. >> commissioners, i would advise we agendize this for a future meeting. this is just new purpose and the purpose is to ask for future items for the calendar. i think we need to cut it short for now and through the chair if yoyou want to agendize this fora future agenda. >> i would like to request that we agendize it for the december 8th meeting, if possible. i don't have the understanding that is what is going to be conveyed at the planning commission. i would like a presentation. >> december 10th is the next meeting. december 12th is the planning commission meeting. >> it was scheduled for october 24 but they had hours and hours of testimony so rather than make a presentation at 9:00 at night we rescheduled to december 12th. >> it is such an important issue we need to continue being with them, whatever that looks like. >> we can do that. >> what exactly is the agenda item, council, or through the chair? it seems to be some confusion about what this. you know it is mentioned what this role of our commission is versus the planning commission. >> maybe the

clearly it would be good to agendize updates as much as possible in our move into the new building and the appropriate business practices and tracking systems. you know, our permit tracking system process as we move so that the commission is involved with it. i would just leave that as markers. i think all of these things help to some of the issues we deal with constantly about keeping track of projects, access to the data. it is good it is happening now in terms of the building. better updates. that is what i would suggest for the agenda. hopefully, somebody can approve it when i am not here. >> thank you. next item 4b future meetings and agendas. at this time the commission may discuss and take action to set the date of a special meeting and/or derm those items that could be placed on the agenda. >> the committee appointments for the commissioners comes up so we have the litigation committee, appointments committee that you factor that into the new group of folks coming in and make sure we don't lose track of that. >> we definitely will and february we will vote on committee members

no political stunt is going to slow down the president's agend agenda. under the earth third in 320 days, you, we commit the american people, we get the final say. the choice for president is going to be clear. here with reaction, lindsey graham. senator, how are you? >> i am great. that was well done. thank you. >> sean: i got a good grade in my class. none of this is upsetting in th least to me because this is who they are. this defines them. this represents everything they have done for three years. can you name one accomplishment besides this if they want to consider this an accomplishment? and act like they are not high-fiving. full. that is more bold to. >> here is that. why are they doing this? the reason they are doing this is nancy pelosi would lose thei jobs if they didn't move toward impeachment. what happened between march and now. impeachment should be a grave decision made in a bipartisan manner. what happened is the mob took over the house. the mob is running the democratic party. if she did not move to impeach this president, she would no

through where we would like to do that or have it done in the interim, and so i don't know how we can agendize it, but i believe we should. >> are there any other speakers? >> our next item 4b future meetings and agendas. the commission may discuss and take actions to set the date of a special meeting and determine the items for the next agenda and other future meetings. next scheduled meeting is december 18th. that concludes 4a and b. any public comment for item 4a and b? seeing none, item 5. proposed ordinance amending the housing code to revise the requirements for heating in residential rental units, in addition to other requirements. >> bill strong, legislative and public affairs. the chief housing inspector will describe what is in this proposed ordinance because the representative from the supervisor's office is unable to attend. i did receive a note from her indicating she had a conflict and couldn't come so jamie will explain what is being proposed here for the heating ordinance. >> good morning, commissioners. we are passing around a copy of title 25, california state law, california

it can be agendized for the commission if the commission wanted to make changes and direct us to do a notice of the bylaws change, we could do that in if in time for the january meeting. but we wanted to provide this calendar for you so you could see what the options were at this point. and we were able to identify the three options shown on the second page. first that the commission retain its current regular meeting schedule of starting at 2:00 p.m. on the third friday of each month. we also did identify there could be a meeting change to the first friday of each month starting at 9:30 a.m. and thirdly, another option is to change the regular meeting date to the second fridaying of each month and change the start time to 9:30 a.m. it is also the case that as you've seen over the years, there may be some months that commissioners cannot make a particular meeting date. when the commission approves this schedule, through a bylaw change, that could be noted in the schedule. so if one month needed to be off of what was adopted as the regular meeting date, we could put that as well. so th

we have agendized as a and b. with b being the office allocation and a being the large project. if there's a reason why it needs to be in that order? >> well, we typically add both items onto an agenda when they have two dual entitlements because the appeal body might be different based on the type of entitlement >> right. my question is the order. >> no, there's no particular order. >> okay. thank you. >> to the chair, this is the third time we are hearing this matter but it's been a while. i don't know how much time you want to provide the sponsor or members of the public. >> i would say -- >> three and one? okay. very good. >> good afternoon. department staff. i'm here on behalf of someone who is out sick today. on august 22 the planning commission continued the authorization and also development authorization for 2300 harrison street so public hearing on november 14. with the direction to work through residential unit design, look at potential to increase the number of residential units and to address traffic concerns. the public hearing on november 14 was canceled and the p

, the way forward but being pulled in too many directions with too many new critics with their own agend agendas. i think the faa will respect this move as a positive step in not only restoring good relations with them and committing the max to get certified in spite of the political opposition that it's been encountering. >> gordon, what does an airbus narrow body sales pitch sound light right now? do they reference the max? how do they leverage it? how do carriers respond? will it make a difference? >> i think they'll use the standard comparative on fuel burn, other issues, but they'll talk about reliability, stability of the airplane and of course the availability, which is what is crucial you cut off about half of the world's supply of airplanes when you drop the max from production, airbus couldn't make enough airplanes to replace that capacity so the max has got to be done, but airbus will tout they'll get theirs delivered to you on time, that's a hell of a sales pitch >> do you see, like, can you imagine a world in which gary kelly does have multiple brands of carriers or models?