— question of august 2020 by claire adamson that, _ question of august 2020 by claire adamson that, atuld it not i adviser on one ground. should it not 'ust adviser on one ground. should it not just be _ adviser on one ground. should it not just be the _ adviser on one ground. should it not just be the case _ adviser on one ground. should it not just be the case that, _ adviser on one ground. should it not just be the case that, as— adviser on one ground. should it not just be the case that, as a _ adviser on one ground. should it not just be the case that, as a matter. just be the case that, as a matter of course, — just be the case that, as a matter of course, as— just be the case that, as a matter of course, as a— just be the case that, as a matter of course, as a matter _ just be the case that, as a matter of course, as a matter of - just be the case that, as a matter of course, as a matter of routinei of course, as a matter of routine policy, _ of course, as a matter of routine policy, in — of course, as a matter of routine policy. in fact, _ of course, as a matter of routine poli