the three year investment plan will be shared through the governor's revised plan, the air resources board is taking both public comment and written comment around what those investment categories should look like, the puc has been working with the broader city family to try to shape some of that. our anticipation of what will come out via the arb department of process finance is that the governor's budget may revise sal will include a broad set of investment categories and likely recommendation that various state agencies administer those funds. the legislature i think has also that their own views so we're already starting to see some bills coming out around the legislature's view and how those dollars should be spent so i think between now and the end of session in september, there are going to be i think many opportunities to weigh in on how we think those dollars should ultimately be allocated. i think some of the things we've been focused on at the puc is i think the city and the puc in particular had a strong track regard around energy efficiency and renewable generation projects pa

the fifth cycle and another budget-related document at the state level that the california air resources board and the department of finance released the first investment plan for auction from the cap and trade auction and this is there was also 8032 and this is one of the ways in which the state hopes to reduce greenhouse gas levels as we reported previously, the proceeds fall significantly below of what the governor had anticipated in the budget which is about a million dollars, the two auctions have brought in a half a billion and there is good news, in the investment plans, that has come out, and well it does not name specific project and link them to specific dollar amounts it does say that the largest share of funding should go to sustainable communities and clean projects including rail modernization and high speed rail programs and transit oriented development we will keep an eye on this and report back to the finance committee next month, this plan will be presented to the legislature on april the 25th. for the parkway, it continues to move a pace within a couple of important mileston

of regulatory agencies, that would impact the port, such as ecdc and fish and game and air and water resource boards. those are the ones we have right here. >> could i suggest, i am probably cautious here. but given what we have experienced lately. is it possible that we can ask who bids on it, to disclose that they are a plaintiff or defendant in any litigation? >> we can, we can add that as a qualification. >> how would you score it? there is a difference between asking for it and scoring for it. i think that the city has a rule about that. >> we can ask for that information, disclosed. and we have on other procurements and not score it but get that information as advisory. >> i assume that all of these studies are for development projects. and who pays? is it the developer or the port? >> these aren't just for development projects. >> what kind of projects are they? >> it could be if we are just doing a standard construction project and we find there may be hydrocarbons in the soil. and have someone come out and test there. if we are doing certain work like driving piles out to a pier for repair.

air in. the second issue is the historical nature. they both found that 1 sprus is important resource on two separate basis. first are the was by a significant san franciscan who was on board of community development. the second issue was apologize to commissioner antonini, this is an important example of a moderate structure. your staff said it concurred with page and i put some quotes here from what your staff said. it concurs with what page and turn bowl, that it's in the example of modern style executed by well-known and accomplished firm and integrity as what we have shown you that this project was featured in architectural record in 1951 and home and garden and your staff also recognized importantly that the character defining features of the property, it list the one and 2 story massing from north to south. let me show you the photos of the property submitted by the sponsor. this is in existing condition. this is a character defining feature according to your own staff. the proposed project completely eliminates that character defining feature by squaring it off that your own staff told you it was a character defining feature of admitted historic property. it allows

the construction of an air traffic control towers versus refurbishing and replacing the old towers. i think we need to become better stewards across the board with the resources we have as we know they are limited and i think some type of the more overarching board that really can look into that across the entire spectrum of aviation would be something that we should look at. >> i will just add a little bit to what dave said about the way our government is organized with lots of silos and what you are talking about is the way to some extent to work between them and set some priorities. he goes right now the funding for nextgen competes for tower closure if you will. there is not a national, and i think that is part of it, it's not a national setting up priorities. so you see decisions being made by the cdc that are very political. a number of us have spent a great deal of time on the facilitation issues because staffing has been cut yet for our local economy tourism is critical. half of the tour is coming to the new york region art coming internationally. it's so important in being able to handle them but the decision to pull staffing and send it elsewhere et