motion to approve the ajunda? >> sthr a motion to had ajunda. to the consent agenda? >> just to the regular agenda. >> where we have to make that change we should include it >> it would be on the next item >> motion to approve >> second. >> moved and second that we approve the agenda for today, all in favor say aye? >> aye. the motion is carried. approval of the content ajunda with the removal of item self help for the elderly, the 28 thousand is a little above the amount so, with removing that i would like approval of the consent agenda >> so moved >> second. >> moved and second that we approve the consent ajund a with the amunded to remove self help for the elderly, the 28 thousand amount. all in favor? >> aye >> opposes. >> the motion is carried. thank you. is there public comment at this time? sorry, i skipped over one. we'll go back. number 4. could we have a motion to approve the june 3 meeting minutes >> so moved >> second >> moved and second that we approve the june 3 meeting minutes as printed. all in favor? >> aye >> opposes >> the motion carries >> is the p

motion to approve the ajunda? >> sthr a

. >> the rez solution adopted >> the next order of business is item 6, public comment on non ajunda items. >> any speaker cards? >> no >> please call the next item. >> the next order of business is item 7, report of the chair. >> i do not have a report. >> the nerks order of business is item 8 recollect report of the executive director. madam director. >> commissioners i have 3 informational items for you 2 of which are in your packet said today. one in your packet today is a solicitation for proposal for infrastructure engineering support services at candle stick point and hunters point. there is a solicitation that went out in the fall of 2014 for the support services at huntsers point shipyard. the nature of the work surveying, engineering, pursuant to phase 1 and 2 development agreement. the developer [inaudible] the infrastructure pursuant to city plan and specks t. is a enormous undertaking that both or staff and city daapartment staff do need a 3rd party assistance for. there were 2 proposals submitted the panel comprised of ocii public work squz other staff determined those 2 resp

do we call both of the items on the ajunda together or take them separately? >> it is up to you. need to allot the time accordingly so the parties can present. they normally have 7 minutes so it is 14 minutes and then 6 minutes rebutal >> i think that is probably better in the interest of time. >> in addition we will also be hearing case number 6813 for 9308940 nob hampshire street [inaudible] attorney [inaudible] issuing order of abatement [inaudible] existed before the purchase of property and working to repair condition and waiting approval from dbi. palt argues all work has been performed. for the record each site-side gets 7 minutes for a presentation but now get 14 minutes and. >> thank you members of the board. reez maer [inaudible] chief housing instreckt specter. we are looking at appeal item 6812 and 6813 regarding 938-940 hampshire street. this is a 2 unit building over a basement and this particular-these appeals before you are related to notices of violation issued early january of this year, specifically january 21 and 22 of this year. the first item contained in th

please note [inaudible] >> can i have a apruvlt of the ajunda june 24? motion to

we urge year approval of the grant >> just one minor point, the summary in the ajunda calls for 912, 856 dollars but the total on the actual contract is 912, 658 and the latter number appears to be correct >> great, thank you. appreciate that. >> 658-- >> this is the correct number. >> okay yeah. so the contract-okay. any other questions? commissioner sims >> the service objective target 1 thousand people >> correct >> in discreet numbers you can get to about half that. how do you crack the other 4 or 500 people? >> those are all the people that call into had hotline and additionally i believe it is people that are outreach through the educational groups. it is a tricky number to track in the sense there is so-the volume of calls that come in i believe each month are in the hundreds and sometimes in the thousands because it is state wide and people call across the country so we tease out the individuals that are from the city and county of san francisco. there is a bunch of calls that come in and a birch of services given where there is no way to identify the individuals personal inf

i see on todays ajunda supervisors have 3 options how to vote. there is to support the mitigated negative declaration oppose it or a third option to ask the clerk of the board to come back with furter reasons for how the sporedboard can support or oppose jail construction projects and we see that as a important option to consider that we as san franciscans see the new jail construction project as a big problem not only for the parking impact in the neighborhood, for the wind impact on the environment and construction and also to the cost to the city and neighborhoods were fund could be better spent for mental helths and affordable housing and [inaudible] >> thank you next speaker please >> my name is [inaudible] a member of critical resistance and also the western regional advocacy project both are members of curb. i have spoken about this jail many times and many have seen me so i don't want to repeat myself. i just want to reiterate on the last thursday there was a amazing hearing about the alternative to the jail where we were able to talk abo

. >> the rez solution adopted >> the next order of business is item 6, public comment on non ajunda items. >> any speaker cards? >> no >> please call the next item. >> the next order of business is item 7, report of the chair. >> i do not have a report. >> the nerks order of business is item 8 recollect report of the executive director. madam director. >> commissioners i have 3 informational items for you 2 of which are in your packet said today. one in your packet today is a solicitation for proposal for infrastructure engineering support services at candle stick point and hunters point. there is a solicitation that went out in the fall of 2014 for the support services at huntsers point shipyard. the nature of the work surveying, engineering, pursuant to phase 1 and 2 development agreement. the developer [inaudible] the infrastructure pursuant to city plan and specks t. is a enormous undertaking that both or staff and city daapartment staff do need a 3rd party assistance for. there were 2 proposals submitted the panel comprised of ocii public work squz other staff determined those 2 resp

. >> the rez solution adopted >> the next order of business is item 6, public comment on non ajunda items. >> any speaker cards? >> no >> please call the next item. >> the next order of business is item 7, report of the chair. >> i do not have a report. >> the nerks order of business is item 8 recollect report of the executive director. madam director. >> commissioners i have 3 informational items for you 2 of which are in your packet said today. one in your packet today is a solicitation for proposal for infrastructure engineering support services at candle stick point and hunters point. there is a solicitation that went out in the fall of 2014 for the support services at huntsers point shipyard. the nature of the work surveying, engineering, pursuant to phase 1 and 2 development agreement. the developer [inaudible] the infrastructure pursuant to city plan and specks t. is a enormous undertaking that both or staff and city daapartment staff do need a 3rd party assistance for. there were 2 proposals submitted the panel comprised of ocii public work squz other staff determined those 2 resp

do we call both of the items on the ajunda together or take them separately? >> it is up to you.d to allot the time accordingly so the parties can present. they normally have 7 minutes so it is 14 minutes and then 6 minutes rebutal >> i think that is probably better in the interest of time. >> in addition we will also be hearing case number 6813 for 9308940 nob hampshire street [inaudible] attorney [inaudible] issuing order of abatement [inaudible] existed before the purchase of property and working to repair condition and waiting approval from dbi. palt argues all work has been performed. for the record each site-side gets 7 minutes for a presentation but now get 14 minutes and. >> thank you members of the board. reez maer [inaudible] chief housing instreckt specter. we are looking at appeal item 6812 and 6813 regarding 938-940 hampshire street. this is a 2 unit building over a basement and this particular-these appeals before you are related to notices of violation issued early january of this year, specifically january 21 and 22 of this year. the first item contained in that i

i see on todays ajunda supervisors have 3 options how to vote. there is to support the mitigated negative declaration oppose it or a third option to ask the clerk of the board to come back with furter reasons for how the sporedboard can support or oppose jail construction projects and we see that as a important option to consider that we as san franciscans see the new jail construction project as a big problem not only for the parking impact in the neighborhood, for the wind impact on the environment and construction and also to the cost to the city and neighborhoods were fund could be better spent for mental helths and affordable housing and [inaudible] >> thank you next speaker please >> my name is [inaudible] a member of critical resistance and also the western regional advocacy project both are members of curb. i have spoken about this jail many times and many have seen me so i don't want to repeat myself. i just want to reiterate on the last thursday there was a amazing hearing about the alternative to the jail where we were able to talk abo