i fully under what alan martinez said in your comments about it and we would definitely work with the department to ~ as i say, roof scape this so that it has a little more organization and address he your concerns. because i do appreciate -- they're very valid comments. >> [speaker not understood] to understand you want to have a common roof deck, which i'm in support of because building owners or building occupants use those [speaker not understood]. but i believe that the private roof decks are an excessive requirement and i do not think that i can support it, partially because you are already asking for a height exception. by now occupying the roof, it puts that much additional space which goes beyond just the common deck. it's just asking for too much. >> if i may rehe expectfully ask, we are not asking for a height limit variance. we are not. we are within the height limit. >> the height limit is 50 from what i understand. >> no, it's 65 feet. it's 65 feet. we need to go for conditional use over 50 feet, but 65 feet is the height limit. we're within the height limit. there's no