alex rosenthal on behalf of the operators. we ask that you uphold the existing building permit with no new conditions for these reasons. the appellants have failed to show the project violates the requirements of the general plan or the planning code. the noise and safety issues raised in the brief have already been heard and adjudicated twice. the appellant lost both hearings by unanimous decision. the project conditions agreed to during the discretionary review process are adequate to address any noise and safety concerns that may have. no. 4, contrary to the accusations and misinformation presented by appellants, my clients have acted only in good faith and obeyed every directive given to them by the city to bring their building permit into compliance. the appellants argue that the plan does not meet the plan and is unprecedented but they fail to provide any argument or evidence that modifications to the project will not adequately protect them from possible disturbances. the appellants claim that because there are no other