let us ask our good friend, historian aleksey miller , aleksey ilyich, if we look at history, to whatnism is characteristic of the polish state in general. history with the polish state of the 18th century it was the political empire of the 18th century. that is, where it could expand at the end of the 18th century, this state ceased to exist until the first world war. polish there was no state. at this time, we can say that the elites were in a certain sense revanchist, that is, uh, the slogan that determined their political position was the slogan, but the borders of 1772, that is, restore the speech to the police, what it was before the partition? then, at the beginning of the 20th century, when some prospects for the polish state actually began to open up in poland , a very tough dispute between supporters of the borders of 1772 was just turning away, somewhat rethought, it can be philosophical and supporters of the construction nation state. interwar poland actually did this in a sense, but she took it. what could it be in a dispute with lithuania lvov lvov in a dispute with ukra

let us ask our good friend historian aleksey miller alekseevich, if we look at history, to what extentate is generally characterized by exponentialism. the history of the century state it was the political empire of the 18th century. that is, where it could expand at the end of the 18th century, this state ceased to exist and until before the first world war. there was no polish state. at this time, we can say that the elites were in a certain sense revanchist, that is, the slogan that determined their political position was the slogan, and the borders of 1772, that is, to restore the rzeczpospolice. what was she like before the partition? then, at the beginning of the 20th century, when some opportunities for the prospects for the polish state in poland began to open up, a very tough dispute unfolds, and between supporters of the borders of 1772, somewhat rethought can be supporters of nation- state building. interwar poland actually did this in a sense, but she took it. what could it be in a dispute with lithuania lvov lvov in a dispute with ukrainians, grodno well, there was no one

thank you we had a story aleksey miller this week we started talking about a new phase of the ukrainianffensive to discuss the senseless fog of war as intense as it was now, perhaps, never. now it is disguised as an unprecedented openness and reliability. from which everything only becomes cloudy, fierce hostilities have been going on for more than a year and a half, one way or another , covering many states. what does all this mean for the world's military-political prospects are we talking with our friend dmitry stefanov, co-founder of the wattford project. hello dima. here is a well-known phrase that the generals are always preparing for the last war. here, as non-specialists, i have the opposite feeling now that they were preparing just in time for a future war, but it turned out something like past, but at the new technological level it is. well, it's actually a common phrase. i would put the emphasis here in a slightly different way. we were preparing, probably, for another war, not for the future, nor for the past, but simply for another, but it suddenly happened. everything is a