. >> commissioner ajesident nageswaran, aye. >> three now we have item 10 a report here in theegcalendarthere's sears and there we go. >> policy division i'll be happy to answer any questions you may ha give a quick s sorry about that this is my usual probes here have a few technical corrections one in the staff one in the resolution itself same change is change was in the environmental review section um - the um second starts in the current version the tids previously said the satisfaction stadium the mitigation program and that. that was incorrect this project so an exemption currents code a ment code for a protect place and staff put together the ceqa adoption and is monitoringalled it age m m rp rather than a protectionatory and it is confusing notpted pi d the permanent any and in the ceq not the led agency stan law counties so as stated in the revised version for implementing the monitoring requirement associated with and the protection measurements in into the mitigation plan we have. for t hopefully that. >> you'rringyú questions which is why we pulled it off consent agenda maybe