joining us right now is jonathan greenblatt, ceo and national director of adl.izations supporting the fund. how did this come about? what is this? well. >> look, as. >> we've talked on the. >> show before about the rise of anti-semitism, and we've seen it poison campuses and we've seen it poison cultural spaces. and we're increasingly seeing the sort of bds hooligans, the same ones who are seizing buildings at barnard trying to target corporations. last year, in 2024, we saw about 75 companies targeted by these bds activists. so that can mean anti-israel shareholder resolutions. that can mean staging actions at shareholder meetings, literally doing die ins or things like that. that can actually mean actions inside the companies. and i'm talking about big public equities like amazon, google, chevron, hp, intel and more. and so we felt like at adl, we've done a lot of stakeholder advocacy over the years. it's time to get into the shareholder advocacy. >> what's a dei in? i've never even heard of that. >> where these activists literally lie in front on the ground a

the adl put out a statement back in 2020 condemning him back then. so how is this person who would say that black people need to know their place in society and intellectual of any kind? it's bizarre. >> yeah. i don't i'm like the congresswoman. i don't have any familiarity with him. however, what i would say is, based on what you read tonight, um, one of the things about the trump coalition is that it is seeking to stop dividing americans by race and start uniting americans by our unique american values. some of these things, i think, are divisive by race, which is something we criticize democrats for trying to divide us by race. this idea of competent white men, the message is we want the best, competent people. period. and this idea of kneeling before a political entity, the only person you should kneel before is god. and so i just i think i think some of these people are provocateurs, and i think they say things for their own personal reasons. i think if you're trump, the question is, is my movement about a continuation of division along racial l

i'm wondering your view of how courts adling these sorts of cases in that circuit and what might affect police ms. jacoby: this sp is maybe not so much two-sided as a three sided. there have been a courts that we are le towards an officer d danger rule where they seem to suggest the use of force is automatically unreasonable if earlier in the sequence the officer did anything unreasonable. we do not think it is correc we think it is bad guidance for officers and would lead th police less aggressively. we t the court should apately take into account thlity of the circumstances. officers will have good guidance tose force when necessary, when there is a danger and they need to protect themselves or e public but to avoid situations, manufacturing a situation where the use of force fectively becomes inevitable. that is, jumpifront of the car, that type of thing. respono speech is what he has done here. the petitioner thinks it is. that is what theyill hash out below. you can use force to respond to danger. don't manufacture a dangeus situation. that goes a long way. justice barrett: it is a

adl you could hear them yelling.he president's outside in the south lawn, no one's on the fence. and if there are moments of loneliness in the white house, but when you live here because you are so aware of everyone lived here before you and every challenge our country has faced before as your income reached, i think there's always a feeling of encouragement and a real strong faith in the american and in our ability as people to overcome challenges. the level of security dramatic increased, the amount of visitors being able to come in to the white house, of course, dropped to for quite some time now. secret service, their credit have found a way that they feel that they can safely allow visitors back in, although we're certain, you know, a limited if you think about the impact of 911 there will be an assessment whether or not we overreacted. think it was very important symbolically that as soon as the president and security felt comfortable that they began to open the white house again, tourism immediately closing an