the exact same ads that are on t.v. or in any other media, that would require disclosure of who is behind them, are not regulated when they appear on the internet. the only permissible ads that require disclosure of who is behind them on the internet, are express advocacy ads that are purchased for a fee on someone else's website. pretty much everything else is not subjected to regulation. and the problem with that of course, is that many of these ads are promulgated through bots or other ways of spreading them and they cost a lot of money to produce. but it does not matter, they are identical to other ads but they are totally unregulated. and then, there is also the requirements were disclaimers. and disclaimers are kind of like stand by your ad, you have to have it on the face of the ad. ... >> or in a mall i like or small item exemptions with the campaign or a whether or not the that so it is cannot do it. jean and there will be potential theory making so hopefully there will be is now in the bowl. that is a positive

what's happening is people don't want to be interrupted by ads and oftentimes terrible ads. that's why ad blockers use them. >> does that mean we'll have to start paying subscriptions for anything and everything. >> most's income's become frozen for a decade advertising becoming a lifeline for media, all media >> your book is called frenemies. who are the friends and how do you think it all works out will it be more casualties >> i think the reason i call them frenemies is increasingly the networks are ad agencies bypassing the agency the big zegest is the public they are repelling against it not just with ad blockers but by skipping ads when day record programs more than half of the people do that by saying stop interrupts. then what the advertising does is we have to reach them not just with ads but with targeted ads. we'll give you information that may help you or whatever then you say wait a second how do you know so much about me >> is it's a tradeoff they now have a thing where they cannot collect your data or cookies thls you choose as a consumer to opt in in the u.s.

>> now those are both heartfelt biographic ads. another candidate may have overdone it by trying to break through with a little movie reference, a little top gun fantasy fiction. ♪ ♪ planned parenthood and obamacare you voted against, you lost that centrist feeling, because you've been right wing appealing ♪ >> no spoilers, but the voters will get to decide if that works. and now we've saved the most bizarre for last. this is a colorado democrat who decided to pepper spray himself on camera in this literally painful ad. >> this will stop anyone in their tracks. it's incredibly painful. for less than $1 per person in the u.s., we could have a secured canister of pepper spray in every classroom in america. >> we checked, and that candidate told us he stands by the ad. the idea was to show an alternative to guns in schools. but if your ad displays questionable judgment, the voters could grade you down. the comedy hosts desus and mere row. >> homies maced and waterboarded himself in order to get your vote? all right. >> damn, he took t

and this is what facebook is telling us about the ads so it says we will be rolling out a video ads gradually and thoughtfully and that means they'll be shown to a select number of users not to everybody and then slowly they will also be appearing on other people's messenger apps and then facebook says people that use messenger each month are a top priority and they will remain in control of their experience now this word control it sounds like people will be able to maybe skip ads or to hide them but that is not the case facebook says that people will only be able to say what ads they would like to see and they can also reports offensive ads or ads that go against the regularities of facebook and this one of the ads look like. well what we know is that there will be a rather short video saw less than fifteen seconds that is what facebook is advising they will be on auto play so every time you scroll through a feed or through messages you will just see an ad pop up and start playing and you probably won't be able to skip and their ads are the videos will appear in the middle of your

and these were ads on facebook? facebook, we did them on twitter, google search, other platforms. facebook was the 500-pound gorilla, 80% of the budget kind of thing. >> stahl: facebook's advertising technology helped president obama in 2012, but today facebook offers something far more precise and sophisticated. while the president tweeted in the past that "facebook was always anti-trump," parscale relied heavily on the company-- particularly on its cutting-edge targeting tools. one of the best things facebook did for you, i heard, was penetrate the rural vote. is that correct? >> parscale: yeah. so facebook now lets you get to places, and places possibly that you would never go with tv ads. now i can find, you know, 15 people in the florida panhandle that i would never buy a tv commercial for. and we took opportunities that i think the other side didn't. >> stahl: like what? >> parscale: well, we had our-- their staff embedded inside our offices. >> stahl: what? >> parscale: yeah. facebook employees would show up

your ad so 20% of americans, one-third of western europeans use something called ad blockers to block ads. >> yet programs such as this one and many others on network television and the like depend on them, right? what will happen in five years from now to the kind of program we're watching on tv right now. >> well, $64,000 question. the reason i wrote this book, i don't see this as the book about just the advertising chemistry. i see it as a book about an industry that subsidized the media and without that subsidy much of the media will continue to die in a much more accelerated rate. >> so let's play delight devil's a advocate. the story of the demise of the media as we know it has been told over and over again and yet we're still flourishing and i would say and many say and you probably have written about it, too, in the post-trump era is flourishing even more. how do you square that circle? >> i don't think it is flourishing. i would challenge the assumption or conclusion that it's flourishing. newspapers are dying. you could argue that the "new york times" is strong today and you

somebody is going to put up an ad, a covered, unlicensed facility posts an ad in los angeles county, and how many languages must they print the disclosure, the disclaimer? >> it would be 13. and it would be -- if a plaintiff showed standing and made a record of the kind of ad that they used to run and that it would be impossible to run it that way, it would be unconstitutional. but that requires actual standing -- >> what kind of an ad, if it's -- what kind of an ad would, as to what type of ad would that not be unconstitutional? >> well, your honor, there's nothing in the record about what ads these plaintiffs do, in fact, run. so we don't know. we do know this doesn't apply to tv and radio ads, for instance. i want the make sure, if i may, to address -- >> so you want me to have a remand for them to tell the court what a billboard is? because i don't know that? >> your honor -- >> there's a lot of things we don't know, but i think we know what a billboard is. >> we don't know what ads these petitioners or nifla's members run, it's not in the complaint. and the court was not -- and

and so they can't even vote with their feet and look at some different ads. so i think that's the sense in which they are related. and then we have to consider if we want to fix those problems, what can we fix with competition policy and what do we need other regulatory tools to address. >> so we talked about how you agreed that microsoft is relevant today. and i'm curious you think whether microsoft time bun link leverage, i asked this of the last panel, working with the tools if you had to rank what the europeans refer to as gafa, google, amusan, facebook, apple, who is the most exposed on microsoft theories today, who is most exposed if you were in charge of making these decisions and prioritizing them according to rank, which would you put first, second, so on. >> that's too hard. i can't answer that one. i mean, partly in order to answer that well, you would like to have a lot of confidential information. you would like to have more information about contracts between these platforms and their users and suppliers. both sides of the market or all sides of

they say is all the information about political ads, if you're getting all of the ads that were intendedence the the shapinof policy. how do you know you're getting all the issue ads that were targeted to residents of the state? what is the scope of this old law and is it sufficient to really protect consumers and protect democracy in the digital era? >> the scope of our law is broad to such a degree, even though facebook and the internet and google weren't even contemplated as you can imagine decades ago when the law was created it was written in such a broad way it would encompass new technologies like facebook and google, new platforms to reach voters. that's a good thing but the law is broad enough to encompass that. >> unless you can see every ad specifically targeted to people within washington state, that say isn't for a product, how can you know that you're getting all of the ads that are meant to influee politics or policy >> well, any law requires, right, the target in this case, individual entity complying with it, must make that information public ave the y my offi to subpoen

and you can also tell facebook what kinds of ads you would like to see ok joy what do these ads look like. well they are pretty short videos up to fifteen seconds that is what facebook is suggesting they will be auto place every time you come across it on your inbox then the video will play automatically you can click it away it will just continue playing and also it will appear in your inbox so where you have your chats that is where these video ads will appear at a locus something like this so you have the people that you're talking to a messenger and then suddenly there you have an ad that tells you that you can buy clothing and if you click on that ads then it will take you to that on a line in the store and of course leyla facebook knows a lot about the use that it has about its users to really target them with ads that have to do with their age or with where they live and also with their gender how are people reacting to this changeless well of people already hating it although just very few people are seeing these ads starting from today i word that i hear lots of people say i

we're not adding sugar. sugar isn't added to maple syrup and to honey. if you put added sugar on the label, it will make the consumer think this isn't a pure product and it will undo 50 years of effort to make the public understand the difference between a pure maple syrup and pure honey and something that is -- may indeed have some added ingredients. mary anneny, by the way, mary anne's husband is the guy pping the tree i showed you a minute ago. she's a state legislator in maine and is also a maple producer. she's in washington this week spreading the word about this issue. and i just want to add my voice to it because this would have a significant impact on these industries nationwide. and these are important businesses. in maine maple syrup is a $20 million a year business. now, i have to admit that one day years ago when i was the governor of maine, we used to tap a maple tree in the front yard of the governor's residence every year. and so it was a ceremonial event. the press was there. i went out one year to tap that tee, nailed one of these guys

it's ade, and it's the fed. every time -- remember, in the short-term, the market is driven m the algori on the floor, and they read trade tension or fed chairman owell thinks the economy is robust and they translate that in the short-termou i want to ege your viewers to be focused on the long-term and to use this as opportunity to buy high quality companies for t next three to ve years. not for the next three to five months. >> what are you looking at when you are lking for a high quality company? >> yeah. the industry leaders are a great place to start. if you can have -- if you can get the oppornity to buy stocks like federal express and home depot and amge i inealth care and then many of the tech names like microsoft and inteli and at these levels, even google and facebook, though we've t beenmming those stocks, are not overly expensive. i've heard many argue that valuation doesn't matter and that you should buy what's working. that's absolutely not what i believe. valuation, cheaper stocks that are growing

adsher it be through direct might be honest ads act. you'll need to identify the advertisers that are buying these ads. of way as have some kind to identify those who are fanning the flames. it are doing these, call fake news, call it what you want, but there are a lot of levers that are being played in american society right now and is being doned it under misattribution, under and and anonymity should always be there for people who want to use it. there has to be consequences. it, youre going to use cannot use anonymity when you are buying a house. so you can i it for an election. i just want to: ask if you wrap up questions. based on our conversation, the answer to all of these questions to the witnesses will be yes, but i don't want to take anything for granted. is au all agree that there national security dimension to this problem? reflect three yeses. do you all agree that the anonymity of shell corporations is a channel for mischief by bad actors? yes, yes, yes. all agree that foreign entities are ready, willing and able to abuse

, one kind of ad, or robocall is usually zero.>> hello mr. wiley, you said that cambridge analytica and sco group are effectively the same thing, and that cambridge analytica was effectively the front facing operation foscl?>> yes. >> what is scl elections? >> there is a group company or was, called sco group, which had several different divisions, the largest one when i joined was defense, scl elections, commercial, and they had different markets for the company, so scl elections handled political. >> what are scl canada and aggregate iq? >> subcontractor set up during the time i was there to build out a software infrastructure, they played a significant role in building the actual infrastructure, the software product. >> are they essentially the same, scl canada and iq? >> they are a franchise. >> using the facebook data, was the same software? >> yes, once you have the same algorithms any target, a set of targets, you need something to connect those targets with an online display network, that is part of the role that ripon played. >> you

on it well in fact facebook is going to start having ads in your whatsapp and importantly targeted ads meaning that it they'll keep on saying it's and encrypt ssion but somehow there's somebody in there an algorithm. looking at what you're talking about because they're they know where you are they know what your likes are they know what you're talking about in order to target the ads to you so here is some félix salmon and slate dot com there is no justification for what mark zuckerberg did to what's app the wall street journal published a bombshell story last week about what reporters kirstin grind and deeper so far men called the messy expensive split between facebook what's apps founders by the time you finish the wall street journal piece only two options seem possible either zuckerberg is a liar or he's a liar with absolutely no concept of the sunk cost fallacy when facebook bought what's out for twenty two billion dollars in two thousand and fourteen the company's rolled out a very clear messaging campaign based around what's out motto of no ads no games no gimmicks the messaging

on it well in fact facebook is going to start having ads in your whatsapp and importantly targeted ads meaning that it they'll keep on saying it's and encrypt ssion but somehow there's somebody in there an algorithm. looking at what you're talking about because they're they know where you are they know what your likes are they know what you're talking about in order to target the as few so here as some félix salmon and slate dot com there is no justification for what mark zuckerberg did to what's app the wall street journal published a bombshell story last week about what reporters kirstin grind and deeper so far men called the messy expensive split between facebook what's apps founders by the time you finish the wall street journal piece only two options seem possible either zuckerberg is a liar or he's a liar with absolutely no concept of the sunk cost fallacy when facebook bought what's out for twenty two billion dollars in two thousand and fourteen the company's rolled out a very clear messaging campaign based around what's out motto of no ads no games no gimmicks the messaging ser

or tv or print ad for print. i don't think it's that hard and some of the countries now for some reason are doing it on their own, which would really appreciate, but again, we're going to have a patchwork rules we just allow them to do that because they are all doing it differently. could you comment about that? facebook,along with twitter, google, msn of the -- am ads -- and a fan fan of the honest ad act. we often dance on the head of a pin. it gets squish oftentimes, there are issues-based ads that never have to do with election processes. they may want to run when there happens to the election. senator klobuchar: it is easy to say that but there is a standard set by law. it would have to be an issue of national legislative importance. actually, that is a standard that somehow the radio station has to follow and figure out. my position is i don't know why the biggest companies in america can't figure it out. has to follow and figure out. >> i think they can. i am not sure if the smallest companies in america c

some people, if they don't want ad they pay a little extra.blem with subs -- push -- in limitings is a pipe dream. i want to talk about apple which is adding more privacy controls and taking a stand very publicly -- publicly. do you think apple will be on the right side of history here? >> i don't know but they are on the business strategy. they are not in the advertising business near it -- neither is microsoft. positioning as a company. mean that apple is doing fine, they don't need any help and they sell luxury goods. they are at war. andbook amazon google microsoft, it is a galactic battle going on. author of frienemies. startup is getting serious about cleaning up waste and trash and the pacific ocean. it is getting the attention of executives. this is bloomberg. ♪ the two leaders meet what would've been unimaginable months ago. emily: it seems like an impossible task collecting the trillions of pieces of trash floating in the pacific ocean. the collection system, a black tube as big as a football field is setting sail for the great pacif

on it well in fact facebook is going to start having ads in your whatsapp and importantly targeted ads meaning that it they'll keep on saying it's and encrypt ssion but somehow there's somebody in there an algorithm. looking at what you're talking about because they're they know where you are they know what your likes are they know what you're talking about in order to target the as few so here as from félix salmon and slate dot com there is no justification for what mark zuckerberg did to what's app the wall street journal published a bombshell story last week about what reporters kirstin grind and deeper so far men called the messy expensive split between facebook what's apps founders by the time we finish the wall street journal piece only two options seem possible either zucker berg is a liar or he's a liar with absolutely no concept of the sunk cost fallacy when facebook bought what's out for twenty two billion dollars in two thousand and fourteen the company's rolled out a very clear messaging campaign based around what's our motto of no ads no games no gimmicks the messaging ser

act -- like the ads act and identify the advertisers that are buying these ads, as well as have some kind of way to identify those who are fanning these flames, who are doing these, call it safe news, call it what you want. but there are a lot of levers that are being played in american society right now and it 's being done under misattribution, under anonymity and that's what needs to have some mechanism. anonymity should always be there for people who want to use it. but there has to be consequences. right? if you are going to use it -- you can't use anonymity when buying a house, so you can't use it to influence an election. >>> i want to ask a few wrapup questions. i think based on our conversation an answer to all these questions from all the witnesses is going to be yes, but i don't want to take anything for granted. let me first ask do you all agree there is a national security dimension to this problem? >> yes. >> yes. >> okay. let the record reflect three yeses. do you all agree the anonymity of shell corporations is a channel for mischief by bad actors? >> yes. >> yes. >>

but yes, we see this a lot where railings are added after the fact. that is not shown on this roof plan, that's correct. >>> which would mean that we would basically call this house as a non-walkable roof. we would call it out as not being a roof deck. there's a big distinction. i would really like to avoid that all of a sudden it would be a full roof deck at some point and we did not catch that. as a condition of approval, should we go to support this project, and i'm not saying anything to lead to that particular assumption, we would definitely restrict the roof being used as a roof deck. i'm still troubled by the upper unit being substantially increased and nothing else happening in the building. i'm curious to hear other commissioners speak to this. >>> commissioner melgar? >>> i would like to hear what is troubling you. i'm looking at the plans and i really don't see anything outside of the ordinary other than they want more space. >>> we weren't available at quick notice. while i support the ownership, this particular neighborhood is now to be o

facebook's ad rollout has been bumpy as they verify new ads.is a critical part of facebook's business. even sheryl sandberg says this has been bumpy. reporter: she says there have been delays, publishers, nonprofits, book authors, anyone who wants to promote something about what of these broad political issues facebook is wanting to put in the ad archive. the archive will be the searchable database of political ads we can go back to for several years. but a lot of these advertisers, especially smaller ones, have been totally blindsided because they did not consider what they were doing to be political. political issues include anything from education to poverty to emigration, and that is a very broad set of things. it's not just candidates running for office. emily: news organizations have been pushing back on these new rules. is anything changing? sarah: facebook says what they are going to do is divide them from the rest of the political ads in the archive. they do not really want to draw that hardline and say this is news and this isn't beca

it is a stupid ad.tic voters i know would appeal to this ad. >> harris: i just don't know why you would bring in the military. >> marie: i'm just giving it -- i didn't say that. i am just giving more context. >> harris: adds cost money. generally speaking, not to just one person would make that decision. so who else? >> melissa: i think it does appeal to the far left. they think that the president should go to jail, is a terrorist. all of these things. i think that is who it appeals to. >> david: everyone running is trying to get further to the left, to outdo each other on the left. the three i can connect this gentleman and samantha b. just someone desperate for attention. pathetic. awaiting a meeting at the white house between president trump and kim young chol it, and mike pompeo, expected to hand-deliver a letter to the president from kim jong un. plus, for the first time, bill clinton is responding to claims from democrat kristen gillibrand that she should have resigned over the monica lewinsky sca

but who wants to deal with the mess and added calories? deep frying food has been linked to high cholesterol, heart burn, acid reflux, kidney problems, and even cancer and alzheimer's. now, you can have all the fried food you love without the added fats and oil. introducing the revolutionary nuwave brio digital air fryer. the nuwave brio uses super-heated, cyclonic air to cook all your foods up to 50% faster, while cutting calories by up to 70%.

now, let's get to a building that's a new construction with an adu added. you're upzoning without an impact assessment and environmental study. one fellow said it's only going to be -- affect, you know, 120 units in the whole city? no, this is upzoning of every single neighborhood in this city without an environmental study. this is needed, folks. okay. now onto rent board issues. yeah, you're taking away space from tenants, their storage, their garage, and in the executive summary, it says we are working development -- to develop some kinds of procedures about it. no, these are rights in your tenant contract, and now, they're being taken away, given away to developers to make an adu? this isn't fair. those are a few points. >> president hillis: thank you. >> good evening. i hope i don't break the microphone. just to continue on what everybody else mentioned, this is effectively upzoning in the city, and we're not talking about upzoning, like, 20 houses here or there, 100. here are the figures: 108,369 in rh-1 and rh 3 that would be eligible for this if the

apparently, yes, there's a market for it. >> it's a type of personal ad. can find them on craig's list and elsewhere on-line. men seeking women who want to meet and act out a rape. a woman responded to the ad. i have been dying to have a rape fantasy occur. if you can fulfill this tonight, please let me know. i am 30, tall, gorgeous, and ready. i have a yorkie i walk every night. c come find me. the e-mail gave an address. the condo in anaheim where ian and angela live. angela and ian told police a man showed up at their door expecting to have violent sex with angela. they told police they sent him away, but other men followed. all invited by e-mail responses to rape fantasy ads. >> it escalates again. now to the point that angela calls it is police department and reports that another person had showed up and had actually tried to rape her. >> police officers responded to angela's 911 call. >> what did they encounter? >> they encountered a very distraught angela diaz who says another person had shown up and -- >> she's got abrasions here, right? >> on her

campaign ads that crush -- we talked about here on msnbc, they are -- ads are breaking taboos. so women candidates are -- besides just the demographic change and new perspective, that they bring to the debate, like the ads are already changing the look and feel of these big campaigns. >> so really wanting to hone in on the female vote. >> that's right. and democrats know that the pockets that are rising for them, minorities and women and so watch the tv ads. you'll see that that's where democratic tv ads are going. >> what about republicans? do they have a plan to focus on female voters? >> they need to do more of that. they certainly are moving away from the tax cut. that was not the ultimate answer they expected it would be. we're going to hear more about national security as the president making big claims after north korea, and of course a strong economy. so a president with peace and prosperity at the moment, republicans down the ticket are going to help they can get a rbi rbi -- a little bit of that halo. >> thanks so much. >> happy getaway day and holiday weekend. >> tha

and the dirty secret in the industry is that these ads right now are just not that effective. not useless, but not as effective as we'd want. so, companies want more, not less data, so they can do better. and so, data becomes the most valuable currency. these condit could be a threat. at risk companies lose much of their treasure trove they worked so hard to build. i look forward to answering your questions today and hearing from my co-panelists about perspectives on this critical topic. thank you again for being here with you today and speak with you today. >> thank yery much. >> chairman, ranking member blumenthal and distinguished members of this subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today. i want to present a few opening remarks but would be happy to submit the rest of my remarks for the record. i ddressed this committee back in 2011. today some seven years later nearly all of what i said still applies although with much greater urgency. our policy has changed very little during that time. companies ability to invade individual's privacy has grown. i've wr

now, arnold also added "it's on. hope trump sees this picture and it haunts his dreams," knowing his every move is being scrutinized and knowing what tom arnold is after. michael cohen did retweet that picture. we don't know if it's a message. because i can tell you that just in the last few minutes cohen then tweeted again, this time saying the following. we can put it up on the screen. "i appreciate the kind words. as a father, husband and friend. but this was a chance public encounter in a hotel lobby we are asked for a selfie, not spending the weekend together, did not discuss being on the show, nor did we discuss potus," with some hashtags after that. so help explain it all we turn to emily jane fox. she's a senior reporter for "vanity fair" author of the new book out this week "born trump" and a known conversation partner with michael cohen as well in more than chance encounters i should say. thank you for spending some time with us tonight. first make sense of these twists and turns on cohen today. >> i think

we are not adding a unit we are adding a big volume to the house. >> we are adding a unit that is up code. the current unit, you know, is not safe. it has a list of deficiencies, it doesn't have a violation, but it does have a list of deficiencies including, you know, health and safety deficiencies. >> i guess my struggle with it is there was a bed in the kitchen and i don't know if it was rented out the month before, but the owner, somebody who had the house enjoyed the benefit of having the unit and now they are claiming the unit was so substandard. that was my opinion. i would say, ok, i get it, you didn't use it. you're trying to have it both ways. i feel bad about this one, but i am really not supportive of the gymnastics we are going through here. it was pretty straightforward. >> since the project sponsors have owned it there has never been a long-term tenant in there. there is not a long-term tenant and they are right now. my understanding is there may have tenancies before they owned the unit. so to answer your question, they are apparently have been tenancies in the past bu

emily: it's not just about adding women, it's about adding people of color, adding different kinds ofsity, which might be a little more difficult to quantify. is the rooney rule, is that something you would like to see every board do? i mean, what are some strategies for companies that, you know, are finding themselves in the so-called predicament to find these, you know, find hidden talent? shannon: i think again theboardlist is a great place to , start, because it is a tool, a platform that provides visibility beyond your first-order network. we know great people know great people. our platform is built on an endorsement model. so you can be sure that those people that are on that platform are board ready. no concern about qualifications. that is certainly one thing companies can do. i think also it's about, like i said before, just embedding diversity into the conversation. there are so many companies taking steps to embed this in their recruiting process, right, from the language used in job descriptions to the process they use to get referrals, from the employee base. i think the

i didn't know how far i would go to get more. >> reporter: this is a first look at one of the new ads launching today. be warned, the story is real, raw and deeply upsetting. >> opioid dependence can happen after five days. know the truth, spread the truth. >> pretty powerful and pretty direct and actually shocking. >> well, the ads are hard-hitting but it's important to know they are scientifically validated. >> reporter: we were invited to the white house for an interview about the new campaign. >> this epidemic is a national health emergency. >> reporter: the crisis affects every segment of society as the surgeon general knows firsthand. >> my baby brother phillip is in prison due to crimes he committed to support his addiction. >> reporter: for an administration often accused of polarizing the country, this issue they say must rise above politics. we must, must see this as a non-partisan issue looking for bipartisan solutions. >> reporter: the ads transcend politics produced over the last seven months in partner with the truth initiative known for its extremely effective 19-year a

guest: i think the ad speaks to politics of fear. they seem to be experts at emotional lysing campaigns and i understand it because if you don't want to defend your record, you talk about emotional context and put out an ad like this. the fear tactic, they could demonize anyone. addressing tens of millions of people who hereto for were not covered and is addressing the pre-existing conditions, which is helpful and it has been forceful on making certain there is integrity in government. she has an agenda along with the caucus to build a stronger america with infrastructure, build the fabric of individuals by making certain health care variousr areas -- programs that develop the strength of the individual are there and build a that her government. integrity, accountability, transparency and campaign finance reform. i think it is demonizing. whoever is the leader, they will demonize. host: you will support nancy pelosi? guest: i believe the speaker has done a good job. host: "washington day.al," live every

but that has also been added —— an 8000 brexit. but that has also been added -- an 8000 bmw brexit.has also been added —— an 8000 bmwjobs, and what all these companies are saying is something outrageous as they want clarity. they want to be able to plan, so it's one thing for politicians to go through all the different tests as we have witnessed and reported on a great deal in parliament. of course we know that bill is waiting —— awaiting assent oi'i bill is waiting —— awaiting assent on tuesday, but the fact of the matter is they do need to plan, and even small delays can cause real problems. sol even small delays can cause real problems. so i think his companies have been very slow in coming forward and putting their heads above the parapet, because they have been so extraordinarily criticised during the referendum campaign. so in the lead up, here we are two years later, months away from the 29th of march, 2019 at 11pm, where the united kingdom will be leaving the united kingdom will be leaving the club of 28 and reducing it to 27. let's go to the front page of the daily express,

i added to abbot labs. i added to health care performance for me so far year to date is where i want to increase my portfolio exposure added to honeywell also. i think it's built in. >> look, levinthol yesterday was saying how he was trimming some of the winners >> he was bringing it back to 5% he was just -- he thought that was overexposed for those people who were in apple and they were up to like an 8% exposure, steve. he was pulling them back to 5% because that's where jim wanted to be. not quite the same as a broad market call, saying i want to trim >> still, trimming some positions that have done very well in the portfolio. >> i think that's what you have to do asortfolio manager >> ste, you're out with a number of names you added i center fohave four or so. >> home depot, oxy >> i added to google i think it's a total overreaction in defense stocks you're getting high quality companies pulling back on the lack of potential defense spend. that's not going to happen in my opinion. not anytime soon yeah,

world cup fans are already adding a party atmosphere to the streets of russian host cities. for many it's the trip of a lifetime and they fork out enormous sums of money just to be here but for some costs are likely to blow out the russian government regulates hotel prices but that doesn't mean they have to let their rooms go cheap. was this one using its experience of such elan pick games russia was able to regulate the prices for hotels in each region the price depends on how many stars the hotel has. many hotels like the three star slav younker hotel in moscow will take advantage of the price regulations despite the authorities saying they've already find more than five hundred hotels for overinflating prices moscow's five star hotels are charging up to eight thousand five hundred u.s. dollars a night that's more than the average annual salary in russia. many fans will have booked train tickets in advance but train journeys between venues can last up to forty two hours for some flying might be the only option according to research by the b.c. group a leading russian busin

shark has added arotating .while deep-cleaning carpets, you can also grab large particles, pull in piles and directly engage floors. duo clean. invented by shark. duo clean. alicewhich is breast canceratic that has spread to other parts of her body. she's also taking prescription ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor, which is for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive her2- metastatic breast cancer as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole was significantly more effective at delaying disease progression versus letrozole. patients taking ibrance can develop low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infections that can lead to death. before taking ibrance, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection, liver or kidney problems, are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include low red blood cell and low platelet counts, infections, tiredness, nausea, sore mouth, abnormalities in liver blood tests, diarrhea, hair t

whether it is the issue of political ads. it will continue those conversations with republicans and democrats. and to build up those relationships in an effort to stop any potential regulation. emily: all right. srahberg's naomi nix and frier. thank you. another shakeup at twitter. it's a move to better integrate the platform's design and video offerings. periscope ceo will become the sixth head of product since 2014. possibly a sign there will be greater emphasis on video. mike montano has been promoted to oversee all of engineering. coming up ai versus civil liberties. is new technology infringing on your rights yet that we will ask the aclu next. a quick programming note. the boston turn into pops fireworks special on this fourth of july. you can watch right here on bloomberg television, listen on bloomberg radio, or catch anywhere on bloomberg.com. ♪ emily: we are continuing our look at the biases in artificial intelligence and the pitfalls. gainingion is not only notoriety. it is being used by law enforcement to track ci

zuckerberg, i asked him to commit to the honest ads act.e assured me that the most effective thing he could do was implement the bills policy on the facebook platform since facebook and permitted his version of political advertising thatparency, we have seen the break things and move fast culture does not work for elections. said thatrk times news articles about politics were being categorized as political advertising. what impact will this change have on the reach of political journalism for the 2018 elections russian mark -- elections? >> we don't know. with much of this technology, it is true that the executives and product -- project managers behind them don't think about scenarios they don't want to happen. they think about what they want to wish to affect. in the case of facebook, that has nothing to do with the impact on society the end engagement with the user or engagement for advertising if you are on the advertising team. i think what facebook as a company is beginning to learn is how to be responsibly -- responsible beyond its e

fraud, to improve our ad products. publishers say this is a land grab. google has been working behind the scenes, especially around the antitrust issues to mend their relationship with ublishers. that has gone a pretty far way. i think axel springer, a large german publisher, has been vocal in the past and we have seen them come out and say that google are crooks. this is not coming directly from the publishers. this is coming from trade organizations whose job it is to punch it up. emily: coming up, amazon held its shareholder meeting on wednesday and questions are being raised about the power held by its board. we will discuss next. all episodes bloomberg technology are dream ising live. this is bloomberg. emily: welcome back to "best of bloomberg technology." i'm emily chang. as we have been discussing, amazon held its annual shareholders meeting in seattle on wednesday. shareholders rejected a proposal that would have required amazon to separate jeff bezo's roles. they recently adopted a policy that required women

companies that rely on targeted ads to make their money companies that rely on targeted ads to make theirgeted ads to make their money will no companies that rely on targeted ads to make their money will no doubt find a weight to retaliate and work around these measures. but now, it is apple one, advertisers mill. —— meal. next, jane is finding out how often laws can transport themselves into virtual rout shall —— virtual matches. but first, she tries to out with a classic piece of goalkeeping tech. he may not look like much, but robo keep that can stop manchester's test players. —— best. his two cameras ta ke players. —— best. his two cameras take up to 90 photos per second. if a football is kicked up to 100 kilometres an hour, that leaves robo keep a jaziri .3 seconds to save the ball. bbc! bbc! here we go! there are some great facilities in manchester as you might expect from one of the world's great footballing cities. no —— normally practice requires that each, players, football players. but what if you can bring all of this into your living room? can bring all of this into your livi

for tv, print ad for print. some of the companies for some reason are doing it on c their own, which we truly appreciate. again, we will have a patchwork of rules if we allow them to do that because they are all doing it differently. could you comment about that? >> i along with facebook google and twitter. i'm a fan of the honest ads act. i do think we have to as we often implement when it comes to definitions commit issues based that it gets squishy and often times there are issues that have nothing to do its election processes and they may want to run. >> it's easy to say that although there is a standard stuff but a lot of national legislative important and actually that is a standard that somehowrd my radio station in minnesota has to figure out. my position is i don't know why the biggest companies in america can't figure it out. >> i think they can. not sure if the smallest companies in america s can't. >> the radio station is pretty small. there is all of these radio stations in little tv stations about