i invite polygraph examiner alexander budnitsky to the studio. hello, alexander.ulties in understanding, although the questions were formulated very clearly and for an adult this should not be the case, this is such an installation behavior to slightly delay the procedure. then we are all really looking forward to your verdict. the most important thing, i can say, is that olga does not remember that she was actually attacked first, she definitely remembers that her son had a knife in his hands, no, she definitely remembers that he delivered these blows, moreover, she saw blows from her husband, moreover, she has in her memory from alexander’s side, that is , alexander beat his neighbor, the question was formulated, you saw with your own eyes that your husband delivered at least one blow with a knife, the question the answer was no, but at the same time fictitious the reaction is characteristic of hiding information. that is, we can conclude that olga saw how alexander, her husband, beat a neighbor with a knife, as the polygraph showed , at least all three took par