then constitutional attorney alan dershowitz and usa founder charlie kirk on the double standard of costingompany. plus, the new timeline out of afghanistan has communist china waiting in the wing former secretary of state mike pompeo on the biggest winners of joe biden's foreign policy as oil prices move from the 30s a barrel to $74 a barrel in bidens america and reaching vladimir putin and iran. plus. >> as we must eliminate funding for ppp ice in their organization deed under dhs. maria: more lunatic ideas from the extreme left of stripping resources from the very people protecting our shores as we bring you new numbers this morning on apprehensions and the got a ways at the southern border or the month of june. here is lee zeldin on why so many illegal migrants in narcotics are making their way to new york city and other big cities within days of arriving at the border, the spike in crime and his effort to turn it around. right now on "sunday morning features". ♪. maria: but first, this morning we are waiting the launch of billionaire richard branson virgin galactic rocket plane expecte

and alan dershowitz is here on the britney spears fight to regain control of her life. but first, the tough organization and its cfo, alan weisel berg, are indicted on tax fraud charges brought against them on the new york attorney general and the fda. accusing the former presidents company of organizing attacks avoidant scheme. he stands accused of avoiding taxes on $1.7 million worth of off the books income. it's important to note that the former president himself has not been charged. they say they are not guilty and a statement. they are saying, make no mistake, this is not about the law. this is all about politics. joining us now is eric trump, executive vice president of the trump organization. they say they avoided on 1.7 million worth of an compared we are talking about use of a company car, tuition payments for his grandchildren -- how concerned are you tonight as vice president of this organization? >> raymond, they've been trying to get my father since the second he came down the escalator. you know this better than anybody. they've been going after him for th

joining me is alan dershowitz, author of the case against the new censorship.re two conservatorships here, the financial one and is a personal one run by jody montgomery. what is going on here? >> this is a personal human tragedy and the law has not proved itself capable of dealing with the human tragedies. one thing that is clear is the current situation is unsustainable. she can't continue to be controlled by her father who she doesn't trust and doesn't like. she can't continue to be controlled by people she doesn't get along with. in the end the father will be removed. she petitioned for removal of guardianship. her lawyers indicated he will do so in the next few days and i suspect the court will have no choice but to eliminating the guardianship but that does not mean she will be completely free. the court might try to appoint someone else to take her of her financial issues. the harder one is a personal one because she is an adult, most 40 years old and has the right to determine her own destiny, make her own mistakes and it was they can prove she is so me

then, constitutional attorney alan dershowitz and turning point usa founder charlie kirk on the doublendard against trump and company.om plus, the new timeline out of afghanistan has communist china waiting in the wings. former secretary of state mike pompeo on the biggest winners of joe biden's foreign policy as oil prices move from the 30s a barrel to $74 a barrel in biden's america, enriching vladimir putin and iran. plus -- >> we must eliminate funding for cpb, i.c.e. and parent organization, dhs. maria: more lunatic ideas from the extreme left about stripping resources from the very people protecting our shores as we bring new numbers this morning on apprehensions and the got-aways at the southern border. lee zelden on why so many illegal migrants and dangerous narcotics are making their ways to cities within days of arriving at the border despite his bid to turn it around. all that right here, right now on sunday morning futures. ♪ maria: but first, this morning we are awaiting the launch of billionaire richard branson's virgin galactic rocket plane, expected to blast into outer

alan dershowitz has talked about it the president didn't incite anything. the people who did wrong, they need to be held accountable. they are being held accountable as we speak. >> bret: this committee is obviously going to go down a number of different roads about who knew what when, who was talking to coordinators of the protests. did you talk to the former president that day? >> i have talked to the former president umpteen times, thousands. >> bret: on january 6th? >> i talked to the president. i never talk about what we talk about. i don't think that's appropriate. just like i don't talk about what happens in republican congresses. i talked to the president numerous times. i continue to talk to the president. >> bret: no, no. i mean on january 6th, congressman? >> yes. i talk to the president. i have talked to the president -- i can't remember all the days i have talked to him but i have certainly talked to the president. >> bret: and on that day, can you share any of the insight of what he was thinking that day? >> bret, the people we need to come te

everybody says the samething .ys alan dershowitz and justice thomas said that he doesn't stand a chance. >> host: was focus on the companies themselves, how would you describe that ? >> i've never used a single one of them . >> you had your chance to make a statement and were focusing on the question here, why you avoid them ? >> because their trash like the media in this country . >> daniel in houston texas, democrats line. >>. >> trump used social media for five years to attack edpeople. disparage people. divide this country more. facebook, trump helped them with the help of russia with all the disinformation targeting g people. and then another thing, i'm very disappointed with you all. you continue to cover him like you did the sitting president, this man is irrelevant. this man is a divider. >> this social media companies prompted us to ask this question about moderating content but you called us to talk about that. how much trust do you have? >> caller: in the media? >> host: in social media companies, how much trust you have in them ? >> caller: i don't know sometimes so i tried

the doj it is the biden administration deploying these intimidation forces the joining us is alan dershowitz, author of the case against the new censorship. explain why this is unconstitutional. >> the justice department has the right to enforce voting laws. i don't think they have the right to demand that state stick with covid instituted voting rules designed especially for covid but they can't restrict voting. we all have the same goals. we want every possible eligible voter to come to the polls and vote and we want no non-eligible voters to come to the polls to vote. the justice department should enforce the voting laws. if they try to extend voting laws, to knock down identification the supreme court will strike that down so the justice department on the one hand but the supreme court overseeing the justice department. everybody who is eligible should vote, nobody who is ineligible shouldn't vote. how to strike a balance is difficult. as far as mandating vaccination i think the supreme court would uphold gradual mandating of vaccination, conditioning going to school and being vaccinated

here with more, the author of the case against the new law professor alan dershowitz. what i don't understand is for example the most restrictive voting laws that we have found are in delaware. there is no early voting like georgia, they have 17 days early in person voting in georgia and they have drop boxes in every county. they have no excuse mail-in balloting, they don't have any drop boxes in delaware and you have to provide an excuse to get an absentee ballot. now i'm watching the doj simply being weaponized, going after georgia while ignoring the more restrictive state of delaware where joe biden never lifted a finger. your comments? your observations? how concerned should we be? t >> number one there has never been a perfect election. jfk's election wasn't perfect, george bush's election wasn't perfect, and number two the evidence strongly suggests that it wasn't a stolen that the outcome was right. there's a big difference between delaware for example in arizona. arizona has native american reservations and the ease ofe voting that we all take for granted and c

and alan dershowitz is here on the britney spears fight to regain contrhe

i was told by alan dershowitz i'm a liberal conservative.eg: how's it working? >> we are still on lockdown. i don't know. >> greg: do you see this as any different than any other period? more outlets on social media? >> it's tough because i like to argue and fight. it doesn't seem weird to me. it seems kind of natural. the dopamine. >> kat: there you go. >> greg: go to the next step and then hit them. >> sean: that i am trying to stay away from. >> clay: what is the last time you hit someone? >> sean: i don't want to talk about it. [laughter] >> kat: on the way in. >> greg: ducey gave him a bad luck. in order to cut out friends, you have to have friends. could be hard to understand. >> it's a tricky question. i knew it was going to come up. friendships are few and far between for me. the pandemic has really been a blessing. i have to say that i do understand why women are the ones who are basically dictating who comes in and out of the house. with the dopamine. i have hit someone in the last 24 hours. what i don't understand, democrats, it t

joining us now is alan dershowitz, author of "the case against censorship." explain why this is unconstitutional. speak at the justice department has the right to enforce voting laws. i don't think they have the right to demand states stick with covid instituted voting rules that were designed especially for covid but they can't restrict voting. we all have the same goals. we want every possible eligible voter to come to the polls and vote and we want no noneligible voters to come to the polls and vote. the justice department should enforce the voting laws. mandatory identification, the supreme court would strike that down. we have the justice department on the one hand but the supreme court overseeing. everyone who is eligible should vote and nobody who is intelligible should vote. as far as mandating vaccinations, upholding mandatory vaccination, conditioning on going to school, conditioned on going into airplanes, crowded buildings. ultimately, if it became absolutely necessary they would quote george washington in the middle of the revolutionary war who m

here with more the author of "the case against the new censorship" harvard law professor alan dershowitz. fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. you know, what i don't understand is for example, the most restrictive voting laws that we have found are in delaware. there is no early voting like georgia. they have 17 days early in person voting in georgia, they have drop boxes in every county, they have no excuse absent email and balloting. they don't have any drop boxes in delaware. you have to provide an excuse to get an absentee ballot, and now i'm watching the doj seemingly being weaponized going after georgia while ignoring the more restrictive state of delaware where joe biden never lifted a finger, to perform and make more accessible voting for the people in the state of delaware. your comments, your observations, how concerned should we be? speak of the evidence shows two things. number one, there's never been a perfect election. jfk's election wasn't perfect, george bush's election was imperfect and the current election wasn't perfect. number two, the evidence seems to strongly sugg

are here with more, the author of "the case against him censorship," harvard law a professor alan dershowitz along with fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. both of you are very bright legal minds. i will defer to you on this. professor, i will start with you.o class action suitsn are usually difficult. we know that. my understanding is you have some of the tobacco attorneys involved in that class action suit involved in this case. it seems like a strong case, but obviously nothing is a slam-dunk. >> this is the most important first amendment case of the 21st century andan it's importat because it pits freedom of speech on the one hand against the first amendment on the other hand. that may sound paradoxical but remember, it's the high tech giants that are banning freedom of speech. they are censoring, but they're claiming the right to do so under the first amendment, so they're using the first amendment as a sword against freedom of speech.'r that's why i call this the new censorship. the old censorship was easy to fight. it was the government censoring, we had the first amendment on our s

alan dershowitz says it is about more than just the former president. >> what is "happening now" is bigng us, the american citizens of the right to hear and see information because if it is banned from social media we have no access to it. that is why this is such an important case. >> reporter: facebook and twitter declined to comment. mark meckler of parlor will be here to discuss the case further that is coming up in a little bit. jillian: if you love facebook you can live there kind of. >> reporter: commenting on the lawsuit, they are building their own city. the company is behind plans for willow park that will feature 1700 apartments, 320 are going to be affordable housing, 120 units for seniors. there will be a supermarket, cafÉ, hotel, parks, even its own square. there will be new office space, 1.25 million, adjacent to the menlo park campus, the company owns the buildings on that land so this should be smooth sailing but we will see. todd: is it like potterphil harkening back to its a wonderful life, that is what i am thinking about. >> reporter: talk about living at your job l

for one thing, his chase is unconstitutional that he's bringing against social media and even alan dershowitz reportedly wouldn't sign on to it, but he was immediately sending out fund-raising e-mails after he put the case out so it's a frivolous case. it's not serious as so many -- >> it is a frivolous case. unfortunately, congresswoman, we're out of time, but it is a frivolous case. i'm glad you made that point. former congresswoman barbara comstock of virginia. thank you so much for your time and insights tonight. appreciate it. >>> coming up, delta variant surge has southern republican governors rethinking their vaccine messaging. the republican former governor of new jersey christie whitman joins me to discuss. plus the threat of war with iran looms over every modern u.s. presidency. how is the biden administration approaching this foreign policy challenge? i'll speak with the u.s. on i have for iran when we come back. like you, my hands are everything to me. but i was diagnosed with dupuytren's contracture. and it got to the point where things i took for granted got tougher to do. thoug

i want to read something from alan dershowitz, also another esteemed law professor.has filed an affidavit with this lawsuit as an expert witness, so he says this is a very, very important lawsuit. what's going on with high tech is unacceptable, it's inconsistent with the spirit of free speech that underlines our first amendment. so harry, there are those -- and he's not alone, there are other law professors and experts i saw who were saying it's a narrow path but this isn't a no chance for president trump, it could actually be sort of groundbreaking if he has success with it. >> you know, the ground has been broken though already, shannon, and very clearly, including by justice kavanaugh. i don't disagree with john as a matter of like a logical seminar, which he and i teach. it's an interesting argument. of course congress would have to go and take that step. congress has done exactly the opposite. it has said that the egg tech companies notwithstanding their power are not foreclosed from keeping people away who they think are violent, like president trump. under cur

then, constitutional attorney alan dershowitz and turning point usa founder charlie kirk on the double

then constitutional attorney alan dershowitz and usa founder

issa: i'm going to presume if you read alan dershowitz's book from early in the 20th century when there is a proposal to reduce the number of jewish people attending harvard, i would assume you would object to the rejecting the number of harvard appointees in the future? >> our constitution anticipates this is a political process. it left it to a president to make the appointment and the senators to confirm and the senators have a role to play in terms of selecting nominees to the district court and sometimes the court of appeals is wrong. it's all appropriate and within the constitution. i don't think there should be any arbitrary rules about who they pick or what their background should be. rep. issa: i think it's appropriate to ask the article from the pew research foundation be placed in the record because it quite frankly shows jimmy carter had more appointments than donald trump and, as was just noted, some of them are still on the bench. chair johnson: and i think his were a little more diverse, as well. so noted, and without objection. next, we will hear from the gentleman from

>> i'm going to presume if you've read alan dershowitz book the early in the 20th century, there was proposal to reduce the number of jewish people attending harvard, i would assume you would object to us limiting the number of harvard nominees in the future? >> i don't think there should be any arbitrary limits. the constitution anticipates it's a process, that the president to make appointments and senators to confirm and the senators have a role to play in nominees in the district court and sometimes the court of appeals as well. that's all appropriate and tint with -- consistent with our constitution and any rules-- >> and i would ask the article from the pew research foundation be placed into the record because it quite frankly shows that j imi carter had more appointments than donald trump and as just noted, some of them are still on the bench. >> and i think his were a little more diverse as well, president carter. so noted and without objection, so ordered. next we would hear from the gentleman from wisconsin, mr. fitzgerald, distinguished newspaper publisher, for five minute

. >> i'm going to presume that fred alan dershowitz early in the 20th century when there was a proposalreduce the number of jewish people attending harvard. i would assume that you would object to us limiting the number of harvard nominees in thefuture . >> i don't think there could be any arbitrary limits. our constitution participates in the political process and it's up to the president to make the appointments and pothe senate to confirm the senators have a role to play in electing nominees to the district court and sometimes the court of appeals as well. that is all appropriate and consistent with our constitution and i don't think there should be any arbitrary rules about who they should or their background position. >> mister chairman this time think it's appropriate that we have the articles from the research foundation be placed in the record because it quite frankly shows that jimmy carter had more appointments than donald trump and as was just noted, some of them are still on the bench. >> are a little more diverse aswell . since president carter. so noted and without objecti

issa: i'm going to presume if you read alan dershowitz's book from early in the 20th century when theres a proposal to reduce the number of jewish people attending harvard, i would assume you would object to the rejecting the number of harvard appointees in the future? >> our constitution anticipates this is a political process. it left it to a president to make the appointment and the senators to confirm and the senators have a role to play in terms of selecting nominees to the district court and sometimes the court of appeals is wrong. it's all appropriate and within the constitution. i don't think there should be any arbitrary rules about who they pick or what their background should be. rep. issa: i think it's appropriate to ask the article from the pew research foundation be placed in the record because it quite frankly shows jimmy carter had more appointments than donald trump and, as was just noted, some of them are still on the bench. chair johnson: and i think his were a little more diverse, as well. so noted, and without objection. next, we will hear from the gentleman from wi

funny as hell, alan dershowitz and justin -- justice thomas says it does stand a chance.t: ok, let's focus on the companies in your level of trust in them. caller: i've never used a single one a day in my life and i never will. host: hold on, you had your chance to make a statement and we are focusing on a russian here. why do you avoid them? caller: because they are trash, like the media in this country. host: ok, you made these points. a manual, texas, democratic line. -- emmanuel, texas, democratic line. caller: trump used social media for five years to attack people. to disparage people, to divide this country more. facebook, trump got elected with the help of russia and facebook with all the disinformation targeting people. another thing, i'm very disappointed with y'all, you continue to cover him like he's still the sitting president. this man is a relevant and a divider. host: relevancy goes to the suit filed yesterday that prompted us to ask these company -- these questions about social media. since you called into talk about that, how much trust do you have? call