canceling the privileges of unused sim cards is against the law, according to the head of the administrative court of justiceal of the regulatory commission for radio communications, which leads to the cancellation of sim cards and fixed telephone lines regardless of use. it would be against the law. mr. mozafari also from actions article 13 informed about this decree and said: the telecommunication company must pay the losses of the people who suffered from this decree. as the head of the administrative court of justice said, according to the law, if a sim card can be returned, the telecommunications company must return the same sim card to the original owner, and if it cannot be returned and has been handed over to another person , the same sim card or phone line must be returned to the customer. . in the name of god and greetings, we are at your service with some sports news and first a bite. we present football to you, the fans of this field. the members of the national football team of our country to meet with hong kong, in the preliminaries of this country's great world cup , iran's football players in

the same points you said now some of the journalists were arrested and convicted in the primary court, in the secondary court, even in the administrative court of justice. the plaintiffs are all private . part of the conversation, mr. shahab esfandiari, a member of the faculty of arts university and the president of sada wasima university , asked about cyberspace: what is your plan to adjust it? we must have a strong and effective presence and governance in the virtual space , otherwise, blasphemy will definitely happen. there is no place in the world that has allowed governance in cyber space. there was talk of supporting women. ms. hijazi, mr. qalibau's advisor, gave some examples from the actions of this election candidate during his previous responsibilities, the women's police and police university , women's parks, cultural centers that were established specifically for women, mr. ghafari, another adviser to mr. ghalib, also said that bringing ideas to the ground is a characteristic of this presidential candidate, and his family and education is his cultural priorities. on the 24th day of june, the economic round table was hosted by mr. masoud al-

of two media activists. you said that now some journalists are arrested and sentenced in the primary court in the secondary court. even going to the administrative court of justice the complainants are all private. somewhere in the conversation, mr. shahab esfandiari, a member of the faculty of the university of arts and the president of the university of broadcasting, went to the virtual space and asked what is your plan to regulate grish? we must have a strong and effective presence and governance in the virtual space, otherwise, vandalism will definitely happen. nowhere in the world. it is not that they have allowed governance in the virtual space. speaking of women's support, mrs. hijazi, mr. qalibau's adviser , gave some examples of the actions of this candidate during his previous responsibilities, the women's police and police university, women's parks, cultural centers that the women's demand was established, mr. ghafari, another adviser to mr. ghalib, also said that bringing ideas to the ground is a characteristic of this candidate for the presidential election , and that family and education are his cultural priorities. he was a physician, that is, mr.

being and being convicted in the primary court, in the secondary court, even in the administrative court of justice, the plaintiffs are all private. well, you want to, yes, if i have to go, i would like to ask a private person, sir, this is a journalist, to forgive me for this, i'm watching him, i'm following the economic round table of one tv channel, also the host. mr. masoud was a physician, in the name of allah rahman al rahim , the expert of the program asked the candidate for the presidential election to present his solutions regarding the reduction of inflation, low economic growth and sanctions, so that the people are familiar with your point of view, there is no disease. it is not possible for him to look for a hizbullah or muslim doctor or a fellow party doctor when he gets sick. he goes to look for a doctor who is an expert. we did n't do this. we didn't look for an expert. you leave it in the economy and i will ruin it for sure, but if domestic experts and even get external advice to achieve the same specific goals. with the collective wisdom and the scientific solutions that exist and

obligation to prevent actual harm to the integrity of the proceedings to protect the orderly administration and to avoid risks to the administration of justice. the court has an obligation to protect the integrity of these proceedings and the fair administration of justice at least through the sentencing hearing and the resolution of any post trial motions. today in florida, donald trump's favorite judge aileen mercedes cannon, a judge pointed by him, scheduled three days of hearings in the criminal case where donald trump is accused of violations of the espionage act and illegal possession of classified documents. those hearings are scheduled for june 21st, june 24th, and june 25th. one of the defense arguments that judge cannon will consider in those hearings is that jack smith's appointment, the judge will also consider the prosecution's motion to change donald trump's conditions of release to impose a gag order on donald trump to prevent him from making false statements to thanks alex present foreseeable danger to those in this case. the government's request is necessary because of several intentionally false inflammatory statements recently made b

quote an obligation to prevent actual harm to the integrity of the proceedings of this court and to the administration of justice. these interests have not abated. and the court has an obligation to protect the integrity of these proceedings and the fair administration of justice at least through the sentencing, hearing and the resolution of any post-trial motions. and today in florida, donald trump's favorite judge mercedez cannon. federal judge appointed by donald trump scheduled three days of hearings in the criminal case where donald trump is accused of violations of the espionage act and illegal possession of documentless. those hearings are scheduled for june 21st, june 24th and june 25th. one of the defense arguments that judge cannon will consider in those hearings is that jack smith's appointment as a special counsel is unconstitutional and therefor the case should be dismissed. the judge will also consider the prosecution's motion to change donald trump's conditions of release to ineffect imposing gag order on donald trump that prevents him from making false statements that quote pose a significant imm

should pay the damages of the people who suffered from this decree. as the head of the court of administrative justice said that according to the law, if a sim card can be returned, the telecommunication company must return the same sim card to the original owner, and if it cannot be returned and it has been handed over to another person, it must be returned to the same sim card or phone line. the head of customs said: the import of smart mobile phones with the apple brand is also prohibited , and if the ban is canceled, the profits of traders will be 96. he also said that it is possible to activate mobile phones in the registry plan of the mobile phone registration process from june 20th. it became possible for these survivors or those who could not anyway finalize the process of registering their phone in the passenger procedure, they can refer to the procedure letter uploaded on the customs website, they can refer to hashem from june 20th . that they enter the country and finalize the process of registering their phone based on the instructions that have been notified, this includes any type of pho

the court overturned a 40-year-old decision, long criticized by conservatives, they gave federal administrative agencies sweeping power to regulate wide swaths of american life. in a decision by justice neil gorsuch, the court ruled that a town in oregon could enforce its ban of people sleeping in parks and public spaces even if they are homeless. now the court will return to the bench on monday to release the last discussions of the term including that major case on whether trump can even be prosecuted for his actions were a generous sixth. what if any immunity does he

professional qualities correspond today we will talk about high standards of justice, but first the news: the sixth administrative courtrefused to renew the former judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv on the staff of the supreme court. the panel of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's dismissal based on the letter. sbu on whether the judge has russian citizenship. we will remind you that bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received the passport of the russian federation back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine. and in 2012 at the age of 45 year he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. already at the last court session, the representative of the sbu reported that the law enforcement officers established through the registers. that lviv's russian citizenship exists, but now it is impossible to either prove or disprove information about the existence of citizenship. bohdan lviv still continues to assure that he does

court of law. doesn't that give you pause about how the biden administration has responded to another court of law, the international criminal cou, ll t of justicegards to gaza? senator blinken: i won't comment on the first part of your question because as i have long said, i don't do politics, i ree been very clear. the decision the prosecutor made was, in our judgment, profoundly wrongheaded. and, in creating equations between hamas and israel, hamas's leaders and israel's democratically elected leaders, as i said, and we have said, it is quite frankly shameful. the reality is the court was created for a very good reason, to be a court of lastesone thatn where a country either could not or would not effectively police itself. so, the principal a country code not or would not it is at the heart of the court's creation and what it does. in israel you ha a vibrant, independent, and very active judicial system and in the case of gaza there are many incidents that are under investigation, including some under criminal investigation. there is a case before the israeli supreme court about election denial of humanitarian assistance forisrael and its s

debate in atlanta, georgia, one of the refrains we should expect from biden is the fact that another trump administration could lead to two conservative supreme court justices nominated by donald trump. of course during his first administration, he nominated and successfully was able to place three conservative supreme court justices on the bench. you should also expect joe biden to focus on the idea that the progress made under the democratic administration was abled by donald trump and that the u.s.' role in the global order could come into question with allies who have heard donald trump repeatedly over the last two years call into question u.s. aid and resources. not only going to russia, or ukraine, excuse me, but potentially to support other allies of the united states and other nato members in the event russia were to invade and use aggression. but also for donald trump, you should expect next week for him to focus on immigration and the contrast between his administration and the biden administration as well as the price on goods under the biden administration practically over the last three years. what we expect next week, number one, no crowd. cnn

chief justice does interact with congress on things like for example raising salaries for judges or expanding size of the judiciary. he is not just a justice. he is also the administrator of the courtbranch including things like standards of ethics. i thought it was a missed opportunity by chief justice to not meet with his coequal branch of government and talk about the concerns they have. they do have oversight authority, you know. it would be a shame if this boiled down into a situation where there were subpoenas or the like. so i don't really understand why chief justice wouldn't meet with them to discuss judicial ethics. >> senator sheldon whitehouse responded to the refusal by saying close reading of text is attribute of good judge. simply ignoring text is often a sign that there is not a good answer. in this case, there is not a good answer. judicial conference is a body created and funded by congress enforcing laws passed by congress, we should note, he has made repeated calls for senate to pass supreme court ethics refusal and transparency act. i think last segment i said i am distraught. i am distraught about many things. i am distraught about this because to michael's po

professional qualities correspond. today we will talk about high standards of justice, but first the news: the sixth administrative courtmer judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv on the staff of the supreme court. the panel of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's dismissal on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's citizenship.

administrator. it is difficult to separate what it means to be a justice of the court and chief justice of the unitede's not just a member of the court, he is the chief administrator of the federal judiciary so all of these questions about judicial ethics, this is right in his wheelhouse and his refusal to do anything about this court and about the lower federal courts where there have been questions about recusal and acts of impropriety and participating in cases where judges have a financial interest and he has done precious little. what he has done is refused congress from writing statutes that might call these courts to account. >> this is an interesting point. he is the chief administrator of the federal judiciary which suggests a different role than most of us are thinking about the chief justice. he did say justices will police themselves. that is paraphrasing. how much control does he actually have over the conduct of justices since the flying of these flags that might be insurrectionist? is it a matter of he can set certain ethics rules, or can he go to alito and say you are causing problems

the supreme court of justice left several judges in their positions at once who have negative conclusions of the state administrativeexample, the judge of the pavlograd city district court of the dnipropetrovsk region serhii babiya. in 2018, babia's wife bought a toyota chr car for almost uah 800,000. babii says that part of the amount for him was allegedly given to his wife by her mother, and he paid the rest. but in the declaration for some reason, the judge did not even indicate the mother's gift. nor mine was told: i give my mother the old one, and she helps me with you 50-50 50 for 50, buy a new one, that's all. in 2013, serhii babiya's wife purchased shares of the ebrd public joint-stock company for almost uah 110,000. according to the foundation, at that time it had no official income, the judge did not report such shares or income from their disposal in any of the annual declarations. the wife purchased these securities with her own funds, i had nothing to do with this transaction, that's why she actually bought it for, but sold it, well, well, where did she get these funds, that's the point in this question

of products at major online retailers. supreme court will weigh in on the issue of gender affirming care for young people this fall, justices will hear a biden administrationeal to a court decision that upheld the transgender care ban in tennessee. the law there prohibits hormone therapy and puberty blockers for minors and imposes civil penalties for doctors who break the rules. nearly half of states either ban or are considering banning and or criminalizing gender affirming care for youth. but there are places like minnesota issuing protections. last year, our correspondent jessica gomez traveled there to see how medical professionals are guiding children and their families through these life altering decisions. in minneapolis, 14 year old be hitting the rock wall after school. nice, nice pull. i really like how it feels when i'm just on the wall and it like nothing really matters. baby was born the oldest of three girls, but from the beginning, the transgender teenager says it didn't feel right. i know who i am and i have known for a long time. barbie's parents, andy and andrea. i think it was about third grade that be finally decided that he wanted to b

transition project that serves as of policy proposals for the next conservative administration with its director. then with the alliance of justice talk about pending supreme courtdecisions in the ethics questions c- su'ndsg washington journal, join in the conversation live at eastern tuesday morning on c-span, c-span now, or onlan.org. announcer: friday watch c-span's 2024 campaign trail, a c-span's camperage providing a one-stop shop to discover what the candidates across the country are saying to voters, along with first-hand accounts from political reporters updated poll numra data, and campaign ads. watc'trail, friday night at 7:30 p.m. c-span.org, or download as a podcast on c-span app, or wherever you get your podcasts. c-span, your unfiltered view of politics.

of our judges, led to diametrically opposite consequences, which i have repeatedly said and emphasized. i would like to note that individual court decisions, inaction of control institutions. for the administration of justicewhich, unfortunately, unfortunately, does not exist today, and the management of these, the management of these processes, by persons who understand little about this and do not have the desire and ability to do this, well, this, leads precisely to crisis phenomena in the judicial system, and, unfortunately, undermines trust in state bodies, in particular the pre-judicial branch of government, and what was wanted i would say that... recently, we began to notice the dissatisfaction with this crisis even of that part of society and, well, ukrainian society, which in general supported the social demand for the massacre, and the latest publications in the mass media, court news, and then court decisions begin cause concern, both in society and... even in this part of society, if we narrow down the subject of today's discussion to a separate area, i would like to address the ukrainian judiciary, namely the consideration and resolution of requests by bodies to judicial investigation, then a

harm to the integrity of the proceedings, to protect the orderly administration of this court and avoid risks to the administration of justicewould appear abundantly clear that they're talking about alvin bragg about go to jail, that the gag order is more necessary now than ever before. >> let's just remember the gad order doesn't prevent donald trump from making any and all political attacks against joe biden and his administration. it doesn't protect and there's a carveout for the judge himself, who has been attacked. and there's a carveout for alvin bragg. what it is doing is protecting witnesses and jurors. this is one where the district attorney has asked both sides to brief this issue, but they're clearly going to take the position, you can't tell witnesses and jurors, we'll probably you just during the trial, but after the trial you're on your own? the judge is not an idiot. he's thinking about protecting the judicial process for this case and all future cases, and you can't expect witnesses to think they'll be safe or jurors think they'll be safe, it's only until you render a verdict, and by the way, if the defendant

of justice officials meet high standards. but first to the news. the sixth administrative court of appeal refused to reinstate former judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv. states of the supreme court. the panel of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's release on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's russian citizenship. we will remind you, bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received a russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine, and at the age of 45 in 2012 , he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. already on the last one. at the second meeting, the representative of the security service of ukraine reported that the law enforcement officers established through the registers that russian citizenship of lviv exists, but now they can neither prove nor refute the information about the presence of citizenship is impossible. bohdan lviv still contin

court of voronezh. the new criminal department accuses him of, quote, disorganizing the activities of institutions that provide isolation. from society, threats or violent actions in connection with the administration of justice but there are no specifics yet. according to tradition, there was a show. the former marine said in court that he would soon die. he supposedly was poisoned by someone in the colony where he is serving his sentence. in general, gilman is prone to apatage. let me remind you that at the beginning of last year he caused a riot on the sukhum-moscow train. the heated passenger had to be removed from the route in voronezh. gilman already disbanded the police department. many attacked law enforcement officers , struck them at least twice, and ended up going to jail for 3 and a half years. the plenipotentiary representative of the president of the russian federation in the north caucasus federal district, yuri chaiko, is on a working visit to the republic of dagestan. the plenipotentiary and the head of the region visited the holy dormition cathedral of makhachkala and the synagogue, which suffered from the terrorist attack on june 23. report by galina hungureeva. they are undergoing treatmen

of attorney general garland in federal court. johnson then accuses the biden administration of a two-tiered justice system and the doj says its hands are tied after there was executive privilege over the tape. and citing that long-term. the responses by attorney general garland to the spreens issued by the committees did not constitute a crime and therefore, it will bring citation between a grand jury to prosecute garland. they've handled the recordings. and they've declined to prosecute other tones general for house citations, and with bill barr and 2012, then eric holder, the first sitting cabinet member being held in contempt of congress. and in the cases, then president trump and president obama exerted authority over the committee. aishah: thank you. griff: democrats are demanding sanctions for controversial supreme court justices making the high court, its rulings and conservative justices a plank in their election platform this fall. and chad pergum has more. >> and on the conservative justices. >> justice alito is an insurrectionist sympathizer joined by his right wing buddy, clarence thomas. >> democrats accuse clarence th

exercise, not the legal one, the what position of our justice system has been the whole mike of a bite and administration. this was a sham show trial. the kangaroo court will never stand on appeal. americans deserve better than a sitting us president weapon icing our justice system against a political opponents all to win an election. we are from us and legal expert. i'm talk. so who's the same hill? hey, cool, the burden a disgusting display of injustice. they couldn't even say what the under. 3 cried was in the jury when they did the, the form finding him guilty simply checked next to each box saying guilty. and it never stated what the underlying crime was, which would have to have been a federal election law. my license, which are barred by the statute of limitations and for a state court to try and force a misdemeanor, a federal crime is again outrage, assistance. the most disgusting display of injustice is the salem witch trials. and not only is they converted a misdemeanor to us, telling me, even though the misdemeanor that they are alleging is barred by the statute of limitations to this all took place 78 years ago. they also are prosecuting a

not the legal one, the what a nice ation of our justice system has been a whole mike of a bite and administration. this was a sham show trial. the kangaroo court will never stand on appeal. americans deserve better than a sitting us president weapon icing our justice system against a political opponents all to win an election. i don't mind calling solid desk. you spoke with the legal allison form, the new jersey. so purely cool judge. i'm going to pull this on. i said the new state statute didn't them all the joys agreement on what the underlying choir ones which ones gave. but she said, is a violation of the us constitution, the president pride and that nothing to do with this case. there is no evidence to support that allegation at all. you know, in america, we have a 50 states as well as the federal system. and the state prosecute trail apparatus is independent of the federal system, the decisions as to who the states prosecute and how they prosecute them. and what they charge them with has nothing to do with the president or the federal government. but this prosecution was for a very bizarre crime that only exists in the state of new york.

the legal one, the what but nice vision of our justice system has been the whole mike of a bite and administration. this was a sham show trial. the kangaroo court will never stand on appeal. americans deserve better than a sitting us president weapon icing our justice system against a political opponents all to win an election. while all the ultimate fighting championship in new jersey, the crowd chanted an insulting slogan against us president bill by the the the same, even donald trump was greeted by cheers of applause. tom was vowed to how it has vowed to appeal, say he is fighting for fundamental rights as established by the us constitution. now we've heard from us legal exploit and talk show host steve deal. he called the verdict, a disgusting display of injustice. they couldn't even say what the underlying crime was and the jury when they did the, the form finding him guilty simply checked next to each box saying guilty. and it never stated what the underlying crime was, which would have to have been a federal election law. my license, which are barred by the statute of limitations and for a state court to try to enforce a misdemeanor, a

of kharkiv district administrative court. this is not the first time she has tried to become a member of the supreme council of justice.ents are making questionable decisions, making decisions while studying, which directly contradicts the law, as well as non-transparent declaration of property. in 2020, olena zaichko made a decision to... build 13 hectares of forest, despite the seizure of this plot, according to another court decision, permission to build was received by the slice construction cooperative, which is part of the zone of influence of kharkiv deputy ihor arich. it is interesting that immediately after of this decision, the minors, at that time the children of judge zaichko, received ownership of an apartment from the kharkiv city hall, with an area of ​​more than 100 m2. the judge also likes expensive cars. in 2021 , she bought a lexus for almost uah 2 million. our colleagues from the investigation. info received records of telephone conversations, presumably of judge olena zaichko. the investigative information found out and released a whole material about how she goes to the fortune teller there, does

of the kharkiv district administrative court. this is not the first time she has tried to become a member of the supreme council of justice. among. of her career achievements, making dubious decisions, making decisions while studying, which is directly contrary to the law, as well as non-transparent declaration of assets. in 2020 , olena zaichko decided to build 13 ha of forest despite the seizure of this area. according to another court decision. construction cooperative slice, which is part of the zone of influence of kharkiv deputy ihor arykh, received the permission to build. it is interesting that immediately after this decision, minors, at that time the children of judge zaichko. received ownership of an apartment from the kharkiv city hall with an area of ​​over 100 m2. the judge also likes expensive cars. in 2021 , she bought a lexus for almost uah 2 million. our colleagues from investigation-info received recordings of telephone conversations, presumably of judge olena zaichko. the investigation was investigated by info and released the whole thing about her going to the fortune teller there, doing other strange t

court agreed with the administration and said the federal law on emergency care overrode idaho's ban. the administration had urged the court not to take up the case, and in the opinion posted today, five of the justices agreed to dismiss the case saying it was too soon for the court to decide. three conservatives dissented saying the court should rule for idaho, and the newest justice, ketanji brown jackson, also said the court should move now but to rule against idaho. now we don't know when the court will release the opinions in this case officially. we do have more decisions that we expect on thursday and friday and possibly into next week. it's just one of several major cases that we're waiting on including those two involving former president trump, whether he's immune from prosecution for his actions around january 6th, and if he's not immune what can he be prosecuted for. jan crawford, cbs news, washington. >>> millions of americans across the midwest remain under threat of severe flooding with several major rivers still rising, and they may not crest until later this week. cbs' tom hanson spoke with homeowners in minnesota who pretty much lost everything. >> reporter: for days this house sat

of war. now has also come out since then that the roosevelt administration what the justice and the war department were extremely deceitful and misleading in their presentation to the supreme court they there were wildly inflated claims of national security but there also was evidence specifically undermined and the claim that this was necessary from a security perspective and they deliberately decided not to present that to the supreme court. now that doesn't excuse the supreme court all i mean, based on what was before it it were truly shameful, a truly shameful decision as three justices to, their credit recognized at the time, but even i think from this kind of worst of legacy, or maybe especially from this worst of legacies, i think there are important for today. and you one of them is the danger of excessive death to the government's claims of national security for the reasons just said that it was wildly inflated here we could add to that tager hoover not exactly known as a great defender of civil liberties. this country knew that there was no evidence. j j edgar hoover was very much against the incarcerate in the fbi. there were voices within federal government. hoover t

of attorney general garland and federal court. johnson then accuses the biden administration of a two tiered justice system, but the doj is essentiallyng its hands are tied after the president asserted executive privilege over the tapes, citing long standing policy, the department says it determined the responses by attorney general garland to the subpoenas issued by the committees did not constitute a crime, and therefore it won't bring the contempt citation before a grand jury or take any other action to prosecute, garland. the justice department has already handed the transcript of the recordings . the department has in the past declined to prosecute other attorneys general for house contempt citations, most recently in 2019 with former attorney general bill barr, and in 2012, when eric holder became the first ag to be held in contempt of congress. in both cases, former presidents trump and obama exerted executive privilege over certain records sought by the house oversight committee in washington matter. rivera, fox news this week on our political show, the issue is two sides of the debate on retail theft and public safety. >> fi

the fda's regulation around mifepristone, accusing the administration of unlawfully easing restrictions around the drug. in the court's opinion, justice kavanaugh writes the plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that fda's relaxed regulatory requirements likely would cause them to suffer an injury, while noting the plaintiffs have sincere legal, moral, ideological, and policy objections to elective abortion and to fda's relaxed regulation of mifepristone. but that because they weren't personally injured, the case doesn't have legal standing. the court did not weigh in on whether the fda was right to roll back restrictions, leaving the door open to future cases. this is the same district court that already has allowed several states the states of kansas, idaho and missouri to intervene. we continue the fight. it is not over. >> we'll be back with another case with better standing next time. >> the ruling keeps mifepristone available by mail in most states where abortion is legal. in other words, status quo, which vice president harris says is not reason to celebrate. >> we are looking at the fact that two thirds of women of reproductiv

senior administration official earlier today asked about the potential for lawsuits and did say that the department of justice routinely has to defend actions taken by this administration, in court. and that it was prepared to do so in this case, as well. of course, we know, chris, that president biden signed this executive action earlier today. we expect to hear from him in just a few minutes about how exactly he envisions this new rule being -- being executed at the southern border, at the border with mexico. we understand that this order effectively blocks migrants who would cross the border illegally, from seeking asylum. when the number of daily encounters at the border reaches 2,500. from homeland security, that number has surpassed 4,000. this order is effectively now usable at the southern border. it is a temporary course of action. the administration saying that, when the number gets back down below 1,500 encounters, daily for a sustained period of seven days, that this order would effectively go away at that point, but could come back again when the number would reach 2,500 again. at the same time right now, the white house is saying this is immigration policy issue th

had not released a killer e united states of america through a parole policy that this administration is advancing. the department of justice is texas in courttaking valuable resources, to get the people of texas when texas simply wants tgsay in stopping people who are illegally entering, arrest them into with that on her own terms when the federal government refuses to do its job. >> as reflected in our filings in that casein court because the united states supreme court in arizona versus united states held that states cannot have their own immigration that >> you are in court laws that the federal government is refusing to enforce. by the way, that is not the same thing as arizona. the final question. the department of justice did not assert privilege with regard to the transcript, correct? >> that is right. >> you articulated a minute ago to my colleagues the best evidence rules is th transcribed copy is admissible, but how can you claim privilege in the face of, not just a legislative inquironal impeachment inquiry? how can you claim privilege for something you just testified was effectively the same thing? how can you claim privilege fo

court ruled that joe biden did not have the power, the power of the purse that belongs to congress supreme court strikes down biden student forgiveness program. the justices ruled by the administrationts authority when it announced it would cancel up to $40 billion in student loans. well, that's important the power of the purse belongs to congress chief justice roberts wrote for the court in biden versus nebraska characterizing the decision is straightforward interpretation of federal law which it was. the heroes act emphasize the secretary of education the power to waive or modify laws and regulations governing the student loan programs. congress use the word modify. it means in biden administration could make a modest adjustments in addition to existing provisions. not transform them biden has violated the supreme court decision. he defies it. and he doesn't prow they want you to listen to this and is not the first time he has done it. >> the supreme court blocked me from leaving student debt but they did not stop me. so far our lives student debt for nearly 5 million americans. i significant number of black borrowers chase your dreams, start a family by a first home start a busin