>> yes, and i would like to agendize that, i know ms. brown's public comment and some of the other callers. i would like to agendize, we have not had a pay out during my time here. i should say, that should fn prevent us from seeking rewards. we're hoping that some case will be solved by that, but i have not had a pay out since i've been here. there is an internal process for increasing rewards basically when the investigators have gone through the all the leads and they don't have any other investigative options at that point is when they make a request for reward. the pattern has been basically, a lot will start out 50,000, and some 25,000 depending on the complexity of the case, things like, they're allowed a ton of witnesses to come forward and that nature. so it is not in terms of a set amount that we start off with. and whether the we or investigators have made a case or reason to raise the amount. but we have not had success in terms of people coming forward to collect those rewards. i don't think it should stop us from doing it.

>> yes, and i would like to agendize that, i know ms. brown's public comment and some of the other callers. i would like to agendize, we have not had a pay out during my time here. i should say, that should fn prevent us from seeking rewards. we're hoping that some case will be solved by that, but i have not had a pay out since i've been here. there is an internal process for increasing rewards basically when the investigators have gone through the all the leads and they don't have any other investigative options at that point is when they make a request for reward. the pattern has been basically, a lot will start out 50,000, and some 25,000 depending on the complexity of the case, things like, they're allowed a ton of witnesses to come forward and that nature. so it is not in terms of a set amount that we start off with. and whether the we or investigators have made a case or reason to raise the amount. but we have not had success in terms of people coming forward to collect those rewards. i don't think it should stop us from doing it.

. >> thank you. >> chief, i think commissioner yanez brings up a great area of-i think we should agendize about i think a couple years ago you sent officers to training that talked about the young adolescent brain and how it develops. that may be something we can bring back before the commission and get a status update on. >> thank you for mentioning that president elias. there are i know-the dgo around juvenile deattention and arrests is revised as we speak, and i think there is a lot of research about the impacts of substance use on the development of young adults and young folk and think the more we can engage and you know, enhance our understanding at the department ends, there is discretion that officers have about when to arrest and when to bring young people to the community assessment referral center or up to detention so i really do believe it is a good time to have this conversation so thank you for supporting that president elias and look forward engaging in that dialogue. >> great. okay. can we move to public comment? >> at this time the public is welcome to make comment regar

this was not agendized i'm not sure we have have this discussion. so we could upon agendize something for the future. to concur. >> yes. >> point of information. i that was a lead in to just plant the seed to may be consider some letter to the mta continuing thoughts -- from our body to their's. considering these case. >> i they are penning cases and would not be appropriate to be directing a letter at this point but the -- one last thing. this would not be with respect to the cases that we are about to hear on the 16th. this would be related to the benefitted future appeals that may be come up sprit low from what i understand those are in longer held by heard boy us. so -- my proposal just -- topic for thought that's all i'm -- suggesting now. is for my fellow commissioners consider whether or not for the case we will no longer be hearing if woad like to offer comment to the body hol now hear those to explain the points we were taking in consideration would you like that on an goodbyed in the future. >> sure. >> so at tonight's meeting during this

nine and making sure we agendized some of the topics for discussion in that section so that folks get the opportunity to bring motion before us, i think that would be good and i want to say thank you. >> i didn't know if you were going to leave. i did a tour of is not bruno before the pilot program, the crows net program was implemented and maybe my fellow board members would be interested to see how it works because i have been trying to visualize it and i have been having a difficult time and i know no more than three of us can be present at any one place but mr. long, we can see if we can schedule that at a convenient time. >> we can work that out. i need to talk to the chief deputy and the captain and give us dates and times and we can arrange it. >> thank you very much. i appreciate that. >> you're welcome. >> thank you all so much. also, i think it's really important to keep in mind that we have heard how very much understaffed our sheriff's are, so i think we want to be thoughtful about when we think about the future agenda items and scheduling as to what the is the priorities

as vice president carter-oberstone said i asked for this to be agendized. after i met the mediators and commend dpa for this -- a big shock to me and coming from the misnomer and coming from the background and restorative justice and adopted by the agencies and complement the mead eightors that volunteer their time what are also sensitive despites. >> . >> they're tremendous people and i know they watch the commission and those watching and i appreciate the work. i am glad to hear that you're doing outreach at district stations. i think in particular there are cases where you have complainants and probably things found in policy and mediation can really provide a cathartic way for parties to address each one and one component of that and thank you for the presentation and the testimony work with the mediation program. >> yeah thank you commissioner benedicto for attending our seminar a couple months back and for your support. i really appreciate it. >> commissioner yanez. >> thank you. congratulations on all the accomplishments and especially you seem to ge

if this motion passes, i'll be agendizing this motion at the next commission meeting both in open and closed seconding meeting >> >> commissioner i need to interject so the portion of the motion that moves to extend the exist ing mou, is not agendized so that is beyond the scope of what can be voted on. you can indicate that you would like to chief to do that, but it's not properly agendized. >> the chief has been extending it so far, but i'm confident that we have expressed that we don't want anybody operating without an mou, and you agree that you never want to operate with an mou. >> we don't want to wait forever. >> so as the motion, vice president are you going to second. >> second the orng motion. >> take roll. >> those that would like to make comment online 8, approach the podium offer press star-3. good evening caller you have two minutes. >> speaker: yes, i'm just calling i'm going to make it very quick. i'm calling to support the m oui and if you don't support it, at least support what commissioner byrne has just proposed. it makes sense, we're getting tired of listening to

allow hybrid inperson meetings during the covid-19 emergency and direct the commission secretary to agendize similar resolution at a commission meeting within the next 30 days. i open public comment. >> thank you. >> members of the public who wish to make 2 minutes of remote public comment on item 4, please press star 3 to raise your hand to speak. do we have any members of the public present who wish to provide quaument comment on item 4? do we have hands raised for item 4? >> madam secretary, we have one caller in queue. >> caller, this is for the state urgency legislation. >> caller, i unmuted your line. >> can you hear me now? >> yes, caller, go ahead. >> great. david pillpel, i have nothing on item 4 but believe you did not ask for public comment on item 3. thanks for listening. >> thank you caller. madam secretary, no other callers. >> thank you. as far as public comment on the continuation, i was advised by our legal counsel we do not need to call for public comment on continuation of the item. next item is item 5, approval of the minutes of september 13-sorry-we need to vote. >> can

georgie: so some people describe that as agender or no gender.me that they feel both male and female and that the, i guess, degree of male or female-ness may vary on any day, and that that may be reflected in their gender expression. georgie: so you had to go to school for half the day today, olivia? olivia: yeah. georgie: i think it's really important to ask the young person themself what being non-binary means for them because in my experience it can be different for different young people. olivia: in term 1 i did tell someone. they were also new and i think she still, like, remembers, like, she asked me since everyone thought i, like, was transgender and she actually came up and asked me. and i told her no and i told her i was actually non-binary. georgie: i get asked quite a lot about why we are seeing so many more gender diverse and in particular non-binary young people coming out now. i don't think it's a new identity or a new type of being a person. i think non-binary people have existed for as long as we have. but that up until more recen

how has the left defund and no bail law agend

. >> i think you will find a very aggressive oversight agend aif your the house of representatives ttheyajority we're on the knife 's edge in senate but there needs to be real accountability. this is a very radical and dangerous agenda. trey: senator john cornyn from the great state of texas thank you for joining us on a sunday night, look forward to visiting with you soon. >> thank you, trey. floridgood to be with you. trey: how can we stop crime and have fewer victims of assault, joining us now. former nypd inspector paul moreau welcome. give us an idea how to stop vie been crime before it happens. >> a very big question. one thing that i suggested in piece that i wrote for city journal on-line to take the sort of approach that country took post 9/11 to terrorism, we're getting to a point we are losing our s cities we need a whole of government approach. we should be considering jfts at the same level, we went to over a hundred jttfs after 9/11, we better take that approach otherwise this will continue. trey: you know, i think it was once said if you want a great new idea, read an o ol

that is my complaint with the sunshine ordinance task force you did not properly agendize this mattere joint meeting in december and you did not give we the people, the chance to address it. um -- there needs to be a commitment from this body to hold meetings this year about the castro theater. and every time you are taking public comment, we deserve 3 minutes. um, by the way, i have a statement of 150 words you are required to put in your minutes i will leave it here for the secretary to include in the minutes. thank you. >> good afternoon georgia. at the general public comment the end of the agenda on february 20, 2014, this member of the public presented photos of oolterations that locked like demolitions there have been 18 commissioners. throughout 2015 i presented more photos raising questions about extreme alteration this is should have been considered demo or tanld emout to demo. by the winter of 2015, a former american requested staff it rereview a sample of 5 projects approved as alterations the conclusion, 40% should have been reviewed. planning staff concluded section 317 w

the first agend aitem is number 1, which is general public comment and these are for items not listed on the agenda. if anybody wants to make a comment not on today's agenda? >> there is none. >> alright. we'll close general public comment and go to number to, approval of the minutes from october 4, 2022. motion to approve? >> move to approve. >> second. >> any public comment on the minutes? >> there is none. >> we'll close public comment and we can vote. [roll call] >> the meeting minutes have been approved. the next item is item 3 which is report from director weiland. >> good evening everyone on zoom. ypt i want to thank my staff for making the meeting run smoothly in person and online. love that i'm able to still join you even though i'm not feeling that great. i wanted to touch base. first of all, letting you know that this past weekday the city as you may have noticed if you were here was packed with large outdoor festivals everywhere it felt like including legacy events such as (inaudible) newer events such as (inaudible) happy to report that with 21 events with permits occurri

year, it's something that our commission would oversee again on all of our public meetings and our agendizeys for in advance and you can always join as a participant and i'm sure that golden voicing will also be reaching out to the community as it will be a requirement to perform neighborhood out reach again and we're happy to provide 311 data from complaintant who are willing to share their email addresses. that is an update this evening, and i'm happy to go over that for you. and i've already provided our response that's we did share with neighborhood in your file along with our responses to the press around this event. >> any questions or comments? >> i know that at least on social media, there were also concerns raised about the safety around crowd control and access to different parts of the. >> yeah, i can speak to that. >> so on saturday it was the first day of the festival. and there were some learning lessons that happened quickly. what you're referring to is the fact that one of the four stages was within the warehouse that was within the space or partially enclosed. so it had a c

mitch mcconnell of course instructed his caucus there was no agender but he cannot control his senatorsletting the cat out of the bag. rick scott said that he all federal programs that would include social security medicare. every five years run johnson tried to do one better, and said he would do it every one year. the other thing, lawrence, that we are seeing now is kevin mccarthy, the would-be speaker. talking about playing games with the debt ceiling if they were to take power again. in other words, preventing the united states government paying their bills on time, wreaking chaos in the economy, and threatening that they are going to create that chaos if we don't make deep cuts in things like social security, and medicare. we've seen this movie before and when i heard kevin mccarthy make that statement the other day, my ears went straight up, my antenna said this is going to be a replay of what they tried in 2011. >> and you were there fighting that every day. senator, before you go quickly, any lingering affects of these drugs that you suffered earlier this year. how are you feeli

put it on your agend a, have the hearing. we have waited 7 months for hearing at city hall about this matter. i am here also to denounce rafael mandelman who has not held a single town hall meeting, yet e-mails show mr. mandelman sent out invitations in september to many people to attend a september 14 meeting at the aortplanet lobbyist office. mandelman had many meetings in his office about the castro theater and he's not disclosed he had these meetings. what has been discussed, who has been in attendsance? he hides behind neutrality. mandelman can easily hold a town hall meeting to hear what the community has to say without jeopardizing his neutrality. now, regarding another planet, i believe greg peroff the ceo of another planet is interested in one thing only. profits. his business has no roots in the castro and his organization has very small number of connections to the larger gay community. they waited until august to hold a town hall meeting. during those months we waited, the trauma of potentially losing the seats in

i would like to agendize, and create a possible action item for the use of social media dgo which is 2.09. it's definitely in need of revision and bolt sterg developments since that was written about five years ago. as far as the community policing question, i know there is a presentation today, and my understanding is after that, there will be an going work group on going effort to police the plans. the d g.o. itself was reduced and revised only a year ago. i believe it would be a beneficial to have a presentation. so as they're having a rollout their effort to obtain community input that we can have that presentation here so that folks know in the community where to access spaces to contribute the feedback. that would be my comment on the community policing d g.o. and the last thing i have to report on, i would like to have an update at some point chief on what the timeline might be for the launching of the benchmark which would then leave to us revise d g.o. in the early intervention system. that way we can put that on the agenda. and that's my report, thank you. vice president ca

agendizing conversation to the committee on stakeholder engagement including what are the committee's needs, whautare your questions and pritorties in terms of engaging with people and soliciting meaningful substanative input from people with lived expertise, that is the language in the ordinance. obviously we want to-there have a been a few different threads in addition to that making ocoh more understandable. the dashboard and data more understandable. increasing engagement currently or past experience with homelessness. connecting with those with limited english (inaudible) something we talked about mostly in connection to meeting together, like meeting in person, but as long as we are in this teleconferencing moment, it would be good probably for us to think about how we can bring in additional participation. and then in the controller office we explore option for outside support and how we can quickly bring in added capacity to help with stakeholder engagement. and then i think the last thing, upcoming at the october meeting i mentioned a up couple times the planning department w

there are 3 items all conferences with real property negotiator as agendized. >> motion to go into executive session? >> so moved. >> second. >> we have a motion and a second. all in favor say aye. >> aye. >> opposed? motion passes unanimously. we are now in >> at this time there are no members of the public on the phone wishing to make public comment. >> thanks, public comment is closeds. next items. >> good afternoon, president adams, vice president commissioners, port staff and members of the public. it sure is good to see a full room here in commission today. i'm executive director board of san francisco. i'm going to jump into economic recovery, i have a lot of history to report. i have a long report, bear with me. we had so much that has been happening and so much that will happen. sustain, we welcomed tens of thousands of people to the water front with events and we carry that momentum from summer to early october and plan to carry it forward so our water front is great place for visitors and as we know welcome water front is key to our economic recovery. so, we're coming off an incre

why item 3 adopt findings under state legislation to allow hybrid meeting during the covid-19 and agendize a similar resolution in a meeting within the next 30 days. >> would you open public comment. why member who is wish to comment on item 3 press star 3 to speak. do we have anyone.to comment on item 3? do we have callers with hands raised? there are no callers. >> public comment is closed. >> thank you. commissioners any comments? questions, can i have a motion and second? >> move. >> second. >> president moran. >> aye. >> ajamy >> aye >> chair maxwell. >> aye. >> the next is approval of the minutes for september 13, 2022, any corrections or comments? public comment y. member who is wish to comment on item 40 minutes press star 3 to raise your hand. do we have callers with hands raised for item 4? >> there are no callers in the queue. >> thank you. public comment on 4 is closed. >> any discussion? motion and second. >> i will move. >> moved and seconded. roll call y. president moran. >> aye. >> ajami. >> aye. >> maxwell. >> aye. >> the item is adopted. next item. >> item 5 general publi

adopt fine beings under legislation to allow hybrid meetings and direct the commission secretary to agendize a similar resolution at a meeting in the next 30 days. >> comments? can i have a motion j. we need public comment. >> members of the public had wish to make public comment on item 4 press star 3 to speak. do we have callers with hands raised? >> there are you no callers in the queue >> opinion comment on item 4 is closed. any further discussions? okay. can i have a motion and second, please. >> so moved. >> second. >> thank you. can we have a roll call >> president ajami. >> aye >> maxwell wrchl aye. >> paulson. >> aye >> rivera. >> aye. >> stacie. >> aye. >> next item, item 5 approval the minutes of september 27 of 22 and october 11 of 22. >> can i have a motion and second? >> public comment. do you have comments on the minutes? >> no. >> can we have public comment. why members who wish to make 2 minutes of public comment on item 5 the minutes press story 3 to raise your hand to speak. seeing noneful upon do we have callers with hands raised? >> we have one caller wish to be recogniz

the revisions made will require the hearing to be continued and agendized in the next 6 months. >> so't address--continue to call the chair and come back to item 2? is that appropriate? >> let's make sure that's right. just to be clear, it isn't the changes being made that require a continuance, it is that within the amendments there are future actions of the board and bodies and thrats that's why these have to be remain open and in committee rather then filed. madam clerk, or deputy city pierson, can we move the hearing to the call of the chair now and then come back in the amendments or should we just put these both over until later in the meeting? >> we remember you put the bulk over later in the hearing. whether this needs to be hearing depends on the responses are so we need to look at those more closely. >> okay, i'll state for those who may be tuning in or in the chambers that it is certainly my intention to subject to advice from city attorney to approve those amendments. i dont know if supervisor chan-i'm trying to spare folks maybe waiting for hours until we get through the