i said on the opposite side of the camp which as we should try to have afghanistan be as mu normal as possible to genuinely say to afghanistan and russians and the world that we made accomplishments in this area. it is not that we are opposed to a revocation, it is just in those places or anchored the farmers could be quickly recruited into the insurgent forces. >> i am glad we got both sides on that thing. >> if we are spending about $100 billion per year right now on the afghanistan problem and a farmer's income is about half a billion dollars, what are the implications that the united states said we would buy all of this from but farmers which is heavily are spending, how does that play out? we are targeting certain farmers or of some kinds of intelligence, would there be a way that we could more effectively control the markets and create a monopoly using our own economic power directly? >> two different issues here. there is a proposal on the table. to buy all the poppy in afghanistan and make more people for medicine and all the parts of the third world that do not have enough. i