member afuhaamang. >> aye. >> member afuhaamang is aye. vice president carrion. >> abstain. >> vice carrion abstain. >> you have to vote, sorry. you can't abstain. unless you have a conflict of interest. >> no, i currently do not have a conflict of interest. i actually would like to a little more information about other oversight commissions that have just posted because we are hearing from my perspective we are hearing from people who used this-a national executive search firm but haven't heard from people who have not used it. it seems to me has there-given the funds and the lack of budget and the very small budget we have to do an immense amount of work i'm very critical of using that budget in a way that will result in the same people being selected that potentially may be selective. given what i learned from the industry and given the fact the bord made it very clear that we will be asking for community input and asking the community the voters the people who have put this to our charge of what they want in a ig. >> circumstances unde

i think commissioner afuhaamang said that at the very first meeting that we should have-- >> (inaudible) >> wrap up the last issue, i like to call the question if there is a motion for the chief attorney position. assistant chief attorney position. >> i have no motion. >> no motions at this time. but again, mr. kind's presentation i think not concluded because we haven't had a opportunity to ask questions or public comment. >> we did have public comment. >> not on his presentation so that needs to be continued and public comment and if someone chooses to make a motion they can. >> i have one quick request that is germane. if we have an agenda item that is up for possible action, if it be presented more then 48 hours advance. that doesn't give the board members meaningful time for input as well as the public, the most important part of our job is to serve the public and i want the public to also have more then 48 hours to review documents. >> i think dan posted this 72 hours before the meeting as required by law. >> i understand that but i think when it is something that important that m