on the non-agenda items. okay. next item >> the next is the adjournment of the financing committee. >> okay. i thought it was closed session. >> we have no items for closed session. >> thank you very much we are adjourned and i'd like to call back from recess into the county agenda the commission on community development and infrastructure at 152 so if someone could go out and get commissioner rosales. we'll just pause and continue with the rest of our agenda item 5 c. >> thank you very much please call the next item. >> item 5 c pursuant to the environmental quality act and approving the project for the amendment with the, llc a delaware company to allow it to be developed with 45 income rental inclusionary units and other units. recommending approval by board of supervisors for the ordinance 2 hundred and 15 dash 12 and submitting the remedies to the board of supervisors. mission bay north redevelopment action resolution 52014. thank you, madam secretary. commissions and members of the public thank you for joinin

and i didn't receive an agenda for this meeting. and when i called some friends of mine - let me finish baby the agenda was for 1:30 today and some people getting got here a utility. i want to make sure i'm still you know, i get the agenda and get a time where i can be on time. that's one the reason i didn't know you were going to be meeting at 11. i'm on time i'm also here. and then in your discussions of chairman i stated to you all some time ago you are the cash cow now. redevelopment tells you be the cash cow for all the funding that's going out and you really need to know why those funds are being given and it's not being given to my opinion. i watch everything i've been walsh this city for a long time how those groups get together to represent not you but for lenore corporation. thank you very much >> thank you, dr. i think the record shows the next two commission meetings will commence at 11 clock and we'll make sure that dr. jackson get information. >> diving i'll speak briefly. i want to apologize i haven't yet read the com

this is part of the agenda. over the next several months, we will be talking about the other portions of the agenda. if this nation is to succeed, we better make sure that the majority of our population, the women in our society, the young girls and the women, young and old, that they have every opportunity to succeed. and there are barriers, some legal, some historic and some custom, that make it very difficult for a woman to have an equal chance in our economy. so we are going to address those. we would like to have the republican side of the house work with us on those issues. we know one of the major parts of that is the minimum wage issue and that is front and center. i turn to my col -- colleague from new york who has joined me so often. representative tonko, you have been on this issue of economic development for so long and i think we have got four years now dealing with this talking about jobs in america, economic growth, what we can do. why don't you pick it up and carry the ball and then we'll see whe

if you have a comment to make about something on our agenda, we have speaker cards, at this desk right up here. and feel free to fill that out and let us know who you are. and thank you to sfgov tv, and media services for presenting this and airing this to the public. we are going to go ahead and start this meeting with a roll call. >> commissioner akers? >> here. >> commissioner hyde. >> here. >> joseph. >> here. >> lee. >> here. >> campagnoli. >> here. >> president tan. >> here >> we have a quour. e >> great. >> our first item is public comment and this is for any item that is not currently agendaized and if you are a member of the public and you would like to address us on anything that is not on the agenda feel free to come up. >> good evening, commissioners my name is steven ocastidato. and i would like you for the more tore um on broad way and the insightful comments from the commission and for that purpose, all of the general comment from the public. i wanted to, share with you one comment that you know, commissioner joseph made which i thought was very prudent observation. she

>> that concludes today's agenda, mr. chair. >> before i do that, i want to thank carolyn goose enin my staff who spent tremendous deal of energy to put this together. thank you, carolyn. meeting is adjourned. [gavel] >> january 21, the meeting of the entertainment commission. just a couple of things, please turn off your cell phones, if you have them on, or leave them on vibrate. if you have a comment to make about something on our agenda, we have speaker cards, at this desk right up here. and feel free to fill that out and let us know who you are. and thank you to sfgov tv, and media services for presenting this and airing this to the public. we are going to go ahead and start this meeting with a roll call. >> commissioner akers? >> here. >> commissioner hyde. >> here. >> joseph. >> here. >> lee. >> here. >> campagnoli. >> here. >> president tan. >> here >> we have a quour. e >> great. >> our first item is public comment and this is for any item that is not currently agendaized and if you are a member of the public and

any other new agenda items. for the future agenda meeting. all right. any public comment about our future agenda meeting. i believe that brings us to the i understand of our meeting. this meeting is >> welcome to culture wire. we will look at the latest and greatest public art project. recently, the airport unveiled the new state of the art terminal. let's take a look. the new terminal service and american airlines and virgin america was designed by a world- renowned architecture's firm. originally built in 1954, the building underwent massive renovation to become the first registered terminal and one of the must modern and sustainable terminals and the united states. the public art program continues its 30-year legacy of integrating art into the airport environment with the addition of five new commissions that are as bold and dynamic as the new building. >> this project was completed in record time, and we were able to integrate the artist's early enough in the process that they could work with the architect said that the work that is completed is the

it just appears on the agenda. the agenda goes [speaker not understood]. there is no requirement to send the form itself to the mailing list. >> go ahead and read it. >> it's a real good word, commissioner stephenson. it's superfluous. so, we may not need it? no action here today. >> no, i know. but if we don't need it -- >> we do it every year. >> i still request that at our next meeting we have a proposal to amend our bylaws to eliminate this requirement. >> if i may. >> or article. >> commissioner gravanis. >> while looking it up, quick question off the top of your head, roughly, how many people want to get information through snail mail as opposed to e-mail? >> two. >> two, okay. [multiple voices] >> 200 or two? >> two. >> it's the same people for 10 years. >> so, is it the will of the commission at a future date to look at removing this from the bylaws if deputy city attorney ellen says it's okay? >> yes. >> yes. >> okay. he'll find out for us. he's diligently looking it up. maybe we can then deal with that and is there any public comment on this item

and i didn't receive an agenda for this meeting. and when i called some friends of mine - let me finish baby the agenda was for 1:30 today and some people getting gotre

any other new agenda items. for the future agenda meeting. all right. any public comment about our future agenda meeting. i believe that brings us to the i understand of our meeting. this meeting is the inteblth is of our everyday life everyone with the seniors use it for work and play. although there's a many valuable websites on line. >> the first thing a senior will ask me is about viruses if they go on websites what are the discharges of being on the internet. >> for instance, you see something that maybe from the bank and the first thing it starts asking you for a private information where you get intiger's offers and they're not real. the way to tell where it's a fishing scam or not is who it's from. they can fake a name that says paypal but they can't fake an e-mail address it would be from a bank if they have any issue it's not going to be over an e-mail. >> stay away from e-mail all the same can be said on networking sites. the user should make sure they know the person before clicking on the requests >> some of tracking software they can get a

meeting should go about up to two hours. >> the agenda is a joint agenda, so, you go back and forth? how does that work? >> so, we've been -- this meeting will help inform thoughts and i've had -- i think i had heard from maybe commissioner wald had given me some ideas. so, ideas from her and ideas here today i think give a clear sense of what to propose and i've already proposed to the commission president some of those ideas. they wanted to hear the 100% renewable energy discussion, where our rules and responsibilities overlapped. the catalyst from puc, they were talking about look at food waste and someone says, well, turning food waste into energy. and then someone says, hey, let's go talk to the department of environment and the environment commission. >> there's a whole biofuels component to what they do that overlaps with what we do. >> that would be worthwhile. >> um-hm, that's a waste issue as well where they do their grease cycle program. we're looking at various ways of turning whatever is left into energy into some pilot programs. it would be worthwhile to talk to jack ma

>> public comment on agenda item no. ix. >> david pilpel. i will remind the commission self years ago we had attached to the executive director's report a six-month forward calendar of topics and hearings that sort of withered away after a while. i think that would be helpful to list those things that we know or intend to have happen in the next few months, and those things that haven't yet been scheduled, but are intended to happen. there are some things that are on an annual schedule and other things, as-needed. i would really encourage you to develop that, and maintain it. i think it would be helpful for you and the staff. >> the next item on the agenda is public comment on matters appearing or not appearing on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of the ethics commission. >> i beg your indulgence for speaking during public comment and i promise not to come again. the library commissioners are appointed by the mayor. one of the library commissioners, michael briar resigned june 11th. i visited the ethics commission's office in the

dippel, if you wish to speak on an agenda item, that public comment will be when the agenda comment comes out. >> i eluded that to the evening. if you would like i can continue at that time. okay. item 7, then. thank you very much. >> okay. thank you. seeing that there is no more. this is regular public comment. okay. >> good afternoon, councilmembers and staff. my name is walter park. i attended the california council on disability access here and last week in sacramento. it was by telephone. i wanted to report to you on that. the item of concern was the parking policy from san francisco mta, also mod staff and gave lengthy presentations and about 14 people from the public spoke. everyone of those was opposed to the proposed limitations on the use of placards and blue zones except one from ilcrc. most said they consider this to be a reversal or betrayal of that. another said and many actually said that a major theme was to divides the problem of the misuse of placards. not by people with disabilities. yes we have fraudulent use. that must be addressed. some suggested the responsibility f

any other discussion from the commissioners on this agenda item? is there a motion to approve the changes to the regulations for investigations and enforcement proceedings? >> is moved. >> second. >> all in favor? >> aye. >> any opposed? hearing none the motion passes. the next item on the agenda is discussion and possible action on reports submitted by lisa herrick formerly of the san jose city attorney's office. as you will recall and was referenced previously, on october 22, 2012 we held a hearing on this matter relating to ethics complaints brought by mr. shaw. we also reviewed and considered paper submitted by mr. shaw and heard argument from mr. shaw on the matter. during that hearing, we asked miss herrick to review a number of determination if they should be disclosed. she subsequently conducted the review and identified set of emails that she believes should be produced in redacted form. so this item agenda is then to discuss whether those emails should be produced as redacted, and if so, whether that has resulted in a willful violation of

and i didn't receive an agenda for this meeting. and when i called some friends of mine - let me finish

we will move on to the next agenda item, which is review and approval of the minutes from january 7, 2014. >> i move to approve. >> i second. >> commissioner campagnoli? >> on the motion? >> yes. >> i will second. >> okay. >> this is vote. >> okay, thank you. >> commissioner lee? >> yes. >> commissioner joseph? >> aye. >> ayed. >> aye. >> akers? >> aye. >> tan. >> aye. >> those minutes are approved, item three is the report from the executive director, so director? >> good evening. really short and sweet hopefully you are having a copy in your binder and i wanted to present to you an interesting survey, that was conducted late last year by the sfmta and do you guys have that? and it is behind and it is, it is a really sort of short but interesting survey done on late night transportation issues, choosing that polk street, that lower corridor to start to get the gated point about what people are looking for and how they are getting to and from and where they are coming from, what kind of transportation are they parking? all that good stuff and so it took a while to accomplish. also to

democrats have a big agenda in 2006. they passed a cap and trade bill, minimum wage increase, fair letter act, but when it came to run again and maintain the majority they toned things down because in part polls showed people were weary of what the liberal agenda -- what was being passed in congress. so they had a low-key year leading up to the agenda. they picked up 21 new seats in the elections so republicans were not able to make any ground in regaining the majority, they lost seats to democrats. so this plan, it works. >> let me ask you this, speaker boehner has now hired a well-regarded expert on immigration policy named rebecca talon. everybody on capitol hill knows her. is that a sign he and the republican leadership are sincere and serious about reform of immigration this year? >> well, it depends on how you define reform. what is interesting here is both parties define reform very differently and what i think the speaker is trying to do is walk a fine line between not angering the base and trying to accommodate

next >> item 89 b future meetings and agenda. at this time you may set the next meeting or determine the agenda items and for other future meetings. as mentioned earlier we have a special budget meeting on february 4th at 9 o'clock and the next is in february >> commissioner mar. >> i had one item that i had talked to president mccarthy about earlier maybe with the assistance of commissioner mccray and commissioner melgar i want to request that we get some feedback from the mayor's office of housing on the plans to subcontract some of the housing authorities even if it's a preliminary plan the department has to get rode for the unit that are coming on line that will fall on the per view of the tenants side. because we've got to service two divisions. it doesn't have to happen at the next meeting but i want some outreach to the mayor's office and they can schedule someone to come to our future meetings >> i will absolutely no problem put that together. you just let me know if you can put it together >> whose supposed to pull it to

as i mentioned earlier, every agenda of every board and commission in this city has on its agenda know your rights under the sunshine ordinance. and yet it is really really a task to push that rock up the hill and get people to actually follow the law. for example, this body in my 150-word summaries, when i had four orders of derrillation from the sunshine ordinance task force, all of which were ignored until at some point somebody made a decision that my 150-word summaries would go into the minutes as required by law. there is no explanation about that, simply changed. so now i have got one issue being handled by four different commissions in four different ways. trying to get documents is one of the most frustrating things that a citizen in this city has to deal with. you want to get involved in the public issue. you want to get, in particular, financial records. and yet, city employees in this case, or in my case, louis herrera, the city librarian used his office to withhold public records from me. he just basically didn't want it made apparent to the public that all the claims that

this is the miniaturization of the president's agenda. 23rd increase in the minimum wage since 1938? it may and good thing, a bad thing, but it's of marginal importance to the economy and of no importance to the middle class. universal preschool which, as you say, he endorses last year. we've had almost 50 years of experience with head start. the government's own studies show that the benefits from universal preschool are a, small, and b, limited. they're not just limited, as the supreme court is going to say several times this spring often unconstitutional. so the shrinkage of the obama presidency will be on display i think tuesday night. >> one area of possible compromise -- there were leaks all over the papers this weekend -- is that the republicans want to do something serious about immigration reform. it won't be comprehensive. it will be piecemeal but the idea is that there would be a path to legalization for the 11 million here illegally, not necessarily a path to citizenship except for the so-called dreamers, people that were brou

what are the agendas being paired? what does that mean? who will provide the intervention. the california department list only three employees on their website and you know now who will participate in the institute and what can you tell us about the agenda or the activities for that institute? the same website for the california education folks list only one institute that took place back in 2012, nothing since then and nothing they have planned for the future. where will the partnership work take place. i know the place the berkeley. the website list the san francisco location for the california education partners at 1 lombardy street. we know that's the office of phil halpern and san francisco alliance. the san francisco suite of mr. halpern works. where are they going to fund it. it states the nclb tutoring money and we went into waiver to free that money. we got about $700,000 freed up by going into core waiver and now you are spending 13 percent of that money plowed back into same consultantcy to pay for the core waiver. is this just the beginning of feeding this alter

. >> if not, we will move on to any items that commissioners may have for agendas on future meetings. >> i don't know that it, if at some point it will make it to, i think the ethics commission but i was wondering where they were with the proposed legislation, the chiu herrera legislation, where is the city with that? >> i know that they were revising it. and i am not sure exactly when they intend to. >> okay. >> and that is correct. it does not have the committee schedule, but it actually has not had it the full examination in a public hearing for public comment, but i think that people want to move it forward fairly soon. >> okay, thank you. >> and at some point, i would like to discuss something which i actually saw in or on the materials last time, having to do with the executive director's power to dismiss complaints. and it is on the content calendar and one of us can pull it off if we want and it is nothing to do with your power to do that. it is just the options that are available because i saw one man and i am not going to go into it because it was on last week. and among the

that is the republican party's poverty agenda. making more people poor. joining me now is congressman dan kildee, congressman from michigan. from your perch in flint, michigan, a state that suffered through very extended rates of unemployment, a city that's had a rough time, how does this look to you? >> well, it's just a shame. unemployment extension is a difference between people being able to pay their rent, pay their mortgage, feed their kids, pay their car payment. the folks who don't get this hep will suffer long-term consequences. and this is the thing, it's just -- it's a heartless act for the republicans to consider a political victory. the fact that they're unwilling to help 1.3 million americans who are facing really tough decisions every day. >> so why -- so why is it the case that boehner could come out and say we're not going to bring this to a vote in the house? i mean, is it the fact that republican members don't have districts like yours where people are hurting? are day just insulated from the folks voting? explain the political logic of

immigration reform is going to be the top item on the agenda.o way around that proposition. certainly now republicans including in the official response last night from president obama and leaving the door open to that. the president is pushing the minimum wage hike and an extension of long-term unemployment benefits that expired at the end of the last year. the prospects for those in the house of representatives haven't changed much. immigration may be the one bright spot that the president and congress will be able to work together on. >> mike, as you mentioned, the republicans already lining up on this particular issue opposing everything he wants to do. i'm wondering how it plays to his democratic base. i saw o'malley there, so was the base fired up with what appeared to be a stump speech rather than a state union speech? >> reporter: every state of the union is like that, del. the president has to do things to fireup and energize his core supporters and there's no bigger stage than the nationwide audience. 30 million watched it on tv not ac

p on pages 163 and 1646 your agenda, item, four bb. on pages 215, through 216, and the original dates of service, should be changed to 11, 1, 12, through 5, 22, 14, and amended dates of service should be changed to 10, 1, 13, through 5, 22, 14. it should reflect the year, 2013, instead of 2014 and a correction to 4 bb. and on pages 252, through 254, original dates of service, should be changed to july 1, 2013, through june 30th, 2014, from august 2013, through march of 2013. and amended dates of service should be changed to november, 1, 2013, through march 31, 2014. from november 1, 2013, through march 31, 2013. are there any items removed for the first reading, seeing none, any items severed by the board, or superintendent for discussion and vote this evening roll call will take vote under section o, i will be abstaining from item, 2 d, due to a potential conflict of interest. superintendent proposal, and it has been moved and seconded on june, 25th, 2013. and both the original and the amend by substitute motions are on the agenda and

the officer isn't here so if you're here to speak on any agenda item. okay. we'll move on we'll take public comment if nothing is presented >> you can ask. >> is there a any public comment on the lack of police report. >> so the next item is the hearing and possible action on our permit. the first thing is the gathering i don't know if someone wants to speak >> the permit we don't see the gentleman but this is for an outdoor permit the reason we're bringing it to commission is because it was on - it's going to go till 1 o'clock in the morning and we have some concerns about treasure island as a whole unfortunately, the permit person is not here. >> i think there was one we postponed because of - >> we 3r0i7bd it two weeks ago. >> does that mean that the treasure island development authority. >> they have come back and approved the land use until 1 o'clock a.m. >> so it's our custom to have the applicant here maybe he got his time mixed up but can we move ahead with this without the applicant present. >> yes. >> so in your packet you'll find the description an