of reality, they are clear structures, as it should be, and megalomania is very well written in aerograds such a desire for something gigantic, gigantic , great, majestic, to conquer, to take away, to conquer, ugh, and this is also something that is not characteristic of ukrainians, i also planned to ask you to talk about, in my opinion, the most tragic scenario of dovdzhenko, which is called ukraine on fire, is a script, a film script, which he wrote in 1942, if i'm not mistaken, yes, we found his address where he says these words ukraine is on fire, it's at the beginning of the war, he addresses as if with an appeal, it seems interesting to us just to look at the temperament of oleksandr dovdzhenko. ukraine is on fire. in our wide spaces, so beautiful and joyful in the recent past. cities and villages have been burning nonstop for two years now, movileten jokers illuminating the great tragedy of our time. listen to the contemporaries of the great era, ukrainians who are surrounded by the fire of ukraine. the decisive time of the liberation struggle is coming, we will even worthy sons o

characters, and they certainly do not look very motivating for those who have started to build, then aerograd shors they are quite like that, it is not a reflection of reality, it is clear constructs, as it should be, and megalomania is very well written in aerograd, and this is the urge to something gigantic, gigantic, big, majestic, to conquer, to take away, to conquer, ugh, and this is also something that is not characteristic of ukrainians , i also planned to ask you to talk about... in my opinion, dovdzhenko's most tragic script, which is called ukraine of fire, is a script, a film script, which he wrote in 1942, if i'm not mistaken, that's how we found his address, where he says the words ukraine in lights, this is at the beginning of the war, he addresses as if with an appeal, it seems interesting to us just to look at the temperament of oleksandr dovdzhenko. ukraine is on fire, on our wide spaces, so beautiful and joyful in the recent past, cities and villages have been burning non-stop for two years now, the speech of latent jokers illuminating the great tragedy of our time, listen t

why dovzhenkom, well, that’s how they got by, and the next film after 32, it was already 35, eh, aerogradwhich he already shot on mosfilm, for according to stalin’s idea, in fact, maybe it is one of the reasons were the same, but i agree with you that i... i think it is because of his world fame and because stalin, perhaps, understood that it was better to use him, and stalin used him to the fullest, i think , and with regard to erograd and shchors, because shchors was also stalin's idea, to shoot the ukrainian chapaev in this way, as if yes, yes, and there, in principle, in both films , it is very, well, very well traced, if there are still some hesitations in the land, and there are also a lot of them in ivan. there is a hesitation between that, well, such an artistic understanding of whether what is happening here is good, whether this transformation is good and where it leads, because dovzhenko puts these doubts in the mouths of his characters, they certainly do not look very motivating for those who start to build, then the aerograd and shors, they are already quite like that, they a