alan dershowitz once represented epstein. you denied all wrongdoing on this program. counter suing. professor, as someone caught up in this. when you look at this verdict, what is your main take away? >> well, that the government was smart enough not to use virginia as a witness. she accused me and prince andrew and senator mitchell and ambassador richardon and anybody she could find in jeffrey epstein's rolo decks. -- the government did not believe her. today was a good day for those people accused by her. as far as ghislaine maxwell is concerned, the government put on witnesses. they were believed. the jury came to its conclusion. there will be an appeal. from are some issues. there is a statute of limitation. some of these things occurred recommend 30 years ago. back in 1994. right now she faces a significant prin prison sentence. >> greg: greg abbott, what happens next here? -- >> i was not surprised by the verdict and neither was ghislaine maxwell. she was stoic because she knew what was coming. sat there during the course of the trial and saw the prosecution's e

here with more is alan dershowitz and gregg jarrett. the evidence was overwhelming. >> every civil libertarian should applaud this. false accusations can destroy our system of justice. we can't assume any particular race or gender tells the truth or any particular religion. we have to focus on the evidence. the evidence in this case has been overwhelming from the beginning. this was a false accusation. now we have to start going after women who are trying to make ony off falsacizations. -- i was falsely accused by virginia. nobody looked into that case. she is a woman, she must be telling the truth. the media won't look into false charges by women, african-americans or guys. it's critical we have a single standard of justice.ays. it's critical we have a single standard of justice. anybody making a false charge should be sentenced to a long prison term. >> tucker: gregg jarrett the reason we tonight hear about the every day victims is because it doesn't advance the agenda. the only lives that matter are lives that can be used as a politi

jessica anderson, alan dershowitz, thank you very much.ext, violent swords around the country and we will show you a shocking video of us lashing ino new york city m.o. plus another horrific weekend of violence in chicago. pastor corey brooks will join us live from his rooftop in the windy city. don't go away, stick around for that. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> gregg: will come back to the special edition of "hannity," i'm gregg jarrett, america's largest cities all seem to have some things in common these days. democrats mayors soaring covid number shocking increases in violent crime. take the city of philadelphia for example, which is having its deadliest year ever with nearly 550 homicides and counting. new york, the bronx man was caught on camera slashing a woman in front of her own apartment during a dispute. of course, chicago where 22 people were shocked including two that were killed over the christmas weekend. tonight on a cool rooftop in the windy city, pastor corey brooks is continuing his 100th day vigil to raise money for the construction of a

jessica and her son, alan dershowitz, thank you very much.up next, violent swords around the country and we will show you a shocking video of us lashing in new york city m.o. plus another horrific weekend of violence in chicago. of pastor cory brooks will join us live from his rooftop in the windy city. don't go away, stick around for that. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list event. earn about covid-19, experience the power of sanctuary the more questions we have. the biggest question now, what's next? what will covid bring in six months, a year? if you're feeling anxious about the future, you're not alone. calhope offers free covid-19 emotional support. call 833-317-4673, or live chat at calhope.org today. >> gregg: will come back to the special edition of "hannity," i'm gregg jarrett, america's largest cities all seem to have some things in common these days. it democrats mayors soaring covid number shocking increases in violent crime. take the city of philadelphia for example, which is having its deadlie

we can now speak to lawyer alan dershowitz.ns spending christmas with a break, suddenly it thatjerry reached a verdict. suddenly it that jerry reached a verdict. ~ . ., suddenly it that jerry reached a verdict. ~ .., ~' suddenly it that jerry reached a verdict. ~ _, ~ .,, verdict. welcome i think the most im ortant verdict. welcome i think the most important thing particularly i verdict. welcome i think the most important thing particularly for i important thing particularly for british people is that the government was very careful who it used as witnesses. it did not use, as a witness, the woman who accused prince andrew, accuse me, accuse many other people because the government didn't believe she was telling the truth. in fact, she, virginia dupree was mentioned in the trial is somebody who brought the young people to epstein for him to abuse, so this case does nothing at all to strengthen in any way the case against prince andrew, and indeed it weakens the case of prince andrew considerably because the government was very

let's just make it clear, the man you are referring to is alan dershowitz, and they deny wrongdoing andwill change as the years roll by?— years roll by? maxwell is a very interesting _ years roll by? maxwell is a very interesting character, _ years roll by? maxwell is a very interesting character, her - years roll by? maxwell is a very| interesting character, her father interesting character, herfather was a socialite, an incredible bully, also very influential, and when he died she had to replace up with somebody, and i think she naturally replaced that with epstein. the difference between epstein. the difference between epstein and maxwell is very clear. he was very reclusive, he didn't follow the social circles maxwell day, he didn't really like to mix, whereas maxwell had all the contacts, and it is through her contacts, and it is through her contacts that she managed to introduce epstein to the people he had contact with. this is a man who spent time in the company with two former presidents, trump and also clinton, a man who had had relationships and friends with some of the world

harvard law professor alan dershowitz says democrats are in a desperate scramble for power. >> whichver way you come out on voting rights reform the idea of the ends justifying the means, making short-term benefits and long-term problems like ending the filibuster or packing the supreme court, giving executive power to the president over matters that are legislative are long-term problems designed to simply help the democrats in the short-term. benjamin: four people killed and several injured in a filing shooting spree. police asked suspect began shooting before opening fire on officers just outside the city. authorities say the officer with it is undergoing surgery. the suspect was killed. police believe the suspect acted alone at a motive is unclear. a colorado da asking the judge to consider reducing the 110 year sentence for truck driver convicted in a deadly crash. the da is asking the judge to extend the sentence of 20 to 30 years for the crash which killed four people. the sentence has drawn national attention and says 20 to 30 years is too much for what many believe is a trag

alan dershowitz and an attorney never meant any wrongdoing.ss insisted it did happen and she was going to have sex with both men. so ghislaine is going to spend the rest of her life in prison. if she cuts a deal, she might be reduced from 30 years to 7. what's fascinating is the,en don't you try to cut a deal. >> that's interesting, john. it's interesting to see it's not over and wonder what might happen next. john, i'm sorry we're out of time, but it's really interesting to talk with you and obviously we'll circle back with you about her sentencing because i know nobody knows about this like you do. thank you for your time. >> by the way, that's not true, but thank you and happy new year. >> thank you. you as well. you as well. >>> okay, meanwhile, a tiger bites a man at a florida zoo. police say he was not supposed to be there, the man. he is badly hurt and we'll tell you what happened next. i don't just play someone brainy on tv - i'm an actual neuroscientist. and i love the science behind neuriva plus. unlike ordinary memory supplements, n

revealing the upcoming battle between david boies, who represented some of these victims, and alan dershowitzen accused by virginia giuffre. he's countersued, denied that. that legal battle could potentially also be revealing about the other big male names it could bring in. >> wow. >> so, you know, it is a beginning. it's an inflection point. it is not an end. it is a beginning. >> vicky ward, thank you for being here and for your reporting on this for nearly two dec dec de decades. i encourage people to watch your special and read your news letter. thanks for the time this morning. >> thank you so much. >>> next, some new year's eve events are canceled or scaled down. the testing shortage and hospitals overwhelmed. how did we get back here? my next guest details the lessons we failed to learn in the first few waves of this pandemic and mistakes we're still making. but the thing they'll remember forever? grandpa coming out of retirement to give a few ski lessons. the time to plan your get together is now. find it on vrbo. throughout history i've observed markets shaped by the intentional and

the bbc is apologizing for its decision to interview alan dershowitz.t the audience did not hear was that dershowitz himself helped defend epstein and a survivor has accused dershowitz of sexually abusing her when he was epstein's lawyer. in his interview, dershowitz attacked her for her accusations against him and the prince. after the interview, the bbc acknowledged that the segment, quote, did not meet the network's editorial standards. >>> a quick programming note for your weekend. friends, collaborators, legends, carole king and james taylor, just just call out my name" sunday at 9:00, only on cnn. kee. ignore us. i've lost, like, 28 pounds. you look great! wow. i love that my clothes fit better. but i just love ice cream a little bit more than that. the new ww personalpoints program is particular to you. so what kind of foods do you like? avocado. ice cream. sandwiches. no food is off limits. when can i start? start the new year with three months free. join today at ww.com. hurry, offer ends january 3rd. ♪ ♪ do your eyes bother you? because after

we have for example tonight, alan dershowitz on the show and we will break it down from a constitutional. a lot of times we get lost in political arguments and forget to step back and say, the constitution is clear about what the purpose of these things are and in many cases the procedures by which they will be held. we have a discussion on the show about, what is actually, what the political arguments are, what the constitutional arguments are but i think the fun part is, you get to look at a lot of the questions you are getting everyday on washington journal and a lot of times that is what i will say. i'm hearing a lot about this, can you break it down? it is more of that discussion between other experts, political or legal, to have a better understanding of issues in politics that are going on. host: the president, did he incite the crowd on january 6? guest: i think that is not entirely true in that that is not necessarily the question. the question is, can you impeach somebody who is no longer in office? the second western is, if so, those events, are they impeachable offenses? are

tonight, we will have alan dershowitz on the show and we will break it down from a constitutional perspectivelot of times we get lost in political arguments and forget to step back and say the constitution is clear about what the purpose of these things are and the procedures by which they will be held. we get to have a discussion on the show about what is -- what the political arguments are and what the constitutional arguments are. i think the fun part is you get to look at the questions you are getting everyday on washington journal. a lot of times, that is what i will say. i am hearing a lot about x, can you break it down for people? it is more of the discussion between political and legal to have an understanding of issues and politics that is going on. host: if you boil it down, did the president incite the crowd on january 6? what is your take? guest: i think that is not entirely true in the sense that that is not the question. the fundamental question is can you impeach somebody who is no longer in office? the second is if so, did those events, are they impeachable offenses? are they