one of my big high horses is this idea of journalists as totally, totally ahistorical.ou know, academic journals and everything, maybe it would still be ahistorical -- >> less of an excuse. >> right, right. but i know when i was starting out, i would be researching a story and my first approach was to find out the history, you know, and i would always run into this wall marked j. store. it impoverrishes the discussion. as a journalist it's easier than it is for an academic to speak to a broad audience but i'm only able to access certain information. this was brought home after the revolution in egypt. i caught a talk show on tv, and i won't say the name of the show and i'm watching the show, i'm interested in egypt, and it's like, a former adviser for mccain and, you know, some democrat saying -- and i know that somewhere there is some guy in academia who's been studying egypt for 50 years, why didn't they find the article this guy had written, research it and get him on -- >> speaking about egypt, like an arab spring, there's an academic spring going on right now, too,