one adjudication of that, so instead of having different adjudications, you have one set of adjudication process os, o - processes, one set that that adjudication is based on, so that clearance can be agreed to and can be recognized across the different agencies. and then clearly, just the one clearance, you know, to make sure that that reciprocity moves across organizations, so i think they're pretty -- they're pretty fundamental, pretty standard, pretty simple processes. one application, one clearance process, one adjudication, recognized by all. >> do you think that would make a difference with the 4 million -- >> i think it would make a huge difference. because not only would it streamline the original investigation, you're not reinvestigating the same people over and over and the resources required to do the reinvestigation would be focused on the backlog. >> thank you. thank you, mr. chairman. >> mr. chairman, if you would indulge me for just one added point. senator feinstein's line of questioning is really critical here. one thing that i think it's important to put on the record,

one of adjudication of that, instead of having different adjudications, you have one set of adjudication processes, one set of risks that that adjudication is based on, so that clearance can be agreed to and can be recognized across the different agencies. clearly, just the one clearance to make sure that that reciprocity moves across organizations. i think they are pretty fundamental, pretty standard, pretty simple processes. one application, one clearance process, one adjudication recognized by all. >> do think that would make a difference with the 4 million? >> i think it would make a huge difference. streamline the original investigation, you are not re-investigating the same people over and over, and the resources required to do their real investigations would be focused on the backlog. if you would indulge me for one added point. senator feinstein's line of questions is critical. one thing that is important to put on the record. are very limited in their ability to get information out of the thernment of the status of investigation and adjudication going on with the people they hav

someone who has been adjudicated a mental defective. the problem with that is it's not a thing. no one really knows what that is. and the concern there is that you could have among other people veterans who are returning with ptsd, somebody in the veterans affairs administration has identified them as having ptsd and given them assistance managing their affairs in order to help them with that. they could be deemed by a combination of action by the v.a. and a regulation put out by the atf to have been adjudicated a mental defective and therefore deprived of their rights. now that may seem like a simple problem to correct, but once you do that and a culture develops among veterans where they're afraid to get help upon their return, you could end up with some real problems. you do not want returning veterans refusing to get treatment or help from the v.a. simply because they fear that they might be stripped of their right to carry that which they've been asked to carry in defense of their country. i'm trying to fix that i think we can get to a fix on it. but it does need to be repa

asa has not been adjudicated yet at all.sult, in the next week, the eu,japan, as a result, in the next week, the eu, japan, south korea, other major trading partners, they will seek more clarity. it is quite hard to know what the world trade organisation may decide in the future. that is an extremely long winded process. it could take years. let this is the real existential threat to the wto, the way in which the administration has justified the ta riffs the administration has justified the tariffs through the use of national security. it is entering uncharted waters. this section gives the presidency the power to impose trade barriers based on national security. it has not been used by the wto since the formation of the wto. if they... is the eu and japan and other countries took into the dispute settling mechanisms within the wto, what with the ruling sad? of the us ignore the ruling? —— what would the us ruling say? these are serious issues. it puts the spotlight on the wto itself. how it operates, and the processes we al

energy that serve the people and those that execute those laws with confidence and compassion adjudicating with justice and mercy i have been privileged to work alongside thousands and no one that i would rather pass or execute or adjudicate or debate about a law or program then a committed public servant. joe, why did you feel the need to do that and dedicate this book to a public servant? >> i really feel they are the heroes of our society over many years. i began to grasp that when i was in the navy i was three years in the navy and pentagon so i saw how hard these young officers worked for our country and in so much with mcnamara and johnson and carter. and all those things people said it's a good idea here is something you should try or do. and without that you cannot be a good secretary and there were brilliant people at the white house but today and for quite a while we have been diminishing as second-class citizens and haven't been paying attention to the fact that they are the cornerstone of what happened. the current president can decide if we clear anybody there is an army of pe

this is adjudication of justice for an internal employee. andy mccabe is or was an fbi employee. he should be merited with whatever the inspector general or the fbi process calls for. >> harris: are you impressed how they have stayed silent? >> absolutely. i was expecting to fire him by tweet. >> harris: and that's how it should be. >> there's no credibility if it's a white house decision. it's a justice decision. >> harris: we got word yesterday about this hour that jeff session's team at the doj, he was not there, he was traveling, but his team of some senior officials at the doj were meeting mccabe and he was fighting for his job and his pension. >> that would make sense. if you're a bureaucrat, your pension is everything. this is your family. it's not a light decision. but on the same token, you cannot lie to the inspector general. when the inspector general says we're investigating a matter, it's the duty of the fbi agents and the highest fbi agents to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. >> harris: does it have to be the inspector general is what i ima

the shooter near washington dc was adjudicated mentally above the state of virginia but the state never uploaded that information on the background check system to purchase a firearm. this bill will save lives. democraticriend, the leader, has said it is not enough. but if it saves lives isn't it a good start? i'm grateful to him for cosponsoring the legislation. could not tell he was a cosponsor of the legislation by his comments acting like this is not an important step but it is. it will save lives. this bill has the backing of the president. and the minority and majority members of the senate, supported the government. and yes, the national rifle association but also every town which is the end of the ideological spectrum when it comes to the second amendment. it is also the national coalition against the mystic violence. it is also the national shooting sports violation and other national associations. it really is remarkable when you divert andidely views when it comes to the second amendment come together and say, this is where we can find common ground. this is where we can do s

thirty-two people gun down by a changed youngster who have been adjudicated mentally on dangerous was prohibited from having a weapon but because of flaws in the system he had been able to purchase multiple weapons and he committed that horrible crime. i am panel the commission and told them, let the lawyers and lawsuits be damned. i want everything that went wrong to go public. they produced a report with hundreds of recommendations. about campus safety and mental health but also about fixes to our state and federal gun laws to reduce the risk of this happening. i was able to make some changes on my own and i took others to the legislator that they rejected but out of that painful situation, it's a funny thing to say about your own state come about a place i love eyes hoped it would be the worst. i hope that would've been the worst shooting but the pulse nightclub shooting, plus las vegas shooting now have claimed more victims and now parkland with the number of victims and the say that we learn from pain to you can make changes and improve, when i fix a piece of the background syste

was awful. back and forth every single hour, every single day. wants greater transparency in the adjudication process. happen on their campus, because that makes your university look safer. it's better for your public relations. and has begun reporting case numbers. while in college. i was sexually assaulted by a friend. than the event itself. were there to protect me was incredibly destabilising. so survivors would have a way of reporting sexual assault. if they don't want to. two, report electronically to the authorities at their school. the same assailant. as an information escrow agency. it holds onto records and only alerts schools when there's a match. students often report to protect others. this matching feature helps do that by detecting repeat offenders. people might use different names, they may look different. how do you make sure you've got the right person? but also a series of unique identifiers. currently, facebook profiles are used to match. numbers and e—mail addresses in the future. 12 us colleges use callisto. the university of san francisco was the first. we knew students

and the camera lights on, his instincts are to do the right thing, to make sure felons and those adjudicated mentally ill couldn't get guns by closing these loopholes of gun shows and on-line purchases. that was the right thing to do, both substantively, because it would have changed thousands of lives, and politically, because 90% of america is for it. then the hard right puts pressure on him, in this case the nra, and he does a total 180-degree flip. it makes it sound like when america really needs something, when america is crying out to prevent future parklands, the president just succumbs to the pressure group that puts the moe most heat on him, in this case the nra. >> what's the likelihood of congress, the senate and the house, passing any kind of gun legislation following the parkland school massacre? >> i would say two things. first, leader mcconnell and speaker ryan are so afraid of the nra, as are most of their members, that unless the president gives them cover saying he's for it, it's very hard to see getting anything else done, maybe until the congress changes in a year after t

the worst shooting, 32 people gunned down at virginia tech by a deranged youngster who had been adjudicated mentally illness but because of glitches in law in background check system he had been able to purchase multiple weapons and he committed that horrible crime. i empanel the commission, i told them let the lawyers and the lawsuits be dammed, i want to know everything that went wrong and i want to make it public, everything that went wrong and everything we can do to fix it and af course of months they produced hundreds of recommendations, the recommendations were about campus r safety, the carecommendations were about mental health and fixes to our state and federal gun laws to reduce the risk of this happening. make some changes on my own as an executive, i took other changes to my legislature that they rejected, but, again, out of the painful situation, and mr. president, the funny thing to say about your own state, about my state of virginia, a place like i love like virginia tech, i always had hoped that would be the worst shooting in the history of the united states, the pulse nig

lin, now an activist, wants greater transparency in the adjudication process.y're trying to cover up the number of sexual assault that happen on their campus, because that makes your university look safer. it's better for your public relations. stanford told click: stanford changed its title ix process in 2016 and has begun reporting case numbers. in the us, one in five women is sexually assaulted while in college. i was sexually assaulted by a friend. over a year after that happened, i decided to report my assault, and i ended up finding the process of reporting to be more traumatic than the event itself. feeling not believed by the people who i thought were there to protect me was incredibly destabilising. jessica ladd's ordeal spurred her to create callisto, so survivors would have a way of reporting sexual assault. they can, one, just say what happened to them with a timestamp, doesn't have to go anywhere if they don't want to. two, report electronically to the authorities at their school. 0r three, just say what happened to them for now but report electron

work alongside thousands of them and there is no one with whom i would rather pass, execute, and adjudicate or debate about than a committed public servant. why didn't you feel moved to do that, to dedicate this to public service? >> they are the heroes of our society over many. i didn't understand that but i begin to grasp that when i was in the navy. i spent three year years in they and the pentagon and i saw how hard these young officers worked for our country and then i saw so much of them working for mcnamara, johnson and carter. all those things he said i did, there were people saying there is a good idea, something you should try. without them, you can't be a good secretary, and i have brilliant people working for me at the white house. this is the backbone of the country. and today for a while, we have been diminishing begin second class citizens we haven't been paying attention to the fact they are the cornerstone of what happens in these departments. the senate can decide and we will block it, but there's an army of people who don't make much money. >> hel >> hell did their role a

elimination of price competition as a reason in favor of the acquisition the administrative trial to adjudicate the complaint is scheduled to begin on august seventh. and now we move to reducing regulations on the financial sector is it a good thing that will generate more freedom and therefore economic growth or will reduce regulations on the financial sector put the economy or consumers at risk here to answer those questions and more as bartlett nailer of public citizen butler thank you for being with us again we really appreciate your expertise particularly in the middle of all this bring us up to date on what's going on in the united states senate really as we speak literally as we speak the bill is asked twenty one fifty five it's got about forty provisions in it the motion to proceed with that they took place today at about eleven o'clock in the morning it got sixty six votes in favor which means about seventeen democrats joined with the republicans and to move this bill forward it's likely to be debated over the next few days with a final vote as early as thursday if not into next week s

there's very of -- what we can do until that person is adjudicated. >> this is due process. after you get determination from a judge that there's probable cause and with no longer than 14 days the judge would have to disturb and evidence that this person is a real danger. you can imagine how would have played out in that case. look at these text messages. i think a judge would have found probable cause. >> so my answer to the question is the president's suggestion would be exactly the opposite. and the president's suggestion it was under process. >> are you starting to get concerned -- snap one of the things i have done is to create the things that i think there are common ground in. hopefully the fix nics in the gun violence protection. these are things that have wrought support. the house can take it up next week and pass it. things are a little bit more difficult to do but i believe we should have debate on whether the age or some of the other issues we discussed. those issues have been around but i don't think we should keep that from getting us to do the things we agree

background checks fix nics approves of reporting in the existing background check system, those who are adjudicated mentally ill to get guns, the online loophole, they are not touched by fix nics. when you're a doctor, i say to my good friend from texas, the senior senator from tects text, when you're a doctor and your se wing up a wound, you don't just do the first stitch and walk away and say, we did something. no. you've got to do the real job to cure the injury. so i appreciate that my friend from texas wants to pass his bill. democrats support it. i'm a cosponsor. but as a response to the spree of shootings in our schools and on our streets and churches and movie theaters, nightclubs, concerts, street corners every evening, a bill to have one tiny piece is not enough. a bill to say that we can't oppose the n.r.a. on everything will never help ameliorate our problem of gun violence to a sufficient extent. as the coauthor of fix nics said, if we were to only debate the fix nics act, we would be slamming the door in the face of all of these kids who are demanding change. he said it perfectly. dem

where are the headlines, by the way, do you realize those are millions of people who have been adjudicatedtally unfit or criminally dangerous that are able right now to go and purchase a firearm because the politicians who are given the most lipservice about it have been the least about this. they could change this tomorrow. they could change it today but they won't because they are exploiting a tragedy for an agenda. shame on you. we call bs. [applause] >> where are the stories about how -- is a step for you, from 1950 to july 2016, 98.4% of mass shootings have taken place in gun-free zones. that's a fact that you guys are welcome to go, it's all online. there's this thing called google. maybe the same place you found the white nationalist to court for your headline. fake news and all. one of the things you saw in this video before i came out because a lot of people than asking what i'm going to do next, god bless america that i i can stay in dallas, texas. and god bless america that i am able to join a group of people at the nra and nratv to bring you an hour-long program everyday begin

people gun down on the campus of virginia tech in april 2007 by a deranged youngster who had been adjudicated mentally ill and dangerous and prohibited from having a weapon but because of glitches in the background check system he had been able to purchase multiple weapons and committed that horrible crime. i am panel the commission and i told them that the lawyers and the lawsuits be damned, i want to know everything that went wrong and make it public. everything that went wrong and everything we can do to fix it and over the course of a number of months they produced a report with hundreds of recommendations. recommendations were about campus safety and about mental health but they were also regulations about taxes to our state and federal gun laws to reduce the risk of this happening. i was able to make some changes on my own as executives. i made other changes my legislator that they rejected but again out of the painful situation in mr. president, the funny thing to say about your own state and about my own state of virginia and i always hoped it would be the worst. i would always hope t

- they want a consultation outside of our panel of providers that can be you know, listened to, adjudicated and approved. as a kaiser doc, i had several patients approved in that setting. >> commissioner? >> yeah. just looking at the clinical assessment on the first page, it describes cases being judged on a four point scale for none, mild, moderate, major. that would seem to be in a nutshell what we would want to see in terms of statistics back for them, maybe as for doctors as a whole and doctors for members. they also talk about this assessment by a team of 200 member committee. i'm trying to imagine what that must be like. how does a 200 member committee review every thing that happens? it seems a little hard for me to -- >> in the interest of words, i actually tried to modify, to stream line is a bit. there's not a 200 person committee who review dos each and every consultation, but some of those consultants were not full-time employees of best doctors. there's a system of cardiologists, so they may ask one of the cardiologists, here's the report. do you think there's no change in diag

i have people in my jail for six or seven years waiting final adjudication. it's a county jail. those kinds of things, i think, all play into the bigger picture of the criminal justice system. >> supervisor sheehy: yeah. it would be happy to call a hearing on that. and maybe i can put morty in my office with you. >> right. >> supervisor sheehy: i also have concerns about resources because it's probably a different set of resources you need to really do effective electronic monitoring. >> well, actually, last year, the mayor's office did increase this. this is part of the reconditioning recommendation. they gave us four positions to help us with doing the electronic monitoring so we could do it 24 hours a day. we're getting ready to ramp that up in the next few weeks. in the meantime, we're finding a lot more people violating the electronic monitoring, and we're bringing people back for this reason. >> supervisor sheehy: do you have the resources to do that? >> i think that this is something we're going to be looking at carefully as we go forward. it's not clear if the humphrey d

lin, now an activist, wants greater transparency in the adjudication process.re trying to cover up the number of sexual assault that happen on their campus, because that makes your university look safer. it's better for your public relations. stanford told click: stanford changed its title ix process in 2016 and has begun reporting case numbers. in the us, one in five women is sexually assaulted while in college. i was sexually assaulted by a friend. over a year after that happened, i decided to report my assault, and i ended up finding the process of reporting to be more traumatic than the event itself. feeling not believed by the people who i thought were there to protect me was incredibly destabilising. jessica ladd's ordeal spurred her to create callisto, so survivors would have a way of reporting sexual assault. they can, one, just say what happened to them with a timestamp, doesn't have to go anywhere if they don't want to. two, report electronically to the authorities at their school. 0r three, just say what happened to them for now but report electronic

would be exceedingly difficult that jared would grant a top secret clearance and that would be adjudicatedt see that to be in the cards. >> thank you, ned price, i appreciate it. >> concerns of the interests of the white house. how it is being compared of past administrations. last next. from your allergy pi? most pills don't finish the job because they don't relieve nasal congestion. flonase allergy relief is different. flonase relieves sneezing, itchy, watery eyes and a runny nose, plus nasal congestion, which pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. and 6 is greater than 1. start your day with flonase for more complete allergy relief. flonase. this changes everything. (vo)just one touch.ith with fancy feast creamy delights, she can have just the right touch of real milk. easily digestible, it makes her favorite entrées even more delightful. fancy feast creamy delights. love is in the details. >>> welcome back everyone, i am alex witt here. here is what we are monitoring for you of growing denvers conc jared kushner and ivanka trump of th

but there's very little you can do to remove guns from someone until that person's adjudicated, gone to jail, or something like that. reporter: is this similar to what the president said just last week, first take their guns away, then go to court? mr. rubio: well, this has due process. you go to court. you have to get a determination from a judge at the front end that there's probable cause for the temporary portion of it. and then within that, no longer than 14 days, the judge would have to determine through clear and convincing evidence that this person is a real danger. there would be due process as there should be on constitutional rights. but you can imagine how it would have played out in this case. they would have gone in and said, look at these instagram posts. look at these messages. this person is showing. i think a judge would have found probable cause to remove the guns from this killer. mr. nelson: my answer to your question, is the president's suggestion was exactly the opposite of this. the president's suggestion was there was no due process. here there is. reporter:

people who have engaged in domestic violence, adjudicated persons, or dangerous and mentally ill. that is a subject we are going to talk about a lot. you can't drive a car, you don't have your license. but can you buy a gun? probably not yet. to florida just changes laws make a minimal purchase age of 21. is that a good idea when you think about the capacity of young people to make judgments and particularly mature judgments in the face of fear and uncertainty? should they have access to a weapon? the second is if we do have laws that ban essentially dangerous persons, should we uniformly enforced them? should we have universal background checks? the national instant background is well-known to have lots of laws. the database is incomplete. states do not report appropriately. lots of people who, by law, should not and can't purchase a weapon can, because they are not on the database. even if you are, very easy to buy a weapon from an unlicensed -- from a gun show, on the internet from an unlicensed seller, or from a friend in a personal transfer, so the question is, should we clos

president normally does not give pardons until somebody's actually served time, has actually been adjudicated, has actually gone through the process. none of these people had at that point, of course. that doesn't mean the president can't do it. the constitution says the president has the power to pardon for any federal offense basically. and so it is certainly within his right to do it, but it is very unusual. of course it is going to raise suspicions among people thinking why is he doing that, what is he trying to do, what kind of signal is he trying to send if in fact he was knowledgeable about it. we don't know for a fact john dowd talked about it with the president but he did represent president. and it is certainly an interesting question to ask as to how much president trump was aware given his own public comments about his ability to issue pardons. >> in fact when he was asked about michael flynn, just sort of brushing it off and saying not at this time. garrett, i want to ask you about hope hicks. it was very noteworthy that the president not taking questions when he waush walked out

anybody whose been adjudicated to be mentally potentially dangerous is not allowed to purchase a firearm, they've tried to expand this in many ways so now that we have misdemeanor cases and the like and my only problem, in fact, i met with the group called the prosecutors against gun violence, da in new york, and the folks, the bloomberg people came to this meeting and said that did i think there were circumstances under which you could permanently or temporarily ban someone from owning a gun and i said, yes, we do. okay, well, we would like to ban guns for anybody who has been picked up for dwi, do you have empirical evidence that if someone had one beer too many will shoot up a mall. no, but it will be a good idea. the problem is that we have always been against treating people as members of groups and so -- as an example going to the prohibited people that are prohibited mental grounds during clinton administration there was an attempt to put a lifetime ban on any military person who had ever had counseling which would mean you're not going to go to council from a broader perspective

and you're not allowed to buy a gun if you have been adjudicated mentally ill.t specific change would you make? >> well, i think the word ends illness varies. one doctor can diagnose you one thing and one the other. we need to be consistent when we talk about mental health issues. that's just one thing i would change. >> tucker: i mean what would the change -- i don't want to be abstinent i want to get to the specifics here. specifics matter it's public policy. what specific change would you make? >> the issue specifically on mental health. in some places people with mental illnesses can go into a gun show or online and buy a weapon. you and i both know that. >> tucker: we just saw that happen in florida. a kid with mental illness was able to buy a gun because the school refused to turn him over -- how would you stop that? what would you do specifically. >> that's my point. we have to have comprehensive extensive background checks so that we can prevent another person -- prevent another person who has mental health issues from having a gun. >> tucker: here is wh

and look for a negotiated compromise between the base in kosovo and said compromise we should be adjudicated and ranged by the european union by the offices of european union and as you know at the moment still a five member countries of do you know putin has no recognized most of all and i do believe that if such a compromise is not the beach you will not have. a union in most acknowledgment of independence and membership of kosovo and you know if you need him by all member states. all right we're going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking to young former president of the u.n. general assembly and foreign minister of the czech republic discussing kosovo's prospects of becoming in your family member states. is a global trade war imminent if donald trump follows through on increasing tariffs and ending existing trade deals it seems very likely after all this was at the very center of his campaign for the presidency it was a promise he made to his base will make america great again. the new economic will resume folding in the realm of education the right to ed

and look for a negotiated compromise between the i think also and said compromise we should be adjudicated and ranged by the european union by the offices of european union and as you know at the moment still five member countries of do you know putin has no recognized kosovo and i do believe that if such a compromise is not the beach you will not have. a union in most knowledge moment of independence and membership.

and so today it affects single judges that are going beyond proper adjudicated bounds, making themselves super legislators for the entire united states. that means that each of the more than 600 federal district judges in the united states can enjoy a law or regulation throughout the country, regardless of whether the other 99 agrees. these limitless injunctions are contrary to the structure of our government, to the role of our judiciary, and they hamper or even block the proper functioning of our government. and importantly they dramatically undermine the power of the people to control their government. so let me share a few concerns about it. first of all, the nationwide injunction will encourage forum shopping, right? and there is a reason why so many lawsuits have been filed against the trump administration in california or hawaii. [ laughter ] which i once referred to, in the middle of the pacific. as far as i can tell. [ laughter ] it will be deemed offensive by some. and it was filed in texas against the obama administration. but look, they are looking for the most flavorrable fo

and make sure that convicted felons, people who are dishonorably discharged from the military, adjudicated mentally ill or committed acts of ofestic violence and number other categories, make sure that they cannot legally purchase firearms. why? because current law prohibits it. we have already passed those saw it sutherland springs, texas, 26 people lost their lives on sunday morning not long ago and 20 more lives were forever changed when they were shot by a government who whened and obtain firearms he was disqualified under the law from purchasing them. the fbi maintains the background check system and it wasn't their system is onlye as good as the information that is uploaded into the system. that's where you get a hit. that's when somebody goes into a store and tries to purchase a firearm and life -- lies, the system finds them and they are denied the purchase. that is how it is supposed to work. recently, the attitude seems to be among some here in washington that this bill doesn't go far enough. there are other ideas that i am more that willing to debate and vote on and some of whic

local criminal justice officials will adjudicate it at the local level, but it's clearly a national phenomenon. it's not a worsening national f phenomenon, but we'reng beco conscious at the unnecessary fatalities at the hands of police officers at the evidence of body wornme s or bystanders. this is a national problemt in fact people are shot every year. i'm not going to say whether it's too high or low, but it's clear there are racial disparities among those unarpe >> i was going to say i had at least three shootings i'm looking at right n a where person, an african american male was shot in the back. in different cities. and not sacramento. i had a case in sacramento a couple years it does happen. i don't see this as an isolated event. i s as a mind set that officers in who n these areas. we talk about implicit, racial bias. that's engrained within a mental state. too quick to shoot. that's what i e. u didn't have to do. you were in a position of safety. and what officers are taught is how to deescalate a situation. advise who you are. let them know who you are. ou have time, distance and sp

look for a negotiated compromise between the base in kosovo and serbia compromise we should be adjudicated. ranged by the european union by the offices of european union and as you know at the moment still five member countries of europe union has not recognized of all and i do believe that if such a compromise is not to reach you will not have. a unanimous knowledge moment of independence and membership of course so and you know if you're going by all member states all right we're going to take a short break right now we're back we'll continue talking to young college former president of the the wrang general assembly and foreign minister of the czech republic discussing kosovo's prospects of becoming the member states. i played for many clubs over the years so i know the guy even saw. football isn't only about what happens on the pitch for the final school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the superman to kill the narrowness and spending to do the twenty million. it's an experience like nothing else not to because i want to show what i think what i know about the beaut

look for a negotiated compromise between the base in kosovo and serbia compromise we should be adjudicated. ranged by the european union by the offices of european union and as you know at the moment still five member countries of the you know putin has not recognized most of all and i do believe that if such a compromise is not the beach you will not have. you know a most knowledge moment of independence and membership of course so and you know if you need him by all member states all right we are going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking to young college former president of the the wrang general assembly and foreign minister of the czech republic discussing because of us prospects of becoming a member states. it's a global trade war imminent if donald trump followed through on increasing tariffs and ending existing trade deals it seems very likely after all this was at the very center of his campaign for the presidency it was a promise he made to his base will it make america great again. the new global economic war is unfolding in the realm of educatio

elimination of price competition as a reason in favor of the acquisition the administrative trial to adjudicate the complaint is scheduled to begin on august seventh. and now we move to reducing regulations on the financial sector is it a good thing that will generate more freedom and therefore economic growth or will reduce regulations on the financial sector put the economy or consumers at risk here to answer those questions and more as bartlett nailer of public citizen bartlett thank you for being with us again we really appreciate your expertise particularly in the middle of all this bring us up to date on what's going on in the united states senate really as we speak literally as we speak the bill as ass twenty one fifty five it's got about forty provisions in it the motion to proceed with that they took place today at about eleven o'clock in the morning it got sixty six votes in favor which means about seventeen democrats joined with the republicans and to move this bill forward it's likely to be debated over the next few days with a final vote as early as thursday if not into next week.

have been detained for over two years and the courts in the immigration system is not moving to adjudicate a resolution, and it's really unfortunate. robert: what was the other book that you were pointing out to me? we were talking-- buck: the other book here is a more recent book. erika lee and judy yung wrote this book. it was called, "angel island: immigrant gateway to america." and what this does is talks not just about the chinese story, because we tend to focus on the chinese immigration story, but it talks about all the other stories, the russian jews, the mexicans who came through, the japanese who came through, the koreans who came through. so it wasn't just the chinese and a chinese story. angel island is really a story of all the new immigrants of the early 20th century. robert: yeah, i mean, it's definitely been a story that we've been wanting to tell. i'm glad to see so many different ways for people to find out more about it. and of course, your foundation doing such great work on it. buck: thank you. robert: thanks for being here. buck: thank you. robert: all right, henry, y