what aidan o'neill to do that again.ernment's side, that actually this isn't really a matter for the courts at all, this isa matter for the courts at all, this is a matter of politics, proroguing parliament, it is pure politics, not a matter for parliament, it is pure politics, not a matterfor a parliament, it is pure politics, not a matter for a court parliament, it is pure politics, not a matterfor a court of law? i note that the government have rather backed off from that position as the case has developed, at least in court, but i would say what the scottish court said to them, lord drummond young said, it is not for the judges to politically scrutinise the judges to politically scrutinise the government, that is the job of parliament, but when the government suspended parliament then judiciary can step in to address the issue and what has become very clear this afternoon in the course of aidan's submissions is this case is about rebalancing submissions is this case is about re balancing the constitution submissions

chris, from cambridge university, do you buy those arguments that we've been hearing from aidan o'neill this afternoon? no, i don't think! buy any of the arguments. it's been a colourful presentation. a lot of romance and colour in what he had to say. but not that much prurience, if

what did you make of what aidan o'neill had to say?argument, he drew a lot on history, he talked a lot about the relationships between scotland, wales and northern ireland. he also made some very important legal points. he was arguing that it was the job of the courts to defend the constitution, thatisit courts to defend the constitution, that is it our all. it encloses understanding of constitutional principles, he was arguing that we had a government that was accountable to parliament, and parliament is accountable to the people. he was basically saying that there are these legal standards because milk at the s prorogation at this moment in time, what is effect on purpose was. if this effect and purpose was to undermine these constitutional principles, then is the job of the court to wait in and defend the constitution. pretty noisy is that you can hear hear. lots of demonstrators from both sides of the brexit divide had been here for the whole hearing. we should get a ruling from the panel of ii judges, we don't know exactly when. t

(tx next) ten—year—old aidan has cystic fibrosis.athes heavily. ..is how i used to be. aidan's dad rob discovered vertex, which makes our orkambi had failed to patent it in argentina. aidan's dad rob discovered vertex, which makes our orkambi had failed to patent it in argentina. he found a company there making a much cheaper generic version — lu caftor. it costs £24,000 for a year's supply. it was a eureka moment. it gave us all hope. the government's been in negotiations for nearly four years now with the pharmaceutical company. they do not appear to be making any progress, so we've got to do something radical. and that something radical is a buyer's club. rob has taken a group of parents and people with cystic fibrosis to argentina to buy the cheaper version of the medicine. so there you see it — a new day dawning. flying over brazil at the moment. it isa it is a huge financial stretch to even afford a three month supply for pa rents even afford a three month supply for parents like paul whose sonjoseph also has cystic fibrosis. a

. >> aidan had a bart themed birthday party complaint complete with a bart cake, bart tickets and ofourse a bart piÑata. his mother proceeded some birthday photos, art solomon invited a little fan to celebrate with them. he got to meet one of the train engineers and his birthday was announced over the train's pa system. >> we have got aidan on the train today. he is four years old! >> he knows all the station names and everything and can look on the map and point out where we live and where his aunt lived. >>> speaking of birthdays, our very own elizabeth cook is celebrating a very special one. with her little guy, her son jack elliott was a born this morning. everyone is doing great. congrats to liz, her husband brandon, big brother beau. little jack is home and doing well. >>> thank you for watching at 7. >> we are back here at 11 with more news. on the meantime kpix.com. announcer: it's time to play "family feud"! give it up for steve harvey! [captioning made possible by fremantle media] [cheering and applause] steve: [indistinct]. how y'all? i appreciate that. thank y'all very mu

aidan o'neill who was the advocates.e case in edinburgh. making is very highly charged accusation about how boris johnson had behaved in his final flourish to the justices. you've got here parliament being shutdown by the father of lies rather than allowing this to triumph, listen to the angels of your better nature. imagine. it's like the harper lee summing up to a jury. it's like there's a jury. they are the most seniorjudges in the land, but in terms of what happens. they're going to say at the beginning of next week, but the interesting thing because that's be honest i think for a lot of us who in the business of covering politics, watching the live footage from the court it is still a novelty. the supreme court has been around for about ten years but seeing cameras in courtrooms is still quite something. trying to understand it. the new box set. still quite something. trying to understand it. the new box setm parliament has been usurped by the supreme court. it's the range of things that the court could come back an

actually, those remarks yesterday by aidan o'neill were pretty political in part, weren't they?towards the end, said to the 11 judges, stand up for democracy, enough is enough, the mother of parliaments has been shut down, he said, by the father of lies, talking about the prime minister. this is what's very interesting about today, this morning is all about the intervenors, people stepping in and saying there are important arguments here but what's interesting is every single intervener has said this is unlawful, this should not be happening. from my legal perspective, the one really to look out for is the public law project, at the very end of the day. they are going to pick up on a very important legal point, brought continuously by the judges over the past few days which is essentially saying, look not at the big legislation, the act of parliament, look at what is called the secondary legislation, the lot that has been made by government. that can be made but it cannot be laid. which means, we are going to sea law that could be created, that could impact people, for example,

what was the most dramatic clip of the week which was by one of the advocates, the scottish advocate, aidanthis very highly charged accusation about how borisjohnson very highly charged accusation about how boris johnson had very highly charged accusation about how borisjohnson had behaved in his final flourish to the justices. we have got here the mother of parliaments being shut down by the father of lies. rather than allowing lies to triumph, listen to the angels of your better nature. imagine. it is like there is a jury here being the 11 most seniorjudges in the land but in terms of what happens... we're going to find out they say at the beginning of next week but the interesting thing, let's be honest, for a lot of us normally in the business covering politics... 5 its bad normally in the business covering politics... sits bad enough. watching the footage from the court. the supreme court has been around for about ten years but seeing cameras in a courtroom is still quite something. try to unpick it and it. the new box set. it is the range of things that the court could come back and s

yes, their lawyer, aidan o'neill qc, this morning claimed the uk government was showing breathtakinghe constitution in suspending and probing parliament in this way, likening it to autocratic rule. he said the government wasn't stacking the cards, it was taking the deck. he argued this wasn't politics as usual, it was rather an attempt to upset the balance of power between the executive and the legislature, an attempt, he said, by the prime minister to roll back history in favour of some divine right. we have a prime minister who is seeking to hold office without accountability, it would seem, the better to use power without responsibility. that is not a situation which this court can permit. well, the prime minister, the court was told, declined a request to submita was told, declined a request to submit a sworn statement to court, but government documents submitted here at the court of session this morning showed that in one document, the prime minister is said to have written that a further sitting of parliament is simply a rigmarole that shows mps are earning the crust. in anothe

one of the advocates, the scottish advocate, would be a qc in england, but an advocate in scotland, aidanusation about how borisjohnson had behaved in his finalflourish to the justices. we've got here the mother of parliaments being shut down by the father of lies. rather than allowing lies to triumph, listen to the angels of your better nature. imagine. oof, that was quite a bit of rhetoric. i mean, it's kind of like summing up to a jury. it's like, the jury here are 11 of the most seniorjudges in the land but in terms of what actually might happens, this is one massive... we're going to go away over the weekend and we're going to find out, they say at the beginning of next week? yes. but the interesting thing, because let's be honest, i think for a lot of us who are normally in the business of covering politics... that's bad enough laughs. watching the live footage from the court. and it's still a novelty, isn't it, in the uk, seeing cameras in courts? i think the supreme court's been around for about ten years now, but seeing cameras in a courtroom is still quite something. trying to u

. >> >> those two adorable geniuses are brothers carson and aidan from texas blissfully spending theon hitting each other in the face with the lid of a garbage can. what could be more fun their grandparents were baby-sitting that day so grandma pulled out the camera to record the little boys being little boys >> you want to know about the difference between raising boys and girls? that's it, right there >> in a single clip, that's it right there. tom, thanks so much. we'll see you in a bit for your wonderful piece. and when we come back, my sunday sit-down with emmy winner neil patrick harris we'll be right back. minimums and fees. they seem to be the very foundation of your typical bank. capital one is anything but typical. that's why we designed capital one cafes. you can get savings and checking accounts with no fees or minimums. and one of america's best savings rates. to top it off, you can open one from anywhere in 5 minutes. this isn't a typical bank. this is banking reimagined. what's in your wallet? cake in the conference room! showing 'em you're ready... to be your own boss

aidan cooney, appreciate you talking with us.on this story out of california, on hurricane dorian as well. newsroom continues right after this break. more towers. more coverage! it's a network that gives you ♪freedom from big cities, to small towns, we're with you. because life can take you almost anywhere, t-mobile is with you. no signal goes farther or is more reliable in keeping you connected. ♪ ♪ this simple banana peel represents a bold idea: a way to create energy from household trash. it not only saves about 80% in carbon emissions... it helps reduce landfill waste. that's why bp is partnering with a california company: fulcrum bioenergy. to turn garbage into jet fuel. because we can't let any good ideas go to waste. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. to help the world keep advancing. play it cool and escape heartburn fast with new tums chewy bites cooling sensation. ♪ tum tum tum tums >>> good morning, everyone. i'm poppy harlow in new york. jim sciutto is off today. we begin this morning with a host of breaking news

just to take a look at what was said from aidan cooney, who represents the coast guard talking to erica hill on "new day." take a listen. >> we don't have that information at this time for 34 fatalities. the most information we have is that there have been five of the members on the boat that have been taken off the boat by the coast guard and that the fire was ongoing is the last information i was passed. >> okay. >> do you know what type of boat this was? we know it's a 75 foot boat. again, it's so early out there on the west coast. waunl o was this one of the ferries that runs back and forth to santa cruz island? >> last i heard, a commercial diving vessel, possibly with tourists. that's the last information i was passed. >> are there typically boats out that early in the morning? >> i can't speculate that's why they were out there so early. >> how far off the coast are we talking? do you know if it was closer to the island itself, ventura, on the mainland? >> i also don't have that information at this time. >> from what i understand, there were multiple rescue assets launched from l

this afternoon it was the turn of aidan o'neill, counsel for the group led by the snp mp joanna cherrythe ‘mother of parliaments had been shut down by the father of lies‘. and tomorrow, there will be interventions from the former prime minister sirjohn major, whose lawyers will makes his submission to the court. our home editor mark easton reports. at the supreme court, the power struggle between the united kingdom‘s government and its parliament has, for some, become an instagram moment, a photo opportunity. i was there. good morning. 11 justices are being asked to make the final legal call on whether borisjohnson‘s decision to suspend parliament for five weeks was an unlawful ruse to get brexit done by halloween. the suggestion, ultimately, that the prime minister was concerned to stymie parliament — whatever on earth that means — is, we respectfully submit, untenable. the case hinges on what might be called westm i nster‘s triangle of power — the relationship between 10 downing st, the houses of parliament and the supreme court. sirjames eadie, the government‘s go—to barrister, argu

lawyer saying that was a political decision, then later we heard from the other side, the lawyer, aidan more than that, or the prime minister did in the suspending parliament was disgraceful. he says the mother of parliaments had been shut down by the father of lies, referring there to the prime minister. and he said to the 11 judges here, stand up for democracy, enough is enough. when are we likely to get a ruling? or what is going to happen next from these 11 judges? there are three days of hearings at the supreme court, which is the highest court in the united kingdom. as you say, 11 judges who are hearing this case. it is a three—day hearing, they may give their ruling at the end of those three days or they might want to think about it over the weekend and give us a ruling perhaps early next week on monday. but whenever that does come, whatever the ruling is, it's going to have huge legal, constitutional and political implications on a country that is so deeply divided by the whole issue of brexit. ben brown outside the supreme court. what's interesting is that if you look at what h

members of parliament guests of honor and failed to give and on and above all on esteemed since of aidan. india as a student for office a job on this very hour 80 years ago. you know if you don't have all hell rained down on the. fields by german racist barbarity down there to try and i really. thank you citizens of a new. right now i'm really getting to be with you here on this day of remembrance and commemoration and i thank you mr president dear. for inviting me. the bad the good sheesh the good touch those who have heard the stories who have seen the pictures who have seen the devastation the suffering and the death. that the german you attack brought to me during 80 years ago on this day biased us here all those inside know that the violence and destruction that began here. would spread over the next 60 years throughout poland and all of europe. there fresh did this. equally aware that it is by no means a matter of course to ask a german federal president for you to stand here before you today. for you know and until you leave i stand before you survivors. descendants of the victims

ten—year—old aidan has cystic fibrosis.er generic version. it costs £2a,000 for a year‘s supply. generic version. it costs £2a,000 for a year's supply. it was not a eureka moment, it gave us all hope, the government has been in negotiations for four years with the pharmaceutical company, they did not seem to be making any progress so we had to do something radical. and that something radical is a buyers club. rob has taken a group of pa rents club. rob has taken a group of parents and people with cystic fibrosis to argentina to buy the cheaper version of the medicine. new day dawning, flying over brazil at the moment. it's a huge financial stretch to even afford three—month for pa rents stretch to even afford three—month for parents like paul, whose son joseph also has cf. in the car, nearly there, getting increasingly excited. we will see you in a minute ina box, excited. we will see you in a minute in a box, i hope. —— with a box, i hope. that was not very straightforward and easy but we got it. campaigners say buyers clu

the lawyer for the cross-party group of parliamentarians, aidan o'neill qc, claimed in court that thend suspending and proroguing parliament in this way and he likened it to autocratic rule. he said it is not parliament blue politics as usual and it is an attempt to upset the balance and in an attempt by the prime minister to roll back history in favour of some divine right. what came out in court as well was that the prime minister had declined an invitation to submit a sworn testimony but government lawyers submitted some documents to court which showed that boris johnson had signed off on plans to prorogue parliament in the middle of august, two weeks before it became public and before the point at which they denied that the plans were afoot. lawyers acting for the government make their arguments this afternoon. the said proroguing was perfectly lawful and not a matter for the courts. thejudge perfectly lawful and not a matter for the courts. the judge said perfectly lawful and not a matter for the courts. thejudge said he will attempt to reach a decision overnight, we expect to he

aidan o'neill, who drove the scottish keys to success in edinburgh, says he wants the equivalent of whatse the queen in the first place. the government came back in a complicated paper today and in submissions suggested that we don't wa nt to submissions suggested that we don't want to see that happen and what we wa nt want to see that happen and what we want is effectively a declaration, a declaration of unlawfulness. but that allows the executive, the prime minister, to work out how he should remedy the situation and they are saying that is a proper balance between the legal and political power lord pannick to see for gina miller in the final closing submissions opened up a real debate over this because he said, fine, give a declaration of unlawfulness but that then potentially means it is nothing to do with the prime minister and he is out of the picture, he has broken the law so forget about him. leave it to the speakers at the commons and the lords to sort it out. that is a very clever move, i reckon because what it suggests to the judges is that it allows them room to come to a leg