you are forced to answer my question? >> i can't speak to what happened because we don't have the transcript. and in fact the new house resolution gives adam schiff the power use laterally to release edited transcripts on sensitive gnat matter. we won't have the transcript until he releases them rather than following regular order. so weave just don't know. david: it's preposterous if it wasn't so deadly serious. you just have to shake it off. but you can't. this is affecting our republic here. thank you for being sheer. president trump says he's drawing the most of energized support from in his fight against impeachment. we'll have all that and more right after a sometimes your small screen is your big screen. and with the xfinity stre

adam schiff who was a prosecutor.er jail now because of adam schiff, the man who lies the most on capitol hill should have their cases reexamined. he doesn't have to have the president's counsel in chamber when he does these hearings. he does haven't to release all the transcript. this is a show trial. adam schiff is rebuilding socialist show trials here in america. he's championing the anonymity for the faux whistleblower. there is a narrow provision that says the inspector general can release the name or withhold the name. but that applies to nobody else. this is such a myth that he's entitled to anonymity. adam schiff started all of this and he's trying to hide with anonymity, this whistleblower doesn't qualify as a whistleblower to conceal schiff's own machinations in creating all of this. in the end do you think the whistleblower will be forced to testify as a fact witness? >> noting to mention, adam schiff. >> the question is where is lindsey graham. hashtag where's hunter biden. but i want to see the hashtag wh

today, you saw an even bigger hole blown inside of adam schiff's fairytale story. one day it was quid pro quo. then he changed it to the word extortion. then he changed it to bribery. today was a sobering reminder of how this ridiculous this impeachment charade is and how ridiculous the impeachment attack is on the president of the united states. today was a great day for republicans and up terrible day for the democrats and the resistance. tellld love to be able to you every single question that was asked and every answer that was given. if we can get adam schiff to give us permission to tell you that, we can talk about every single last and that happens behind these closed doors. back inare, supposedly the open phase of this hearing yet we are here on a saturday, you all are here on a saturday and it is now very late in the day where we are inside the most secure room of the capital in wheresement unfortunately, all the questions that got asked and all of the answers given you could not watch live. my constituents could not watch live. when you are asking that mo

adam: we have made a lot of progress.here are a couple of big policy challenges and the wall is the biggest one. president of the white house republicans want to keep their ability to transfer money out of the dod for the wall. there seems to be no moving off of that. vonnie: this has been a sticking point for months and you have known this. at what point -- adam: i am getting to that. we can live with that. basically they have decided they will negotiate that as part of the larger appropriations process. i have problems with that from a policy standpoint. it comes down to two issues -- space force, which the president wants and my caucus is concerned about, and paid family leave. this is something we supported in the house bill. quite honestly, in the white house is with me on this, we can do the space force and paid family leave and we are done. we have a bill. skinny he is saying the bill is a no go. adam: it is an impossible thing to work and it does not have the space force at all, which is part of the reason it is a

of this in adam schiff, initially in september said he was adamant about hearing from the whistleblower and it only change when it became clear there was coordination between democratic staff in the whistleblower. before that it was issued. >> to other quick things. first i thought we are the public stage, of his so-called impeachment inquiry. we hear just a few minutes, one back to the buffer in the baseman of the capital for another deposition that the market people will get to see. and what they also haven't seen yet, our full transcripts of people who have already been deposed. which means on house rules, we cannot use that testimony in these proceedings. we would like to use parts of the testimony from mr. morrison as an example in the open hearings but we are prohibited on house rules from doing that. so my question for you all that as mr. shift when is he going to read their transfers we can actually use that information in the public here. >> did not completely undercut anything where trying to do at the hearing today. >> were not we are not here to talk about the brief. let me

they're crazy, adam schiff is a nutjob. listen to this. adam schiff gets up before congress and he made up my statement. brian: right. >> who made that statement? he made it up. then after he got caught, three days later he started saying parody. the thing i did that was right, brian, the thing i did that was right, i released the transcript of the call immediately. had i not done that, i would have had a big problem. a big problem because they all lied about my call. my call was perfect. if you heard adam schiff's made-up version of my call, i mean it was the worst thing i

this was a real court of law and not adam schiff's kangaroo court.bjections would have been flying from any reasonable attorney. to say hey we've just discovered staffer of mine overheard a conversation the a staffer was having about the president in a restaurant. reporter: democrats as you pointed out remain convinced the president's conduct in that conversation with ukraine's president amounts to high crimes and misdemeanors. so for them it's full steam ahead. tomorrow wee continue with the impeachment inquiry. marie yovanovich will be back on the hill. keep' and watch for volker and sondland. the president's legal team filed a petition with the supreme court seek something overturn a second circuit decision that would allow the new york district attorney to get years of the president's taxes. all this is happening as we get ready for another rally in louisiana. lou: kevin corke from washington. the radical left today trying their dandersest to sell their -- their darnedest to spin yesterday's impeachment' inquiry as a dud. in her news conference s

this has been adam schiff's playbook from day one. adam, did you write this? adam, were you involved in writing this? because adam needs to be a witness, too. we want to know all about -- we know he's a liar. but we need to put them under oath under penalty of perjury. when you go through this complaint, you can see this with adam schiff's playbook from day one, page after page after page. you know what this was? this was a shadowy exercise by schiff, his staff, this whistle-blower, the lawyers, and the democrats to bring on the president. >> sean: the great one mark levin. his new show, his new spot, 8:00 p.m., sunday night. joining us now, fox news correspondent at large geraldo rivera, author of the best seller "exonerated, fox news contributor dan bongino. i don't know how you guys talk that but h he is right. all that is true. he's been a disaster, geraldo, for the democrats. >> it has been but i think it's the b story tonight. he's great, eloquent, and passionate. but if it is true, that they have an fbi agent who has altered documents supporting the fis

adam schiff put a former u.s. attorney and an msnbc contributor daniel goldman in charge of questioning impeachment witnesses. here's just one of his small utterances as a cable news talking head. >> legally we already now know that the president has committed a felony in order to obtain the office of the presidency.el >> laura: that was his first bite of the apple in january 2018. that was all about mueller. this is the kind of guy who is getting to the facts that have already been concluded. >> wow! what is concerning is the american people ought to get i concerned. the democrats are willing to put up people who already made upts their mind in positions where they present themselves as arbiters of truth and fairness and the facts. he already made up his mind.s. the democrats know where they want to be. t they just need to get there. when you getet to this point, te founding fathers warned us about they want the executive fearful of a congress that would take political moves to remove him from office. >> laura: n

why would we be surprised biabout adam schiff doing -- about adam schiff doing this?he did exactly what he's accusing the president of by collaborating with people from russia that we have posing as ukrainian on a telephone call about dirt and trump. then he comes in fronts of the american people and lies about what the president said on the telephone call. then he says he doesn't know anything about the whistleblower. so of course we expect it from adam schiff, year used to it. he just made things up. lou there are is within this something of an explanation for his conduct. but some context that we should attach here. and that is, the ambassador to the european union, sondland, acknowledging that his family is being threatened, the left is attacking him everywhere it can web's from oregon, his hotel is there apparently being boy cod. demonstrators are trying to intimidate this man. when adam schiff stood there and talked about how he was going to be the great defender of ambassador yovanovich, he didn't say a word about defending sondland at all. even though he is ob

what was his reaction to that. >> having adam schiff be in charge of it. he's an admitted liar.e has been orchestrating this whole thing behind closed doors. it occurred to me the real crime here honestly is against the american people and the democrats are refusing to work on behalf of them. we had amazing jobs numbers just announced because of president trump and his economic policies. we just had the for under and leader of isis killed because this president is committed to keep our country safe. he's built up our military. the real crime is being perpetrated by the democrats and they are not doing anything. they are not working, just yelling the word impeachment. judge jeanine: the jobs numbers for october were higher than expected. it's all good, obviously. but let me ask you this. there was talk about the fireside chat. i was fascinated by that. only one hand i said if adam schiff in congress can literally lie in congress about what the transcript said, the president could do the same thing. but the president does haven't to lie because the transcript is perfectly legal an

the president is taking aim at nancy pelosi, adam schiff and the dems.hat is the white house plan? hogan gidley is standing by. [♪] judge jeanine: president trump continues to slam the democrats' ridiculous impeachment hoax. tweeting, i recommend nervous nancy pelosi who backed up schiff's lie, shifty adam shiver, sleevey joe biden, the whistleblower, the second whistleblower who also disappeared and the i.g. be part of the list. joining me with more, white house presents deputy press secretary hogan gidley. what do you think the chances are of shifty adam schiff saying let's make them part of the list. >> probably zero. the fact that the media is giving any credence or credibility to adam schiff and nancy pelosi at this point is absolutely ridiculous. they lied about collusion and kavanaugh. they lied about a cover-up. adam schiff lied about a bissell blower. he lied to congress and the american people. when he read his own demeanted and deranged words and tried to pass them off as the president of the united states. it's insane what this man has done a