. >> adertising, big deal, it's the movie, not the advertising. this worriesme, and i'm not a fan of this, but i am for, you know, free expression, even violent expression sometimes, but what worries me and the folks about connecticut, if it makes one out of a hundred who see the movies or play uch games act them out potentially, then they should be banned or they should be reigned in. what do you say to them? >> i think the connection is not strong enough to have that infringement on free speech where the government can ban these things. to say, in a culture with so much violence is a bad thing in general. is a right thing, have voluntary estraints is a good thing. these people pulling back movies are basically people who are in favor of severe gun control. arguably, their movies may have more of an impact than any form of gun or gun control. they are feeling a little b of the heat, maybe hypocritical which is is why they are pulling back. neil: what worries me after an incident like this, tragic as it is, mayor,s that we overreact with censorshi