don siegel man, convicted of taking a bribe from scrushy in irk exchange for putting him on alabama hospital boardit is legal there was no bag of cash that went to customer, scrushy free after 70s month in jail, siege siegeln still behind bars but looking for a trial. joining us now is. this is bizarre, you don't see it here, why condition the governor -- why governor, how is it governor was not able to win this case just on that alone? no clear quid pro quo. >> i agree, and no dispute there is no evidence, no one is alleging that don siegel man put money in his pocket. seeking support for public education by establishing a lottery, contribution was made and prosecutors alem that contribution was a bribe in echange for which mr. scrushy was appointed to a regulatory board he served on in two previous administration, two previous governors, but, the jury, convicted -- they acquitted governor siegel "m.a.s.h.seeingsiegeman on 22 other counts but convicted him on this one. neil: what constitutes a financial bribe is a slippery slope, where is it now? >> making a point on that, a hundred former attorn