cases, how to adjudicate cases and whether to execute removal orders. so the facts might be slightly different. i see no basis in the opinion for distinguishing it based solely on the facts. >> there's been a lot of discussion about how dapa and daca grants additional benefits. but it is my understanding that it simply defers action and pursuant to section 274-a of the immigration and nationality act which provides that employment may be authorized either by the act or by the attorney general and acfr-274-a.12 provides that an alien who's been granted deferred action an act of administrative convenience for the government may apply for authorization if there's an economic necessity which must be proven. is it your position that it's only the statutory basis that's being exercised following a grant of deferred action, or does the executive action give some kind of benefit directly? >> yes. i think it's a little bit of both. i would distinguish two kinds of so-called benefits. first of all, there's the benefit of simply receiving a piece of paper in which

that is why we have deferred adjudication. sometimes, immigration chooses not to deport somebody, but the reason you put somebody in deferred action is to grant a specific benefit. that's what this administration is doing deciding not to deport people. they are saying, we want to put them in a criteria that under the law, they are going to receive benefits. could this president say tomorrow, i want everyone in the united states illegally from mexico in deferred action? could he say that? mr. legomsky: my gut instinct is to say that that would be difficult because it would turn on the empirical question of whether he would still be able to spend the resources. rep. labrador: you keep saying that. they can always spend the money. that is the most ridiculous statement i've heard. they will always spend the money. the question is, does he have the discretion to pick one category of people and say, i'm not going to deport you? that has never been done in immigration. it was always done on a case-by-case basis. this president has de

so in effect, when you hear this, you're adjudicating or judging your own actions which seems to me to be a pretty low standard in order to move the hearing along. anyway, there are a couple of issues involved here, and i couldn't hear mr. sancrow well enough, but there is the issue of the waiver that i raised in the memorandum because in my view, of course, i'm a lawyer of only 60 plus years experience, i think that that by law constitutes the waiver as does the one where the commission agrees enforce the open government laws, which is precisely is what's involved here. in any case, mr. sancrow believes that this is a single issue case. again, in my memorandum, it's clear that there were three violations involved in the order. not just the question of the attorney/client privilege and its applicablity. those remain to be enforced. if you go ahead despite your conflict and hear it that's what you would be addressing. but i think i have a larger point to make, and it's this. the adverse effects of the litigation and the commissions ten year history under mr. sancrow of failing enforce t

this was not a pre-litigation matter and the document that's were withheld were adjudicated by the court of appeal, and it was not found in mr. grossman's favor. in particular, the court of appeal did deal with this issue of the commission not authorizing the lawsuit and while i concur some extent with their king, that perhaps it's a policy matter that may be a different story. as a legal matter, i think it was allowable. those are my views. i'm happy to have further discussion from commissioner on the issue, on any of the issues. is there a motion on this matter? speaker: i make a motion that we find that there is not a basis for finding that the executive director, uh, violated his obligation under -- on an appeal from the sunshine task force and bound by the findings of the court of appeals that his actions were consistent with san francisco open government ordinances. speaker: is there a second? speaker: second. speaker: all in favor. speaker: aye. speaker: opposed. hearing none. that motion passes. speaker: next item on the agenda is discussion and possible action regarding approval

first, hud in formal adjudications has found disparate impact liability available under these provisions since 1992, i believe. those would be entitled to chevron deference. i think that is a point we made in our brief, in the first case, the gallagher case. second, and i don't mean to be flip about it, i do think that overestimates the efficiency of the government. [laughter] making an issue like this out within seven days. i think, actually, this has been the position for a very long time, and you would get chevron deference for the adjudications. i think that is clear. but we do have the reg now and i think it gets chevron deference. if i could turn to the question of constitutional avoidance, i don't think this is a suitable case for constitutional avoidance. let me try to explain why. what everyone might think in the title vii context about the consequences of disparate impact liability, this is a different context. the issue has been raised that the only way to avoid disparate impact liability is to engage in race-based remedies, not race-based thinking about what neutral criteria

these petitions submitted to the adjudicated three separate congressional committees formed the basis for hundreds of bills of relief, covering thousands of former confederates. section three outpaced section one and section two as a source of public consternation. this probably should not surprise us given that by operation of the provision, an entire generation of southern political leadership was barred from reconstituting itself leaving its leadership gap in the southern politics. i mentioned to you before that as predicted by the augustine telegraph, the supreme court never spoke about the validity of section three. we have nothe absence of meaningful oversight fostered a constitutional vacuum that the people, civil and military as well as regular citizens filled with their own understandings and misunderstandings about how these innovations ought to function. the improvisation of standards rules, and principles to govern the implementation of the mandate in section three fell to the people. in theory, implementation should have been a straightforward process involving a direct p

his response today, he says this is an historic day for the adjudicator. a regulator that has real teeth. last week i secured the final agreement from government to enable the red -- regulator to impose fines for those supermarkets that were found guilty of mistreating suppliers. and also i agreed to increase the funding for the coming year so that it can carry out its important work. now that the formal investigation has been launched, i would encourage anyone with any evidence of wrongdoing to come forward and be confident on -- that they can do so confidentially. anonymity will be protected. that is the voice of the business secretary on what is the beginning of a journey for the adjudicator. she was on the bbc saying that the investigation is launched later than others because the breach of code is not the same as the issue that led to the prophet misstatement. caroline: we will take a short break. minutes before we see trading. we will have details before the start of the trading session. the news out of bt and ee just minutes ago. more on that when w

the responsibility is for screening not for adjudication of a claim. credible fear, to find a credible fear, i'm sure miss mccarthy could speak to the issue as well. >> i'd like to hear what the government has to say about it. >> we screen for fear. it's a simple questionnaire we provide and go through. officers go through the questions. if someone expresses a fear under our law we're required to find a credible fear. then they have more rights to not be returned. as i said in my remarks contiguous countries are the ones we screen initially. the other countries will be skreepd when they go to hhs custody but we screen them as a matter of policy. franklin, i don't know if you want to add. >> as a matter of practice they are providing a checklist go through a checklist. they give the individual their rights and the assessment -- the agent is not responsible for making -- or allowed to make an assessment if the individual indicates that he or she meets the requirement then that individual has to be referred for additional screening. >> if they don't meet

illustrate this right now this is the street view inch cut away the fad to see the 3 spaces that are adjudicate adjacent to my neighboring property that this is can the neighboring property in addition to built up and the doted lion it the stent to the building and this is the facing railing slash class which exceeds the rear bum out of 10 foot it will be a solid item that is in the plan here's the plan that was submitted or the zoomed in version planter is 5 by 60 feet long and 3 feet 6 inch high compatible to my bathroom it allows for trees to grow not only will their planter be a solid surface but have a significant amateur of feet this is through my bedroom to the deck it is shown the condition as proposed and if the planter is gone or if a safety rally of glass i recognize that per that pose the privacy issue i have shown where the planter could be reduced in height or narrower it will allow more light into my home and it wouldn't reduce square footage on the proposed property or be shortened in height not provide a safety hazard because there actually is no safety railing on this side not

firm [inaudible] and my pleasure to represent the applicant in this matter and this needs to be adjudicated in the court before the board has enough time to pass on the resolution one way or another so it's my recommendation that the board support the motion of supervisor campos. >> thank you. are there any other members of the public that would like to pride public comment at this time? seeing none. public comment is now closed. [gavel] . and. mr. gibner. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the board it continue it but you have to keep it open to continue for three months so take the motion to continue the hearing open per a subsequent hearing at the continued date. >> okay. thank you. and supervisor campos. >> to clarify that that in fact the motion is predicated on the understanding that the hearing remains open to a later date. >> okay. with that mr. clerk can you please call the roll on the motion to continue. >> open to april 28, 2015. supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> supervisor christensen. >> aye. >> supervisor cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye.

not every country adjudicates it the same way. so sentencing, all of this becomes a part of a solution that is not the same in every country but they are all trying to do the same thing. there are authority issues like evidence, like law enforcement like religious motivations. let me go back all the way to my experience in iraq. we had more than 200 religious leaders working in that facility for those 20,000 and we do not have any other programs anywhere on the globe that don't include that discussion about beliefs. they are there. so that's a part of the process. and we welcome that in every nation that we've engaged with. just about last, every nation that we've been with has -- i don't want to use the word pleaded, but asked very very intensely what should we do about the returning foreign fighters? what should we do? in iraq when we were there, we had about 79 separate countries that had showed up. i can't even tell you in my time in afghanistan how many there were but it's probably at least that or more. i don't know today bu

or adjudication, do you think they will be tried as juveniles or adults?you know, i think that at the end of the day, you could see a juvenile prosecution here. and the reason i say that, there's something fundamentally different about the way that a child's mind works. and we have a juvenile system for a reason. we have it because juvenile systems are predicated upon the notion of rehabilitation whereas the adult system is more of a punishment-oriented type of approach and not at all excusing what happened here, seems like there's mental infirmities or what have you going on. but i think the attorney in making a petition to bring it back to juvenile court will highlight the ages of these children, will highlight of course the seriousness of the offense -- there's no argument as to the seriousness of the offense. it's horrific. but what about a child's mind would make a child do that? i think that's going to be the source of -- >> danny, you're not on the same page with that one? >> i am. in fact, i think we have a problem in the juvenile justice system in

this half built project back to the very beginning of the review process when it has already been adjudicated in every possible venue. please allow this nine year june toe to proceed to completion and allow to uphold the permit. thank you. >> mr. sanchez? >> good evening, scott sanchez, planning department, just to respond to a couple of points, first in regards to the concerns about blight, after the collapse of the building, i did meet with the department of building inspection, they had in there -- and inspector duf if can get the terms right there's the engineer of the project sponsor, there was also the enbacker engineer for the adjacent project, there were meetings to discuss this, it was determined that the retaining walls, the foundation work needed to be done in order to stabilize the hillside so that was authorized by the department of building inspection, i concurred with that. it was necessary for safety of the community, that was allowed to continue, but no work beyond what was necessary to stabilize the site was allowed so after the stabilization was completed, they submitted th

if they are able to adjudicate their claims with an officer. but typically and there are always assessmenteds for humanitarian reasons particularly at the border is placed in detention. >> i don't have those numbers. >> does anybody have those numbers? would you have those numbers? would your office or your agency have them? >> i.c.e. might have those numbers. >> can you secure those and send them to us in the 30 days? >> sure. >> typically if an adult were released, it would only have been because they were having a fear of persecution. >> mr. franklin -- jones i'm sorry, mr. joans. >> no problem. >> okay. zero tolerance sexual assault policy have the same source of law? >> it is a restating in the commissioner's policy. >> when you say private contractors for cvp. >> for detoengs. >> okay. cvp, we don't do detention, if you will. we only hold individuals for the amount of time necessary to process them and transport them to i.c.e. in extenuateing circumstances -- does anyone on the panel have an answer to that? >> i can take it. if you're ref

the adjudicated value by adding at 6 percent simple interest according to this commission makes the totalincipal value of american claims to over $8 billion today. i do not think the state department will enforce by investigating trafficking and confiscated us property nor enable us property owners to secure compensation for the unauthorized use of property subject to the claim. do you think that you will or won't? and i worry the administration will use influence to go even further will we try to get cuba into the world bank, imf, idb, other multilateral development banks banks, or will we prevent any assistance, financing, or benefit from these institutions and tell us property claims have been resolved to the satisfaction of american owners? lastly if you could tell us the three conditions according to us law for the embargo to be lifted. and i know the president is going to present us legislation to free up the embargo. what of those three conditions have been met that would satisfy the embargo justified -- justify the embargo being lifted? first, on the claims, what we we will do if

which has to be part of this discussion, judgments against the cuban government which has been adjudicated in u.s. court which has to be part of it. that's a much longer process and we have not ceded to anything things. >> and i don't expect that we will acquiesce to any of those things. >> at the start of the process. >> understand that what was your response when they said we are not going to do anything on normalization? >> what they meant by normalization is the end of the year-long process not restoration of diplomatic relations which is the first part. i'm presuming that they mean they won't have full normalization but they will have restoration of diplomatic relations. smack thank you. i yield back my time. >> thank you very much. mr. connolly of virginia's recognize. >> i thank the chair. ms. jacobsen i believe in politics and diplomacy and a very simple adage don't give it away for nothing. i'm very troubled by the abrupt change is precisely a moment where we actually have leverage. for 50 years one could argue the castro brothers have loved policy because it's helped keep them in

this half built project back to the very beginning of the review process when it has already been adjudicated in every possible venue. please allow this nine year june toe to proceed to completion and allow to uphold the permit. thank you. >>

the reality is that the bulk of this was re-conducted by case-by-case ad adjudication. so those are mere needles in our title ii haystack. moreover rates and charges and classifications will be reviewed under the just and reasonable standards. and there will be no certainty. this includes a recipe for overreach and confusion. the item notes that parties may seek an opinion which appears useless, they are only available in certain circumstances and are nonbinding. and although there are many caveats amongst us, the commissions path forward is clear the commission claims that this item does not require broadband providers to contribute to do response at this time. but that is because it differs that decision to pending proceedings which is likely to result on the broadband services. and this includes any intent to adopt out regulations. pressurization is a form of this regulation. the commission contemplates examining on a case-by-case basis whether they just were reasonable under section 201 and 202, that includes an evaluation with a condition of such an arrangement. th

tesco's adjudicator has launched an investigation saying there is a suspicion tesco has breached theice. francine: the mastermind behind online crime market silk road has been convicted. found guilty of using bitcoin to trade drugs on the black market. he will be sentenced on may 15 and could face life imprisonment. guy: sony is moving past last year's cyber attack. it posted its best quarterly profit in seven years and shares rose 18% in tokyo. coming from demand for front facing cameras. sony supplies the image sensor for apple iphones. francine: breaking news from francois hollande. giving his biannual news conference to the press. he is saying he will meet with angela merkel and vladimir putin of russia friday and they will discuss ukraine. that is a development we need to watch. guy: as the u.s. secretary of state lands in kiev. what will the u.s. be offering the ukrainians? francine: would you trust an app with your keys? assa abloy is aiming to make unlocking your door digital. we talked to the ceo about earnings after the break. ♪ guy: welcome back. you are watching "the puls

judgments against the cuban government which have been adjudicated in u.s. courts which has to be part of this. so that's a much different process and we haven't acceded to any of these -- >> no and i don't expect that we will acquiesce to any of those. >> it is the start of the process. >> i understand. what was your response until they said we're not going to do anything on normalization until you do these things. >> what they meant by normalization is the end of that year's long process, not restoration of diplomatic relations which is the first part. so sim's presuming that they mean they won't have full normalization until all those things are done but they will have a restoration of diplomatic relations. >> okay. thanks. i yield back. >> thank you very much sir. mr. connelly of virginia is recognized. >> i thank the chair miss jacobson, i believe in politics and diplomacy in a very simple adage -- don't give it away for nothing. i am very troubled by the abrupt change in u.s. policy with subat the precise moment when we actually have leverage. for 50 y

where you told that story is hobby lobby was applying a statute, using the case-by-case and adjudication. this case marks the first time in the nation's history that the supreme court has given secular for-profit corporations religious free exercise rights and religious exemptions from the general business regulations. it's rare when you're talking about the supreme court to say this is the first time something has happened that the supreme court has said you can do it you can look at instances in the recent past like the gun case that it's very rare to say this is the first time the court has said the corporations have this right in more than the 200 years of the nation's history that hobby lobby is big news because it doesn't say for the first time in the nation's history but for profit corporations are entitled to the religious free exercise rights from the general business law. it's now opened the door to new claims from the religious exemptions and it's kind of the case-by-case method. there is no principle in place that can say these people don't get exemptions but these people do.

the state department and other agencies, the justice of, settlement commission acted to adjudicate andis i'm value to those claims. we believe strongly that has to be a part of future conversations over the next years. those are extremely difficult to have with any foreign government have those commission dealings have proven. we are to pursue that as part of our discussion. i raised that in our first conversation, knowing we would not talk about it that they deep we, but it must be a part of full normalization. on the financial situation there is a civic language in the law about this. we feel we are not in a position right now where cuba is eligible for membership certainly >> when you say right now, do you foresee? will the in that direction? >> i think we all hope for the day when there would be logical membership because it would be a free and open cuba with an open economic system and illogical member. but i do not know exactly what point. we also hope that some point in the future, they may ask for help opening the system cannot right now. but just as we said, we were not going

hannon enjoined the deferred action program because he believes the applications were not being adjudicateda case-by-case basis. and concluded that this was not happening in the daca context. do you think that is a reasonable way to approach the decision in that case? >> i'm glad to have a chance to answer that question. judge hannon had no support in terms of evidence on the record that that was true. the starting point is the secretary's memo. it loosely says repeatedly must engage in individualized case-by-case determinations and also specifically says that even if the criteria are met, it you still need to exercise discretion. furthermore there is a lot of discretion being exercised just determining whether threshold criteria have been met. for example, figuring out of someone is a threat to public safety there is a opinion of how much of a threat a person has to be before you would deny them and so forth. the critics are reduced to having to argue in effect that the workforce is going to somehow systematically disobey the secretaries clear explicit instructions to exercise discretion.

so we all want justice but if there is not a civil state to adjudicate properly execute justice thenll do with ourselves that is self-help justice so where the committee does not believe that the courts are fair and day undertake justice themselves leading to an increase of violence and one of the reason our rates of homicide are eight times higher than europe we have eight per 100,000 because we have guns and illegal drugs so for another rival gang violates your turf you cannot go to the police say you have to settle yourself my argument is ever since the scientific revolution we have been solving social problems homicides are problem to be solved in these are all scientist but i have all whole chapter on this they were inspired in their field and they wanted to do what they did with biology to apply science to solve economic and political and social problems so one of the books is called lifeline is us senator to have a legitimate use of force this explains a lot why did ferguson happen? it is a violation so there is only one result that will happen and that is why this is installe

absolutely in the cases of certain types into the eastern district all the people that want to cases at adjudicated promptly including certain consumer litigations and patent litigations into certain categories seek out the eastern district of virginia to bring the cases here. i always get asked about the rocket docket because it seems to strike a responsive chord when people hear the term they always think that's wonderful. lawyers didn't think that it was all that wonderful when it was imposed on them but it used to be a joke. there was only one reason for granting the content of its continued on the extension of the trial date for any other and that was a death in the family. [laughter] that's the way the rocket docket is important from the legal history perspective and for years i got with this myself. and i practiced the lawyers paid for the control of the litigation. the judges never entered into it. if the lawyers wanted to bring their case on the trial they would end if they wanted it to some of docket for months or years they could do it and the judge normally wouldn't interfere. that was

where we have to do investigative work and adjudicate it.and sometimes those worlds collide. >> does it take awhile for the federal government to get involved? >> in this case, no, because the seattle police have dealt with it, and i think they have, and they have made an apology and taken administrative action against the officer. it's not a good idea to assume that the federal government has to come in on every case. the local authorities have got to be able to step up and do this. there are not enough people in the federal government to monitor it if you wanted them to. >> stan, thank you very much. >>> our race in america series continues through the week. movement for civil rights has gone on for decades but a new generation of african-americans, say traditional leaders don't represent them. and tomorrow, we'll tell you what they believe should be the way forward. >> the reason why people like al sharpton and jesse jackson are getting booed they come to be the representation of blackness, but not necessarily the movement right now. >> w

reporter: sheriff, i've got to ask you, is that possible that mexico is going to find, catch and adjudicate is a lawless part of mexico? >> i really cannot answer that, but i can tell you this, based on their past record, i think they have a -- somewhat of a zero solvency rate and a zero conviction rate. >> reporter: there is one more piece of evidence. a small blood spot on the life jacket tiffany hartley wore the day she says her husband was shot. the blood is from her husband. sheriff gonzalez says a dna test confirms it, but even the dna match remains just one more piece of an unsolved puzzle. there is still no body, no jet ski. is tiffany hartley even telling the truth? or is there another secret yet to be told? meet the world's newest energy superpower. surprised? in fact, america is now the world's number one natural gas producer... and we could soon become number one in oil. because hydraulic fracturing technology is safely recovering lots more oil and natural gas. supporting millions of new jobs. billions in tax revenue... and a new century of american energy security. the new ener

working hard to that end. >> i wanted to ask how you see in the future this orbit influencing adjudication about the potential complaints about what used to be known as specialized services. there is the broad protection, but there appears to be a bit of i guess discussion or debate about what happens to services that, i guess, don't exist yet or potentially come up in the future that don't neatly fall in the category. >> i don't know if you know stephanie who is an associate general console, but also the chairman special adviser on internet law and policy. >> hi. thanks for that question. so the order that we adopt today is about broadband internet access service and that's the service that travels over the public internet, and that ensures that as john just described, end users can reach all internet end points. the concept of specialized services we think is a bit of an odd one in that there is not a distinct category of services or nothing unifies those services other than the fact that they are not that broadband internet access service and they do not travel over the public internet

they are awaiting adjudication of their cases before -- through the united states immigration and custom service for the purposes of being able to possibly stay in this country but they have not committed crimes. they're here for whatever reason. so, what -- that being the case i think it's incumbent upon a company, such as you, to try and work with stake holder xhunlts much more so than perhaps you have or been asked to in the past because i think this could be a model -- to the extent i'm against the mandatory bed thing let me put that out there but the extent it's a fact of life, the fact of life is you're getting many people possibly in your facility, tell me what you plan to do or would like to do with regard to the stakeholders in your area to be as good a custodian as it were for these people. >> i think that is a great question and line of questioning, commissioner. these are the very things we've been working on from the very day we started putting our proposal together for the south texas family residential center. we have worked days nights, weekends, holidays, making sure tha

also, you should know that other markets will look to the united states and the adjudication of puerto rico and take some leadership. we have tested chapter 9 in jefferson county, alabama, more recently in detroit and some smaller places and so i think this is a tremendous issue to the markets. >> is it still analogous to what's happening in greece? we still have a country with a huge debt load that needs help servicing it. the u.s. might ultimately have to decide whether congress is going to come together, allow them to file for bankruptcy or become a 51st state. >> there's not a lot of motivation for congress to do that. >> do you have a thought on this point as well, jason? >> so this is an interesting scenario. it's not just a government story in how it relates to greece. it's also a market infrastructure story. when you think about municipal bonds, this market used to be an almost fully insured -- it used to be a business where you basically came in and you bought whatever had high credit ratings after they'd been insured by the mortgage insurers and now it's a credit market. peop

you'll remain in that status until such time as your report has been adjudicated.e'll determine what your next status will be. thank you very much. >> it really sucks to be in here. i was doing so good. you know, i told my mom, i'll stay out of trouble. and just to be good. you know? they take all the fun out of everything. sex is the only thing you have. and half the time it's not even worth having anyway. because it's that 30 seconds, get in, get out. what fun is that anymore? >> prison officials must determine if gilchrist will receive any additional time for his actions. in the meantime, gilchrist will not be allowed any work detail. >> i'm like the most popular one. they call me countess. the countess, above all, because i look more female-like more than any of the other ones here. >> randi stamper is an openly gay inmate at isp. he's serving a 25-year sentence for attempted murder. >> shot somebody. shot them for getting me like the wrong bottle of vodka. stole his truck, 18-wheeler. >> stamper received additional prison time for inmate stabbings and for kick

app it is rare that you have a criminal defendant that is adjudicated by reasons of in sanity and it is not just the fact that the defendant suffers from mental illness, there are a lot of defendants that do and in this case i think the jurors will conclude that ralph did suffer from some type of mental illness. this is a individual hospitalized in the months prior to the shooting and look at chris kyle's own text about him in the truck. this guy was straight-up nuts. his family had taken away his guns. but the issue is did he know right from wrong at the time of the shooting? that is why you have his criminal defense attorney in opening statements today using those buzzwords. he didn't know what he was doing. he didn't know that what he was doing was wrong because that is the legal standard that the jurors will have to decide. >> i want to just quickly switch gears and talk to you about a story here in new york which is the rookie officer who shot akawhi gurley in a stairwell, being indicted on criminal charges. what do you make of that? it is rare for a police officer to be indicte

>> hennis had been adjudicated not guilty.he state of north carolina was not going to try him again. >> we fought a revolutionary war because the king of england could try somebody over and over for the same offense. our founders put in the constitution that there will be no double jeopardy in this country. >> i understand that, but i think there might be certain cases like this, we've got this dna now, that says he was the man who raped this woman and killed her, i think you should be able to. i think somehow the judicial system is going to have to work around that. >> i was at the d.a.'s office. we asked the army if they were interested in bringing him out of retirement and trying him for the murders. >> a team helped evaluate the case for the army. >> my personal opinion about why this is important to the military is the military sent gary eastburn for duty in alabama. and his family was left behind. and they were murdered. >> i'm sure there was debate within the military. it's high profile, it's controversial, but you had

you have to adjudicate that. it's not just that he picked up some woman la la la. of the reason they let him go. this young man going to rehab i hope the best for him but you're right, the game he has to work on is between the hash marks. >> and these young men, and maybe to some extent women in professional sports but when you're looking for singular kind of talent and you ignore character, what you end up with are people who feel entitled to bring the rules, right? they feel like super heros and no doubt they're built up in that way. >> from the time they're kids really z. from the time they're kids. then add head trauma. i know it sounds like a rounding error but it's not. these people have been through head trauma after head trauma after head trauma. i'm not blaming it all on that. but it's something to look to. and hiring a prostitute millions of american executives do it all the time. we have to look into that law. i don't like arresting people for victimless crimes. >> specifically talking about the assault. >> t it's not fighting with the hooker in the morn

so we all want justice if there is sent courts to adjudicate properly properly then we will do it ourselves it is a self-help justice so where people don't believe that law enforcement is fair to undertake justice themselves with an increase of violence. with eight times higher than in europe but we also had illegal drugs and then to violate our turf says you have to settle it yourself. that is an increase of violence. to be applying the methods of science to social problems that it is the problem to be solved. homicide, of course, and they're all scientists. they did not call themselves that the natural philosophers. that they wanted to do in their field of physics and biology to solve political and social problems. that the alliance fund is a behalf social contract of the body of people. so this explains why did ferguson had been? never a good idea to reach inside a cop car to grab his gun. so there is really only one results that will happen. if citizens don't feel the police are fair then we have conflicts like that. budget decreases incentives and reduces the need for vengeance and rep

heroin quote/unquote all that's exposed of in municipal court because there wasn't any and it is ah adjudicatednal discharge by his attorney. >> for clarity -- >> my client had no drug charge. >> there was no heroin. >> yes. >> i do want to get to your client, though. so, this gun, this antique flint lock pistol where does he stand with those charges and what is your take on that. >> we're fighting those charges because unfortunately new jersey's slaw so absurd and here we say discretion should have been exercised by the sheriff's office. they didn't. okay, we're hopeful that the prosecutor will. but we're dealing with a bona fide flint lock antique queen anne victorian pistol that is absolutely a throat no one and it should really be dropped but unfortunately new jersey's law when it comes to handgun bans says right in it includes antique handguns. there are proposals going forward in the legislature now because of this case to change that. to conform new jersey to federal law. under federal law they're exempt. >> what we're going do,, this has blown up as you've seen on social media. we're ge

. >> now you're asking the nfl to adjudicate its own case.e 50 cases of domestic violence. >> they have the authority to do it. >> sure they do. >> the same way in fox. if you did something that wasn't a crime but they thought it was a bad act, almost all the contracts here they have the right to get rid of you. >> nfl has suspended people. >> in this case, there's sworn testimony by her about what he did. >> why can't they get stuff over turned like that? if the nfl is within bounds to do what it needs to do even if the court doesn't agree -- >> because the person in the ray rice case happened to be the same judge that tried the taylor case with me. she found that the punishment was excessive compared to the crime. >> i think the nfl has to step in though. >> i think they will. >> i think we have to talk about boston. it is the law. boston is buried in snow with more than two feet of snow falling in the latest storm, nearly six feet in the past few weeks and even more on the way this week. bean town is literally closed. commuter train subway

. >> he was adjudicated in court where a judge sent white the prison for 15 years.still he the predator went down without expressing any remorse for his scheme. >> while warren white was being held awaiting sentencing he basically kept a journal basically confessing of everything he did and how he didn't feel that what he had done was all that wrong. >> braced by the knowledge that there are many more warren whites out there, these investigators routinely troll the internet. >> there is my guy. >> setting traps for any and all who would prey upon children. >> yeah, yeah. >> it's about 5:30 p.m. when sergeant daniel gets a call from an interested party. >> i've got some experience girls that are pretty ying and i've got a couple of them. i'm not sure whether you want to take possession or are looking for a one night thing. >> the caller doesn't express interest in taking possession of a young girl but he is definitely interested in anna picture on the online ad. >> that's amy. she is my adopted niece. she is 14. i know what she does but i try to givehill her some pro