to ensure that we can still confront and defeat multiple adversaries. the last area is to protect obviously and prioritize key investments and have the capacity to grow and adapt and mobilize. i talked about some of the areas that we want to invest in. this budget provides almost $12 billion of investment in science and technology. $10.4 billion in special operations forces. about $4 billion in unmanned air systems. and about $3.5 billion in cyber. the last point i would make is we have got to maintain a strong reserve and a strong national guard that can respond if we have to mobilize quickly. that's been a key to our ability to mobilize over these last ten years and, today, i have to tell you when you go out to the battle field, you can't tell the difference between active duty and national guard and reserve units. they are out there fighting, developing great experience, great capabilities, i don't want to lose that for the future. i want to be able to maintain that. last area i will mention is obviously an area that is extremely important. it's fund

our legal adversary system, our legal system is an adversary system that's predicated upon legal advocacy for both sides. that's what mr. helmick did at the request of the court. it really shows a misunderstanding of why we have the best legal system in the world, people don't understand that both sides -- both sides, both sides -- are supposed to be adequately represented, and no nominee should be disqualified for representing clients, especially when the courts ask hem to. at his confirmation hearing to become chief justice of the united states, john roberts made this point. quote "it is a tradition the american bar goes back before the founding of the country. the lawyers are not identified with a position of their clients. most famous example probably is john adams who represented the british soldiers charged in the boston massacre. he did that for a reason, because he wanted to show that the revolution in which he was involved was not about overturning the rule of law; it was about vindicating the rule of law." and, mr. president, just by that. here is a man who became president of t

yes, our adversaries are persistent. they are clever. the pressures of globalization and technology are ever-present. change is a constant in today's world and we must prepare for it. yet, change is just one constant. the other is the american people's resolve. the same resolve drives the fbi every day, and together, we can and we will keep our country say from harm. thank you again for having me here today. i certainly will be happy to answer whatever questions you might have. [applause] >> thanks to director muller. i direct the stanford center for international security and cooperation and i am a professor at stanford law school, and i am on it to be your to moderate our question and answer session. i am also very glad that i am not the one to have to answer the questions. director, i wonder if we could start with a pair of questions about 9/11. there were many questions from the audience about 9/11, and i will just pair these two together. "on the day itself, as you recall what you and your team went through, what did you learn about

he said he felt there trying to be too adversarial. i said, moon. adversarial sounds like a good thing for a regular to be. it is almost like a journalist. people who ride a beverage not like what i write, the adversarial. i'm not part of their corporate spin. a regulator should not the end member of the institution they're regulating. how he is seen by members of congress. that was kind of an eye opener for me. i would argue for a more adversarial relationship than less. >> one more question. >> this person has been very patient. there you go. >> i do not see any hope for actual things happening. what you think is the ultimate answer? >> the ultimate answer for getting us out of the boom? i think we have to see a few cases. it would not take a lot. it would take maybe one prosecutor who make people sit up and take notice. i think it is a multi-faceted question. it goes to the question of investors. it is massive. there are a lot of failures at every step of the way. what can we do as individuals to try to change this dynamic. this is the toughest q

he said that he felt there are trying to be too adversarial. i said that sounds like a good thing for a regulator to be. he said that they were too adversarial at was not the right idea. people who are right about call me adversarial i have not a part of their corporate span. a regulator should not be part of the span of the institution they regulate and i thought it was an interesting comment which revealed a lot about the regulatory community and how it is seen by members of congress to oversee these people. that was my opener for me. i would argue for a more adversarial relationship that less. this person has been very patient here. >> i don't see any hope for actual things happening. what do you think it is the ultimate answer? >> the ultimate answer to getting as out of this boom- bust cycle? >> illegal actions and immoral actions on the part of government and business. >> we just have to see a few cases. it would not take hundreds of cases. just one prosecutor trying to make his or her spurs to make people sit up and take notice. it is a

force your defenses that makes a huge difference right i guess to get the game changes when your adversary is also as well equipped douglas thank you so much for coming in the studio is a pleasure as as always that was retired u.s. army colonel douglas macgregor. well coming up next on our roads here is the capital account with our leicester let's check in with florence to see what is on today's agenda laura and what he working on over there well live what can i say your guest mentioned the germans so hey let's talk about them on our show the germans and the greeks they face off in soccer tomorrow for any euro cup bans but they face off a lot more frequently in the debt crisis but what's missing from the mainstream media's characterization is the new wants the detail it's brushed over with platitudes and stereotypes so we're really going to break it down in depth on capital count in just a few minutes that is coming up and much more on the capital account next lauren thank you for the update but that's going to do it now for the news from one of the stories we covered you can check out our

the sandia report speaks of those who oppose the department's recommendations as adversaries, according to what's circulated on the hill. it notes although they are willing to potentially violate the law, violence is unlikely as an operational movement, does the department believe the media are adversaries, what rules and laws are we likely to break and what evidence or experience is such a statement based? sandia continues stating the apparent root cause for the issues driving this assessment is the possible presence of algorithmic traders and/or their agents in the press lockup faster. has the lockup been infiltrated by hedge funds? the public, press and congress would be entitled to that information. is it that difficult to distinguish between an authentic news organization and hedge fund? most significantly, if the root cause of the issues driving this assessment is the possible presence of algorithmic traders, why not just expel them from the lockup? why threaten to erode the fi

and over again that scientific cooperations turned into a transfer of wealth and technology to our adversary, to what appears to be economic, if not military and political adversary. >> first of all, the administration is no admirer of the human rights policies in china and we constantly, when we travel to china for whatever purpose raised the human rights issues with them. we also raised with them the issue of the theft of intellectual property. >> if when you raise issues like that, when you go to china don't your actions speak louder than your words because you were there to find ways to cooperate with the people whom you are now saying we're very concerned about this, now we met that responsibility. so let's go do this. >> actually, congressman rohrabacher, the point that i make. >> okay. >> with my interlock outors in china is selected to be beneficial us to as well as china is jeopardized by china's human rights and intellectual property theft and that if those activities do not stop that these beneficial activity, mutually beneficial activities will not be able to continue. that is an

sponsored what was then called a dirty tricks operation to undermine the campaigns of potential adversaries and launched an intelligence organization that would use wiretapping and surreptitious entry to acquire information about the president's adversaries. the exhibit is very clear about what we know and what we don't know. in fact, there's a whole panel here that lays out based on the trial testimony, on the tapes, on the documents that the watergate special prosecution force and the house judiciary committee looked at and we've looked at, and materials that we had in our collection, that we were able to release in the last few years. the best evidence on what various members of the white house staff and the president himself knew and did not know about the illegal intelligence operation. again, if you would prefer to acquire information through audio visual means, you've got a nice screen that you touch here. and you can listen to the president himself who was interviewed after he left office, not by us, but by the private nixon foundation. he talks about dirty tricks. >> this sort of t

in the 21st century, our adversaries will come at us using 21st century technology.hat is the world we live in. we have got to be able to respond with 21st century technology. so we must invest. we have got to invest in space, cyberspace, long-range precision strikes. we have got to invest an unmanned vehicles. we have got to invest and special operations forces. we have got to invest in the latest technologies to insure that we can still confront and repeat multiple adversaries. the last area is to protect and prioritize the key investments that have the capacity to grow, adapt, and mobilize. i talked about some of the areas you want to invest in. this budget provides almost $12 billion of investment in science and technology. $10.4 billion in special operations forces. $4 billion in unmanned air systems. $3.5 billion in cyber. the last point i would make is that we have got to maintain a strong reserve and a strong national guard that can respond if we have to mobilize quickly. that has been a key to our ability to mobilize over these last 10 years. today, i have t

. >> i was going to say, i believe in the adversarial system. okay? no, i do. all right? i believe that -- that one attorney represents one side, the other attorney represents the other side, and then a neutral fact finder makes the facts. you've concluded certain things, and you have more facts than i do because you were an investigator, all right? there are some other facts out there that were not presented at trial, whether they could have been hearsay or just tactical, all right, decision not to present it. our defense for him was -- and he was convicted, all right? we got -- i was on the team that had his conviction reversed. all right? those of us who represent him and other criminal defendants who have convictions reversed tend not to apologize that the trial was not fair. all right? i mean, that was it. if the court decides that severance was required in the unanimous decision, that's in definition by my mind not a fair trial, and then a decision was made the decision was made not to retry him. and that was more a political decision, i would suggest, not retry him

culture of the intellectuals has turned into a mass adversarial cynicism the common assumption is the elites are always hiding something public servants are in it for themselves those people at the top are nowhere near as smart or as wonderful as peer and all knowing as me. this boy now only do i feel like he's scolding me for having the balls to think for myself but he actually acts like the common assumption that elites are always hiding something is up for debate why do you think so much of our country's negotiating process happens behind closed doors without cameras without a paper trail what about our national security state or everything down to the most minute detail is considered classified wiki leaks prove very well how just not true that is if anything the powers that be keep things secret because they don't want to be embarrassed and if public servants really were doing all of these things like running for office solely for us now what do they flip flop on their positions break their promises they make to us all the time. mr nixon did you know about the burglary of our demo

purely oppositional and obstructionist, disdaining problem solving, defining its partisan adversary as the enemy and opposing positions often because of who is supporting them, not because of what is in them. the first evidence comes from the filibuster, let me put up a chart, which is now being applied in a fashion unseen in all of previous american history. i don't have time to go over the history of the filibuster, much of it is in the book that i mentioned and makes a great holiday gift, but let me say that in the past, filibusters were used rarely for an issue of great national moment by a minority feeling intensely about them and willing to stop everything and throw themselves into making their point. now it is used routinely as a weapon of obstruction. cloture motions were roughly two a month in the 1970s, three a month in the 1980s. now there are two or more a week. i have to say to be sure that the minority has a point here, many cloture motions are filed prematurely. they're designed to shut off the minori minority's ability to debate an issue. that's true, and it's a chicken

in the 21st century, our adversaries are going to come at us using 21st century technology. that is the world we live in. we have to deal to respond with 21st century technology. so, we must invest. we must invest in space, cyberspace, long-range precision strikes, unmanned vehicles, special operations forces, the latest technologies to ensure that we can still confronted and defeated multiple adversaries. in the last areas, to protect obviously and prioritize key investments and have the capacity to grow and adapt and mobilize, i talked about some of the areas we want to invest in. this budget provides almost $12 million of investment in science and technology. just under ten and a half and special operations forces, 4 billion in unmanned air systems command three and a half billion in cyber. the last point i would make is, we have got to maintain a strong reserve and national guard that can respond if we have to mobilize quickly. that has been a key to our ability to mobilize over the last ten years. after tell you, when you go out to the battlefield you cannot tell the di

in the 21st century, our adversaries will come at us using 21st century technology. that is a world we live in. they have got to be able to respond with 21st-century technology. so we must invest. we got to -- we have to invest in space, cyberspace, long-range precision strikes, unmanned vehicles, special operations forces, the latest technologies to insure that we can confront and defeat multiple adversaries. last area to protect and per caskey investments. i talked about some of the areas that we want to invest in -- this budget provides almost $12 billion of investment in science and technology $10.4 billion in special operations for fixes -- forces. $3.5 billion in cyber. we have to maintain a strong reserve and a strong national guard that can respond if we have to mobilize quickly. that has been a key to our ability to mobilize over the last 10 years. today, i have to tell you -- when you go to the battlefield -- you cannot tell the difference between active duty and national guard and reserve units. they're developing great abilities. i do not want to lose tha

. >> advising people that you never confront an armed adversary. >> the case appears to be an isolated incident, a crime of opportunity. they're hoping to get tips to crack down the suspect. >> it is a very disturbing incident and we ask anyone with information to come forward. >> it did you have any information, you can call metro crime stoppers at 866-7-lock-up. >> a man impersonating a police officer is apprehended after pulling over a real cop. they tried to reform a traffic stop on a capitol heights police officer. even after learning he was a cop, he was claiming he was a military caught from louisiana. take a look at the car the suspect was driving at the time. they want anyone who may have been victimized to contact authorities. >> a man was shot and killed near a metro station. authorities say there was a possible attempted abduction around troubled top 30 yesterday afternoon. police say he became combative and walked out of his house with a gun. >> i just can understand today that he's gone. >> his car was rammed up against the officers vehicle. now the other suspect is in po

adversaries. >> that is the fifth combat communication group, known as the mob.deploy and last to leave. >> we're always first. first ones out the door, first ones of excellence. >> we're building up for installing initial communications. and make it so that we can actually get up within a few days and have communications with the outside world. >> reporter: the first step to base building. >> absolutely. >> all begins here. >> yes, sir. >> reporter: to get a better understanding what the mob does i was made an honorary member for the day. from communications to shelter, to air traffic control and supplying troops in the field, the mob does it all. you guys make the complex look easy and it's not easy at all. >> it's training, that is all it is. just training. >> reporter: there is a lot to this. >> we put tax dollars to work. >> reporter: the mission doesn't come without risk. >> it's life and death business. >> reporter: these are guys who will deal with electronics, engineering but also are soldiers. >> may be in an environment where bad guys want do do them h

you had a president who had no coattails, 36 days to come in, facing an adversarial environment. it would have been easy for democrats to hold a dinner meeting on inaugural even say the way that we can regain power is to stomp on his neck and lever led up. we can vote against everything he wants his presidency will die. instead, they cooperated immediately on no child left behind. that gave him a victory that established the legitimacy of his presidency. democratic votes provided the margin for the tax cuts. that was a hallmark of the bush presidency. democrats say the vote on the tarp program which saved the bush presidency. contrast that with another book about the meeting that took place with top republican leaders on inaugural even 2009. the president came in on a landslide with a 70% approval in the worst economy since the great depression. i think that is the difference and when you look at things like blocking nominations that are widely acceptable because you don't want bill to be implemented, that is the difference. let me address the argument that you made that tom and

i felt there were trying to be too adversarial, he said. i said, adversarial. of sounds like a good thing for a regulator to be. no, no, there were too adversarial. that is not the right idea for a regulator. it is like a journalist. people who did not like what i write, the adversarial. the regular should not be part of these institutions there regulating. about how it is viewed and seen by members of congress who oversee these people. that was kind of an eye opener for me. i would argue for more adversarial relationships than less. >> i do not see any hope for -- newlin >> did not say that. >> what do you think is the ultimate answer? >> the ultimate answer to getting us out of this bailout cycle? >> i think we just have to see a few cases. it would not take a lot of cases. it would not take 100 cases. it would take one prosecutor to make people sit up and take notice. i think it is a multifaceted question. it goes to the question about investors. it is massive and there are a lot of feelings it every step of the way. what can we do to try to change those dyn

but i just want to respond they were there that night, and a lot of people think it is adversarial, but it is supportive to think that they are there, they are watching. we know who everybody is, and it and the seeing support of knowing that if they are not saying anything we are doing something right. >> thank you. >> the updates and timeline we have tended now -- pending now, recently the sergeant was assigned to emergency operations. ghis first task will be to see what we can do to make that ready to be issued. there has been in a boat -- been input, and i do not expect out to be much longer in the process of being finalized. i do have to personally thank her for being such an incredible hulhelp. she is more than a help. she does the majority of the work, and last week and prior to that we have had a number of meetings with new language access and limited english proficiency issues, and i think we are making strides within the department. it needs a few corrections before about will be sent out to the officers industry. good -- officers industry. there are a couple of recommendations

we have certainly weakened them in many ways, our terrorist adversaries are -- given that raility, now is not the time to rest on our accomplishments, to weaken our defenses or to scale back on critical intelligence authority. to the contrary, now is the time to redouble our efforts, to press the advantage that we have gained and to authorize a status that -- thank you for giving the opportunity to speak in this important matter. >> mr. rottenberg. >>> mr. chairman, members of the committee, thank you very much for the opportunity to testify today. i'm director of the electronic privacy information center where nonpartisan research organization, and i'm very much concerned about the government's use of surveillance authority. the committee was fully aware of the threats to national security, to our country and considered certainly the essential purpose of the fisa to enable the collection of important foreign intelligence protection of important privacy breasts and congressional interests of u.s. persons, subjecting that congress had an oversight role to play and in that spir rid, we'r

our first meeting was very adversarial. i was trying to point out the code issues with the fire department. i was dismissed as not understanding the building and fire code. subsequently, i was able to ask the planning department to ask the fire department. some of the changes were not compromises. there were requirements by the fire department. the setback of the deck was a fire code requirement. the firewall on the property requirement was a fire department requirement. moving it back from the fire escape at the back was a fire department requirement. the lot of these changes were requirements of the fire department. we started having these discussions, and the planning department came back and said this is the rear yard. they would not work with reasonable restrictions, and everything fell apart. commissioner moore: as far as exiting from the fire escape, originally, the fire code was set up that you exit in a straight line, even if it is a diagonal line. you move toward the front of the building to come to the street and

this is an adversarial relationship, a legally adversarial relationship. labor solicitor, patricia smith with anabominnable record in new york, and worse on the federal level. >> sean: let's go to the extreme. detroit became the extreme, where labor got too powerful and even eastern airlines. i remember baggage handlers were getting paid $60- $80, $100,000. unions give the politicians money. how do they get it back? how are they rewardd? >> it's an inherent conflict of interest. in a private negotiation, have you an employer with a profit motive. it wants to preserve its profit motive, at the same time, paying high enough wage to take care of the laborers, but in a government sector thing, the democrats when they are in charge, see to it that they get high wages, in return for big labor pac money and thuggery at the ground level as we saw in wisconsin. >> sean: david limbaugh, thanks for being here -- "the great destroyer." >> are you sure that's the name? >> sean: john stossel is here to explain how it became varmenty impossible to fire teachers, no matte

the first one is we are conducting a covert espionage operation against iranians, our adversary in then and we're trying to stop them from having nuclear weapons and this operation is focused on that very thing. to reveal the details of that in an ongoing operation, and you know for a fact and we've been advocating on your show that we need to do cyber attack against iran. obviously, the government is doing it, you can make the assumption that this isn't the only thing that they're doing in terms of cyber attacks. what has that done for the iranians. they've got their antenna up now and resources, what they think it is, how to stop it. cautionary measures taken in other areas. and this is harsh dealing with the iranians, they are an eye for an eye government and they will respond to this attack as they have in the past to others. and they may have already responded and we just don't even know it yet, but the fact of the matter is, they will return some kind of cyber attack to the united states and look what they've done with the israelis. they suspected the israelis killed some of thei

. >> we are advising folks to never confront an armed adversary. give up your proper gear. contact police. -- give up your property. contact police. >> anyone with information is asked to contact police. a man impersonating a police officer is caught after pulling over an actual police officer. around 4:00 wednesday, anthony giovanni tried to perform a traffic stop on a police officer. the suspect told the officers he was speeding claiming he was a military kopp. he was arrested and charged. here is a look at the car the suspect was driving. if you have been victimized, contact authorities. officials have a good reason why the public pools are not open. plus a john collar company is coming to the rescue of these artists. -- junk hauler >> jerry sandusky stepping into a police car before heading to jail, convicted of sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years. when the verdict was read, insurers were heard from hundreds outside the courthouse. the prosecution thinks those who helped convict sandusky. it was the victims who deserved recognition. >> this trial was not something th

the adversarial relationship between the press and richard nixon was pal paable. >> i wonder if you could share with us your thoughts. tell us what goes through your mind when you hear people who love this country and people wlobble in -- who believe in you say reluctantly that perhaps you should resign or be impeached? >> well, i'm glad we don't take the rote of this room. chris: a third watergate legacy, the distrust of politicians. here was david brinkley reporting it back then. >> two college professors asked people which proffings and occupations they trusted the most and the least. the results are interesting and here they are. doctors came in first as the most trusted. 19th and next to last, politicians. 20th and last, used car salesmen. chris: wow. you know, brinkley used to write his texts, his scripts underlining those words he would punch. let's talk about today in politics. nixon may have been the best friend that the haters of government ever had. he gave them a face nor their anger against government. >> we had an era before nixon where people believed in government out of n

does the department believe the media are adversaries? what rules are we likely to break? what evidence or experience is such a statement based? india continues stating the apparent root cause for the issues driving this assessment is the possible presence of the algorithm at traders and/or their agents in the press lockup facility. has the lockup been infiltrated by hedge funds? the public, press and congress would be entitled to that information. is it that difficult to distinguish between an authentic news organizations and the hedge funds? most significantly, is the root cause of the issues driving this assessment is the possible presence of algorithmic traders, why not just expel them from the lockup? why threatened? in summary, mr. chairman, this proposal does undermine the first amendment. it reduces transparency. a potentially reduces the agassi of the data come increases market volatility. given the dol's refusal to extend the current june 15 date for removing equipment, the calendar will dictate how short we will seek an injunction unless the competence of overal

it tells you a lot about the al qaeda affiliates and our adversaries.if you look at bo koran and the local language it basically means down with western education. in other words, down with institutions. i believe that africa offers a lot of promise, a lot of opportunity if you look at the growth in some of the countries like ghana, tanzania. enormous resources and you have this middle-class that is growing, that is really challenging the status quo. i spent 10 years in africa's indifferent countries in some respects i'm very positive about africa but acknowledging they are risk. i believe that they can be mitigated. the u.s. needs to be there. look at the chinese, the indians and russians, others that are in their competing. in these capital markets and is free enterprise opportunity. the u.s. needs to be in there. and projecting that nonmilitary power. it's not just the u.s. government, it's companies like yours, private enterprise, they goes into places like africa and affords the opportunity, the capabilities for africans to come and visit our count

they wouldn't be on my top five as a geopolitical adversary. >> calling it like he sees it.r i can't, thanks so much. >>> a university under fire for admitting the daughter of a syrian official with close ties to the syrian president, bashar al-assad. here is cnn's mary snow. >> reporter: human rights advocates are furious she's accepted to a prestigious program. her ties to bashar al-assad. she's the daughter of syria's ambassador to the united nations. leaked e-mail shows she appeared to have a close relationship withal as add, referring to him as handsome and cute. she provided advice to him on his public image abroad, as syria waged a brutal crackdown on its people and denied it. she's syrian, graduated from columbia school of international and public affairs. she's demanding columbia rescind that admission. >> i was surprised and disturbed by this decision. it is not a personal thing, it is accepting what's happening, accepting the genocide and saying we are going to welcome people who are part of this into our school. >> reporter: barbara walters landed an excuse inter

way of demonstrating that he is, in fact, pro business when everybody, you know, pants all of his adversaries paint him as anti-business. it's a major issue for him to overcome. to the point that i was making a little while ago that i think obama and romney sort of battle against their opponents' efforts to paint them in one extreme than they really are. obama has a terrible ability to connect with business. i mean, he's the teleprompter. he's not the one that business folks can relate to. and i think that translates to a sense that he's not sympathetic or understanding of how a private sector economy works. i think he has saulgt to find directions forward that is unintrusive to businesses. you know, i think, again, the affordable care act is one of them and the jobs act is one of them. one of the ironies of the keystone pipeline issue is that if he did not have to worry about how approval of the pipeline would disenchant his base, he would have approved it days ago. >> he just couldn't take the headline risk with the environmental groups saying i'm going to green light this thing and they ar

>> alan, we learned tonight mec ru rini is scheduled to testify on june 28th and his adversary is set to take the stand the next day. what is not known is whether or not the eliana lopez will testify live here in person or perhaps via skype via venezuela. the suspended sheriff entered the hearing room amid cheers from his supporters. more than six months after the new year's eve fight with his wife had brought him to this point he says he was undermining the will of the voters by trying to throw him out of office. >> he is resorting to it since day one. they are doing whatever they can . >> one thing they are trying to get into evidence is the cell phone video taken by ivory madison. she is seen and heard describing a bruise inflicted by her husband. he says she was trying to calm her down during a verbal fight. but lawyers fought over a written statement from madison which came under attack by one member of the commission. >> clearly hear say. clearly appear to have solely the purpose of poisoning the well. >> they are trying to admit testimony from his exgirl friend. >> that makes h

. >> there is a game going on in cairo tonight between two old adversaries with the highest stakes. on one side, the egyptian military, on the other, the muslim brotherhood. in the last week, the military has made bold moves dissolving parliament and changing the constitution. is what we are seeing a slow motion to? >> we have party seemed to -- >> is what we are seeing a slow- motion coup? >> we have already seen the coup. >> we don't want to resort to violence whatsoever and this is not part of our mandate but if the military pushes the egyptian people think that only exit, we will not shy away from confronting them. >> the man who often speaks for the generals in public absolutely denies they have any desire to hold onto power. >> we believe that we have a burden. that is not funny or to be enjoyed. the leadership of this country has been thrown to the left. >> then, the retired general makes this rather breathtaking prediction. >> i have a crystal ball and i look at it in the evening and i see the results of the questions. this is what i can say. no more than that. >> the genera

his primary adversary is brian losee. he defeated him yesterday and the individual medley.y met in the pool again tonight in the 200. phelps cannot check him down the stretch. they meet again tomorrow in the final top two earned a spot in the olympic games. >>> a major college football announcement in washington dc. the big schools will determine a champion with a 14 playoff. that begins in the 2014 seasons. four playoff teams will be picked by a committee. bowl games will service playoff games. this will do away with the bcs system that's been used since 1998. >> this is huge news. people have been wanting this to happen for years. what do you think lex. >> play it on the field. >> thanks, mark. coming up, make way. how these fuzzy little guys got into trouble and how they got out. next. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, >> is one of the most famous names in the world. big ben will soon be known as the elizabeth tower. the name change comes as the queen celebrates her time in jubilee. the tower has been a landmark of britain's parliament since 1859. it's been known by a handful of