alexander shchipkov, alexander vladimirovich . let's go here. with what topic shall we start with lithuania , the patriarch in bartholomew is going to create an exarchate there, and even some orthodox priests from lithuania and belarus are moving there , the first question. and why at all eh? does he need it? what do you think? well it's for real a very interesting situation, because there patriarch bartholomew is one of the tools in the hands of such big american and geopolitical games. and here is the creation of a small exarchate. in small lithuania, in fact, this hurt, and for such a big strategic perspective, as it imagines, bartholomew and him neatly. the fact is that and this exarchate that they are planning they call the exarchate and the baltic and belarusian and russian and ukrainian . that is, they want this little structure like this. well in in general, to be honest, it’s fake, but it’s framed in such a way that it’s jurisdiction extends to the entire territory of the russian federation, that’s their, uh, such a plan, and these guys usually play for a long time, they expect there to be 15-20 years ahead. they understand that now it, well, will not work in any way, but they are estimating. this is such a distant prospect for us, that is, they want to pretend about them that the moscow patriarchate is not legitimate at all, almost no longer reduces, but the ecumenical patriarchy opens a new zakhar and its jurisdictional possibilities will extend to the whole of belarus, ukraine and , uh, russia, that is, to the entire canonical territory of the russian orthodox church , a little bit, and of course, there is. e, as you correctly noted, and some of the lighting that e is already starting to flow, but in e. there, in this exarchate, the names of priests are called there, uh, two or three from belarus, and this is a very interesting moment. deal in is, that and these priests, and according to rules. uh, church according to the rules of the so-called troy, but the cathedral, and this was in the seventh century such was the chairmanship of emperor justinian, and a cathedral was held, at which very clear rules were written down when lighting can go and when cheeses and smells cannot go into the church. so there is such a seventeenth rule that says. ready. that in order for a priest to be able to move from one church to another, he must have a so-called holiday letter from his bishop, ruling these guys who have now uh fled there, naturally no holiday letters in belarus from uh their king, uh belarusian e was not received. it is further written at the end of this canon of the seventeenth that if a priest crosses arbitrarily, he ejaculates himself, that is, in fact. i think that a decision on these will be made soon. eh, the priests will be deprived. they themselves will cease to be a priest. and then, of course, they will still remain in this to the zarhata. they will perform divine services, but not legitimately, because they will no longer be a priest, except they will baptize. this will not be baptism everything is as if they will be buried from them liturgy will be. uh, already liturgies, and so on. the church has very strict rules that have existed for thousands of years and, it is strange that the greeks, but in particular the patriarchs catch. well, they don't pay attention to it at all. that is, they seem to demonstrate to the entire orthodox world their non-canonical , absolutely political consciousness. well, look, when hmm the dog was created in ukraine and with the light hand of constantinople and western partners, and hmm in moscow they also underestimated, and the threat of what would follow this also seemed to be some kind of a small group of raskolnikov who will not decide anything. and now we see what we see, but it happens. it's actually a kiss that doesn't solve anything. this exarchate. with the one being created now in lithuania, we somewhat underestimate the risks of this, you understand. the fact is that we are talking about different things, and m and the hrc this newly created exarchate, and on the territory of lithuania these are political entities, and not religious, not ecclesiastical and dog. e ecclesiastical canonical point of view. this is a very small organization, and most of the uh, the population of ukraine are adherents canonical church. even if these people do not fully understand. here, how this canonicity is arranged, how it works, they did not read the rules of the trulsky cathedral or some other, uh, church documents. they feel this skin, and people feel where the true church of eugene is. no, why the fate of the pouch is a foregone conclusion. this is a very small structure that will be poured into the asian church. this is my prediction. just like a specialist. after a certain number of years. eh, this dog will no longer be called the orthodox church there. this these people will pour them into a non-hellish church, and there they will have a road, and it is now already registered. it’s just that they don’t know it yet, and their fate has already been decided there in washington a long time ago, and the ukrainian orthodox church is not going anywhere, it will still remain, and it will still be reborn. in the sense that it will exist quietly, since the church should exist in normal peaceful peaceful conditions. that's all. there is another point. uh, many uh, the priests are pretty famous names. uh, let's say ukrainian who were in our church and then went over to a dog or somewhere else, or these belarusians. these people were treated kindly in moscow, these are very famous names. it's just that i'm not going to promote them right now . these people who came to us invited them, they spoke at our conference. we all of them personally know them here the verdict was coalesced. it is not clear why i have always said why we need to take a liking to e, but also caress, but a frank traitor. well , can't you see, this is the nationalist fifth column. of course there is, of course there is fifth column, as elsewhere. unfortunately, these guys who have now defected. eh, in this so-called zaharkhan. and i think that in the near future they will be deprived of the sacred san well to raise their obygraund to raise their political biography, so to speak. this is a belarusian nazi. these are belarusian nationalists. therefore, their motivation is absolutely political, their motivation is nationalistic, and they are not at all religious, therefore, when they are deprived of themselves, well, absolutely right. uh would be absolutely correct decision we mentioned, uh, hmm patriarch bartholomew of constantinople. and let's talk about turkey, and hmm, your opinion is interesting. and what will happen to the presidential elections in turkey what are erdogan's chances? and what? uh, which candidate is best for us erdogan is not the easiest partner, as the last decade has shown, not the most stable, or the one who comes for him, do you think it’s very interesting who the patriarch will vote for, e bartholome, after all, he is a citizen turkey so i think that 99%, and 9900 that they will not vote for erdogan, but will vote for the current protege connected he has a very intricate surname. i'm afraid to take it out now. his name is kemal, like ataturk's kemal, and he leads the party, just a follower of the turk, that is, this is such a party, well, of a democratic persuasion, but it has been set up for the secularization of turkey and in recent years. she began to lose her positions and erdogan and so on powerfully pushed him into the basis of his political rhetoric and practice, so to speak. i put islam a and moved these kemalists, and the current kemal, and who are also in order, that we are already 74 years old. he relies very powerfully on american support. the fact is that and we don’t really imagine ourselves here, but the real situation of turkey and erdogan is such a powerful guy, such a powerful political figure, but the tour is countries that are very, very, very strongly dependent on the united states of america and erdogan's task has always been to break out. why does he look with admiration at putin but putin broke out of the american addiction that arose in the nineties, and erdogan has not yet broken out, therefore, in the sixteenth year of erdogan, a little bit, uh, with the help of orange coups did not throw off putin saved him putin helped him. and now they would they, i mean , the americans will play. e during the election campaign. here are the elections on may 14, that's just around the corner, and the question. and what should erdogan do for us, of course, it was beneficial for erdogan to remain, and not some pro-american person come who, well, right there, uh, will change the policy towards russia by 180 °. it seems to me that erdogan's mistake is that he does not look at his bread, and there is a very interesting, but the person who withdrew his candidacy will not run, but, in my opinion, the name is dagu rescheduled. this, and he has a very small party called motherland, and it is absolutely. anti-american his slogans are leaving nato and he recognized crimea but his party recognized crimea as uh belonging to russia he supports putin uh in the current geopolitical situation. he is a weak figure, because to me the party is small but the mass of the people who share in turkey who share his views. after all, you know that 70% of turks are sure that an earthquake is some kind of unnatural geomagnetic phenomena 70%, uh, the tours are sure that this is an artificial earthquake created by washington somehow or not. i will not judge, but public opinion is important. and if now erdogan aloud, supported this dag perchik and his ideas, he would unite with his leftists, at least pure static considerations. he would have won these elections at once, because now the rating of the shorts is coming, and who will win erdogan or those appointed by washington it is still unknown, and we will not repeat interested. yes, now they are coming, since washington what does this mean for russia , but for russia it means that we are losing turkey, we are losing it, as a strategic partner it is more profitable for us, of course, but erdogan remained to our domestic affairs russia is now going on a year of a teacher and mentor recently you published such an article where you propose to introduce an oath for teachers, for what and what should this oath of russian teachers contain in your text, see, and there are, uh, several categories of professions that military personnel take the oath. priest's oath and e, the oath of a doctor for this hippocrates is three professions in which the ethical one is very strong, making up these three professions, on which the life of the people depends, and its protection , its spiritual moral health and its physical health. and we are not surprised that if a person graduates from a medical institute, he refuses to take it, but he will sign this oath and from hippocrates they will not give him a diploma in the same way as a military school diploma there or you will not be able to become a priest. and the teacher is also a profession that belongs to such an ethical category is very important, because if a doctor is engaged, but a person of today. that teacher is engaged in a man of tomorrow, he brings up a big citizen from a small person. and so it seems to me that if we compiled a text, it is clear that it does not yet exist , to compose the text of the teacher's oath, then this would increase self-esteem, firstly, of the teacher himself, and secondly, this would raise the prestige of the profession and respect. uh, teacher and mentor and teacher, what we are all about we are talking, but we are not taking any practical steps, except for an increase in wages and something else, and then we would have raised the profession of a teacher and put it on a par. here are the most important professions of the defenders of the priest, the doctor and the teacher. it seems to me that the teacher's oath, and this was very helpful, but we still somehow talk about the duties of teachers in this way, who are already hung with a lot of duties. uh, cutting and talking about their rights. it seems to me that in modern russia there is a social package for a serviceman and a social package. strongly better than the teacher's social package there were calls for raising salaries to the level of a few deputies in the state duma there. after all, i would generally transfer. eh, teacher in woah, within the framework of civil servants, this ministry is exactly the same as the priestly medical office. uh, the military is a service to the people. well maybe before asking them to take an oath they need to offer something. first we must change attitudes. e to the teacher, and to lead this oath and as a result. uh, there will be all the rest of what is called social packages unconditionally and absolutely agree, of course, teachers need to be paid, men need to be returned to school. a man should serve in the school, and now the men have disappeared. no, that is , the rector of the russian orthodox university, and so mostly women in russia, obviously now the search for national ideologies has begun, you are very active. well for those viewers, no one knows if you defended your doctoral thesis topic you had a political culture and ideology. tell me, please, in what direction does modern russia need this very search for a national ideology? but you remembered my doctoral dissertation. you know that even 10 years ago there were 20 dissertation councils in the country. where was this topic, political culture and ideology, they were cut out one by one. i don’t know now or not, in general or one dissent, that is, practically now in russia in fact. it’s not on purpose that in fact there is a ban on writing scientific papers, both ideologies, because there is nowhere to defend them there are no dissertation councils where to defend a ph.d. ideology. and it seems to me that the mistake of my many colleagues is that we are all looking for an ideology and trying to come up with one ; it is impossible to come up with an ideology there in silence, in offices or in the kitchen over a cup of tea. it arises in the depths, the people formulates its policies, those politicians who feel that they are in the thickness of the peoples formulate it, because the politician who feels it is a stable policy, and the one who relies on the language, as if the people is stable, and therefore it is necessary watch carefully what to do and putin says in fact, the ideology has already been formulated. it is necessary to look at his texts of his statements, those documents that he signs, for example, the national security strategy. yes, the whole ideology is written in it. not only is it already spelled out, we live within this ideology. she already has nothing to look for is an ideology. i would formulate it, i would call it social traditionalism, because on the one hand , in recent years we have been talking about traditional values, but about the preservation of history. we oppose falsification, history and so further. that is, we are talking about traditional values about tradition, as a method of transferring experience from generation to generation of social, religious, political, cultural, scientific, any experience. and this, by the way, was and is being done a lot by the holy patriarch, because he was the first to become a champion of traditional values, he generally came up with this wording. what does the president do, and for the last 15 years, the social program, he emphasizes is called protection, strengthens the army and the social program. this means that what is called the social package is moving to the side - it's much wider as soon as we build a welfare state, according to the constitution, it exists, but in fact it does not exist yet. putin builds it and it turns out, but a social idea. these are, as it were , left-wing ideas, and traditional ideas, as it were , right-wing ideas are conservative. and suddenly you find out that in russia they combine so easily and go hand in hand with a stump, so i say it is an ideology . well, you can call it social traditionalism alexander about such a phenomenon as eh? new phenomena for modern russia as denunciations, well, not so new, i'll tell you. here i will read to you the post of the writer alexander tsypkin. and we are still surprised at the denunciation of the actors here , an employee of the power structure, yuri yuryevich evin, wrote a denunciation to a military doctor. the legend of patriotic tactical medicine, thanks to his courses and manuals , recommendations and lectures , thousands of russian soldiers and civilians were saved in the lives. he went through syria first with him at the front. now he is a field doctor, surgeon, and so on, and he participated in the hostilities in the donbass in 2014. and why was there a denunciation, and at one of the lectures on tactical medicine for employees of the russian guard, it took place in yuzhno-sakhalinsk. he told the police how to provide medical assistance to himself as a comrade-in-arms. what are the problems with provision in the army and so on ? linsku cons
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Open Library
American Libraries
TV News
Understanding 9/11
