presumably used to offer to offer — presumably used to offer to pay for the protection money to al caponeut it's not enough. they'll offer this money, but it's not enough-— not enough. yes, this is michael gove saying _ not enough. yes, this is michael gove saying the _ not enough. yes, this is michael gove saying the leaseholders . not enough. yes, this is michael - gove saying the leaseholders should not have _ gove saying the leaseholders should not have to face these huge costs for replacing combustible clattering, and he is directing his fire in the — clattering, and he is directing his fire in the direction of the developers, and i think he has said if the _ developers, and i think he has said if the offer— developers, and i think he has said if the offer is not made, then legislation passed will force them to pay— legislation passed will force them to pay this. but this just covers combustible clattering, it doesn't cover— combustible clattering, it doesn't cover other fire risks such as balconies _ cover other fire risks such as balconies or fire doors, which campaigners understan

so he asked me remote, this time, you know, one johnson critic said, it'd be like al capone's being done for tax evasion, but headlines all over the world. are you k b, m bowers? johnson? no, apparently relaxing restrictions amongst the worst death numbers in western europe sends troops to ukraine. and it apparently is korea's over. what's your take on all of this hubbub here in westminster? well, it's just that it is humbug around westminster political reporter in this country and, and, and the united states as well as is based around the parliament, if that narrow focus south of what parliament on sandra. i never understand what the choice why the tories are complaining about the bbc, because if you watch the baby say, all it does is record column or cell run reporting the wider issue. so what we've had in this country is so i great deal of thought. ah, ah anti johnson, the staff he deserves every bit of it, of course. but it's focused almost entirely on him. and on understandably, on the, the scandals of parties and downing street went down a street, was, was telling the country to wa

so he asked me remote this time, you know, one johnson critic said it to me like al capone being done for tax evasion. but headlines all over the world as you k p. m. birth johnson there apparently relaxing restrictions amongst the worst death numbers in western europe. sense troops to ukraine. and there apparently is korea's over. what's your take on all of this hubbub here in westminster? well, it's just that is how bob around westminster political reporting in this country and, and, and the united states as low as is based around the parliament. if that narrow focus south of our parliament on spanner. i never understand what the choice why the tories are complaining about to be received, because if it was the baby, say all it does is record column up. so i'm reporting the wider issue. so what we've had in this country is saw i great taylor thought, ah, ah, anti johnson, the staff he deserves every bit of it, of course. but it's focused almost entirely on him. and on, understandably, on the scandals of cartesian downing street went down his faith was, was telling the country to, to

it's a bit like al capone being done for tax evasion. but headlines all over the world view k b m bars. johnson apparently relaxing restrictions amongst the worst death numbers in western europe sent troops to ukraine. and apparently is korea's over. what's your take on all of this hubbub here in westminster? what was just that is how bob around westminster political reporter in this country and, and united states as well as is based around the parliament. if that narrow focus south of what parliament oz fans or i never understand what the choice why the tories are complaining about the bbc. because if it works, the b, b, c, all it does is report, parliament seldom reporting the wider issues. so what we've had in this country is a great deal of and ah, anti johnson stuff he deserves every bit of it, of course. but it's focused almost entirely on him. and on understandably, on that the scandals of parties and downing street when downey's fate was, was telling the country to, to log down. but it always scandals ah, earlier for sod, for ser

cove it about so it has to be remote this time, you know, one johnson critic said it to be like al capone's being done for tax evasion. but headlines all over the world view k b m bars. johnson, a apparently relaxing restrictions amongst the west death numbers in western europe sent troops to ukraine. and apparently is korea's over. what's your take on all of this hubbub here in westminster? well, it's just that is how bob around westminster political reporter in this country and, and i'm the largest states as low as is based around the parliament. it's narrow focus of what parliament on santa, i never understand what the tories, why the tories are complaining about the bbc. because if you watch the bbc, all it does is report, parliament seldom reporting the wider issues. so what we've had in this country is, or i great deal of her and, ah, auntie johnson, the staff he deserves every bit of it, of course. but it's focused almost entirely on him. and on understandably, on the, the scandals of parties and downing street when downey's faith was, was telling the country to, uh, to lock down. bu

it would be like al capone being done for tax evasion. but headlines all over the world view k b m bars. johnson a apparently relaxing restrictions monthly, worst death numbers in western europe since.

i realize a tradition when someone dies, a dignified silence, i guess al capone died, we would be combined about the fact he made really good spaghetti and meatballs. they would say nothing about what this man's life was declined by appear the same with harry reid. he has been a divisive in american politics. american politics designed to be an argument. well, it's not between friends but at least among people not sworn enemies. i think if we look back to american politics, we see reagan did not treat his opponents, his enemies, neither did carter and by the way, neither did bill clinton. what changed, who changed it? certain key figures and harry reid is one of them where they began to treat the political adversaries as people to be destroyed and they look for ways to gain the system, almost like las vegas gangster style politics. we are living with the ugly truth, it is hardening our hearts those of us that want to have arguments can't have them because we are in the mode of constant demonization and determination. >> laura: victor, people have said bob dole, of course, he light and stay

injury on us, but, you know, it is like saying the murder committed by frank nady is not traceable to al caponethe man who ordered and paid for it. it is clearly traceable. our injury is clearly traceable. justice sotomayor: do you think this is in fact authorized by this statute? mr. cooper: i have not -- we did not have an apa challenge that it was in excess of statutory authority. we did not advance that argument , and as i sit here today, i cannot think of that argument, or at least i do not believe we did, but our claim from the beginning was that the 20-day regulation cannot survive and unconstitutional authorizing section 304. justice sotomayor: what makes the standing argument sort of weird and interesting is that the regulation actually does not seem to have all that much to do with the statute. in other words, the regulation imposes its own requirement that is separate and apart from what the statutory requirement is, and, usually, where we see something like that and say the regulation went beyond the bounds of the statute, that is its own legal problem. we start thinking about this

but, you know, it's like saying the murder committed by frank nitty is not traceable to al capone, the man who ordered and paid for it. it's clearly traceable, our injury is clearly traceable. >> do you think that this regulation is in fact authorized by the statute? >> umm, i -- i haven't -- we did not have an apa challenge that it was in excess of statutory authority. we did not advance that argument. and as i sit here today, i can't think of that argument. i think that -- or at least i don't believe we did. but your honor, our claim from the beginning was that the 20-day regulation cannot survive an unconstitutional authorizing section 304. >> i mean, one of the things -- >> no, go ahead. >> -- that makes the standing argument sort of weird and interesting is that the regulation actually doesn't seem to have all that much to do with the statute. in other words, the regulation imposes its own requirement that's separate and apart from what the statutory requirement is. and usually where we see something like that, and we say, well, the regulation went beyond the bounds of the statute

autoridades en italia lo consideran como uno de los objetivos mÁs buscados y de la talla similar a al caponeel doctor de todos nos acompaÑa esta maÑana. >> nos vamos a enlazar con la doctora dalila y con el doctor marlo, cÓmo estÁn? >> muy buenos dÍas. >> yo aprovecho para saludar a la doctora, muchas gracias, se le da las gracias a todos los mÉdicos que estÁn apoyando a toda la poblaciÓn. mÁs de 1 millÓn de personasfueron diagnosticadas con el cÓdigo 19, confiesan que es imposible esconderse del virus para siempre. algunas personas estÁn pensando en tratar deliberadamente que les dÉ omicron. >> muy buenos dÍas y feliz aÑo, es una idea no recomendable, el contagiarse corre varios riesgos, tambiÉn que pueda llegar a personas susceptibles. enfermarte no es una decisiÓn sabia, tampoco para la salud pÚblica. >> es muy difÍcil entender por quÉ alguien va a coger un virus que puede ser muy peligroso para ustedes. vamos a usar el sentido comÚn, pÓngase el par agua que es la vacuna y no se empape adrede. yo sÉ que estamos frustrados, cansados, pero tenemos la manera inteligente de protegerlos que es