aleksey reznikov had already written a statement this morning on his own decision about his resignation zelensky announced the day before , simultaneously informing the ukrainians and, of course, washington was reading, but it had grown three times. however, these scandals are just the tip of the iceberg , according to the new york times, reznikov's departure is associated with the failure of the so-called counteroffensive, which indirectly hit the reputation of the vaunted nato weapons. and, of course, the west itself is resnikov's stand. coincided with the resignation of the british minister of defense, er, wallace , in this way, apparently, the west reacted to the setbacks. i think we can say with certainty that the ukrainian counter-offensive failed after 3 months. they have achieved only a small number of tactical successes and it is almost impossible that they will be able to make a strategic breakthrough that would change the course of the war and improve the position of the armed forces, ukraine is involved in attrition, which it cannot even win with all western help and the det