housing to find more affordable housing in the private market that helps with the affordability challenge the math is we think in san francisco the actual value of the sdwik effects is actively bigger than the direct effect that's one the reasons the tight housing stock we're building affordable housing is the most effect strategy you can have for effecting affordability you can begin to state of california measure the price effect an additional point this price benefit that you get for all low income household from the low income hours that's at risk if the demand spills over from the higher income by the way, the supply is not up with the demand we've seen this in san francisco houses tennessee 10 or 20 years ago are now occupied by a higher income they have the power and generally, the ability to set the prices and their unmet demand creates priced pressures that e roads the addict benefits of housing we can begin to measure we think the both the price benefits of building affordable housing and the price benefits across the housing market and talk about what we've seen in the income t

we need to secure mitch more for affordable housing. that is why the affordable housing bond is critical. my hope is we have a measure moving forward and that there is a lively dialogue in the next few weeks as we put it on the ballot. i think the new funding for 500 million dollars dedicated to affordable housing is critical for the next 5 years to deal with the crisis raised. the new funding serves need for family, senior and homeless and supportive and special needs housing as well as first time home ownership for teachers and first responders and others. i like how supervisor avalos identified the san francisco community land trust small site acquisition and other ways to really insure that we have new sites to have affordable housing before they are flipped and changed and taken off the market as well. with 500 million from my calculation the city has 100 million to kb a neighborhood stabilization trust large number to fund 600 or more units of at risk displacement over the next 5 years, 200 million to build tupe 1 thousand afforda

housing there's an effort to try to create new programs to add on affordability to existing projects we've serve middle-income residents that are very, very hard-pressed to stay in that very, very heated housing market we've been working with the city departments this is an area that is of particular interest thought school district the school district is undergoing a bit of a transition they anticipate losing 5 hundred teachers over the next 5 years and the question what can we do a a city to support them in creating housing opportunities to new teachers what worry about teaching as opposed to the housing the experienced teachers have gone through the system can't afford to buy a home and continue to contribute to san francisco and it's neighborhoods so what we're trying to address is some of the broader issues some of that is related to working with our sister development like the planning department like regulatory changes we can do together and bring before the planning commission and board that will regulated and create housing that woo and clearly we're looking at ways to creat

housing element which we passed at the board 5060 percent of the housing u housing united 60 percent affordable i know as we passed prop k the goal set in the housing balance initiative were measure was set at 33 percent as a goal i think some view it as pa strong mandate i'm wondering how we're inadequately meeting the housing element i know our regional needs arena suggestions are 60 percent affordable housing how are we doing in meeting those important goals. >> your question is really an important one given the housing situation you're right prop k is a goal of having a citywide balance of roughly 2/3rd's market street and 1/3rd affordable so one of the things we're doing is keeping close tabs on the numbers by the end of this month you'll see a report on the first reporting period of that requirement i think that the other issue is related to how we're achieve a higher percentage of affordable and middle-income housing obviously requires more the planning department and process it requires major funding and major resources this is what you'll hear from the mayor's office of housing but it

housing percentage we call affordable housing shoulder and also affordable units as part of larger towers in the because of the towers that's the economics of those transactions work well, for affordable housing we'll not take on 40 stories building or the affordable housing for a couple of reasons one we could clearly build it people build large tall buildings all the time that's not the problem but the problem can we operate something that needs you know elevators to the 40th floor he genealogically deal with the question of the life safety systems and looking at some of the other residential high-rise residential the cost of operating those residential units granted they're in a market rate building close to what we charge for rent solely without an accomodations for reserves vessels vacate those costs will go up on a market was not on the medium north carolina and the concern the long term viability of those building should those the expense numbers sort of not or actually, the rent numbers not keep up with the market rate increases in the expenses overall so i think that in terms of

units not only 4 units on site the problem there's not enough onsite affordable housing 4 unit does hardly anything to help with the situation of displacement and gentrification in this area so many people are being displaced there are 23 percent offsite the keyword is unify taking people of low income to a different area separating families, separating community and it is really detrimental to the people who live there and who have been living there a long time my biggest point is to say that in the mission we must have more affordable housing and it's incredibly important that we continue to champion this idea and represent the community that lives there now thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon. i'm carolyn i'm with the mission neighborhood all to apologize to the developers and architect that have been working a long time they probably know this neighborhood has been experiencing extreme change so what is their proposing to build awhile appropriate and aesthetics and appropriate to what makes sense for this neighborhood is hardly appropriate at this ti

about teaching as opposed to the housing the experienced teachers have gone through the system can't afford to buy a home and continue to contribute to san francisco and it's neighborhoods so what we're trying to address is some of the broader issues some of that is related to working with our sister development like the planning department like regulatory changes we can do together and bring before the planning commission and board that will regulated and create housing that woo and clearly we're looking at ways to create financing instruments to assist in some of the expansive work we're trying to do in addition to the affordable housing we're not looking to ignore or loaf behind what's the bread and butter of the mayor's office of housing our traditional affordable housing but we want to do add to this work and to address a broader range of individuals and families who also given the housing market are hard-pressed to stay in the city in a nut shell that's what we are doing in terms of creating new programs and trying to line up projects to leverage out the funding and meet the mayors go

housing we want to know if affordable to whom? just like the mayor is talking about thirty thousand of units and when you look at the area when the affordable housing is going to be built it is going to be built in areas that are contaminated areas you talk about the shipyard it is a super fun site roadway you may not know that commissioners but you have to tear down brand new units on the shipyard they're built on contaminated soil not you'll but some and this investigative reporting will be doing a lesson i didn't thing for the community user community commissioners that's a shame even though a lot of the things are happening in the bayview we don't have one representation and draek and myself come here to represent you don't have the developments or 2k0789sdz to look at line item things and some of the projects and give our opinions so next item donna in connection don't leave us in the dark you say go to the intersect or shut down our electronic device you prohibit it so it is like do this but don't do it i'm going to be talki

ordinance was two pathways once a property is declared surplus it what be solid or developed start affordable units so i'm speaking whether it was venerable we have a lot of surplus assets that are either unvenerable or hostage to a property because of their access requirements and utilized constraint you name it so on releasing website were the properties that were reviewed by the malice and the cac regulated for housing prudent persons but moved towards a disposition process to yield revenue, however, those on the site were down to the shriver's of property only a neighbor would be interested in quasi that's typically what we have in our vibrant. >> how many properties in the inventory. >> i'll say 35 or so on our current list we'll get you that exact list i object to get that. >> i don't expect an exact 94 number how many have we sold and used the affordable fund. >> we will have to get that number back to you supervisor the best examples of the surplus properties was a surplus property under the jurisdiction of - it was development for affordable housing for vets but you know the ordinanc

cheeper isí-np affordable. it is not affordable.isting housing is important housing and it needs to be protected like the code requires. protecting housing that is affordable has an effect on entirety market, which i think is the underlying reason for planning code section 317. i believe that by ignoring this very important criterion the board asc staff has made a major error. the huge difference between $5 million home and $2.3 million homes. one thing that distinguishes one from the other is size. square footage. your motion and your vote did not confront this and i'm asking for a rehearing so you can make a motion that at least deals?i%("?7 with this one way or the other. thank you very much. >> thank you. >> we can hear from the permit holder. >> thank you good evening. i understand that the issue here is not about design and that's what the appellant's position is. i will not go into the design. if there's any question about the design of the building i'm glad to answer them. it's really just a rehashing of the same discussion

housing percentage we call affordable housing shoulder and also affordable units as part of larger towers in the because of the towers that's the economics of those transactions work well, for affordable housing we'll not take on 40 stories building or the affordable housing for a couple of reasons one we could clearly build it people build large tall buildings all the time that's not the problem but the problem can we operate something that

we had a good hearing on a bigger issue of affordable housing and how we start to for the purpose up interesting ideas of buying existing rent controlled buildings or exist lots few people come to those we get more on the specific specific projects an easy vote yes or no will solve the affordable housing so i invite people and developers like the gentleman that built avenue we would like to talk about more affordable hoourdz like you did in the excelsior i woirn we'd put our i like you've put the affordable open site and the use into the courtyard so i'm supportive of the project and appreciate it thanks. >> if you don't mind i'll follow-up open those comments and agree with commissioner hillis i agree with many of the folks that are supportive of the project and opposed splild is one factor not the end all factor that will solve san francisco's problems if we didn't approve that seeing an empty lot it can contribute to the problems on the flipped side i'm confused the population growth in san francisco overall the area growth irks we and traffic aishgz me i feel the same frustration

to stay overall i'm sure you're aware of the need to rehab and preserve that affordable housing is aajor initiative of the administration and in addition our work in hope sf basically rebuilding 4 family developments that were so delipidated we shouldn't be rebuilding and we should be not rehabilitating but rebuilding a large part of our work in terms of providing affordable housing how that- those units because their they will be sauptd by the federal governments rent subsidies will be able to serve individuals, families without income; right? the thirty percent of the income whatever their income might be on g a or cal works they'll be 38 percent of that number or nothing as the case might be that allows generations of families and individuals to stay housed 90 in san francisco in addition to the our work in terms of the brick and mortar we work in the neighborhoods and strengthen the physical and infrastructure of the neighborhood this is where some of the homeless and safety net services are provided out of the community development division at this time i'm going to turn it over

an affordable place to rent is nebraska. you need to make $13.49 to afford a 2 bedroom apartment. arkansas it's $12.50 needed to represent a place there. keep in mind it's $5 more than the federal minimum wage. here is something else to consider. most of the job growth occurred in low-wage industries according to the bureau of labour statistics, it is expected to continue over the next five years. joining us from washington is victoria steiner, a real estate broker and real estate attorney with the think tank carnegie group, joining us from fort lauderdale florida. based on the numbers we are seeing we can't keep up with our represent, especially our wages. is there anything in washington in government who understands it? >> i think the mayor of new york understands it. he wants to help people to live and afford to live in manhattan, and the burrows, and is asking developers when they are plying to build the high-rises to put aside housing for the middle income people and the lotteries. he's open to having people have affordable housing in new york. >> but he is asking the develop

health care act presentation and we and our response to the affordable health care act does focus on vulnerable population and health disparities we've respond to that through the san francisco health network the integrated system we've developed in the department that delivery system from primary care to long term care at laguna honda we also have focused on the population health program that works on communicable health disease in our affordable health care act prelims we've increased enrollment in thetions for all individuals in san francisco working with the h f a and expanded the access to care to thousands of individuals in the city and one of the things if the affordable health care act is that we have to show health outcomes and proved quality of life so we put a lot of effort into those areas this year we had the great opportunity with having a good revenue based to restore health care programs from prior budget initiative and you've heard a bit from the director of h f a about the citywide programs we've worked with with human resources i mean the human services department

that affordable housing this is what that is about i'll ask airbnb i don't agree with the chronicle but they acknowledged the heirs market is being impacted by the airbnb but the chronicle remedies the average is correct instead of trashing us they have recognize this system right now is broken and what we're facing in neighborhoods like the mission is incredible they need to take responsibility for the fatigue that their business model hases batted this housing crisis we have a legislation from supervisor kim i want to note a couple of key points what we're mroep first a key component is prohibiting the airbnb platforms not on the short term register and feinstein them if they list the units unregistered the fact that implementation is not going to happen unless we hold airbnb accountable and right now no affordability a on the only a couple hundred of units are registered and thousand of units are being listed on airbnb platform alone they know their listing unit and making money off the illegal activity and emily rogers of the planning department has received to the penalties i q

lease housing partner a california limited partnering for the construction of hundred and did 98 affordable housing and plus two manager units development at 58 percent 8 mission boulevard as long as as mission bay block west and adaptation with the quality act and the project area discussion and action resolution. >> madam director. >> thank you, madam secretary commissioners that particular block you've seen most recently over the course of the last year's and taken the owner participation agreement to allow the project to move forward in mission bay and then specific predevelopment loan permanent lesson and now ground lease that is authorization of a ground lease for the mission bay block 7 west fronting mission bay common park utilizing another affordable unit 50 percent ami we're tliefltd to bring forward for your contradiction it should break ground in another month with the commission actions today with that i'd like to ask pam and ocii housing distinction to walk you through the components of the project and the scope of the terms of ground. >> good afternoon madam chair rosales and

. >> no one said i didn't speak loud enough we talk about the rfps for the affordable housing being built you know we've said many times about wanting to make sure that local minority owned and women owned biz businesses or businesses around or evictions have been around and had an opportunity i'm hoping that the rfps are being created one of the things i've asked for awhile back even boise on the first ones being selected that they you know have a good track record with us in the city but also their nonprofit organizations that are part of it so i'd like to ask we highlight that in and be great if the commission sees the rfps before they go out. >> absolutely the rfp drafts will be provided to the commission before published. >> the other question about the percentage of 83 versus 17 percent and 83 being rental and 17 being homeownership you know the prices of homes in san francisco are just going through the revolver and how can we do it so that more people are able to stay and more people are able to own their own homes 17 percent seems awful low because if we - i would hate for people

at this as a result huge loss of people where it is a regional problem and trying to look at be affordable issues on in san francisco and treating ourselves like an island differentiation x district attorney make sense we have to work in areas particular close to us to provide enough housing oftentimes where there is more land and lower costs for the los angeles police department it make sense to do that along those lines i was looking at the statistics for the changes in san francisco and we sort of were using the year 2000 as baseline the city has been around for hundred 75 years more or less and the income ethic composition from the last few years is a disparity because san francisco has been different foremost of the period than what it is today as far as the income statistics relative number of people income levels and ethnics is different i don't think we can micro manage where people are going to live we can acknowledge try doing everything we can to provide the housing the demand is minute missed mr. egging began says if you build the high income people are here and continue to be

come we might not be no where around this 50 percent hiring is just a bunch of shut oh, when i can't afford this high dog gone rent let's try san francisco recipe but all you got to do look around and tell me where the black folks went when i'm standing here in city hall oh, get silly all what do did you is here in city hall sometimes, it get silly you all you call that still i but i call it silly hall because i'm going to tell i've been a tall in it you all at city hall do you want to know what's going in city hall do don't you want to know leakage i'm not an activist i'm an entrepreneur and i want to show you before i got 00 into this political game i was in church all my life got murder at 18. >> mr. washington. >> i would like you to address item. >> address the budget. >> the budget. >> i agree with if you don't take care of off your obligation in the fillmore i call it the feel no more look around the blacks are leaving this town thank you. >> madam secretary. >> i don't have any more cards our for on the budget the budget item. >> i mean my church. >> sir if you want to speak on the

housing and thank god we have one commissioner here from the mission who has seen it all affordable to whom? that land belongs to the indian i represent them i've told you hundred times this land was stolen if you look at san francisco redevelopment agency they were supposed to help the borrow again and again very, if any, commissioners pay attention to this when we have a housing element i bet you haven't read the housing element not the last 3 housing element they're our market value price units are over 3 hundred percent when it comes to affordable housing they're below 4 hundred percent you all don't pay attention to the academy of arts university bowing hundred and hundreds of rental unit and converting them to dormitories you don't pay attention therefore all this commission with the very fancy name and investment and infrastructure this is the third bachelor you need to push tell the mayor i'll call out his name mayor edwin lee sit down with the mayor and when you talk about thirty thousand units mr. mayor please put in affordable housing in places where the land is not conta

what programs and efforts exist to preserve the existing affordable housing? what are the challenges and the stumbling blocks to these effort and how can we remove them and what additional things can we do to retain affordable house and our neighbors who live there? ideally we want to identify and protect buildings before they are at risk, in the meantime, we are also trying to cope with ongoing displacement in researching the housing situation, and in speaking to housing advocates and one of the things that we heard repeatedly is that we are not getting ahead of the systematically clearing out of long term tenants and so we have created a resolution to create a earn warning system that is designed to help us identify the at risk buildings and to connect them with the valuable resources, and at the early stage this is a simple, short term fix and the rent board is going to add eviction and buy out notices to their data base and when we see the multiple notices, filed on a building the mayor's office of housing and the district supervisor will then be contacted