sarah, you saw that interview with alan dershowitz, what was your concern? i was horrified. was really, really outraged. and it was the phrase, "formidable conflicts" in your description in your description sticks with me from the other viewer. he has multiple conflicts of interest in this case, and he is himself directly implicated, as he said. so not only did he not comment impartially on the maxwell verdict, he didn't comment on the maxwell verdict at all. he took the opportunity to charge virginia giuffre who has accused him of abuse, and to say that the verdict somehow vindicated him. so it was, it was problematic on multiple levels because at no point for a uk audience, or an audience who doesn't know who alan dershowitz is, and what his very complex relationship with this case is, theyjust took him as the "constitutional lawyer" that he was described as, an impartial, neutral expert, when in fact he is personally implicated in the case, and has been accused of criminal wrongdoing, a very serious criminal wrongdoing. could he have been a suitable guest if enough contex

alan dershowitz. have a great sunday, everybody.rrow on fox business. ♪ ♪ schwab starter kit™. new investors can open an account and get $50 to split across the top five stocks in the s&p 500®. you can also unlock short videos, step-by-step guides, and other easy-to-use tools designed for people just getting started. plus, investment professionals are on standby 24/7 if you ever have a question. it's the smarter way to start investing. ♪ ♪ ♪ howard: from the moment the white house got upstaged by a leak to pete williams, the retirement of stephen breyer or has dominated the news. don't buy the spin that the 83-year-old justice essentially woke up one day and decided he had enough. breyer had been under enormous pressure from democrats and media liberals to surrender his seat while joe biden still has nominal control of the senate. the coverage has been turbo-charged by the biden cam campaign promise to name a black

recently the bbc admitted it had been a mistake to interview the lawyer alan dershowitz after ghislaine maxwell's conviction. do you accept that with fewer experienced journalists in the newsroom, mistakes like that are going to happen more? well, mistakes do happen. i'm not going to deny that. but i think in that particular case, it was less to do with cuts, to be honest, and more to do with covid. it was also 28 december, it was night, i think the teams are actually quite thinned out, no doubt about it, but that's not because of cuts so much as where we are between christmas and new year. really? people thought you should have just googled alan dershowitz, you'd have known you should be putting them on the air in that context. well, possibly — actually, i think the teams now know that they actually they could have avoided it by doing some kind of more considered handovers to each other on it. and we admitted it was a mistake and dealt with it. mistakes happen, they do. but i don't necessarily think there are any more of them now than when ijoined the bbc nearly a0 years ago — or if th

alan dershowitz. have a great sunday, everybody.e you tomorrow on fox business. >> are you ready to start a great career? >> safelite is now hiring. >> you will love your job. >> there's room to grow... >> ...and lots of opportunities. >> so, what are you waiting for? >> apply now... >> ...and make a difference. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ >> man, i love that song! you're a one-man stitchwork master. but your staffing plan needs to go up a size. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire space bar second young nypd officer will be laid to rest this week just days after tens of thousands lined the streets of fifth avenue to remember his partner, detective jason rivera. he and officer wilbert more as you see on the right they were ambushed in a harlem apartment, shot to apple answering a mother's call for help. putting the focus back on illegal weapons, our criminal justice system, progressive's s

alan dershowitz. have a great sunday, everybody.tomorrow on fox business whether you've enjoyed the legendary terrain in telluride, the unparalleled landscape of park city or the famed peaks of whistler, you face the hassle of lugging your gear through the airport. with ship skis, you're just a few clicks away from having your skis, snowboard and luggage shipped from your doorstep to your destination. with unrivaled pricing, real time tracking, ship skis delivers hassle-free. ship ahead and go catch those first tracks on fresh snow. on fanduel sportsbook, new customers can bet 30-to-1 odds on any team in the playoffs. so you can make every catch feel like the catch of a lifetime. bet 30-to-1 odds on any team to win their playoff game. bet $5 to win $150. only on fanduel, america's number one sportsbook. when times get dark, we can't see the help that's all around us. let 2-1-1 be your guiding light for help with food and other resources. call 2-1-1 or visit 211.org >> hello everyone welcome to kudlow i am larry kudlow. so today it c

and essentially alan dershowitz was not found to have committed any wrong.ot do anything, then you should go to court and depose her. but of course that's not the strategy which the lawyers for prince andrew have taken. ~ ., ., , ., lawyers for prince andrew have taken. ., ., , ., ., lawyers for prince andrew have taken. . . . ., taken. what does that mean? you should no taken. what does that mean? you should go to _ taken. what does that mean? you should go to court _ taken. what does that mean? you should go to court and _ taken. what does that mean? you should go to court and depose i taken. what does that mean? you | should go to court and depose her. what does that mean in layman's terms? in what does that mean in layman's terms? �* .., what does that mean in layman's terms? �* , ,, , terms? in america the process is you take the evidence _ terms? in america the process is you take the evidence in _ terms? in america the process is you take the evidence in advance - terms? in america the process is you take the evidence in advance of i terms? in america

although this was not made clear on air, alan dershowitz used to be a lawyer forjeffrey epstein, andg with epstein, been accused of abuse by virginia giuffre, a charge he denies. many viewers expressed shock at the interview, with michael mcelfresh contacting us to say: and john moyes added: well, the following day, the bbc acknowledged that those criticisms had a point, putting out this statement. there has been no further word yet on that, but in the meantime they have been more objections to another bbc interview about this case, and it took place on new year's eve on radio 4's today programme, and clips of it were shown during the day on the news channel. the guest: ghislaine maxwell's brother ian, who challenged the version of events set out in court by her accusers.

on multiple levels because at no point for a uk audience or an audience who does not know who alan dershowitz complex relationship at this case they took him as a constitutional lawyer that he was described as an impartial neutral expert when in fact he expressed that he implicated in the case and has been accused of criminal wrongdoing, a very serious criminal wrongdoing, a very serious criminal wrongdoing, a very serious criminal wrongdoing could ——. if criminal wrongdoing could ——. if enough context had been given about his connections and is conflicts of interest? he his connections and is conflicts of interest? . ., ., , interest? he could have been. if he was not challenged _ interest? he could have been. if he was not challenged either. - interest? he could have been. if he was not challenged either. he - interest? he could have been. if he was not challenged either. he wasl was not challenged either. he was giving airtime to put his case out there. and even when he said base has cleared me at no point was that taken up a challenge. if he had been interviewed where it had been made ver

member of the senate will co-sponsor itry i don't know if you heard the earlier segment with alan dershowitz and greg jarrett and joe biden has said he will only choose an african-american woman. do you believe that totodo be constitutional? well, i believe it to be typical of this administration, which has been the most race obsessedbe, gender obsessedes in terms of trying to deconstruct. there's actually i mean this is a hard woke left administration . i wasn't surprised at all when the president said that this is what he's going to dohe. here's what i think, sean. it's a real moment of truth for joe biden. he's deeply unpopularnpop. he's been the most divisive president of my lifetime. now he's gotw h a choice if he's going to nominate a pro america pro constitution justice or is w he going to keed doing what he's been doing and divide this country with the hard work left activistac we're about to find out. i hope republicans are ready to stand up for the constitution. yeah. all right, senator , we'reio going to watch very closely. appreciate you being with us . straight ahead tonight , s

although | this was not made clear on air, alan dershowitz used to be a lawyer for jeffrey epstein andd shock at the interview. what an amazing lapse in thejudgement that not the following day the bbc acknowledge that those criticisms had a point putting out this statement. last night's interview did not lead to the editorial standards as he was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst and we did not make the relevant but as background clear to our audience. we will look into how this happened. there has been no further word yet on that but in the meantime there have been more objections to another bbc interview about this case and it took place on new year's eve on the radio for a two—day programme and clips of it were shown during the day on the news channel. the cast was ghilane maxwell's brother who challenge their version of events set out in court by her accusers. i their version of events set out in court by her accusers.— court by her accusers. i am not saying that _ court by her accusers. i am not saying that they _ court by her accusers. i am not saying that

i'm not like someone like alan dershowitz, who simply seeks public attention.and with the expertise that i have. but in a way, that's my point. but you bring a reputation to the table, and i wonder... i'm going to finish my sentence, whether you want me to or not. go on. i think it's unfair to make the kinds of allegations that you've made on the basis of 1—2 things that i've made a mistake about. everybody makes mistakes, and i'm not exempt. now, i really don't want to be unfair, but i am interested in the political atmosphere in the united states today and indeed your reflections on it. i look at polling evidence, which partly, i think, because of the american public�*s exposure both to truths, but also to untruths which are masked as truths. the american public�*s confidence in key institutions, notjust the presidency and the congress, which of course are partisan, but also the supreme court. their faith in these institutions is plummeting, according to all of the survey evidence — and i wonder whether you feel that the polarised atmosphere in america today,

all right, you wouldn't believe ohio ran into hiking none other than esteemed legendary lawyer alan dershowitzd. boy was he tired. he has been hiking for miles. terrible breath by the way. any way dershowitz was enjoying himself he was stuck there for a while. >> dana: did he die his hair pink? >> greg: he has an interesting social life if you ever look into it. it's actually a baby poor could you pine at the smithsonian national zoo. where am i? it's time for you, geraldo. >> geraldo: all right this is geraldo's geraldo's news with geraldo. featuring birds. i love birds. i have every kind of bird you can think of. doves, rescued dove. look at my head. >> dana: there is dove on your head. >> geraldo: a dove on my head. canaries, finches, lots and lots of birds. >> greg: stop crowing. >> geraldo: nothing like this. i lived with a great view of the reservoir central park but i never saw this. this rover, an american bawled eagle catching a seagull. now, this is a bald eagle who has. >> judge jeanine: wow. >> geraldo: tagged in connecticut living on the hudson. that is amazing skill. >> judge jea

been seen with epstein: former president bill clinton, the other former president, the former alan dershowitz c.e.o. bill gates, or part-time clarinetist woody allen. if it's revealed that one of the "john does" is woody allen, it could ruin his reputation. of course, one man we do know spent a lot of time with jeffrey epstein is andrew. you guys know andrew? you might know him as "prince andrew," but last week, in light of his sexual assault trial, the queen stripped him of his titles. ( applause ) now, a new documentary in the united kingdom is outlining some of andrew's unusual bedroom habits. no, not those. although, yeah, probably those. i mean, in this case, his teddy bear collection. former royal staffer paul page explains: >> it had about 50 or 60 stuffed toys positioned on the bed and, basically, there was a card the inspector showed us in a drawer, and it's a picture of these bears all in situ on the bed. and the reason for the laminated picture was that if those bears weren't put back in the right order by the maids, he would shout and scream and become verbally abusive. >> stephen

with legal analysis is the author of the case for vaccine mandates, harvard law professor earl alan dershowitz. greg, we will start with you. very clear here and what he's saying. even with identity politics, the supreme court nominee, this will be troubling for them when he says that they are not going to consider anybody in the case of the vice president gender discrimination would be allowed. is that constitutional? >> it's not just supreme court decisions, it is -- you can go all the way back to title vii of the civil rights act. the equal employment opportunity act. all that says you may not use race and gender as a condition of employment. he actually got kicked out of law school for a while. so i'm not sure he understands or even comprehends the law. but you know it, i wrote a column today and i said look, republicans need to remember that if a liberal replaces a liberal combat does not change the ideological balance of the court. the current composition remains the same. and i would resist the temptation to demonize a qualified liberal judicial nominee because democrats will use this i

but if you note on the book on the cover my criminal law professor alan dershowitz said some very nice things about me. so in addition to the above as jim mentioned i was deputy council on president nixon's watergate defense team. and i was there throughout the scandal and it's unfolding. i transcribed the white house tapes. i ran the document rooms holding the seized files of the watergate defendants. and i staff nixon's counselors. on watergate issues as you all know it ended rather badly president nixon resigning in disgrace and two dozen members of his administration going to jail. i've pondered ever since what exactly went wrong in our response to that burgeoning scandal. without really coming up with any answers. that is until i learned some time ago that the watergate prosecutors files. at least those that survived are maintained at our national archives. the prosecutors were after all technically government employees. i spent a lot of my time ever since reviewing those files. and that's a bit about what i'm going to talk to you tonight. but it's been 50 years. since the scandal

the network didn't bother or to mention alan dershowitz that she's a former epstein lawyer who's been misconduct. the move did not meet the bbc's standards as mr. dershowitz was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst. but dershowitz told viewers that the government's failure to cale made full disclosure. >>> cnn senior producer has resigned the network confirmed after project veritas alleged he had solicited sexual photos of his fan yea see's 15-year-old -- fiancee's 15-year-old daughter. he is under investigation by the child exploitation unit. the departure of -- follows the firing of john griffin who's been charged with unlawful sexual activity with minors, no indication either case involves their work at cnn. >>> and keith olberman is taking flak for a nasty comment on a family photo of mitt romney who has 5 children, 25 grandchild. he said of the utah senator's clam, somebody gift these people vasectomies. does he have something about large families, or is this just the level he has sunk to? >>> next on "mediabuzz," four days before the anniversary of the capi

sarah, you saw that interview with alan dershowitz, what was your concern? i was horrified.ld have been but it is notjust that he was a guest, it is that he wasn't challenged, either. he was just given the air time put his case out there. and even when he said "this has cleared me", at no point was that taken up or challenged. if he had been interviewed where it had been made very clear that he represented epstein, that he acted for him in the non—prosecution agreement in florida that has been so controversial, and then he had been challenged, and he had been, you know, robustly interviewed, then i think that that would have been acceptable. but the problem was that none of those things happened. and we should say, of course, alan dershowitz, you know, absolutely denies any involvement in abuse. now, the bbc have said they are investigating what went on — you heard that statement. will that do? well, i guess it depends on what the outcome of the investigation is. my personal concern watching it was that at no point did the presenter say, "wait a minute — are you implicated?

all of these qualifiers around whatever woman they will inevitably choose so i won't argue with alan dershowitz the law better, but from a pr perspective, senator collins is right, this is a mess. maria: clumsy is a good way to put it, michael. i think there's no black woman on the court right now. i think most people would like to see a diversified court and we want to see a black woman on the court, but to just zero in on that being the criteria to naming one of the most important positions i think is unnerving some people. they want to make sure everyone is taking into account. >> maria, the goal of diversity is to get diversity of thought and avoid groupthink. there's nothing that the left wants less than diversity of thought. they simply want robots, different color, shape, size, gender that will spout identical ideologies to what their narrative is at the moment and nothing shows it more than saying i'm going to pick this person, this race, this gender of this religion so that you know there validation of the left's narrative at the moment can't be criticized based on that person's color,

people thought you should have just googled alan dershowitz, you'd have known you shouldn't be puttingecause since you've been in post, you've faced as busy a news agenda than most journalists can remember. and this week was no exception with the temperature at westminster raised to fever pitch. tonight at 10:00, we are live in downing street after a day in which borisjohnson faced a wave of calls for his resignation. reporter: is it all. over, prime minister? well, we mentioned on last week's programme complaints that the bbc�*s coverage of those downing street parties has been "excessive" and "biased" against the prime minister. and those continued this week, for instance with this phone call. woman: i'm ringing to complain about the amount of news - on borisjohnson. it's about time you stopped being judge, jury and executioner. i think as for the bbc being impartial, i most certainly don't think you are. as ever, though, another side to the story, and philip pooley agreed that: you have been in news for a very long time so complaints like that you know, one side and then the other s